Major Reddit Communities Will Go Dark To Protest Threat To Third-Party Apps (theverge.com) 107
Some of Reddit's biggest communities including r/videos, r/reactiongifs, r/earthporn, and r/lifeprotips are planning to set themselves to private on June 12th over new pricing for third-party app developers to access the site's APIs. From a report: Setting a subreddit to private, aka "going dark," will mean that the communities taking part will be inaccessible by the wider public while the planned 48-hour protest is taking place.
As a Reddit post about the protest, that's since been cross-posted to several participating subreddits, explains: "On June 12th, many subreddits will be going dark to protest this policy. Some will return after 48 hours: others will go away permanently unless the issue is adequately addressed, since many moderators aren't able to put in the work they do with the poor tools available through the official app. This isn't something any of us do lightly: we do what we do because we love Reddit, and we truly believe this change will make it impossible to keep doing what we love. A complete list of the hundreds of communities taking part (known in Reddit parlance as "subreddits") includes dozens with over a million subscribers each.
As a Reddit post about the protest, that's since been cross-posted to several participating subreddits, explains: "On June 12th, many subreddits will be going dark to protest this policy. Some will return after 48 hours: others will go away permanently unless the issue is adequately addressed, since many moderators aren't able to put in the work they do with the poor tools available through the official app. This isn't something any of us do lightly: we do what we do because we love Reddit, and we truly believe this change will make it impossible to keep doing what we love. A complete list of the hundreds of communities taking part (known in Reddit parlance as "subreddits") includes dozens with over a million subscribers each.
But still using the platform (Score:1)
If they went dark until demands were met (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Says the anonymous coward.
Re: (Score:3)
Big conspiracy against the party of prejudice, how dare they stifle my messages of misogyny and hate.
Re: If they went dark until demands were met (Score:2)
Yes he should definitely post nonymously himself to you so you can harass or stalk him, right? He told you why he posted AC and you just agreed with it.
"Show us your face so we can get you fired" is peak twitter, said to anyone smart enough to wear a mask while holding a sign you hate.
Re: (Score:2)
Mods are not paid by Reddit itself, but the smart ones find a way to monetize their roles. The dumb ones do it just for the sheer power, since it's the only real power they have in life.
r/politics is definitely modded by the DNC itself, as the main page is always just a straight-up listing of threads favorable to DNC talking points.
Huh? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I always mod up rsilvergun when I see him and I have points. He’s a great poster.
Re: (Score:3)
If they were actually that loosely modded, they would be packed with spam.
Re: (Score:2)
Then so would the mods (Score:5, Insightful)
Reddit isn't a social media site, it's a free message board host.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting distinction. Does reddit own the namespace? Let's say the current mod of r/videos decides to nuke it. Can reddit kick them out and re-open it for some other mod willing to do it? Or hire somebody to do it? Or does whoever originally claimed the name r/videos own it?
This came up on Twitter with NPR decided to leave and Twitter said, OK, but we're going to make the handle available.
Re: (Score:2)
The distinction (Score:3)
A social media site makes it's money from social connections. You're not on Facebook to discuss hobbies with strangers or get questions answered, you're there to connect with friends and family. FB might have some of the other stuff, but it's not their bread & butter.
A message board is a very different thing than social media. There's not a lot of point to being anonymous on Facebook, but over on reddit (or here on
Yes and no (Score:3)
I can make a website tomorrow with user id NPR if I want. Doesn't mean I matter in the slightest. The currency online is eyeballs paid for with advertiser dollars. When you sell users you can only get away with so much.
Re: (Score:2)
Reddit communities aren't owned by reddit. They are created and destroyed by people. Taking away the ability to control your subreddit takes away the entire point of Reddit itself. It would be like Wordpress taking away your ability to create a website.
Re: (Score:3)
There’s the real point and the PR point. If people knew the real point of reddit a lot of them wouldn’t go there.
Re: (Score:2)
It wouldn't work so long as they are all announcing that they will stop after 48 hours.
If it matters so much for reddit, they'll just shrug and say "see you on Wednesday then".
They are pretending that 48 hours of being private is a huge sacrifice and they can't stand to inflict that on their communities for more than that. It won't make a dent in Reddit opinion.
In this case, the more likely scenario would be a drop in visitor count inducing them to back off a bit. On the flip side, they may declare the visi
This isn't about working though (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Meh, awareness won't matter here. Either they are directly affected (their preferred apps no longer work) and they will inherently care (app developers have been mentioning it loudly so they already know). Or they aren't impacted and will say "oh well, two days without this reddit over an issue I don't care about". If all their favorite reddits were down for a couple of weeks they might get a bit irritated, but two days is nothing.
