Reddit Users Heckle Search for New Mods, as Some Mods Move to Lemmy and Discord (arstechnica.com) 73
"Over the past week, a Reddit employee has posted to subreddits with ousted mods, asking for new volunteers," reports Ars Technica.
But it's not always going smoothly... A Reddit employee going by ModCodeofConduct (Reddit has refused to disclose the real names of admins representing the company on the platform) has posted to numerous subreddits over recent days, including r/IRLEasterEggs, r/donthelpjustfilm, r/ActLikeYouBelong, r/malefashionadvice, and r/AccidentalRenaissance... Like most official Reddit posts since the API war began, the comments under the job ads display users' discontent.
"May I nominate a mod? I think u/ConspirOC would be a great mod, as he created this subreddit and has successfully run it for years, before you forcibly removed him," a user going by LittleManOnACan wrote on ModCodeofConduct's post seeking replacement r/IRLEasterEggs mods. "Additionally, fire Steve Huffman (Fuck u/Spez)."
There's also a desire among Reddit users for a return to not just how things were but an acknowledgment of the efforts made by many previous moderators, how things changed, and why things are different now. A Redditor going by QuicklyThisWay wrote on ModCodeofConduct's post for news mods for r/IRLEasterEggs:
"Just to be clear for anyone 'applying' to be a moderator. The user that created the subreddit and any other mods were removed by admins for making the community private. Even though the option to change to private is available to all subreddits at any time, the admins have not and will not respect any 'autonomy' moderators appear to have...
As Ars has previously detailed, user protests didn't prevent third-party Reddit apps from closing. However, they have disrupted the platform.
Reddit didn't answer questions Ars sent about its replacement mod criteria or how it'll help ensure new mods can properly handle their newfound volunteer duties...
"mods Ars has spoken with over the weeks have frequently pointed to the potential for burnout, death threats, long training sessions (from other volunteer mods), and rapid turnover for Reddit mods..." the article notes, adding "Without mods proven to be dedicated and experienced, it's unclear how fervently such efforts will continue in the future...
"Disgruntled mods and ex-mods continue seeking new platforms to continue community discussions, including Lemmy and Discord. And as of this writing, there are still 1,900 subreddits private, per the Reddark_247 tracker."
Meanwhile, the third annual edition of Reddit's annual pixel-placing event r/Place "turned into a battleground for dunking on the CEO," reports Polygon. A Reddit spokesperson declined to comment about this year's edition of r/Place, telling Polygon via email "redditors are going to reddit."
Gizmodo's article includes a timelapse video (from YouTube) that they say captures "the whimsy — and anger — of its users," including "plenty of protest art directed at CEO Steve Huffman, who goes by u/spez on the platform..." While there are plenty of examples of "Fuck Spez" to go around, the most creative moment occurred at the end of the project. As r/Place wound to a close, users were able to place a pixel once every thirty seconds, but the pixel had to be white — an effort to wipe the slate clean. However, in the final moments of the project, users collaborated to leave one massive "FUCK SPEZ" across the canvas.
But it's not always going smoothly... A Reddit employee going by ModCodeofConduct (Reddit has refused to disclose the real names of admins representing the company on the platform) has posted to numerous subreddits over recent days, including r/IRLEasterEggs, r/donthelpjustfilm, r/ActLikeYouBelong, r/malefashionadvice, and r/AccidentalRenaissance... Like most official Reddit posts since the API war began, the comments under the job ads display users' discontent.
"May I nominate a mod? I think u/ConspirOC would be a great mod, as he created this subreddit and has successfully run it for years, before you forcibly removed him," a user going by LittleManOnACan wrote on ModCodeofConduct's post seeking replacement r/IRLEasterEggs mods. "Additionally, fire Steve Huffman (Fuck u/Spez)."
There's also a desire among Reddit users for a return to not just how things were but an acknowledgment of the efforts made by many previous moderators, how things changed, and why things are different now. A Redditor going by QuicklyThisWay wrote on ModCodeofConduct's post for news mods for r/IRLEasterEggs:
"Just to be clear for anyone 'applying' to be a moderator. The user that created the subreddit and any other mods were removed by admins for making the community private. Even though the option to change to private is available to all subreddits at any time, the admins have not and will not respect any 'autonomy' moderators appear to have...
