Google Urges US To Update Immigration Rules To Attract More AI Talent (theverge.com) 98
The US could lose out on valuable AI and tech talent if some of its immigration policies are not modernized, Google says in a letter sent to the Department of Labor. From a report: Google says policies like Schedule A, a list of occupations the government "pre-certified" as not having enough American workers, have to be more flexible and move faster to meet demand in technologies like AI and cybersecurity. The company says the government must update Schedule A to include AI and cybersecurity and do so more regularly.
"There's wide recognition that there is a global shortage of talent in AI, but the fact remains that the US is one of the harder places to bring talent from abroad, and we risk losing out on some of the most highly sought-after people in the world," Karan Bhatia, head of government affairs and public policy at Google, tells The Verge. He noted that the occupations in Schedule A have not been updated in 20 years.
Companies can apply for permanent residencies, colloquially known as green cards, for employees. The Department of Labor requires companies to get a permanent labor certification (PERM) proving there is a shortage of workers in that role. That process may take time, so the government "pre-certified" some jobs through Schedule A. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services lists Schedule A occupations as physical therapists, professional nurses, or "immigrants of exceptional ability in the sciences or arts." While the wait time for a green card isn't reduced, Google says Schedule A cuts down the processing time by about a year.
"There's wide recognition that there is a global shortage of talent in AI, but the fact remains that the US is one of the harder places to bring talent from abroad, and we risk losing out on some of the most highly sought-after people in the world," Karan Bhatia, head of government affairs and public policy at Google, tells The Verge. He noted that the occupations in Schedule A have not been updated in 20 years.
Companies can apply for permanent residencies, colloquially known as green cards, for employees. The Department of Labor requires companies to get a permanent labor certification (PERM) proving there is a shortage of workers in that role. That process may take time, so the government "pre-certified" some jobs through Schedule A. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services lists Schedule A occupations as physical therapists, professional nurses, or "immigrants of exceptional ability in the sciences or arts." While the wait time for a green card isn't reduced, Google says Schedule A cuts down the processing time by about a year.
Hey, Google... (Score:5, Insightful)
Hey, Google Assholes...
How about you train-up some American talent? Go to high schools, like the car makers used to, pick the most talented / gifted / hardworking students, and see if you can make something of them?
But of course not, you're going to just grab for India, as always, instead of helping our students get a leg up.
There was a time when GM / Ford / Mopar would take you, train you, teach you how to machine and stamp and weld, and then you worked for them for a long time. Maybe even make enough to buy a house and start a family.
Somewhere along the line, maybe the 70's or 80's this stopped, and suddenly any new hires need to be superstars just to make it into the door.
We need to re-establish the Social Contract with our own people, not keep importing more cheap labor.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This has nothing to do with differences in education systems, and everything to do with paying employees less.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And if you really wanted to address the issue, its weird you keep going after those that wish to immigrate instead of the businesses that illegally employ those that are not legally here in the USA.
So instead of demonizing people looking to get out of a scary place, you would demonize those here in the USA that exploit these people.
Seems an odd position for you to take, to slap down those that are already beaten and bloody on the floor. But hey,
Re:Hey, Google... (Score:4, Informative)
I live in the US and the southern border is indeed WIDE OPEN.
Invasion is an accurate term.
I wasn't the OP, but I guaran-fucking-tee you I'm a US citizen. And the majority of those crossing the border are not legitimate asylum seekers...they are ONLY coming here to earn money.
Being poor in a foreign country does not qualify you for asylum under those laws. Most of the border crossers are younger military age males.
If they truly were seeking asylum from political or other persecution, they'd not be crossing over multiple countries ...they'd apply in the first country they come to, but no, they keep going multiple borders to get to the US borders.
Why? To make money...
We're not under obligation to take in economic nomads....and most of the people coming across...if we can catch them, do NOT qualify for asylum and will get deported, but our US system of letting them in and "trusting" them to come back in a year or two for a hearing...isn't really working out that well.
JFC....even the northern cities are starting to get tired of this shit because now, they are finally getting a taste of what the southern states have been going through by being overrun by these illegal aliens.
Sentiment is turning....finally.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
LMAO. Nobody is here because of climate change. They are one and all economic migrants. They are being aided in the the trip, they aren't saving for a lifetime to get a shot. Most of them have no skills that are even usable here except theft and drug dealing. We don't have jobs generating anywhere near the speed to support these economic losers. Sell your crazy somewhere else.