If the users make enough noise (Score:2)
Consolidation and a lack of anti-trust law enforcement have taken away a *lot* of consumer power, virtually all of it for necessities, but for luxuries there's still leverage. Especially for something with a low barrier to entry like tabletop like games and web forums.
Re:If they went dark until demands were met (Score:5, Insightful)
48 hours of severe decline of ad impressions is something they will notice. And there's nothing to say that they can't extend it beyond 48 hours if Reddit is going to be dicks about it.
We're talking about volunteer efforts here, for the most part. Thousands of hours, collectively, of volunteer content posting and moderating. Fuck around too much with volunteers, and they stop volunteering to do work for you in short order. See: the decline of this once-great site that relies upon volunteer content creation.
Re: (Score:2)
those aren't the "big forums" though
Nice analytics sites out there that tell what the hugest subreddits are, by posts, comments, growth, upvotes.... but I'm not going to bury them with slashdot tourist.
These video ones don't appear at all in top 10 of each of any category. I'd expect reddit to say "don't let the door hit you in the butt on the way out" , they may be top bandwidth hogs but that's it
You haven't been able to bury a site (Score:2)
They're big enough to raise awareness of the issue though. When they go dark a *lot* of people who didn't know about the issue will know now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Reddit can't survive without the big forums after all.
They can just remove the mods and set the forums public again. Problem solved. Finding new mods probably won't be too big a deal, there are plenty of people who will cheerfully work for free so they can have that sweet, sweet power over others that already drives plenty of mod teams.
Re: (Score:2)
Or even better, get submitters to post content to Lemmy [lemmy.ml] (or other instance, as this one is reporting load problems from the influx of new users already), or some other free site while dark. It would be good to not have all ones eggs in one basket.
Re: (Score:2)
Some of them are. The mods of /r/Videos, e.g., have stated that they'll be extending the period if there's no movement. It's just one sub, but a biggie (26M subs)
Re: (Score:2)
Reddit power-mods and admins are very closely intertwined. The biggest subs would never go dark because they depend on Reddit as much as Reddit depends on them. Payola is a very real thing, as far as big-sub mods are concerned. A day without the sub operating is a day without big money.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That'll show them...
This form of protest has actually had a material and positive effect on Reddit in the past... which sounds exactly like the opposite of Facebook.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Bunch of assholes (Score:5, Insightful)
It's beyond just ad removal, the UI design is just subpar overall.
I think people see the monetization goal and jump to assuming that is the root of the problems UI wise, even if they can't see why that would be connected. In truth, their UI design just isn't very good.
Re: Bunch of assholes (Score:2)
Https://old.reddit.com isn't too bad
Re: Bunch of assholes (Score:5, Interesting)
Not too bad if used on a desktop where you have a pointing device other than a finger.
On mobile, there does not exist a respectable reddit designed UI, but some of the third parties do a decent job.
If reddit's mobile app or web UI for mobile were vaguely decent, the third party apps would probably evaporate.
Re: (Score:2)
I use old.reddit.com in desktop mode on my phone.
Re: (Score:2)
put down your phone and use a computer like a normal person?
Re: (Score:2)
That is the only way I can stand to use Reddit on a desktop, and Reddit Is Fun when on my phone.
If they keep old.Reddit then I may just use that in the browser on my phone instead of an app.
Re: (Score:2)
They just lost 41% of their valuation according to Fidelity. Reddit is on shaky ground.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Bunch of assholes (Score:5, Informative)
Reddit has been gutting that, too. And I'm not talking about the shitty redesign, I'm talking about forcing users to use the app if they try to access parts of the site with a mobile browser. Been doing that for a couple of years now. They really are going balls deep in pushing their little dumpster fire.
Re:Bunch of assholes (Score:5, Informative)
The irony is they purchased a pretty well liked 3rd party app (Alien Blue) to base their official app off of and then proceeded to change and gut most of what people liked about it.
It's a pretty clear cut case of letting the priorities of your advertisers override the preferences of your users. Instead of just creating a user friendly experience that would draw people into using the app and figuring out how to fit ads into that experience and actually competing with the 3rd party apps they've been trying to direct users into an advertiser friendly platform at the expense of user experience.
It's a case (in my opinion) of not simply being happy with making most of the money and doing everything in an attempt to make all of the money.
That's the problem with online advertising (Score:2)
They stopped that (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm talking about forcing users to use the app
They don't force it technically. They display a popup asking if you want to continue in the app or browser. Like half of the f-ing broken modern internet which is borderline unusable on a phone these days.
Re: (Score:2)
Depending on the subreddit (if it's NSFW, "quarantined", or a few other qualifiers, e.g.), it won't let you continue without the app.