As Ars has previously detailed, user protests didn't prevent third-party Reddit apps from closing. However, they have disrupted the platform.
Reddit didn't answer questions Ars sent about its replacement mod criteria or how it'll help ensure new mods can properly handle their newfound volunteer duties...
"mods Ars has spoken with over the weeks have frequently pointed to the potential for burnout, death threats, long training sessions (from other volunteer mods), and rapid turnover for Reddit mods..." the article notes, adding "Without mods proven to be dedicated and experienced, it's unclear how fervently such efforts will continue in the future...
"Disgruntled mods and ex-mods continue seeking new platforms to continue community discussions, including Lemmy and Discord. And as of this writing, there are still 1,900 subreddits private, per the Reddark_247 tracker."
Meanwhile, the third annual edition of Reddit's annual pixel-placing event r/Place "turned into a battleground for dunking on the CEO," reports Polygon. A Reddit spokesperson declined to comment about this year's edition of r/Place, telling Polygon via email "redditors are going to reddit."
Gizmodo's article includes a timelapse video (from YouTube) that they say captures "the whimsy — and anger — of its users," including "plenty of protest art directed at CEO Steve Huffman, who goes by u/spez on the platform..." While there are plenty of examples of "Fuck Spez" to go around, the most creative moment occurred at the end of the project. As r/Place wound to a close, users were able to place a pixel once every thirty seconds, but the pixel had to be white — an effort to wipe the slate clean. However, in the final moments of the project, users collaborated to leave one massive "FUCK SPEZ" across the canvas.
Mods ruined reddit (Score:1, Troll)
Getting rid of them was the right move
Re: Mods ruined reddit (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
You hit the nail on the head
Re: Mods ruined reddit (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Mods ruined reddit (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone with empathy for a reddit sub has never spent much time on reddit or is a mod spending way too much time on reddit.
Took the liberty and fixed that for you. Because now it's a perfect explanation why Reddit is fucked.
Frankly, I don't care for mods. Or Reddit for that matter. But I think we should learn from the mistakes of others, especially if they spend so much on making them. I don't know if that lesson is valuable, but it sure was expensive.
Why would someone be a Reddit mod? Well, in general, there were two reasons:
First, a "passion" for the topic. That can either be actual, genuine interest in the topic and wanting to promote it, giving people who are interested in it a way to communicate and a way to promote just how awesome it is. And while it's not passion but actual money that motivates people who work for companies that run subreddits, it falls in the same category. These subs exist to promote an idea, a product, a hobby, whatever, and there are people who want this to be promoted, either because they care about the subject or because they care about the money they make with it or the money they get paid by the company making it.
And second, the lust for power. These people are in it because they want to control the narrative, because they want to have an "emergency brake" in case they lose an argument and because they enjoy that feeling of being "in control" (as virtual as that control might be). You find that kind of mod mostly in political and more controversial subs, but also in general "chat" subs.
Now you throw away the mods and a third type of mod appears: The astroturfer.
The astroturfer doesn't give a fuck about the sub and he also doesn't care for the "power". The only thing he's interested in is that there are a LOAD of people using it, millions of eyeballs, and they really need to see what he has to sell. Be that spam, be that a scam, be that a political statement.
And now the fun begins! Because you now have a lot of subs without mods where Reddit desperately needs some. Who will apply?
Well, of course the astroturfers. Fully independent of whatever sub we're talking about, as long as there's eyeballs to catch, they will try to control it. That way they couldn't only spam, they could also ban those that point out their scam. Great position to have.
What you'll also get, though, is people who were rejected by the "old" mods for some reason. Now, and that's the rub here: Successful enterprises, be that for-profit or just a subreddit, are not successful by chance. They are because the people who run it know what they're doing. You may agree, you may not, but the fact is, they somehow did something right, or the people wouldn't come back to them. Since it's trivially easy to just open a "rival" sub down the road, and this has happened more often than I could count, anyone pissing off his customer base will not have one for long. So whether I personally liked the mods of large subs or not, somehow they managed to attract the crowd.
