Meta's Customer Service is So Bad, Users Are Suing in Small Claims Court To Resolve Issues 69
Facebook and Instagram users are increasingly turning to small claims courts to regain access to their accounts or seek damages from Meta, amid frustrations with the company's customer support. In several cases across multiple states, Engadget reports, plaintiffs have successfully restored account access or won financial compensation. Meta often responds by contacting litigants before court dates, attempting to resolve issues out of court.
The trend, popularized on social media forums, highlights ongoing customer service issues at the tech giant. Some users report significant financial losses due to inaccessible business-related accounts. While small claims court offers a more accessible legal avenue, Meta typically deploys legal resources to respond to these claims.
The trend, popularized on social media forums, highlights ongoing customer service issues at the tech giant. Some users report significant financial losses due to inaccessible business-related accounts. While small claims court offers a more accessible legal avenue, Meta typically deploys legal resources to respond to these claims.
Re: (Score:1)
"Your issue is very very important to us, that's why our top bot is answer it."
Re: (Score:3)
Zuckerberg of Borg is handling support requests now?
Re: (Score:1)
Oh wait, that's because I'm not stupid enough to have a Facebook account. Seriously, just say no. It's not like they're selling food or something that you really need. If you are retarded enough to use Facebook then you only have yourself to blame.
and how? (Score:2)
How do you serve Meta with the lawsuit?
Re:and how? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, pretty much this. Kind of weird to even think it would be hard.
Filing against rando in off grid house in Idaho is kind of hard, tracking down one of the largest companies in the world is pretty straight forward.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
States also allow you to do service by mail.
Recommend using Certified or Registered Mail to get proof of delivery.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
States also allow you to do service by mail.
Recommend using Certified or Registered Mail to get proof of delivery.
That's REQUIRED when Serving by Mail.
Also, if you filing in U.S. Federal Court, you have 120 Days after Filing in Court to actually "Complete Service".
Re: (Score:2)
How do you serve Meta with the lawsuit?
Same way you Serve any Corporation. Serve their Registered Agent at the Address listed as Public Record in the State they are Incorporated, often Delaware.
If you can dig up their Corporate Counsel, you Serve them, too.
If they are Based Overseas, then you Serve at their U.S. Offices. In an abundance of caution, I'd try to serve them at their Main Offices, too.
Since "All have a Duty to Assist in Service", you can usually Serve nearly anyone High-Up in the Corporation (like any Board Member), and it will be co
Re: Get counterfeit currency now! (Score:2)
I get them also, "Segway bikes" for £59 was the first, I reported it as deceptive to Meta, which thought it was A-OK! I gave up after that..
Surprised that works... (Score:1)
Re:Surprised that works... (Score:5, Interesting)
That is the beauty of small claims courts. Costs almost nothing to use - easy to serve a large company as they must list where to serve in their incorporation, and if they don't show up you get a default judgement that you can use to take money directly out of their accounts. So they show up with lawyers at hundreds of dollars an hour - costing them more than what you are asking for. Simpler for the company to simply give you what you should have gotten and settle out of court.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I got charged a fee on my electric bill that I should not have been. I looked into small claims court. Depending on where you live, they can make you pay the legal fees for the other party if you lose. I could just see having to pay 5000.00 dollars for a bunch of lawyers they had on retainer if I lost. I had three people, including a supervisor, at the the company that actually did the work at my house say that I shouldn't have been charged the fee (because the people I pay my bill to is not the same compan
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
some states have a Public Utility Commission that have teeth. use your state’s PUC instead of small claims if possible.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Small claims generally means you're in the same state, at least, as the other side, and generally in the same court district. And generally, there are mechanisms in place to make it easy to force payment.
In California, for instance, once they're past the deadline to pay the judgment, you file paperwork with the county Marshall's office, naming specific items to be seized and auctioned off to satisfy the judgement (and the cost of collecting it), like office equipment or company cars. There have been multi-b
Re: (Score:2)
The ability to collect on a judgement is pretty remarkable when you see it in action. There is no aspect of your life truly immune.