Re:Bunch of assholes (Score:5, Interesting)
On mobile, they nag and nag hard to stop using the browser, in some cases outright saying "nope, only through our mobile app".
But even on desktop, "too stupid to use a web browser" implies that the target web developer *nailed* their UI exactly the way the user wants. One big easy example is 'old vs new' reddit. I just checked and new reddit on my sceen maximized caps the core content at 28% of my screen width, and with old reddit, it gets up to 50% (not *great* but far better than 28%). Similar story on vertical spacing. One might counter "but well it makes sense given you want to support mobile", however even then they fail due to things like "collapse this level of thread" having a minuscule hit box. Folks preferring old reddit are at the mercy of Reddit bothering to keep it going, and even then probably settling for something 'good enough' when you have a mouse pointer to deal with the inadequacies.
On mobile, well, as mentioned before they nag you the hell to their app, making their mobile web experience deliberately crap. But regardless of app or web site, the touch experience is atrocious. Third party apps sprang up because people hated the poor UI design for mobile.
Note that once upon a time it was not a forgone conclusion that the hosting of a conversation dictated the UI of interacting with the conversation. Newsreaders got to handle UI separate of content concerns. Reddit, through pretty atrocious Web design in conjunction with a surprisingly viable API resurrected that sensibility.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You seemed to have skipped over the part where the desktop UI still sucks if you have a touchscreen, and that the third-party app uis are better than the desktop browser ui anyway.
But if people care so much, then stop using reddit when the changes get implemented. That seems to be a pretty valid course of action.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Replace unable to read due to nag with unable to read due to 1 pixel font size and a UI layout which assumes you have a 32" monitor.
Yep you really solved the issue there.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
One big easy example is 'old vs new' reddit. I just checked and new reddit on my sceen maximized caps the core content at 28% of my screen width, and with old reddit, it gets up to 50% (not *great* but far better than 28%). Similar story on vertical spacing.
Normally I'm right there with you on that with the exception that the majority of reddit posts (at least the ones I frequent) are loaded with pictures and have short often single sentence text associated with itself. This doesn't lend to easy reading across as page and the vertical format is at least for me far easier to read and follow, especially since most of the posts are about the pictures / videos.
That said the big issue is the continuous scrolling bullshit making the new reddit crap itself on any bro
Re: (Score:2)
Reddit nags you to use the app if you use a web browser on mobile. Its super annoying.
Re: (Score:2)
The irony being that these 3rd party apps make using Reddit a vastly better experience than a web browser, and you're too stupid to have even looked at them to see what people are on about.
Hoping we go back to NNTP (Score:3)
The quality of reddit the last few years has been terrible. People know there are swarms of brigading bots, especially when it comes to political discussions. Go to the subreddit of any major city and you see the same talking points. My favorite, the top 10 most populous cities in the US have a housing crisis, which is the reason we have so many addicts in tent cities. There also seems to be a big influence from China on the site. Saw several posts on Tiananmen square yesterday, they didn't garner nearly the attention I thought they should have.
That being said, it's probably best we go back to the internets decentralized platforms like nntp.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are a lot of smaller forums still around that have pretty good quality. Better than reddit or even slashdot but I keep coming back here for the nice mix of intelligent discussion and romper room trolling.
Re: (Score:2)
I’ve been hitting up the BBS scene lately I know they won’t replace Reddit but they’ll attract the right kind of people at least for awhile. The people are nice and intelligent and it feels real good to be posting somewhere where you know things are on the way up and not on the way down.
Re: (Score:2)
Others and I still use the usenet newsgroups since its peak days. :)
The circle of life... (Score:3)
Back I come, Been a long time.
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome back asshole.
Nah I kid you’re ok,
Ok (Score:2)
The Less Than 1% (Score:2)
Less than 1% of Reddit users use a 3rd party app. It's amazing this uproar has gotten so big based on something that directly impacts so few.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Chances are, while only a very very small number of the more than 800 million monthly active users utilize 3rd party apps, they likely browse much more than other. Stands to reason you have to be a fairly heavy user to bother paying for an app to use the site.
It's still something they have to support. It's not free for them to offer and support the API, especially in terms of making new features available through it.
Re: (Score:2)
The impact is a minor inconvenience for the users, we will have to move to the official app (which side bar, steals about everything on your device that isn't nailed down in a similar way to Tic-Tok) and we can no longer use our third party apps that block ads, prevent data scraping or simply better designed with more accessibility features (The in-house app doesn't even try to accommodate Text-2-Speech, high contrast or colorblind modes).