And these people rejected these now re-applying mods.
Since people in general do things for a reason, the reason might be that they didn't consider them "mod material" for some reason. Either they react badly to criticism, they try to control the narrative with a heavy hand or they go against the general groupthink. Whatever the reason could have been, they will now reapply and they will very likely get a shot.
And they will likely try to turn the tide to give the sub "their" preferred direction. Which will result in quite a bit of fallout. And not only from the people who don't like the change. Because the new group of mods will be under a LOT more scrutiny from Reddit than the old crowd. "Having" a sub, at least so far, meant quite a bit of freedom. Unless you had people, I don't know, promote terrorism on your sub, you would get away with nearly everything, at least for a while. This is certainly not going to be the case now. Reddit wants to appeal
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm generally just stating the obvious here, yet still it gets upvoted. I guess it's not as obvious as I'd think it is.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think I fit into any of those categories... I don't have a "passion" for my local county, and I've only banned the most obvious of spammers... I'm pretty sure there are many others in similar situations.
Re: Mods ruined reddit (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That's why the decisions are so divorced from desires of the community.
Actually I'm not so sure about that. Reddit is nothing more than a bunch of communities created by people who thought it would be neat to do so. They end up the de-facto mods. Mods abide by code of conduct such as not shutting down the community or leaving a community mod-less. A bunch of mods got booted for thinking they get to dictate how reddit runs their business.
Now what of the community? There's two choices: either the community thinks it should exist and should be modded by someone who hasn't run afo
Re: (Score:3)
Spez is literally the head mod. He's the head asshole among many small time assholes.
The only reason small time assholes are whining about him now is because he finally turned on them. Before they were the choir cheering him on as he victimized victims of the small time assholes. Their problem isn't that Spez is an asshole. Their problem is that he finally turned on them.
Re: (Score:1)
It's endlessly amusing to see the Reddit mods go to an old slogan from the_donald, but I tend to think there are no good guys in this fight.
The mods are hot garbage on almost any sub of note, though it's also funny that the only subs here are practically unknowns. I mean the biggest one here is male fashion advice and although there are a number of people using it, it's not something you generally see on the front page. The other subs are, though apparently large, still pretty far down there.
So it reads l
Re:Mods ruined reddit (Score:5, Insightful)
Being a moderator always means you're the bad guy. Much like the referee on the pitch, you're the one to blame for everything. Because with the very same decision you make you're a pushover anyone can push around as they please and Hitler incarnate that wants to crush everyone under his boot if they don't roll over. Of course to different people and sides in the argument.
Why anyone wants to have that position is beyond me. I sure as fuck don't.
Re: Mods ruined reddit (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's come up a lot more that most people don't want the job. Even before the protests the owners of some subs were saying calls for new mods were only getting a few replies and maybe only 1 serious one. It's a shitty job that's a lot of work and little appreciation
Re: (Score:2)
I know. Back in the days, when the internet was young and so was I, I was moderator for a board. It was back in the days when the trolls were a bit more sophisticated (or so blatantly stupid that they already signed up with some variant of "adolph hitler" as their user name) and the state actor astrotufers weren't really a thing yet (yes, THAT long ago it was).
And even back then it was already playing Blue Helmet on the Golan Heights. Both sides accused you of siding with their "enemy", nobody took any subt
Re:Mods ruined reddit (Score:5, Interesting)
When you say "Well, we're not going to pay you in money, but we *will* pay you in the power to throw your weight around, declare the supremacy of your own ideology, and ruin people's days"... ...well, what kind of person do you *think* is going to be attracted to that position?
Re: (Score:2)
You may be nothing in real life but you can be the strongman/woman of your dreams on reddit! Plus we get free labor from you.
Re: (Score:2)
The old mods?
Quite frankly, that wouldn't change much. What will be the thing that changes much is that the people who will get hired now are the same people the old mods rejected when they applied to them.
