Ohio Plastic Surgeon Loses Medical License After TikTok Livestreams (nytimes.com) 51
An Ohio plastic surgeon lost her medical license after the state medical board investigated her for livestreaming operations on TikTok and surgical complications reported by patients. From a report: The State Medical Board of Ohio voted at a hearing on Wednesday to permanently revoke Dr. Katharine Roxanne Grawe's medical license and to fine her $4,500 "based on her failure to meet standard of care." At the hearing, doctors on the board said that Dr. Grawe, known online as "Dr. Roxy," had previously been cautioned about protecting patient privacy on social media. They also spoke about her treatment of three unnamed patients who had reported complications from procedures, including one whose surgery Dr. Grawe had broadcast a part of on social media.
Dr. Jonathan B. Feibel, vice president of the medical board, recommended that Dr. Grawe's license be revoked because of the "life altering, reckless treatment" provided to those patients. "These outcomes were not normal complications like those that exist in the routine practice of medicine, but were rather caused by recklessness and disregard for the rules governing the practice of medicine in Ohio," he said.
Dr. Jonathan B. Feibel, vice president of the medical board, recommended that Dr. Grawe's license be revoked because of the "life altering, reckless treatment" provided to those patients. "These outcomes were not normal complications like those that exist in the routine practice of medicine, but were rather caused by recklessness and disregard for the rules governing the practice of medicine in Ohio," he said.
Why is this on /. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Because this site is full of old miserable fucks who hate everything. So someone doing something stupid on TikTok gets their blood pressure up.
Re:Why is this on /. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Because this site is full of old miserable fucks who hate everything. So someone doing something stupid on TikTok gets their blood pressure up.
Yes because everyone knows that /. is the only site on the Internet with clickbaity headlines.
Re: (Score:2)
Because this site is full of old miserable fucks who hate everything. So someone doing something stupid on TikTok gets their blood pressure up.
No, miserable old fucks get onto medical boards so they can suppress any innovations that might, God forbid, make the field more competitive and transparent.
Re: (Score:2)
You have an extremely low bar if you think she's hot. Probably the same type of person who thinks Elizabeth Holmes is hot.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Why is this on /. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why is this on /.
Because it is a story about contemporary technology being used to ill effect?
Re:Why is this on /. (Score:4, Insightful)
The decision was not even really because TikTok. The decision was primarily because of "life altering, reckless treatment". TikTok is a side-show and the headline is simply crap.
hi dr nick! (Score:4, Funny)
hi dr nick!
And? Dumb people do dumb things? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I would say he sounds like a guy who wanted to suffer brain damage, but that behavior shows he already had it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People are live-streaming surgeries on social media .. you wouldn't want to know that's a thing? I hadn't heard about it. I mean, I knew about surgery videos on YouTube, but not live-streams by a doctor holding up a selfie stick going "watch me cut this open."
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't say "People" are doing it. One stupid person was doing it.
And no, I wouldn't expect to see that on national news.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. The solder paste gyt at least did something excessively stupid with a tech material. Also, apparently TikTok is pretty mich a side issue and medical malpractice resulting in complications that should not have happened is the real reason.
3 patients reported having severe complications (Score:5, Informative)
The State Medical Board of Ohio on Wednesday permanently revoked the medical license of Katharine Roxanne Grawe and fined her $4,500 “based on her failure to meet standard of care,” board spokesperson Jerica Stewart told The Washington Post.
The board found that while Grawe was performing surgeries, she live-streamed parts of her patients’ procedures on TikTok, spoke into the camera and answered viewer questions from some of her more than 825,000 followers. At least three patients reported having severe complications — infections, a perforated intestine and a loss of brain function — and needing medical care after Grawe operated on them at Roxy Plastic Surgery, her practice in Powell, Ohio, according to the board.
“The one thing that is clear is that she had an intense focus on her TikTok presence,”
“Dr. Grawe’s social media was more important to her than the lives of the patients she treated.” A state lawyer arguing for Grawe’s license to be revoked said Grawe “made major surgeries with potentially life-altering complications seem like one big party,”
https://www.washingtonpost.com... [washingtonpost.com]
Re:3 patients reported having severe complications (Score:5, Informative)
A lot people seem to regard plastic surgery as on a level with getting your nails done. It's not. It's unpleasant, it takes considerable time to heal from, and things can go seriously wrong. It's surgery.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Look at several actresses that have turned into hideous simulacrums of a human being by botched plastic surgery jobs.
