Chinese Social Media Campaigns Are Successfully Impersonating US Voters, Microsoft Warns (cnbc.com) 50
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: Chinese state-aligned influence and disinformation campaigns are impersonating U.S. voters and targeting political candidates on multiple social media platforms with improved sophistication, Microsoft said in a threat analysis report Thursday. Chinese Communist Party-affiliated "covert influence operations have now begun to successfully engage with target audiences on social media to a greater extent than previously observed," according to the report, which focused on the rise in "digital threats from East Asia." The Microsoft report also cautioned that some Chinese influence campaigns are now using generative artificial intelligence to create visual content that's "already drawn higher levels of engagement from authentic" users, a trend the company said began around March.
Chinese influence campaigns have historically struggled to gain traction with intended targets, who in this case are U.S. voters and residents. But since the 2022 midterm elections, those efforts have become more effective, Microsoft warned. Microsoft found content from Chinese influence campaigns on multiple apps, including Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Microsoft-owned LinkedIn, and X. In August, Facebook parent Meta announced it had disrupted the largest ever identified disinformation campaign and linked it to China state-affiliated actors. Microsoft's report included screenshots of two different X posts in April that were identified as CCP-affiliated disinformation. Both were about the Black Lives Matter movement and had the same graphic. The first came from an automated CCP-affiliated account. The second, Microsoft said, was uploaded by an account impersonating a conservative U.S. voter seven hours later.
Chinese influence campaigns have historically struggled to gain traction with intended targets, who in this case are U.S. voters and residents. But since the 2022 midterm elections, those efforts have become more effective, Microsoft warned. Microsoft found content from Chinese influence campaigns on multiple apps, including Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Microsoft-owned LinkedIn, and X. In August, Facebook parent Meta announced it had disrupted the largest ever identified disinformation campaign and linked it to China state-affiliated actors. Microsoft's report included screenshots of two different X posts in April that were identified as CCP-affiliated disinformation. Both were about the Black Lives Matter movement and had the same graphic. The first came from an automated CCP-affiliated account. The second, Microsoft said, was uploaded by an account impersonating a conservative U.S. voter seven hours later.
Have they gotten better (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I have to wonder if they have improved or if we have just become more willing to believe anything that stokes our narrative
Why not both?
Re:Have they gotten better (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
China has a lot of home-grown LLMs. I've noticed a massive improvement in the quality of translation using them lately. Often they read like native speakers now.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I have to wonder if they have improved or if we have just become more willing to believe anything that stokes our narrative
Actually, the opposite is happening. There is so much misinformation that voters have become cynical and don't believe anyone. Political advertising is becoming less effective.
Those who pay the most attention to politics on social media are those whose minds are already made up and are the least likely to change their views.
There was an article about this in the Economist: Polarization inoculates voters against misinformation [economist.com].
Re: (Score:2)
So the whole shit finally had a good effect, too.
Re: (Score:3)
That's worse. Voters end up simply picking and choosing what they want to believe. The famous "alternative facts" - find some somewhat true information that affirms your preferred narrative, and dismiss anything that contradicts it as fake news.
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, the opposite is happening. There is so much misinformation that voters have become cynical and don't believe anyone. Political advertising is becoming less effective.
Is it less effective or is it the candidates getting shittier and shittier, so people don't bother caring any more.
Re: (Score:1)
Couldn't tell that from Republican voters. In polls, the still believe the former alleged president is telling the truth and not a bunco artist.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Found the MAGA spreading their lies. Or maybe it's a sleeper from China.
Either way, they hit all their talking points so they've done their job.
Re: (Score:2)
So why hasn't it happened?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Also target registrars and Secs-of-Sate? (Score:5, Insightful)
Who the hell thinks that load of complete and total bullshit is insightful?
Mail-in voting is incredibly safe and secure. Ask any of the many states that have, for years, safely and securely conducted elections by mail.
Though if you really think that our elections are a shame, send them a message by refusing to vote.
Re: (Score:2)
Who the hell thinks that load of complete and total bullshit is insightful?
Mail-in voting is incredibly safe and secure. Ask any of the many states that have, for years, safely and securely conducted elections by mail.