Bottom line is to pay what you owe (or exercise your rights) before you find out.
Old tactic, new company (Score:5, Interesting)
30 years ago my bank merged with another. Car loan was with the bank. I mailed in the car payment - they cashed the check, no problem I thought. They came back and said - we didn't get the payment. Went to the branch and gave them the next payment by check. Same outcome. I soon received a letter saying they were going to repossess my car. Got the copies of the check and the bank records showing that they sent it to the location that processed loans, and they stamped it endorsed. They still didn't credit my loan.
Off to small claims court I went. About a week before the case was to be heard, the branch manager calls me to ask what is up. Give him the story and he got back to me with a credited loan, and a few hundred dollars to cover fees and time spent. What a waste of effort on both sides
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
This is just escalation. Companies don't want to be bothered by customer support, and the only way for them to give a shit is to haul them into court. I'm sure that the bank will be demanding all loan signers go through their own arbitrator, but at least for now, a small claims lawsuit will get some action done when everything else is ignored.
Want to know what created the Karen archetype? Businesses fucking customers on the CS side, where only the loudest, most assholish people were the ones that got any
Re: (Score:2)
My mom's bank is very helpful in this regard. The local branch that is. Because the managers there will get on the phone with the corporat office and which point they have to go through all the headaches that mere customers have to go through... I see this other places too, like the AT&T reseller that has to wait on hold to talk to AT&T service
Overall the modern approach to customer service is to just not bother with customer service.
Re:Old tactic, new company (Score:5, Interesting)
I told them that because they were rude and lying I wanted my money. I told them I was closing my account and they needed to give me my balance in cash or cashier's check and they should close my account immediately. They refused and said they didn't have to because my stated reason was "Because it's my money and not yours" on the account closure form. I immediately called the police and reported the incident and asked for an officer to stop by. It took the cops a couple of hours but they called me and met me at the bank. I told them the bank has my money and I want my money. If they won't give it to me I plan to press as many charges as humanly possible. The cop goes in with me and I gave them my ID, and a copy of my last statement, then asked to close the account. The same clerk/bitch didn't outright refuse but went and got the same manager I'd just argued with. That manager immediately wrote me a cashier's check and closed the account without saying much of anything. Then I completed the police report, walked across the street (literally) and started a new account with a new bank. Been with the new bank ever since.
Re: Old tactic, new company (Score:2)
Tell me you pressed charges and whether they were found guilty!
Re: Old tactic, new company (Score:5, Insightful)
There's no such thing as pressing charges. A prosecutor would have to choose to pursue the case, and there was essentially no crime committed. The cop defused the situation the way they do many times a day.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Fuck the government and their efforts to "keep us safe" (a phrase that sets off red-alert bells esp since CV1984). I'd rather deal with the gangsters and abus
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Friend of mine, who worked as an IT contractor, took a check from a customer to a branch of the bank it was written on. They refused to cash it because it was drawn on a different branch and he didn't have an account with them.
He expressed the opinion that they must be in pretty bad shape if they don't trust their own branches and have no way to verify funds. Loudly. Repeatedly. By the time a manager came running up to give him his cash, he's seen several potential customers get up from the load department
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Several years back I had an account with this one bank, since gone out of business. I had two jobs, one day job that paid shit but gave me benefits, then my consultancy, that paid more, was more sporadic, but no benefits.
One day, after work, I got a call from one of my wealthier clients and because of that call I spent most of the weekend with her, and got a ginormous (for me, at that time) chunk of CASH for my services, plus another chunk as an 'appreciation' My paycheck came in thursday, s
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know how many officers you know, but nobody likes banks. A chance to say fuck you to a bank is a choice anyone would make.
I believe it, Meta quality is non existent (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
They did you a favour.
Re: (Score:3)
"Subscribe to unlock this article"
Oh, no! Anyway...
