Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Transportation

Lamborghini Takes Last Combustion Engine Model Order (reuters.com) 80

Lamborghini's combustion engine models are sold out until the end of production, its chief executive was quoted as saying in the WELT newspaper on Wednesday, as the luxury carmaker transitions towards a pure hybrid lineup. From a report: Order books for its Hurucan and Urus models are full, marking the end of combustion engine vehicle production for the company, Stephan Winkelmann, head of the Volkswagen subsidiary, said. Lamborghini announced last July it would be investing at least 1.8 billion euros ($2 billion) to produce a hybrid lineup by 2024 and more to bring out its fully electric model by the end of the decade.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Lamborghini Takes Last Combustion Engine Model Order

Comments Filter:
  • Overpriced trinkets.

  • by anonymous scaredycat ( 7362120 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @09:12AM (#63658392)

    For example the hybrid Lamborghini Revuelto has an ICE quote: ...combining the power of a brand-new 12-cylinder internal combustion engine with three high-density electric motors...

    • by crow ( 16139 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @09:20AM (#63658430) Homepage Journal

      RIght. It's obvious that electric is superior for acceleration, so they need to go at least hybrid to remain competitive. These will not be green in any meaningful sense.

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by skam240 ( 789197 )

        These will not be green in any meaningful sense.

        Pretty sure their hybrids will see the same extended range per tank of gas other hybrids see which certainly makes them greener than their non hybrid cars.

        • by ranton ( 36917 )

          Oh it will definitely make them greener, with CO2 savings estimates of 30% for their first hybrid car on the market (The Renault). It is certainly not a green car though. Top Teslas have similar performance but ridiculously less CO2 impact.

          • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

            Oh it will definitely make them greener, with CO2 savings estimates of 30% for their first hybrid car on the market (The Renault). It is certainly not a green car though. Top Teslas have similar performance but ridiculously less CO2 impact.

            Top Teslas are only fast for a short while till their battery complains. Hybrids OTOH add supplemental power to the ICE.

            Compare Formula E (full electric) to Formula 1 (hybrid) for the difference in state-of-the-art race cars. They are not even remotely close.

            • I wondered how expensive it would be to add enhancements to EVs like with ICE engines. Like say you want your Model 3 to go faster, what would you do to add horsepower and torque?
              • I wondered how expensive it would be to add enhancements to EVs like with ICE engines. Like say you want your Model 3 to go faster, what would you do to add horsepower and torque?

                Costs? As with ICE vehicles, the sky is the limit. You can take it as far as you can afford.

                How / what to do? Add supercapacitors, upgrade voltage regulators, and software tuned to deliver the increased amounts of electricity to the motors. You could even add more motors (going from a standard single or performance dual motor system to a full 4 motor system). Just don't expect Tesla to support you in your efforts.

              • I wondered how expensive it would be to add enhancements to EVs like with ICE engines. Like say you want your Model 3 to go faster, what would you do to add horsepower and torque?

                I don't know what the aftermarket hardware (motors, gearing where applicable, batteries etc) market will look like when people no longer have traditional ICE cars to mod. For now I think removing or tweaking limits in the software is about all there is for HP and TQ.

                Of course you can still mod suspension and brakes, possibly steering, wheels and tires etc if you want to go faster in other than a straight line. Tesla brakes are notoriously bad so I'd expect lots of options there, but have never actually

        • Pretty sure their hybrids will see the same extended range per tank of gas other hybrids see which certainly makes them greener than their non hybrid cars.

          They will see an improvement, but it will not be the same level of improvement because the tech is being used to make faster cars and not just equally performant ones. Economy-oriented hybrids are mostly slower than similar ICEVs they are priced against. These are going to be faster than their predecessors. They will still see significant benefits from regen, though, so yes they will wind up with better mileage — just not as much better as cheaper vehicles.

        • by Sique ( 173459 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @10:22AM (#63658660) Homepage
          Hybrids only show extended range if you operate them mainly on short distance travel. For long distances with not much variation of speed for most of the time, hybrids don't improve upon normal ICEs. If you drive mainly in mountainous environments, hybrids might even show less mileage than a normal car.

