Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google IT

Google Search Can Now Critique Your Grammar (theverge.com) 22

The next time you want a quick gut check on whether a sentence is grammatically accurate, Google Search might have the answer. From a report: 9to5Google has spotted a "grammar check" feature that will offer suggestions on whether a given phrase is grammatically accurate. For example, type "the quick brown fox jump over the lazy dog" into the search engine and Google will highlight that you probably meant "jumps" instead of "jump." Although most people probably don't care about the grammar of their search phrases, we suspect this tool is meant to be more general purpose. If one of your sentences looks off when you type it into a messaging app for example, Google's hope seems to be that you'll give it a check with Google Search -- because anything that encourages more searches and engagement is good for business.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Search Can Now Critique Your Grammar

Comments Filter:
  • fuk;

  • how long before Bad grammar overload! errors happen?

  • Linguo IS dead.
  • with "jump", the letter "s" would be missing in the pangram - a much worse mistake than your average grammatical one...

  • What I want to know is, how long before there's a browser addon to let you use this in typing boxes. Once we have that, we can at least hope that the average /. post won't be filled with grammatical errors.
  • by Uldis Segliņš ( 4468089 ) on Monday August 07, 2023 @03:37PM (#63748246)
    Return to search AS I ASKED not "something with similar most letters". Tired of this. Google search is crap now. Only popular stuff is found.
    • Seriously at this point I would simply like the text dump and I'll comb through 50 pages of exact word matches. The filtering is so grotesque now as to not even return word matches at all. Plus all the stuff hidden by scripting and frameworks. Right, only popular stuff and my word is mashed into what they want my word to be. Aggravating. If I put in my city name, I should get it's website first, a map second, wikipedia third and so on. I can never find official websites anymore even by putting in "official.
    • Return to search AS I ASKED not "something with similar most letters". Tired of this. Google search is crap now. Only popular stuff is found.

      Erm, 1. "Popular shit" is exactly what Google is meant to find. The whole point of a search engine is to find the most wanted (read: popular) results for a query.

      2. If you find Google isn't providing decent results, it'll be down to your query. I rarely venture to page 2 of Google results because usually what I need is found on page 1. Page 2 is where things tend to go a little obscure as to what you searched for.

      I rarely have problems finding things with Google and when I do it's usually because the

  • by nightflameauto ( 6607976 ) on Monday August 07, 2023 @03:45PM (#63748276)

    From the company that's spends more effort "correcting" my search terms to something completely unrelated because the word might be more popular than the oddly spelled acronym I was actually looking for, now they're going to correct my grammar for me as well? That's just absolutely fantastic. I'm sure it'll be 100% spot on, just like their crap-awful search engine's "corrections" have been for years now.

  • English grammar is not the worst to work with. Do they plan other languages?
  • Just what we need, another grammar nazi. And google don't even have an ego issue like other grammar nazis have.

    • Just what we need, another grammar nazi. And google don't even have an ego issue like other grammar nazis have.

      *doesn't*

  • gud findin (Score:4, Funny)

    by byronivs ( 1626319 ) on Monday August 07, 2023 @04:31PM (#63748436) Journal
    Google, you right gud findin me lottapus in them ole interwebs 'er. Watta this 'er goatsem? Sinners all'em.
  • I canne belve ti. Can has cheezburger nao?
  • If you find Google doesn't return results to you like you asked, this is a good reminder that you aren't using it right. Google is designed for the average moron. It parses sentences, not fragments. It answers questions, not discrete mathematics puzzels. If you find yourself typing AND, OR or NOT into search terms, you are using the wrong search engine.

    Ask it a question like you would your mother and it may actually give you better results.

    • Google wasn't always like that at all. I prefer key word and boolean search. It makes sense to tailor your search to limit useless responses.

Fast, cheap, good: pick two.

Working...