Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Technology

VW Wouldn't Help Locate Car With Abducted Child Because GPS Subscription Expired (arstechnica.com) 226

A sheriff's office in Illinois said it was initially thwarted from tracking a stolen car with a 2-year-old boy inside when Volkswagen's Car-Net service refused to provide access to the tracking system because the car's subscription had expired. From a report: "While searching for the stolen vehicle and endangered child, sheriff's detectives immediately called Volkswagen Car-Net, in an attempt to track the vehicle," the Lake County sheriff's office said in a statement posted on Facebook about the incident on February 23. "Unfortunately, there was a delay, as Volkswagen Car-Net would not track the vehicle with the abducted child until they received payment to reactivate the tracking device in the stolen Volkswagen." Volkswagen Car-Net lets owners track and control their vehicles remotely. According to a Chicago Sun-Times article, "the Car-Net trial period had ended, and a representative wanted $150 to restart the service and locate the SUV."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

VW Wouldn't Help Locate Car With Abducted Child Because GPS Subscription Expired

Comments Filter:
  • by Joe_Dragon ( 2206452 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:03PM (#63330329)

    just get an court order to trun it on now!

    • Re: (Score:2, Troll)

      by groobly ( 6155920 )

      Sorry, court is closed for the 4 day weekend. Filing fees must be paid at the clerk's office by check and be collected funds before the court can act.

      • by King_TJ ( 85913 )

        You do know, that's not how it works, right?

        There's a difference between the police getting a court order for an emergency situation and the average person going in to court to file for a restraining order or what-not.

        Law enforcement has a fast-track to reach a judge, even at home, to get these taken care of.

        • Law enforcement has a fast-track to reach a judge, even at home, to get these taken care of.

          Except, perhaps, for the tiniest jurisdictions, the courts have at least one judge formally "on-call" 24/7 for emergency orders (which everyone hopes will not need to be exercised, but "stuff" can happen). That judge may need to leave early and/or arrive late at their court in order to be certain to be available at their residence during their on-call hours.

        • You do know, that's not how it works, right?

          No, but why let facts get in the way of a pithy comment about the US justice system? On occasion, Slashdot loves to proudly display it's collective ignorance as much as anyone else.

      • you can get a judge in 30 seconds to approve it. So just raid the place with our militarized police force!

        I'm just kidding, how are we going to get those cops over to the 3rd world country where the call center is located?
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      An order from a court in Waukegan (Lake Co. seat - where the county court is) to the Lake County Sheriff Dept. Not a problem - both know who they are and who gives the order (judge) and who receives it.

      Where does the judge / Sheriff Dept. send the court order to whom/how? What if VW doesn't recognize the jurisdiction? How does VW validate / verify that the judge / order is legit, and not a gang/cartel trying to find the vehicle to do a hit on it?

      Agreed - there needs to be a mechanism to expedite and esca

      • by King_TJ ( 85913 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:21PM (#63330401) Journal

        The thing is though? The police were apparently able to gain access to tracking the vehicle by simply calling and stating the nature of the situation, plus paying the required fee to turn the service on in the car.

        So it doesn't sound like VW really *needs* to be super concerned with verifying a court order is really the real thing? The whole process isn't that secure to start with.

        • by sjames ( 1099 )

          And as a result they richly deserve for the Chicago Sun-Times to expose them as heartless mercenaries.

          • You say "heartless mercenaries" and I say "good capitalists".
            They're just putting their shareholders first.
        • by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @02:13PM (#63330641) Homepage Journal
          Hmm..

          More basically, is there a way to know if your vehicle HAS a GPS or other communications with the manufacturer and therefore also potentially available to the authorities?

          Do all car companies reveal this upfront before you purchase?

          Is there a ready way for the average consumer to de-activate, or even better...completely remove such device(s)?

          I don't want such a service, I don't want this kind of thing even installed on my car.

          • by amorsen ( 7485 )

            In Europe it's really easy to know whether a new vehicle has GPS tracking. It's government mandated...