Re: (Score:1)
We don't have jobs generating anywhere near the speed to support these economic losers.
wrong. those 'losers' are currently doing stuff like harvesting all the food I eat and painting my apartment building. cant wait to see how much prices skyrocket after conservatives implement their 'no brown people' immigration plans
Re: (Score:2)
1. Not my fucking problem.
2. Still not a valid asylum admission value even if it is a factor.
3. The US is not the only country in the world that pollutes....and we're making huge strides against it.
Re:Hey, Google... (Score:5, Insightful)
Then perhaps all those hotels, golf courses, landscaping companies, restaurants, home builders, construction companies, meat packing plants, farmers, ranchers, wineries and who knows who else, stop hiring them. Problem solved.
Here's a question: when was the last time Abbott crowed about any employer being fined or even jailed for hiring illegals?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Hey, Google... (Score:4, Insightful)
This disingenuous bullshit falls flat on its face when you see that kind of political meandering from an orange who cant even stay awake in court or stop shitting himself from all the drugs he takes to keep himself awake.
Re: (Score:2)
It was a worthless bill, with no teeth and no real solving of the problems.
It allowed many thousands a day (5K?) before anyone could do any action on closing or limiting border access.
Turn the shit off now....no crossings outside of official checkpoints will be considered, if we catch you outside of there crossing over, you are caught,
Re: (Score:2)
I agree!!
Re: (Score:2)
Here's a question: when was the last time Abbott crowed about any employer being fined or even jailed for hiring illegals?
Is this a trick question? The answer is never. The reason is that he would lose support (and likely friends) if he prosecuted any of them. The more of a ruckus he creates about "illegal aliens", the cheaper the labor gets. That is why there is a ruckus at all. They want slavery back so very badly.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Some are...some are trying to avoid them.
Whether or not they are crossing and trying to get caught..the border is wide open allowing them the ability to cross at all.
That needs to be stopped, halted as close to 100% as possible.
ONe way to help, make it so tha
Re: (Score:2)
Your full of shit.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
I agree with you in general. But this article is specifically about AI talent. That's different than the legions of grunt commodity folks you are referencing.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Again, I don't necessarily disagree. But I still maintain it's about the difference between the average masses and the elite. If you want a bunch of average folks, I agree that you do not need to look externally. There are plenty within the borders.
Both things can be true. There are plenty of folks to fill "most" positions. And for some niche spaces, there are not.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because they want wage slaves (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Why hire American when you can bring someone to America, pay them minimum wage, claim they're tipped to bring that down even further, and if they complain, fire them and let the State Department deport 'em?
Well, that approach certainly creates the indentured servitude [wikipedia.org] like system with all the requisite atmosphere of anxiety and fear that modern executives seem consider is essential to the smooth running of a modern corporation.
Re: (Score:2)
Why hire American when you can bring someone to America, pay them minimum wage, claim they're tipped to bring that down even further, and if they complain, fire them and let the State Department deport 'em?
Google pays its H1-B workers the same as US citizens, or green card holders, etc. There's no cost savings to be had there.
Actually (Score:3)
Importing a H1B worker, even if paid the same as a US worker is not the same.
The H1B worker is tied to the employer for 3 years.
Lose your job and you will get deported.
Refuse to work 99 hours a week, you will be eventually let go and deported.
File a labor complaint, you will be eventually let go and deported.
Take too many vacation days, you will eventually be let go and deported.
Complain about work assignments, you will eventually be let go and deported.
And the pay is US equivalent but at the low low end of
Re: (Score:2)
Importing a H1B worker, even if paid the same as a US worker is not the same.
Certainly there are differences, I was addressing pay.
One prefatory comment before I respond to the rest: I am in no way claiming that H1-Bs aren't terribly abused by many companies. I know they are; I've seen it firsthand (before joining Google). But the context of this discussion is Google, and in nearly 15 years at Google, many of them as a manager, including of H1-B holders, I have never seen any abusive behavior. Moreover, no one I know had seen or heard of any, nor would they stand for it.
If I
Re: (Score:2)
You really don't understand the industry very well (Score:2)
Hey, Google Assholes...
How about you train-up some American talent? Go to high schools, like the car makers used to, pick the most talented / gifted / hardworking students, and see if you can make something of them?
Because training for cutting-edge technology is much more difficult and specialized than teaching someone how to work in a 60s-era automotive factory. Google does too many things already, it would be kinda foolish for them to get into the education business and fuck that up the way Sundar Pichai is doing with Google as a whole.
Would you say the same to a biotech company?...hey Pfizer....stop looking globally for international cancer experts and just train up some smart high schooler and make them cancer
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
We need to re-establish the Social Contract with our own people, not keep importing more cheap labor.
