Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AI Technology

India Reverses AI Stance, Requires Government Approval For Model Launches (techcrunch.com) 19

An anonymous reader shares a report: India has waded into global AI debate by issuing an advisory that requires "significant" tech firms to get government permission before launching new models. India's Ministry of Electronics and IT issued the advisory to firms on Friday. The advisory -- not published on public domain but a copy of which TechCrunch has reviewed -- also asks tech firms to ensure that their services or products "do not permit any bias or discrimination or threaten the integrity of the electoral process."

Though the ministry admits the advisory is not legally binding, India's IT Deputy Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar says the notice is "signalling that this is the future of regulation." He adds: "We are doing it as an advisory today asking you to comply with it." In a tweet Monday, Chandrasekhar said the advisory is aimed at "untested AI platforms deploying on the India internet" and doesn't apply to startups.
About-face from India's position on AI a year ago.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

India Reverses AI Stance, Requires Government Approval For Model Launches

Comments Filter:
  • AI ? What could possibly go wrong?
    AI Regulations and limitations ? What could possibly go wrong?

    • by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 ) on Monday March 04, 2024 @07:47AM (#64287820)

      The Licence Raj [wikipedia.org] strikes again.

      India never fails to fail.

      Indian-Americans are the most successful ethnicity. Indians do well everywhere in the world ... except in India.

    • by Erioll ( 229536 )
      Remember, no bias! Especially not based on merit. That would lead to horrifically "bad" results.
  • by Entrope ( 68843 ) on Monday March 04, 2024 @06:52AM (#64287768) Homepage

    This position is exactly in line with other policies of India's government on speech, religious freedoms, expressive content and political dissent, so it's not objectively surprising. The only surprise was that they even briefly considered a very low-regulation approach to AI.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

      On the opposite side of the narrative and much closer to the subject, India has been trying to get as much of tech companies flight out of PRC by loosening regulations on the sector.

      Tightening of regulations goes against this trend.

  • It's a nonbinding "request".
    From a third-world country
    that is in no way leading anything in AI.

    Not news.
    Not useful.
    But hey, I get 20 emails a day from them offering to redo my website so it can also be a "taxi app" or other such nonsense.

    Slasdot on weekends. /smdh

  • by mysidia ( 191772 ) on Monday March 04, 2024 @10:41AM (#64288206)

    "untested AI platforms deploying on the India internet"

    As far as I know the Internet is worldwide, so I could post my model on a US server where our Constitution protects free speech, including the right to post whatever message or content I want, and whatever the Indian government says about it doesn't matter - I wouldn't need their approval to post a copy of my AI model.

  • ... and they have big hopes for being #1

Dynamically binding, you realize the magic. Statically binding, you see only the hierarchy.

Working...