          Hybrids are ideal for commuters in daily stop-and-go traffic - exactly the type of traffic we should try to replace by improving public transport.

          • Why would hybrids be worse in mountainous areas, where they can regen while going downhill?

            Anyway, these hybrid lambos will be a bit more efficient when driving to a fancy restaurant (which is what they're mostly used for) and a little quicker at the cost of a bit more weight in an already fat car. So mostly a win, though in the big picture it won't make a difference either way.

            • Why would hybrids be worse in mountainous areas, where they can regen while going downhill?

              "Worse" doesn't make much sense. "Not much better" might, since most hybrids have very tiny batteries. If you're descending for a long time, you can only regen for a few minutes and then you're back to using brakes to slow your descent. Hybrids should do much better in hilly areas, of course, where you're going up and down, up and down.

              Anyway, these hybrid lambos will be a bit more efficient when driving to a fancy restaurant (which is what they're mostly used for) and a little quicker at the cost of a bit more weight in an already fat car. So mostly a win, though in the big picture it won't make a difference either way.

              Yeah. As another poster said, they're Lambos, the only way to make them green is to paint them green.

            • by caseih ( 160668 )

              Yes going down a mountain will definitely help the hybrid work better. But the problem is mountainous terrain is rarely up and down in a way that makes hybrids work. It's not like stop-and-go traffic, where hybrids work the best. It's usually a long, slow climb and then a long descent, so you won't see that much benefit from hybrid really.

            • by Sique ( 173459 )
              Because the batteries are much to small to be really of any help. Instead, the higher system weight costs more fuel to get to the top. I am talking about mountains, not some small floating hills left over by the last Ice Age. I for instance live in a town where many people have a daily commute with more than 400 m of height difference (about 1200 feet). Going down the slope within a few minutes far exceeds any charging capacity of a hybrid battery.
      • by chill ( 34294 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @10:02AM (#63658594) Journal

        It's a Lambo. The only way it'll be green is in you paint it. British Racing Green to the rescue.

        • I don't think there's ever been a Lamborghini painted British Racing Green, even aftermarket. Certainly not in the past 50 years.

      • It should also help with braking - you're less likely to boil the brake fluid if you're pulling, say, half the kinetic energy out via the motors as opposed to all being scrubbed by the brakes.

      • These will not be green in any meaningful sense.

        You are totally right off course. Still, the amount of exhaust gasses also depends on whether it is a plug-in hybrid and on how large the batteries are.

      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 ) <slashdot&worf,net> on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @10:36AM (#63658720)

        Anyone buying a Lamborghini or other exotic car is not about "being green". I mean, it's pretty obvious when the car is equipped with a V12 or other exotic engine configuration. Ditto with other cars - no one buys a Rolls Royce for good gas mileage. Ditto Bentley and others. (After all, those cars aren't very lightweight at all, so you need a powerful engine just to move all that mass down the road).

        And yes, the headline should be clarify that it's their combustion only engine models, they still sell ICE equipped vehicles, but they are hybrids with an electric motor attached for extra power.

        This is especially since ICE vehicles have a significant lag between throttle action and when you feel it - stomp on the gas pedal and it will take half a second before you're actually moving as it takes time for the engine to accelerate and get into the power band. Electric motors react instantly will full torque so you touch it and it goes with instant power to the wheels.

        In fact, that's the biggest issue - the power often needs to be modulated because if you send too much power too fast to the tires, they will spin out.

        • >>This is especially since ICE vehicles have a significant lag between throttle action and when you feel it ...

          This is true of standard passenger cars, but it is decidedly NOT true when dealing with supercars (while I"m not rich enough to own a Lambo, I've had several Maseratis, a Bora to name one) which are on a world of their own. Instant response to the loud pedal is the name of the game.

          • This is true of standard passenger cars, but it is decidedly NOT true when dealing with supercars

            Of course it is. Supercars have a lot more power but they don't suddenly magically have a flat torque vs RPM curve. Seriously spend some time reading detailed reviews of supercars from people who actually test and drive them for a living and you'll find wide and varying discussions about lag whether caused electrically, a function of the engine size and RPM, or turbocharger vs supercharger.