The Social Contract still exists, it's just been altered. It now reads, "All people will be subject to the whims of for-profit industry and those that have enough money to own for-profit industry sectors. When confused, please re-read the first sentence."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
India spends a fraction of what the US spends per child on education, how do they have more trained AI workers? Could
It be our kids don't care about boring stuff like learning to program AI?
Re: (Score:2)
Kids don't wanna learn that crap. It's boring.
Re: (Score:2)
How about you train-up some American talent?
If just anyone could be trained up, that might make sense, but there's a big element of native talent and intelligence needed, and the US only has about 4% of the world's population. It makes a lot of business sense to look into the other 96% to see what you can find there. And its the moral thing to do, too. Kids in the US are already massively advantaged by their lucky break of being born here. Why not give others a chance?
Go to high schools, like the car makers used to, pick the most talented / gifted / hardworking students, and see if you can make something of them?
Google actually does that except they start a little bit later, with college freshm
Re: (Score:2)
Who should get trained? Whenever we have articles about forced computer science training in the US and coding being a required subject you same idiots claim it's not needed. Meanwhile, developers are pulling in 6 figure salaries .. so why in God's name are people still working retail and fast food WHEN YOU CAN GET TRAINED AND CERTIFIED on anything online for dirt CHEAP, if you're poor and want in-person classes .. community college is cheap or free with federal loans. There's really no excuse for bullshit n
Re: (Score:2)
How about you train-up some American talent? Go to high schools, like the car makers used to, pick the most talented / gifted / hardworking students, and see if you can make something of them?
Training them is someone else's job. Let someone else pay to find out if the person can be useful or not. India has people pre-made for companies like Google so of course they will get their employees from there. It is a global market of (but not for) labor.
Didn't google just layoff a bunch of workers? (Score:5, Insightful)
No special immigration programs for you if you're not smart enough to move programmers from one department to another.
Re: (Score:2)
Let's make up our minds, please. Either programmers are interchangeable cogs, to be swapped or transferred arbitrarily and without consequence, or they aren't.
I work in a consultancy. Pretending programmers can be moved around like pawns is a great way to torpedo your efforts.
Re: Didn't google just layoff a bunch of workers? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that's a good point. I'll definitely grant you that. But in my experience, that does happen. Somebody that proves themselves valuable and flexible does get shifted when changes happen.
What I find in developers is the same distribution curve that I find in every profession. That bell curve of capability is real. Some few are in the top tier, some people are in the bottom... and most people are jammed up in the middle.
If you're after that top tier, you have to look far afield. Certainly beyond geographi
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is you can't reset their salary along with their expertise.
I'm not exactly sure what you mean. So, sorry if I'm misinterpreting. However, I've certainly sat down devs before and reset their salary (in some fairly dramatic ways). I've never lowered salary but I've often raised it. Rather than lower salaries, I tend to simply fire the folks who are underperforming and free up the slot for someone better.
Re: Didn't google just layoff a bunch of workers? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've been programming computers for 48 years.
Once you know how to fly, it doesn't make any difference what kind of plane they give you.
Re: (Score:2)
No special immigration programs for you if you're not smart enough to move programmers from one department to another.
(Google) No Donor Class money for you unless we get our way.
Those In Charge, have little to do with those In Control.
This also explains why competency in Government leadership, is optional.
Putting Americans Out of Work to Put Even More Out (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
hmm, $$$? (Score:1)
Fuck it. Buy American or fuck off. (Score:1)
Enough of flooding the country with people to vote the way you want and that you can get at a fraction of a normal person's salary
Re: (Score:2)
And why do you think our youth is like this?
I know exactly why they're like this. Knowing that, and even knowing Google contributes the the problem, doesn't solve the problem Google has, however. When they aren't trying to take over HQ they're proudly indulging their bathroom confusion and creating other problems. So obviously Google wants a pipeline of workers from Asia that aren't all fucked up in the head.
Re: (Score:2)
When they aren't trying to take over HQ they're proudly indulging their bathroom confusion and creating other problems. So obviously Google wants a pipeline of workers from Asia that aren't all fucked up in the head.
Well... that's google's problem. They sound like the alcoholic that's shocked, I tell you, SHOCKED!!!! to find their kidneys and other systems are failing and shutting down from 2 decades of alcoholism.
I have no sympathy for Google, and would exhort our "leaders" to tell them to pound sand. Problem is, our "leaders" stopped listening to their people sometime around just before the Civil War, it seems.