The other key issue is about moderator tools. This will effectively
Re: (Score:2)
Automods are literally killing the site. When I first started using it, it took me several hours to get enough karma to be not autobanned from every subreddit I was interested in posting in. Most don't even announce whether they require karma to post. It's quite an experience looking for a subreddit that's both underground enough to not use automods, but also has enough traffic to generate the necessary karma. Nothing says "welcome to Reddit" quite like a "your post has been removed" message, especially aft
Re: (Score:2)
my guess is because those few are moderators and think they matter and have enough leverage. time will tell if they do, but i wouldn't bet my lunch money. meanwhile media loves to run these stories.
Re: (Score:2)
they should just get rid of all apps entirely. will get rid of all the people too stupid to use a computer.
Not long enough (Score:2)
Reddit is a cesspit run by degenerate moderators (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Reddit is a cesspit run by degenerate moderators who forbid any criticism of child groomers.
You're correct about /r/conservative as nearly every topic is for flaired users only.
I'm being sarcastic here and this sub should really get you angry. https://old.reddit.com/r/NotAD... [reddit.com]
Re: (Score:2)
How big is your girl-dick
What about marketing accounts? (Score:1)
If the change goes through and reddit still has a massive bot problem, won't it mean that the bots are being run by the platform itself?
Re: What about marketing accounts? (Score:2)
It's not too hard to have a secondary PC shashed away somewhere whose purpose is to run bots locally.
But if Reddit is hosting this ability serverside, well the ball (fault) is fully inside their court.
Simpsons clip (Score:2)
It might look like this [youtube.com]
Use Free Apps. (Score:1)
The King descidith... (Score:2)
The King (Reddit) ultimately decides what can be used to allowed to access the treasures of the kingdom.
There used to be a platform on the internet that no one entity had complete control over and that was Usenet. Usenet is still around but as a shadow of it's former self. Maybe we will see a revival.
Let them go dark (Score:2)
The big, top 1% subreddits are a fucking joke as-is. They exist strictly for meme-worthy content and hard pushing for lowest common denominator likes. The niche subreddits are a mix of passionate labors of love and fascism perpetuated by the mods.
I'm 100% sure that whatever 3rd-party apps the mods are most up in arms about is what lets them run a sub as their own personal fiefdom. If reddit would be unusable / unmoderateable without these apps then call their bluff. The moderators should resign en mas
Re: (Score:1)
Re:How dare they... (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't think anyone is particulary opposed to Reddit covering it's costs on API calls but the issue at hand is that those fees are looking to be out of bounds for the market and almost malicious in nature. The feeling is Reddit is charging exorbinant prices for API access to effectively shut down 3rd party applications without actually "shutting them down", which would be the honest move if they wanted to make it but they know that would drive a lot of loyal users right off the platform so they think they are being sneaky here.
Since many of these app developers also make apps for other platforms their accusations is those other platforms of similar size charge 5-20x less per bundle of calls than Reddit is asking here.
A developer says Reddit could charge him $20 million a year to keep his app working [theverge.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With the amount of trolling, shitposting, awful grammar, and just straight up disinformation all across reddit, it's an extremely bad idea to train any LLM/AI using reddit content.
I'm not sure it's a bad idea. Some people are expecting LLM/AI to mirror human characteristics. Sadly, that includes trolling, shitposting, and all the other nasty things you mentioned. What better place than Reddit to train a would-be netizen in the 2020's?
OTOH, if you want your (insert name of pseudo-AI here) to be polite and well-behaved, then you should deny it Web access altogether. Oh, wait...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's referred to as "scraping", but it has the downside of being a maintenance nightmare, by virtue of being likely to be broken by trivial formatting changes on the site in question.
Re: 3rd party apps should not use the API (Score:2)
I see a potential cottage industry here, one that uses servers to scrape sites and turn the content into an API interface and will be automatically updated serverside so app developers don't have to worry about having to update the apps over breakage by minor changes to a site.
This of course requires putting trust into a proxy, a trust that is very easily broken, and that the proxy isn't just a fly by night operation or will be suddenly abandoned by the ones running it.
Re: (Score:2)
> This of course requires putting trust into a proxy, a trust that is very easily broken, and that the proxy isn't just a fly by night operation or will be suddenly abandoned by the ones running it.
Or sued out of existence by the main site when it inevitably starts charging for access.
Re: 3rd party apps should not use the API (Score:2)
Overseas, out of juristiction and in one with a lawsuit unfriendly government.
Of course this creates more of a trust issue for app developers.
Re: 3rd party apps should not use the API (Score:2)
I used to do the brute force method of scraping using Curl. Just about everything would be stripped out of the retrieved page to only leave that one nugget of information, like the current local temperature, before it is further processed and converted into a variable that could be used in a program for any purpose. Of course, this was just a hobby project and something I would never rely on for something critical.