    • That's not likely. The courts would likely find they're within their rights to charge a $150 fee for it. It looks like the company was quite willing to take action immediately as long as the money was good, so there is no need to force VW to do anything.

      On the other hand, most companies are smart enough to realize in the court of public opinion, it is a far different financial balance in effect.

      • $150 payment versus much more expensive blowback to Volkswagen over the bad PR. Most likely this call center is staffed by undertrained people anyway for minimum wage (or less if off shored). They're just following the rules, it's not their kid, they'll get fired if they allow an exception, etc.

        • What is that, like 3 hours of PO time? You would think they would a charge card for stuff like this. The police is an emergency service and should be prepared for contingency, the grunt at Volkswagen is not. What if it is night time and decision maker is not available?
    • Very time consuming. Also you have to present to court order to the person on the other side of the phone, wherever in the world that happens to be.

      Best solution though - NO SUBSCRIPTIONS! A GPS doesn't need subscriptions, it is self contained and requires no interaction with any back office servers, the data transfer between the independent standalone GPS receiver and satellites is 100% open and known with no trade secrets.

      It's your car if you purchased it and it is paid off, therefor it is your right to

      • by Erioll ( 229536 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @02:19PM (#63330665)

        And the data connection to access said GPS in the car you're not in? Where's that cost coming from?

        See, I agree with you for in-car stuff. If the device is physically there, I bought all the features of my property. But that doesn't obligate the company to pay for net/cell access to those devices for you, so any remote-access features they are free to monetize, and I'm free to not pay for either.

        VW was just stupid here though. Law enforcement gives a legal route to access the GPS? They get it with a court order, not a payment. I'm somewhat leery of how this could be misused actually, for police tracking of you. But in this specific case, VW was just dumb for saying "we can't do this without payment." It would have been good PR for them to do so. And they could have even made it a privacy win (if they actually did so) by saying something like "if you're not subscribed, we don't keep this information, but we turned it on specifically in response to this court order." (etc). Then they look "good" (as much as possible) from all sides.

        Of course that's not what happened. I wonder if they own that information regardless, and monetize you even if you're not subscribed. I'll bet yes.

        • by Bert64 ( 520050 )

          VW don't provide that data connection, it's done by a telco. You should be free to use whatever telco you want with no involvement from the vehicle manufacturer.

        • > And the data connection to access said GPS in the car you're not in? Where's that cost coming from?

          Real answer? The car maker pays for a 24/7 cellular link rather you subscribe or not, and uses it to siphon data from your car, which they then sell to advertisers, insurers, etc. Read the fine print.
    • by sjames ( 1099 )

      Even that creates a delay that no right thinking person could stomach. We won't need GPS to know which way the corporate automaton that made that decision will be going when they die.

  • I’m curious if the sheriff official who gave that quote would have come into the office if he was told he would no longer being paid?

    • by Anonymous Coward

      How is that analogy at all reasonable? Nobody would actually incur a measurable cost or be denied pay. To help police find a child it is common to do things like call them when you see something, look through your CCTV footage for them if it's relevant, and, yes, temporarily enabling a GPS to give a location should be among the top of the list. I'd try to charge them for extortion trying to charge $150 in order to help... Yeah, we're not doing the abduction, just trying to profit from it!

      • How is that analogy at all reasonable?

        'cos it depends on how your business is structured. If you are a cafe in a nice rich area you are probably find doing it for free. If, on the other hand, you are the cafe next to the recently set up drugs den and most of your customers went away whilst the police come by wanting your CCTV coverage ten times a day, frightening away those few customers that still do come in, you might find that getting some reasonable payment for your time is justified.

        I'd guess that VW runs their GPS service centre and much

        • by sjames ( 1099 )

          How about give the info NOW rather than delaying for the payment to process considering that a child's well being was on the line. If it's a simple auto theft, ask for payment up front.