            There is a solution to lag though, it's what this discussion is about and Lamborghini isn't the first or only company t

      • by mspohr ( 589790 )

        I don't understand their "pure hybrid" name.
        It's either pure EV or pure ICE.
        Hybrid is not pure anything.

    • by rossdee ( 243626 )

      So the ICE powers one wheel and the other 3 have electric motors? That seems weird.

      I thought that the best way to go would be to have an electric motor on each wheel with the ICE just powering an electric generator and batteries to give it extra acceleration when needed.

      • Or electric + ICE where ICE actually provides some speed and acceleration at speed (like going from 130kmph to 180kmph). ICE has acceleration at higher speed, EV has acceleration at lower speeds.
      • by UnknowingFool ( 672806 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @09:45AM (#63658528)
        No, one electric motor is in the transmission and also works as a starter-generator. I assume the other two are in the two rear wheels as many Lamborghinis are rear-wheel driven.
        • The best place to put the electric motors is in the front, because you can use them to replace the drivetrain that goes there on so many modern performance vehicles. As well, they will add weight to the front of a mid-engined vehicle, which improves front-rear balance.

          • Ideally, perhaps make the engine a generator, and go all electric for the drivetrain? This way, the engine just keeps the battery bank going, and doesn't need its own mechanical connection, which simplifies the drivetrain. A serial hybrid would be a nice transition point for people who want an EV, but don't have a home charger, and don't want to fight the Tesla people for the single charger in the parking lot.

            • Since the vehicles are mid engine, rear wheel drive, there is no driveline between the engine and the rear wheels... just a transaxle. Eliminating the transaxle and replacing it with a generator and motors doesn't save any weight to speak of. I think it makes more sense to ride that out until they go full EV. But eliminating the drive shaft to the front, the center diff, and the front diff will save both the weight and the hassle of the driveline, if nothing else...

              • I'm thinking along the lines of having some sort of fuel mechanism, just for the racetrack. Tossing gas into a tank and having a turbine engine keep the battery bank topped off would allow for some all day fun without having to park and charge for 30-45 minutes. Of course, an EV brings along a ton of design freedom, perhaps even one electric motor on each wheel, for true four wheel drive acceleration.

                • The problem with per-wheel motors is that you wind up having to go huge if you want performance. In the best mechanical AWD systems you can transfer 100% of the power to either end of the vehicle, and lock the wheels together so they work at the same speed. But emulating that with hub motors (or just near-wheel motors) means literally half the maximum output part of the time under those conditions if one wheel is slipping part of the time. I have wondered if you could have two motors in the space where you

          • by Sique ( 173459 )
            The drive train of a mid-engine car powers the rear axle. Front wheel drive only makes sense if the engine sits near the front axle.
            • The drive train of a mid-engine car powers the rear axle. Front wheel drive only makes sense if the engine sits near the front axle.

              Absolutely nobody suggested making a front wheel drive Lamborghini. Try reading that comment again. Maybe do some research on how many wheels of current Lamborghinis are driven first so you can come up to speed.

            • Found the car noob who doesn't know the difference between a drivetrain and a powertrain, but thinks they're qualified to talk about cars anyway

              • by Sique ( 173459 )
                Sorry, in my language, they are equivalent and both are called Antriebsstrang. What's the difference in English (I know, people love to introduce differences where there are none, e.g. wanting to have a difference between lightrail in a tunnel and a metro or similar. I recently had one trying to explain to me that the Budapest Metro is not a metro, as it has overhead wires and should thus be classified as a lightrail. Apparently, inventing a word in the 1970ies somehow changes the Budapest Metro, which ran
        • by mobby_6kl ( 668092 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @10:42AM (#63658752)

          No, one electric motor is in the transmission and also works as a starter-generator. I assume the other two are in the two rear wheels as many Lamborghinis are rear-wheel driven.