It may surprise you to know that some of those aren't botched and was actually the look people were going for. Seriously people do really dumb irreparable shit to their bodies on purpose.
Re: (Score:3)
....It may surprise you to know that some of those aren't botched and was actually the look people were going for.....
I would question the ethics and competence of any doctor who is willing to mutilate a patient because that's "what the customer wants." In some fields, "the customer is always right" shouldn't apply, medicine being one of them.
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
A lot people seem to regard plastic surgery as on a level with getting your nails done. It's not. It's unpleasant, it takes considerable time to heal from, and things can go seriously wrong. It's surgery.
She should have gone with 'gender affirming surgery', then she'd be untouchable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Infection I get, that is always a risk when patient is opened up. But perforated intestine that you don't even notice requires some fucked up level of carelessness as you go around the stomach sucking the fat out. Guess she was too busy making sure it looks good on video to pay attention to the things she was hitting inside the patient.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
That was my point, yes. These are tissues designed to hold your internal organs in place. They're not fragile and are not something you're going to easily punch through with liposuction tool. That requires pretty epic level of carelessness combined with excessive force.
Or you didn't actually bother to do prep work on the patient to see if they have hernias, which is just bizarre. I am not an expert on this specific medical procedure, but it sounds absurd to me to surgically go into a patient in a non-emerge
Re: (Score:2)
getting some imaging
Every CT scan performed on you increases your risk of cancer. Not a ton. Maybe 1%, tops. But definitely not zero. There are a lot of X-rays going around in one of those. No, for hernias you use those classic, non-ionizing detectors: the eyes and hands. If it's big enough to matter, trust me, you'll notice it.
Re: (Score:2)
Ever heard of ultrasound?
And if you're worried about risk of cancer from CT and x-ray when going into invasive surgical procedure into your abdominal cavity, then your risk tolerance is clearly far too low to go into an ELECTIVE invasive surgical procedure into your abdominal cavity. Risks of that are millions of times higher than that of a single CT/x-ray.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It normally takes a LOT to get a medical license outright revoked. And these particular complications seem relatively run of the mill while she seems to run a pretty high volume operation, so it's a small fraction of patients (haven't looked up prevalent rates or her rates etc )
While i would be happy if TikTok fell into a volcano and we'd never hear of it again, this case seems like pearl clutching by haters on the review board rather than a sober assessment of her skills or risks to patients.
Uh oh (Score:1)
Do you smell that? It smells like lawsuit in here. When an entire board already finds that to be the result, and you're the patient, you don't even go to court. You just settle. They'd probably have the check in hand same-day.
I hope ... (Score:2)
NSFL (Not Safe For Lunchtime)
Re: (Score:2)
I think that the difference is that the most you get out of her streams, which are done by a different person, is a running commentary. Given that she's talking to the patient as well on what she's doing, she's still keeping her attention where it belongs.
The argument here is that this surgeon was getting distracted, basically hamming it up for the camera.
The scale of danger is also different. She's usually just working with surface stuff where the patient is only on a local. I also get the feeling that
Re: (Score:2)
Conflict of Interest (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I Believe... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Dude (Score:2)
Under current government regulations, there is much much more to patient consent than not giving out names and bluring faces.
We have to take training on this at the "U" if we do anything adjacent to medical research.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Dude (Score:1)
Not entirely correct. People have identifying tattoos, with sufficient resolution, many other parts of the body are identifiable or imaging can be reconstructed. Very specialized surgeries in small locales may fall under statistically identifiable.
I donâ(TM)t know the specifics of the case, but itâ(TM)s not infeasible that if no release or consent was signed, this doctor violated one or another HIPAA rule.
Whether the subjects can prove that and want to pursue it, especially since this practice is
Stick to "pimple popping" videos! (Score:2)
Any jury deciding that would become "engrossed", demand more videos, and the judge would have to declare a mistrial.
It's totally this guy (Score:2)