    • You would be surprised how many such people in your hypothetical would help find the kid first, then protest/raise hell/whatever about their nonpayment afterwards. Homo economicus is a myth. Coming to the office is a subtle false analogy because there's no emergency implicit in that.
  • What is it with VW (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jmccue ( 834797 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:06PM (#63330337) Homepage

    What is it with VW, do they get free high level legal help ? First the scam with diesel and mileage and pollution.

    Now they want to flirt with a large payout should that poor child is injured ? If your Cell Phone is cut off, the carriers keep 911 active, granted a legal requirement but I think some carriers still allowed 911 before that law was enabled.

    • by Xenx ( 2211586 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:49PM (#63330537)
      Well, to VW's credit, the summary doesn't talk about any of the details. And sure, it does require taking VW's word for it. VW says they contract a 3rd party for the service, and there are policies in place to assist law enforcement. They state that those policies were not followed in this case. Given how 3rd party call centers operate, and how obvious a PR disaster it would be, I would be inclined to believe VW. I find it much more likely that the call center worker wasn't trained properly, didn't grasp the situation, or in the worst case didn't care.
  • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:06PM (#63330339)

    I mean, all 8+ billion of us should be happy to have our every move tracked, recorded, and even monetized! After all, there is a slim possibility it might save a child!

    • This is not about universal tracking, this is about demanding money to help resolve a kidnapping of a child. The person who answered the phone for VW would be in a world of hurt if something happened to that kid through his/her inaction, unless they could shove responsibility onto VW itself.

      • by Iamthecheese ( 1264298 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:27PM (#63330423)
        > this is about demanding money to help resolve a kidnapping of a child

        No, it really isn't. The fluff is about some idiot following procedure when he shouldn't have. The payload is about letting the government have instant, unquestioned access to tracking devices.
        • by thomn8r ( 635504 )

          > this is about demanding money to help resolve a kidnapping of a child No, it really isn't. The fluff is about some idiot following procedure when he shouldn't have. The payload is about letting the government have instant, unquestioned access to tracking devices.

          This. The camel's nose under the tent is always "think of the children"

        • by Bahbus ( 1180627 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:48PM (#63330529) Homepage

          Yes it is. In an EMERGENCY when you actually want police to do something, MONEY shouldn't be the thing blocking, or slowing down, a capability that already exists. Now, should any person claiming to be a cop be able to call and get tracking information? No. There should, and probably is, a process. The emergency generates a police report involving said vehicle. Send a copy to the company. A very quick and simple verification process can ensure that everything is on the up and up. Would there still be abuses? Of course. There are abusers of every system ever created and there always will be.

          tl;dr: Cops should not have unfettered access, but shitty capitalism shouldn't be slowing down emergency responses either.

          • As long as the company in question (it is not just VW) verifies the caller, an immediate response is acceptable. So the request has to pass through an official channel, be it phone, email, etc. The nature / reason for the request is irrelevant - the emergency personal determine if it is warranted and not the company in question.

            So I am in agreement with what you have stated. However, I would add to your point that in addition to a report being generated, all information regarding this request should b

        • by Xenx ( 2211586 )
          According to VW, grain of salt and all that, the agent didn't follow procedure when they should have. Given VW says it's a 3rd party service that manages it for them, it doesn't shock me at all that it happened. Even if the call center was run directly by VW, I wouldn't be too surprised to see it happen. It's generally an entry level job. and normally would have a higher turn over rate.
      • The person responding was acting in capacity as a rep for the company. It's the companies actions, not the individual, unless the company takes actions to rectify it.
    • If you choose to do that, that's one thing. I opt out. My last two GM vehicles had OnStar, I removed their modules. Of course I received e-mails from OnStar lauding all of their great features, especially safety.

      I don't want over-the-air control given to my manufacturer or third party, just no. I don't want to pay for subscriptions to features the vehicle lugs around like heated power seats or turn signals that somehow BMW owners never seem to sign up for.

      • If you choose to do that, that's one thing. I opt out. My last two GM vehicles had OnStar, I removed their modules.