My guess would be that their preferred narrative clashed with that of the old mods. And thus that of the regulars. Which in turn pretty much means that we will soon see a /r/the_real_$insertoldsubnamehere
Re: (Score:1)
And while we're at it, yes, the Earth is an oblate spheroid. No matter how much your favorite faery tale says it's flat.
Re: (Score:1)
idk, the more I hear the more I think the whole fucking thing is rotten. Maybe not all of it, but enough that it's creeping me out. I'm watching many subreddits and it's obvious people are gaming the fuck out of the voting system, which means money/bots and people looking the other way.
The voting system is supposed to keep bullshit quiet not elevate it to the top if you pay for it.
Re: (Score:1)
i.e. fucking UFO's. Lost count of how many 'new' UFO/alien subs keep popping up in my feed, and I keep muting them, but more different one's keep coming.
Re: (Score:1)
That and using random subreddits to frontpage political memes, pointless meme subreddits like /meirl.
The new zeitgeist is just random number subreddits, which are targeted at the youngest users
Re: (Score:2)
1: I'm on a where few generally non-controversial subs
2: I seldom use the main page
3: I view everything in reverse chronological order (newest on top) apart from comments that i prefer reading oldest on top
Point 3 kind of insulates me from the voting problems as it makes votes irrelevant for sorting and I've never notice messages being obviously hidden. This might go a long way in explaining my posts here on slas
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah it's probably because I'm subbed to r/Conservative, so it thinks I'm a lunatic and feeds me the appropriate subs. To be fair, lunacy is about all that exists in that sub, so guess I deserve it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey! Don't badmouth The Reddit Game or I'll find out your username and play the "get the weenie of the week banned" minigame with you!
Re: (Score:1)
lol too late. They perma banned me back when the war began and I was losing my shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Just get back in and get someone else banned. That's all the game is about, after all.
Re: (Score:1)
Petty is every humans middle name I'm fairly sure.
reddit is dying (Score:2)
Free economic analysis (Score:4, Interesting)
Assuming $40 / hr, 7 hr / week, 52 weeks / year, 1 mod / sub, and 2000 subs, I estimate moderators provided at least $29M of free labor to Reddit each year. It takes a sizeable paid content team to replace a single passionate expert. The API revenue had better be a lot higher to risk spoiling the whole show.
Reddit was interesting because people used it to organize interesting conversations. Web forums are everywhere but Reddit had community. The owners seem think their platform is more important than the community. I remember what was and look forward to a better future. Maybe variations of Eternal September are destined to recur.
Re: (Score:2)
>Web forums are everywhere but Reddit had community.
I would disagree with that. A "community" is, at mininimum, a group of people who know who each other are.
Reddit is a "forum" that would never fit into any physical forum. To them, everyone is just another anonymous asshole. Banning any given one of them has no meaning, because in ten minutes, another will fill their place.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Free economic analysis (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd go a bit lower on the wages - moderating a sub is a basic cube slave job even if it shouldn't be. Go with a bit over the local minimum wage and then outsource to whatever country has an available workforce with the lowest wages. Doesn't matter if the resulting work is garbage.
Your estimate is still wildly low because it's far more than 1 mod / sub by the time you get to a decent size (Reddit has 500 sub-forums with over 1m subscribers), and for a 24/7 site you're going to need 24/7 service even if it is understaffed during the day and grossly understaffed at night.
Re: (Score:2)
Go with a bit over the local minimum wage and then outsource to whatever country has an available workforce with the lowest wages.
Better option: Just nuke the sub. People seem to think that all of reddit is dependent on a handful of subs. They aren't. It's like saying if slashdot.com suddenly went offline the internet would fail. It won't. A few people who visited only Slashdot would lose interest but the majority would just keep on internetting on all the other sites that are still online. The overwhelming megamajority of subs are online and have moderators in them.
Subs are community made. If they are deleted and someone thought they
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Assuming $40 / hr, 7 hr / week, 52 weeks / year, 1 mod / sub, and 2000 subs, I estimate moderators provided at least $29M of free labor to Reddit each year.