Though if you really think that our elections are a shame, send them a message by refusing to vote.
You don't need to go to any great lengths to subvert democracy. People are incredibly gullible and easily manipulated.
But, that said, I'd be more interested to know about similar campaigns being run by the USA against both its adversaries and its 'friends'.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It is unjust and favors a party!
After all, it requires the voter to be able to read AND write.
Re: (Score:2)
Who the hell thinks that load of complete and total bullshit is insightful?
Mail-in voting is incredibly safe and secure. Ask any of the many states that have, for years, safely and securely conducted elections by mail.
Though if you really think that our elections are a shame, send them a message by refusing to vote.
Nonono... the "danger" with mail in voting is that many of them vote for the "wrong" party.
Re: Also target registrars and Secs-of-Sate? (Score:2)
Georgia and its Secretary of State was _famously_ aggressive at purging voter rolls. You lost, suck it.
BLM? That's *not* propaganda! (Score:1)
Re:BLM? That's *not* propaganda! (Score:4, Informative)
saying on its website, “We are anti-capitalist. We believe and understand that Black people will never achieve liberation under the current global racialized capitalist system.”
I can't find this quote anywhere except right-wing MAGA sites claiming that BLM said it.
So: Citation need. Where on "its website" did BLM say this?
Put up or shut up.
Re: BLM? That's *not* propaganda! (Score:3)
BLM removed the Marxist and anti-family messages from their website in 2020. I read their web site because I was curious about them after the George Floyd murder. Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza used to openly describe themselves as Marxist, but apparently realized that it was hurting their image. You can still find some old interviews on the internet that they haven't been able to take down.
https://www.politifact.com/art... [politifact.com]
https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/... [nypost.com]
https://www.dailysignal.com/20... [dailysignal.com]
https://samrocha [medium.com]
Look at the mirror (Score:3)
You can see it in the mirror [project-syndicate.org]:
Americans have been understandably outraged and alarmed about foreign electoral interference. But the practice is not new; in fact, the United States was for a long time its leading exponent. As Dov Levin shows in his book, Meddling in the Ballot Box, the US and the Soviet Union (and subsequently Russia) engaged in 117 covert or overt foreign electoral interventions to help or hinder candidates or parties between 1946 and 2000, with the US accounting for 81 of these cases (or 69% of the total).
Other people on this planet doing the same are criminal, because the US monopolizes the whole planet and define who are allowed!
Re: (Score:3)
Geez comrade, did you rtfa? Microsoft is hot on your tail. You're supposed to be laying low until the heat dies down.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft is hot on your tail.
How? Oh... I'm a Microsoft user... you are saying that American products are full of spying back doors? You must hate this country so much to say that or you're telling the truth. I can't tell which best describe you.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes comrade, that's it exactly. I just checked my secret NSA spy records and determined that you are indeed a Microsoft user.
So to be clear, my comment had nothing to do with the relationship of the blatant Chinese propaganda in your original post to the article linked at the top of this page describing how Microsoft has been tracking Chinese propaganda on the internet.
Re: (Score:2)
I just checked my secret NSA spy records
Thank you for confessing the NSA of USA is the evil spy of the world. You will get the treatment of Edward Snowden from your superior officer very soon.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that half the electorate doesn't mind interference, because they think it's helping their guy win.
Re: (Score:2)
"think Sparta"
Lots of homosexuality?
Act of war. (Score:3)
Make that plain to them and give them a deadline to stop. At the end of that deadline, if they have not, declare that China's possession of Tibet is illegal, Taiwan has the right to be an independent nation (if it declares itself to be one), and the illegal regime in Beijing has placed itself as incompatible with the survival of the United States of America.
Re: (Score:1)
Picking an ar
Re: (Score:1)
Very original, relevant, and persuasive. Thanks for participating.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you've ever heard the phrase, "Those who would burn books will soon burn people"? It works on many levels. Those who would impersonate a voter would also impersonate a vote, or deny it e
It's pretty easy to spot grammatical disfluencies (Score:2)
How did I guess? (Score:1)
How did I guess conservatives were the marks? I guess our international competitors and adversaries can easily see our big red weakness, and know that one side ... and one side only ... will be the death of the US.