        How difficult was this to do? Where did you find the information to do this?

        I thought I'd heard that OnStar vehicles specifically....that OnStar was so tightly integrated into the whole car system, that it was nye impossible to remove without screwing something up?

        Did your removal also remove the whole ability for the car to talk cellularly back to the mothership?

        I ask because I do NOT want

        • Snip the cable to the cell antenna. You might get lucky and find it even has a connector.

        • In my case, it was just disconnecting a module. my truck was as simple as described here. [youtube.com] In the other it was in the trunk and just needed to be unplugged. Yes, it disconnected everything from the mothership.

  • Hmmm, is not a persuasive argument, but I am going with it.
  • So pay the $150 (Score:3, Interesting)

    by magzteel ( 5013587 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:25PM (#63330415)

    Seriously, your kid is abducted and you wont fork out $150 to track him down? Reminds me of that movie "Ruthless People" where Danny Devito keeps trying to bargain the kidnappers down because he doesn't want his wife back anyway

    • Seriously, your kid is abducted and you wont fork out $150 to track him down?

      Seriously, you're sticking up for a multi-billion-dollar corporation that refused to help find a missing child without being paid first?

      • Seriously, your kid is abducted and you wont fork out $150 to track him down?

        Seriously, you're sticking up for a multi-billion-dollar corporation that refused to help find a missing child without being paid first?

        Seriously, you're sticking up for a parent who wont fork over $150 to save their kid?

        • And which one would be quicker to do you inhuman fuck. A company immediately helping law enforcement in a notoriously time dependant safety situation, or maybe you wanted the sheriff to hang on VW, call the parent and explain to them they needed to pony up the cash or his hands were tied. What the fuck is wrong with people.
        • The parent was RUN OVER trying to get the kid out of the car while it was being stolen.
          • by q4Fry ( 1322209 )

            The parent was RUN OVER trying to get the kid out of the car while it was being stolen.

            Can't let extraneous details get in the way of an homage to capitalism. The parent should have anticipated this eventuality and tattooed a maximum ransom payment contract onto their arm, just in case they were incapacitated. After all, $150 is probably worth it to this parent to retrieve the child, but there must be some amount they don't want to pay beyond. Maybe even different limits for different children.

    • by Bahbus ( 1180627 )

      No. That's a ransom. Doesn't matter if you aren't paying the kidnappers themselves. The car has GPS built in. Paying customer or not, the GPS should always be functional in an emergency with zero delays from the car company. But Volkswagen is a shitty company who makes shitty, ugly vehicles with shitty extra services.

      • No. That's a ransom. Doesn't matter if you aren't paying the kidnappers themselves. The car has GPS built in. Paying customer or not, the GPS should always be functional in an emergency with zero delays from the car company. But Volkswagen is a shitty company who makes shitty, ugly vehicles with shitty extra services.

        I agree that the company could help here, but if it was my kid I wouldn't have wasted five seconds trying to get them to do it.
        That's MY KID, not theirs. MY responsibility. I'd have paid it on the spot.

        • by Wolfier ( 94144 )
          I would pay for it right away too, and THEN, still make sure a complaint is filed against VW. By the way, if you RTFA, you would have known that the mother was run over and hospitalized, so the choice of paying up wan't available.
        • by Bahbus ( 1180627 )

          Responsibility here is irrelevant. What if you couldn't? What if you, the parent(s), were incapacitated and unable to do so?

          In fact, the responsibility is NOT yours at all regardless of your situation. Yes, it is your child. But a crime has been committed. And as much as I conceptually love vigilante justice, it's not acceptable in the long run. So, a crime having been committed, it's now the police's responsibility to put a stop to that crime and return things to normal. That is their purpose. I grant you

    • Seriously, your kid is abducted and you wont fork out $150 to track him down?

      FFS. You couldn't take *thirty* seconds to read the article before posting?

      The child's mother was seriously injured in the abduction and was in the hospital.