Mods provided no labour to Reddit. Subreddits are created as a community interest project by an interested community, not by Reddit. They aren't Reddit. You can wipe all of these 2000 subs and one of two things will happen:
a) nothing, life goes on among the million of subreddits currently existing.
b) someone misses the sub and re-registers it instantly becoming a mod for his now new own personal project.
The idea that Reddit owes money to mods is like saying that web developers own money to ISP/hosting providers for writing the websites they host. That's not the business relationship here even if Reddit / ISPs / Hosts benefit from the existence of people using their service to attract other people.
Re: (Score:2)
And forgot a /
Re: (Score:2)
Re:What the fuck (Score:4, Interesting)
Was there anything, ever, that you thought was a good thing? I mean, aside of your birth?
People do things because they consider it positive to do them, even if they don't get paid for it. Try it some time, you might not be as miserable anymore.
Bye bye reddit (Score:2)
Reddit's quality in moderation and discourse has gone down the toilet. The pettiness of mods and the up/down voting system feels more like junior high kids run amok than adults running things. Reddit admins do nothing to reign in abuses. The only time reddit takes action is if the press pushes them.
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen this post before, 10 years ago. Reddit is still here. I suspect after reading your post I will reflect back on it in 10 years on a reddit post.
Why don't they buy the app publisher? (Score:2, Interesting)
If I understand this correctly, part of the problem is 3rd party apps that are being locked out. These apps are important because the official app is not easy to use.
So why don't Reddit's owners just buy out the publisher of the app that the moderators like to use?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
When you triple the access cost, you're locking out those who can't pay for access. This was a lot more than tripling the cost of access to the API.
So I think it's fair to say that the apps are being locked out.
Re: (Score:2)
Weird hill to die on (Score:1)
Re: Weird hill to die on (Score:2)
Re: Weird hill to die on (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd think by now it's way, way past that. Reddit showed the mods that they can take away pretty much anything they consider dear and valuable as they please, and, well, that doesn't exactly sit well with them.
Be honest, how'd you react?
Re: (Score:2)
Be honest, how'd you react?
I think many of us are just sitting here on the sidelines munching on popcorn.
Playground owner vs Bully Squatters - news at 11.
Re: (Score:2)
Guess it's less bully squatters. If you want to do a playground analogy, what you got here was a bunch of hobbyist teams playing for fun, shits and giggles and letting the playground owners collect the ticket income in exchange for having a place to play. Now the terms of using the pitch change and the teams get pissed because they somehow thought that they had some sort of deal with the playground owner when they didn't.
But I agree, I like this game a lot more. Pass the popcorn, here's your soda.
Re: (Score:2)
People put up with that kind of thing all the time. Yeah, it's very unpleasant, but if you just don't think about it, you can ignore it until it happens.
OTOH, IF the moderators are important, and IF they depend on tools that are no longer available, THEN they're going to stop working or go somewhere else. And if so, then Reddit is going to need to replace them. And that will have associated expenses.
Now I don't know if those hypotheticals are true or not. Various folks have chimed in on various sides of
Re: (Score:3)
Basically from what I've seen, Reddit's own spam protection is pretty terrible so in order to keep up with spam bots posting porn links and scams, mods rely on bots to keep an eye on things round the clock.
Disgruntled mods and ex-mods continue seeking new (Score:2)
"Disgruntled mods and ex-mods continue seeking new platforms to continue community discussions, including Lemmy and Discord.
Reddit had better find a way to gruntle them, then.
So much sturm and drang (Score:2)
Mods suck and are crying to slashdot (Score:2)
The parade of horribles didn't happen. In fact, mods got their feelings hurt when discussions about this quickly turned into a conversation over what a shitty job mods had done on said communities and how many didn't believe their parade of horribles.
It's business as usual and any article about this non-issue is clearly from a source whose employees are mods. Mods aren't unpaid labor... they're people scamming their day job (coughcough FDA) which is why the potential breaking of mobile support is the _re