          Many are awd actually, especially compared to others that tend to be traditionally rwd still. Anyway, it looks most likely that there will be two motors in the front for the front wheels and one integrated into the transmission or axle or something like that

          The Revuelto packs a 814-hp 6.5-liter V12 that can rev up to 9,500 RPM, three electric motors (two upfront, one in the rear) and an eight-speed DCT. Thereâ(TM)s also a 3.8-kWh battery pack that can send up to 187 hp to any of the three motors as needed. Power goes to all four wheels, with the V12 primarily powering the rear ones. Electric torque vectoring is also included as a Lamborghini first, and it has all the goodies youâ(TM)d expect from this car at this price, including tons of carbon fiber and active aerodynamics.

          https://www.theautopian.com/i-... [theautopian.com]

        • by 0xG ( 712423 )

          Not so. Mid-engined car, Mostly AWD because of the tremendous power. Two motors in front for torque-vectoring.

        • by Junta ( 36770 )

          I'd assume the front wheels, to get AWD acceleration while leaving the ICE drivetrain rear-wheel drive. Like the corvette does.

          High performance at this point utterly demands AWD, you can only make the rear tires so grippy.

        • Most if not all currently produced Lambos are AWD. Each front wheel gets an electric motor, and an electric motor is integrated into the gearbox driving the rear wheels to boost the output. https://robbreport.com/motors/... [robbreport.com] You can't compete on acceleration these days without powering all the wheels, or putting enormous tires on the rear.
      • I'd assume that a pair of wheels are on the third motor, more like how your ICE car works.
      • by pz ( 113803 )

        High-performance hybrid cars typically can deliver power to the wheels from both electric and combustion motors, at the same time. The drive trains are fully integrated.

        • That's true of performance hybrids with one electric motor, but if they have three then usually two of the wheels are powered only electrically, with a motor per wheel, and the third motor is attached to the transmission in between the engine and transmission and replacing a torque converter.

    • by kriston ( 7886 )

      Came here to ask what they think they mean by "last combustion engine order?"

      • I think you have been here long enough to know that they aren't clever enough to realize that their headline is nonsense.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I love the thinly veiled attempt to make it sound like they are doing something for the environment, but really they are still just making stupid toys for the super rich.

    • From what I understand this is just a step towards full electric eventually based on what Lamborghini has revealed. If and how they get there is crystal ball territory.
  • Rich posers strutting around downtown in Lambos at walking speed won't be able to call attention to themselves by revving their engine and annoying the shit out of evebody.

  • How soon until they come back with a new V10 model or get bought out for pennies on the dollar?

    • Nonsense (Score:5, Insightful)

      by crow ( 16139 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @10:13AM (#63658630) Homepage Journal

      First, they're already part of Volkswagen, so they won't get bought out unless VW goes bankrupt or decides the need a cash injection.

      And going hybrid here is about adding power, not about going green. This will increase performance, so not doing it would be giving up their market to those that do. They're tired of getting left behind by Teslas. (A Urus has a 0-60 time of 3.1 seconds vs. a Model X Plaid of 2.5.)

      • Until that Tesla has to turn a corner.

        • Which they can do surprisingly well
        • Re:Nonsense (Score:4, Informative)

          by organgtool ( 966989 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @11:35AM (#63658986)
          The Tesla Model S Plaid has an official Nurburgring time of 7:25 while the Urus has an unofficial time of 7:47. So it looks like the Model S Plaid can either handle turns just fine and/or its acceleration overcomes most of any turning weaknesses.
          • The Urus can do many laps at that speed. I'll bet the Tesla can't do a second hot lap right after the first.
            • Re:Nonsense (Score:4, Informative)

              by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @04:18PM (#63659918)

              I'll bet the Tesla can't do a second hot lap right after the first.

              Tesla set the 7:25 lap record on the second lap right after breaking it's previous record on the first lap. Seriously, show me on this doll where the EV touched you causing you to hate on it so much.

              By the way this discussion about Tesla is asinine, they aren't even the fastest EV. The Volkswagen (you know that company who owns Lamborghini) ID-R holds the current EV lap record, and is nearly a minute and a half faster than the Urus. And yes it also has no problem doing more than one lap at a time. It's not like EVs generate that much heat going at full throttle. Generating heat and requiring upwards of a megawatt of cooling is the staple of the inefficient thing known as a combustion engine.

              • Tesla set the 7:25 lap record on the second lap right after breaking it's previous record on the first lap. Seriously, show me on this doll where the EV touched you causing you to hate on it so much.