    • "What is this, the bargain basement??... *crying* I've been kidnapped by K-Mart!" - One of the best, underrated comedies from the 80s.

      Anyways, it wasn't about the money. The cop had to go find a credit card (personal, etc.) just to start up the service. The VW rep wasn't trained very well.

  • by SvnLyrBrto ( 62138 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:32PM (#63330453)

    The really problematic issue here is not so much the $150 charge. I mean... unless they're a large department to do it in house, outfits like the DNA and toxicology labs that analyze other types of evidence don't work for free either. It's the fact that VW (their outsourced phone support anyway) seems to have taken the word that the caller was a legitimate LEO without any validation. They just took the $150, switched on the GPS, and turned over the location to someone who, for all they could have known, was just some random weirdo, a paranoid controlling husband, some obsessed stalker, a rogue cop with a vendetta, or some scamster who really Really REALLY wanted to sell an extended warranty for the car. This is why we have things like subpoenas and warrants, after all... to validate that the request is justified, legitimate and authorized.

    • We've been trying to reach you about your car's expired extended warranty. Thank god you posted on Slashdot, so we could find you! So, how would you like to pay for the charge on your account for your new extended warranty?

  • With Ford trying to patent recovery/collection features for cars, more GPS and tracking data in new vehicles, and even things like Tesla Autopilot are we not surprised
    that these things will become more mainstream? In this case, there was a small child involved in a carjacking incident. VW's obviously outsourced staff wasn't going to help until the subscription was paid. That's egregiously callous but somebody was following a script somewhere and we must not go off script.

    More and more data is collected on e

  • by twocows ( 1216842 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:38PM (#63330471)
    I've worked in a call center before and we didn't have any kind of process in place for edge case stuff like this beyond ask the supervisor. If the supervisor was busy, well, do your best!

    I'm inclined to think that this is just a matter of VW (or whoever they outsource their support to) not properly training their CC reps for interactions with law enforcement because it doesn't come up very often. There's definitely a problem, but it's one I assume a lot of companies with call centers have. As other posters noted, I think the correct solution is some kind of expedited process for a court order for time-sensitive stuff like this. It's unrealistic to expect every call center out there to have proper training on this sort of thing; they probably should, but it's not realistic to expect it to happen.
    • The regular call center may not be equipped to deal with law enforcement at all. At the only job I've had where the company had regular interactions with the police, we had a contractor who was our dedicated law enforcement liaison. She had a separate contact method from the regular call center... never even set foot in the center, actually... and all LE requests, and the occasional subpoena, went straight to her. She would then do whatever one does to validate the request. And then she'd pull in whoev

    • by Bahbus ( 1180627 )

      If you are a company that has any kind of service that might need to be accessed remotely by law enforcement... you should probably have a separate dept of people trained for that. It's unrealistic to expect every call center to have some dept like this, but many wouldn't need it. Any company with GPS services? Not unrealistic at all to expect them to have a legal dept that interfaces with police. Any company providing remote video monitoring services? Same. It is very realistic to expect them to have these

    • by slazzy ( 864185 )
      This is true I'm sure it's not an option on their flow-chart they are allowed to use, but it still shows how ugly a smart connected future really looks like.
    • It's not just training. Their legal team needs to come up with a proper protocol on how to handle law enforcement demands. For example, you need to verify whom is calling. You don't want nutjobs and stalkers calling to ask where someone's car is. Then, there are some cases where the police need a warrant.

    • The article says there are protocols in place for calls from police and they are followed on a regular basis. This appears to be some sort of glitch during a panic situation. The mother was run over in the process of the car being stolen. At that point I'm going with SNAFU - the more stressful the situation the more likely things just go off the rails for no good reason at all.
  • Didn't we already lose control of our cars when they force installed Lojack and controlled it with frequency 108.1 FM? Why do you need VW's rootkit for this... we're already hacked!

    • Didn't we already lose control of our cars when they force installed Lojack and controlled it with frequency 108.1 FM?