Re: (Score:2)
You're free to tell our leaders to pound whatever you think is best. Google, on the other hand, sets up our leaders kids in nice, cushy non-profit no-show jobs at $250K/year. Guess how our leaders are going to vote?
It's done. The fix is in and you lost. Accept it. Adapt to it. That's the only rational plan left to you. The rest is some form of self delusion.
Re: (Score:2)
It's done. The fix is in and you lost. Accept it. Adapt to it. That's the only rational plan left to you. The rest is some form of self delusion.
Cute. Let me guess, a variation on the old jewish "It is what it is?"
That is the thinking of someone who's been beaten so badly they can't stand up for themselves anymore. Figuratively, or literally. Or both. And yes, I used to be "there." In both senses. Beat physically, regularly, and figuratively, by those who were supposed to be "raising" me. "You'll never amount to anything.' "Lazy." "Slow." And I was "It is what it is" until it wasn't, and I took steps to remove myself from that house, and d
Re: (Score:2)
Yea, well, that band of fanatics are ... fanatical. You, poasting on the interwebs, aren't going to dislodge them. They've got their vision for this world and you're not in it. And I mean right now, not some terrible future. You don't matter. Your preferences, your ideas, your votes. None of it.
Re: (Score:1)
If that were true then it would be a non-issue. It isn't, however, is it?
Re: (Score:1)
Google Spokesman (Score:2, Troll)
Karan Bhatia, head of government affairs and public policy at Google
The name is a clue. India has become a colonial power.
Why do they have to move to US (Score:5, Insightful)
We can't allow an AI gap! (Score:3)
Google Urges US To Update Immigration Rules To Hire Cheaper Labor, Using FUD To Threaten A ${buzzword} Gap If Denied
FTFY. HTH. HAND.
Here we go again (Score:5, Insightful)
Anyone who has been following tech has seen this same sob story for decades. There is always an excuse why they can't find the "right" people. Even when there are recessions and people are being laid off left and right, "We can't find anyone!".
Here's a small idea which could be implemented right now. Get rid of your shitty software which filters out anyone who doesn't have the exact words in their CV that you're looking for. Hire minions to manually review all the resumes and CVs which come in and I can guarantee you'll find the people you need.
Re: (Score:3)
Indeed. There are enough people around that can do these jobs. Find them, make them actually _good_ offers and this problem will go away. This is sheer leadership failure, nothing else.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Americans cost too much. It's more profitable to buy politicians and get foreigners to do the work.
Re: (Score:2)
Americans cost too much. It's more profitable to buy politicians and get foreigners to do the work.
Google pays the foreigners the same as it pays Americans. Maybe a little bit more, if you count the free immigration attorney work.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you lie when that's so easily fact-checked, and do so without at least posting as AC while you're trolling?
Google's pay rate for a level 4 engineer in India is about 6.7m rupees which is roughly 80k USD. In California the same category averages around 280k USD.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you lie when that's so easily fact-checked, and do so without at least posting as AC while you're trolling?
Google's pay rate for a level 4 engineer in India is about 6.7m rupees which is roughly 80k USD. In California the same category averages around 280k USD.
We're talking about H1-Bs, which means they're in the US, not in India. Don't be an asshole.
Re: (Score:2)
Look bro, they aren't ever going to treat people with basic human respect ever again. Google is completely dark now. They are just another soulless and accidentally evil corporation. (their goal isn't evil, but their motivations demand that evil occurs more often than not)
Fuck That (Score:2)
I'm sorry, we already have negative impacts from H1-B recipients, besides Cognizant, Wipro, Infosys, IBM and other outsources just love humping the legs of Congress to get more.
Re: (Score:1)
The US is pretty big (Score:2)
internal training (Score:2)
I don't understand why tech companies are so averse to training up employees?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This logic doesn't make sense. In all my years in the industry, the general wisdom is that if you want a proper raise you have to leave the company. It's usually cheaper for companies to promote rather than to bring in outside talent to fill a position.
Can't they work remote? (Score:2)
If they are that good, surely they can work in their home country, self manage, and conduct meetings online, no? Isn't that the purpose of collaboration tools like Google Workspace?
can you work with criminals illegals instead? (Score:1)
How to find your monkey with +15 years experience (Score:2)
Saw the job descriptions asking for +5 years experience with ChatGPT requirements already in the mail box last month.
Of course they were only willing to pay bananas.
Really, we really just want it easier to get cheap (Score:1)
Why? So they can send them to Mexico and India? (Score:2)
I hear Google has about 200 core developers they could be training up now that the positions have been reassigned outside the USA.
Hypocrits (Score:1)