Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Military United States

US To Stop Giving Russia Some New START Nuclear Arms Data (reuters.com) 34

New submitter terrorubic shares a report from Reuters: The United States said it will stop providing Russia some notifications required under the New START arms control treaty from Thursday, including updates on its missile and launcher locations, to retaliate for Moscow's 'ongoing violations' of the accord. In a fact sheet on its website, the State Department said it would also stop giving Russia telemetry information - remotely gathered data about a missile's flight - on launches of U.S. intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has not formally withdrawn from the treaty, which limits deployed strategic nuclear arsenals. On Feb. 21, he said Russia would suspend participation, imperiling the last pillar of U.S.-Russian arms control. Signed in 2010 and due to expire in 2026, the New START treaty caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the countries can deploy. Under its terms, Moscow and Washington may deploy no more than 1,550 strategic nuclear warheads and 700 land- and submarine-based missiles and bombers to deliver them.
"The State Department said it continues to notify Russia of intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and submarine ballistic missile (SLBM) launches in accordance with the 1988 Ballistic Missile Launch Notifications Agreement, and of strategic exercises in accordance with a separate 1989 accord," notes Reuters.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US To Stop Giving Russia Some New START Nuclear Arms Data

Comments Filter:
  • Seems Misguided (Score:1, Informative)

    by Tellalian ( 451548 )

    We weren't giving Russia that data to help Russia.

    The point of the treaty was to give rach other the data to lessen the chance of a test launch being misinterpreted as the real thing and starting thermonuclear war.

    • Yeah. Realistically the only way a nuclear war starts, is if both sides make a serious mistake. Information sharing helps keep that from happening - which is why everyone competent is perfectly happy with foreign spy satellites, balloons, etc. overhead (so long as the media doesn't notice them and drum up public outcry) - the opposition is much more likely to trust our information if they can verify it for themselves.

      Well, either that or a suicidal lunatic with their finger on the button - hence Kim Jong

  • We all know what this meansâ¦
  • by Eunomion ( 8640039 ) on Friday June 02, 2023 @10:11PM (#63572297)
    No point in pretending.
  • Both have different ways of keeping the polity calm.
    But their problems are the same, i.e., a growing population with not enough money incoming.
    Putin's method works because Russians are OK with staying safe indoors, like during the Russian winter.
    Biden's method works because Americans keep informed via media (social and regular).
    But Biden has an advantage in that even if he falls in public, citizens don't panic,
    but we do not know how Russians will react if Putin or his deputies falter in public.
    • Growing population? What are you smoking?

      • by leets ( 10372554 )
        Do not look at just one year increase.
        Look at three decades or more.
        • Re:Biden and Putin (Score:4, Informative)

          by DrMrLordX ( 559371 ) on Saturday June 03, 2023 @09:21AM (#63573051)

          Russia's population has been in decline for decades, while the United States is heading in that direction. The only thing keeping up American population numbers now is immigration. That won't last forever, especially since a lot of the 1st gen immigrants go back while leaving behind children that often contribute to the below-replacement problem we have in this country.

          In any case, Russia had more people in 1989 than they do today:

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik... [wikipedia.org]

          Meanwhile the United States is still experiencing minor growth at 0.4%, but with a birthrate of ~1.6, that won't last.

  • As someone else commented, this is a bad idea. The purpose of giving them at least some of this data is so they know the US is not mounting a pre-emptive (first) strike. There is no value in the tit-for-tat in this case. In fact, if we did do a first strike, we should still give them the data (maybe fake), so they think it is just a test.

You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.

Working...