Re: (Score:1)
Slashdot effect (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
I am seriously thinking about suing them for allowing scam ads to run rampant and then invariably reply to ALL reports with "We’ve taken a look and found that this ad doesn’t go against our Advertising Standards."
The EU is looking into this, and several EU countries have implemented a way to report those ads directly to local authorities.
Re: (Score:2)
An effective response would be to stop using Facebook/Meta. If you don't see the ads in the first place then they have no business model.
If enough people did the same they'd change. (And I'm not hypocrite: I had a Facebook account but closed it completely several years ago. It's possible to live without it.)
Re: (Score:2)
As I have stated elsewhere, there are (way too) many groups, forums and communities which moved to Facebook Groups. As of now, there is a duopoly: Reddit and Facebook. Discord is trying, but it's simply not designed for proper information structuring.
If I ditch Facebook, I ditch a plethora of information and people I can connect to, who share my (also way too) many hobbies.
It's the only thing that keeps me on Facebo(r)k.
A couple billion users, zero support staff (Score:1)
Solution (Score:2)
Folks could make Facebook the next MySpace.
Re: (Score:2)
Many communities and forums moved to Facebook, alternatives are either shit or don't exist.
Amazon is next in the new with this (Score:1)
My 81-year-o father was banned on account creation (Score:3)
I'd told him about a couple of local organizations that (unfortunately) post some notifications just on FB (or possibly also X, but that's worse IMHO). So he tried to create an account... and for some reason was banned immediately. He never tried to post or anything. No idea what he could have done that would have triggered that, but no method to appeal either apparently.
Re: (Score:2)
This also happened to my friend. My conjecture: Meta automatically created a "digital profile" of your father based on his email address, phone number, full name, birth date, residence, and other relevant information that all combined would likely identify him. This means that Meta may have permanently banned your father's (and my friend's) overall identity from its servers, which is, of course, very troubling. So here's my advice to your father and everyone else:
My friend got around this by creating an acc
Re: (Score:2)
Also, don't use the same IP address!
Re: (Score:2)
Was that in 2016 or 2020? It was quite funny to see Meta trying to deal with the endless spam accounts peddling election bullshit, by laying waste to their entire platform banning many legit accounts in the process.
They still have a spam problem now. The platform (and the company running it) are a shitshow.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it was last month!
Facebook is in a death spiral (Score:3)
I have a community page on facebook I use to announce new versions as I release them, live coding sessions, new plugin releases, etc.
I recently released a major version representing over 8 months of work. I wrote a long blog post about the new/enhanced features and posted a one paragraph announcement on my community's facebook page along with a link to the blog on my own website.
Facebook instantly deleted the post, classifying it as "spam" with no recourse to object. How can I be spamming my own page?! The linked blog post was all original text and imagery I created specifically for the new release.
I ended up posting the announcement with no links and told my followers to move to Zoom Player's reddit community instead.
Re: (Score:1)
Personal Experience (Score:2)
Cost of doing business (Score:2)
Reminds me of a Far Side cartoon... The chickens are restless.
Meanwhile, I'm going to bet Meta's real customers--the advertisers--experience great service if they have a problem.
Meta has customer service? (Score:2)
Facebook Business is a minefield (Score:1)
Having a Facebook Business account trying to support communication with customers on Facebook is the most rediculous show of non-existing security.
Not only is Meta not able to filter out messages from scammers claiming to be meta representatives and using meta logos in their accounts, obvious scammer keywords doesn't trigger any filtering either.
As a result every business owner using Metas platform must every day carefully NOT click endless amounts of phishing and other scam links.
Maybe if they solved this
Tricks for Australians (Score:2)
You get what you pay for. (Score:2)
You get the support you pay for with Meta.
Oh, wait... not paying them? Then you don't get support.
Advertise? Get support
Pay for verification? Get support
Build meta tools? Get support.
Use the service as a free user, get free support through self service