      I've not heard about this one....got any links?

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Isn't this what is suppose to happen in a capitalist world? You pay for something, or nothing occurs?
    I mean if they cared about the kid, $150 should be easy to come up with right?
    • Peloton charged a monthly fee for the treadmill software that kept your kids from mangling themselves with the treadmill...
    • by mark-t ( 151149 )

      Obviously, but the basic principle is that you shouldn't be paying a ransom to someone who maliciously does something to hurt you because you know you have no guarantee they won't do it again, especially if they find out you are willing to pay them!

      Oh, but it's only $150, you might say, and it's going to a company, not the criminals... But tell me, how do you know that the people who were asking for that $150 to locate the car aren't actually in on this, and willing to take advantage of a crime of opport

      • Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • by mark-t ( 151149 )
          Let's put it this way... if you knew that somebody had no ethical compunction about causing harm to you or your family in the future, leaving principles aside, why would you ever want to give them anything?
  • I think we should separate what is VW policy vs what actually happened. VW's policy is certainly NOT "no cash, no flash" when it comes to law enforcement, because it results in this exact terrible PR situation. However, VW's failure here was in not recognizing that there needs to be a clear policy for call center employees to follow to help law enforcement instantaneously without worrying about payment. There would need to be ways to prevent normal people from taking advantage of this, but I could imagin

    • by mark-t ( 151149 )
      Worse yet, it creates an incentive for companies to actually want to work under the table with criminals who might try to otherwise steal cars or do shit like this.
    • Responding to my own comment to correct myself. Here what VW says:

      "Volkswagen has a procedure in place with a third-party provider for Car-Net Support Services involving emergency requests from law enforcement. They have executed this process successfully in previous incidents. Unfortunately, in this instance, there was a serious breach of the process."

      So this wasn't even a policy failure on VW's part, they had a plan. It just wasn't followed correctly by one particular employee (of a contractor).

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • I think that holds true if policy is consistently or frequently ignored. Otherwise generally policy is crucial to set standards for employees to follow. The question is whether it has been followed. According to VW their policy has been followed in the past, but we don't have the data to say a) if that's true, b) if this was a 1% exception, or c) if this was a 99% standard and the policy is just a smokescreen.

  • Profits before people is the corporate mantra. Somebody needs to teach their support monkeys how to make an exception in an emergency.
  • Is the cry as freedom dies... Really people, US Police can't force a foreign corporation to do something just because it's easy for the cops. The next step is live GPS car data automatically streaming to the "government" for everyone always. Don't think so? It's already being done for cell data. So is door bell cameras, and information from Alexa, or any personal "assistant". Our founding fathers would absolutely shit and demand a new resolution if they knew the level of surveillance we are placed und
  • ...the kidnappers won't be able to join you for the ransom, that's not on the phone company, pay your fucking bills.

  • Obviously the details are what matter and not a news article's description, but the overview sounds like a straightforward and easily indictable act of extortion by the company. If I were the kid's family, I'd be pressing charges.
    • by fwad ( 94117 )

      Charges what for? Because I choose not to sign up to a service? If it were my kid that 150$ would be out of my account as fast as possible.

  • Interfering with a police investigation

  • Pay the $150 immediately. Then fine $5000 to VW for requesting payment in lieu of prosecution for obstruction.
  • ....if I was going to abduct a 2 year old, I'd probably let my GPS sub expire first too.

  • by Hank21 ( 6290732 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @09:48PM (#63331729)
    Forget about all the noise of the Sheriff pulling the "I'm the law" card, or finding some judge somewhere to approve something. How about the parents just getting on the horn with VW to pay the $150 and get instant access. Is their kid not worth $150? Seems a fair price to pay under the circumstances. And the Sheriff complaining that VW was not helping? Puleez.... The Sheriffs department could have ponied up the $150 out of petty cash. Think of the man hours it would have saved. This whole thing is just flame bait.

Per buck you get more computing action with the small computer. -- R.W. Hamming

Working...