                Well I will admit 15 minutes of hooning is good. They have come a long way from the days a couple hot 1/4 mile runs would be all you get on a charge. Obviously fixed the brakes too. That said I doubt a Models S would beat a Formula E car in an actual race, and Formula E cars would likewise have a tough time with a decent supercar, so it's nice that Tesla has optimized putting down a lot of power in a short time at the Ring, but don't kid yourself it won't also be the first to die. No getting around that

                • That said I doubt a Models S would beat a Formula E car in an actual race

                  No of course not. As I said it wasn't even the fastest, and the Model S isn't designed to be either a Formula E car or even a hyper car. It's a family sedan, which I think is what makes its racing record so absolutely incredible.

                  but don't kid yourself it won't also be the first to die. No getting around that energy density thing.

                  It's funny you mention this. I think you have no appreciation for just how quickly energy is consumed in a hypercar. You know you can empty the entire fuel tank in a Veyron in under 8 minutes right, and that has a 100L tank.

                  At best your argument may be that it won't survive an endur

                  • At best your argument may be that it won't survive an endurance race do to taking 15min to charge the battery, but saying it will be the first to die isn't a given in a racing car category. Even most F1 cars don't run more than around 30-45min (not because they can't, but because racing is a game of optimisation, and weight of fuel (they don't fill the tank all the way) is part of optimising when the car needs to be pitted. That's not much higher than the 25min the Formula E does.

                    Can tell you are not a racing fan.

                    F1 races are typically ~2 hours. They are allowed 110kg of fuel, and there are no refueling stops. F1 cars are also massively faster than Formula E cars, with around 1000 HP from a 1.6 liter V6 plus hybrid system. FE cars, with around 450HP, run ~45 minute races. FE cars also have no ground effects, because adding downforce would drain the batteries faster and make the races even shorter.

                    Actually I think a Model S would compete with a Formula E car for the first f

                    • I should correct myself, the F1 rules say a max of 2 hours, as safety cars can drag out the race considerably. A typical race with no red flags is about 100 minutes.
              • Double replying but yeah, I thought 7 minutes was much more likely than 14 and apparently it is.

                https://www.roadandtrack.com/n... [roadandtrack.com]
    • Just a V10? Their new hybrid is a V12!

      The Lamborghini Aventador's Hybrid Successor Will Come With a V-12 That Delivers 1,001 HP. The setup will include three electric motors.

      At the heart of the new powertrain is a naturally aspirated V-12, as has been the case with nearly all of the marque's flagships. The 6.5-liter L545 engine tips the scales at 481 pounds, which is 37 pounds lighter than the one in the Aventador, but produces more power and revs. The automaker says the mill will be able to produce 81

  • Lamborghini sells less than 10,000 cars per years, which makes this news is inconsequential to 99.9999987% percent of the world's population.

    • by io333 ( 574963 )

      It's VW's halo car. It doesn't matter if it is profitable or not.

    • Supercars are like the space program, eventually advancements trickle down to the general consumer level products. Especially here as Lambo is part of the VW family.

      Really though this is more of a "sign of the times" as even Lambo, the prototypical last vestige of old-school ICE supercars, naturally aspirated raw power type cars is seeing the writing on the wall, from performance to customer demands and yes to emissions.

      Just another sign of the end for the gasoline engine in the passenger car market. When

      • Supercars are like the space program, eventually advancements trickle down to the general consumer level products. Especially here as Lambo is part of the VW family.

        Really though this is more of a "sign of the times" as even Lambo, the prototypical last vestige of old-school ICE supercars, naturally aspirated raw power type cars is seeing the writing on the wall, from performance to customer demands and yes to emissions.

        Just another sign of the end for the gasoline engine in the passenger car market. When these companies do things even for their very small customer base it shapes perceptions for people and the industry.

        Formula One cars have been hybrids since 2014, but the ICE part won't be going away anytime soon.

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by bill_mcgonigle ( 4333 ) * on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @05:57PM (#63660176) Homepage Journal

    When I was young I wanted a Lambo and couldn't afford one.
    Then I got older and was too tall to fit into one.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (10) Sorry, but that's too useful.

Working...