EU Competition Commissioner Says Apple's Decision To Pull AI From EU Shows Anticompetitive Behavior (euractiv.com) 149
Apple's decision not to launch its own AI features in the EU is a "stunning declaration" of its anticompetitive behavior, European Commission Vice-President Margrethe Vestager said. From a report: About two weeks ago, Apple announced it will not launch its homegrown AI features in the EU, saying that interoperability required by the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) could hurt user privacy and security. A few days later, the Commission accused Apple's App Store of DMA breaches. Apple's move to roll back its AI plans in Europe is the most "stunning, open declaration that they know 100% that this is another way of disabling competition where they have a stronghold already," Vestager, the Commission's vice president for a Europe fit for the digital age and Commissioner for Competition, told a Forum Europa event.
The "short version of the DMA [Digital Markets Act]" is that to operate in Europe, companies have to be open for competition, said Vestager. The DMA foresees fines of up to 10% of annual revenue, which in Apple's case could be over $32.2 billion, based on its previous financial performance. For repeated infringements, that percentage could double.
The "short version of the DMA [Digital Markets Act]" is that to operate in Europe, companies have to be open for competition, said Vestager. The DMA foresees fines of up to 10% of annual revenue, which in Apple's case could be over $32.2 billion, based on its previous financial performance. For repeated infringements, that percentage could double.
Stunning (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
They will only face a fine of that magnitude, or any fine at all, if they break the law.
Re:Stunning (Score:4, Insightful)
They will only face a fine of that magnitude, or any fine at all, if they break the law.
The EU enjoys treating US big tech (for whom I have zero sympathy,) as a big piñata full of money. Apple understands that they will be found guilty regardless of what they do or don't do. Case in point: they're intent is to not "compete" at all by forgoing the EU market: yet that is somehow "anti-competitive."
If it were left the the EU, the Internet wouldn't exist. The place is fundamentally incompatible with an open network.
Re: (Score:2)
The EU expects platforms to be open to competing AI systems, just like on Android you have a choice of which assistant app you want to use.
Apple has decided to simply not enable the APIs for it on European devices, because they don't want to open them up. The EU isn't dumb, it can see that Apple is doing it to prevent other companies that are well ahead of them getting a foothold on the market.
Re:Let me get this straight. (Score:5, Insightful)
No, not the reason. Apple is pulling out because they don't want to comply with the law that forbids anti-competitive behavior. Ie, the law requires interoperability, and Apple does not want that. This is not a money extraction from the EU, instead, unlike the USA, EU wants competition, and EU wants corporations to serve the public instead of vice versa.
Re: (Score:2)
No, not the reason. Apple is pulling out because they don't want to comply with the law that forbids anti-competitive behavior. Ie, the law requires interoperability, and Apple does not want that. This is not a money extraction from the EU, instead, unlike the USA, EU wants competition, and EU wants corporations to serve the public instead of vice versa.
By your logic, if I choose not to drive my car cause I don't want to comply with traffic laws, I should be fined. Yeah, that makes sense!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, corporations serve whoever their corporate charter says they will serve.Originally corporate charters were hard to acquire and did often involve serving the public in some way, often a profitable way. Today there are for profit public corporations that serve their shareholders, there are also non-profit corporations that serve others, sole ownership corporations whose purpose is saving on taxes and other types of corporation.
First paragraph from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
You can't force them to compete in the EU.
Re: (Score:3)
EU violates freedom of contract. This is socialism. Freedom of contract is a fundamental basic human right. It is freedom of contract who lets you pick your friends, partner and work.
"Complying with the law" is an invalid argument, for several EXTREMELY strong reasons, all the way back to Hume's law but also the fourth Nuremberg principle.
Companies have no moral obligation to serve "the public", whatever that is (DMA is not serving me and I am part ot the EU "public").
Re: (Score:2)
EU is acting like Apple has a fucking monopoly on the cell phone business over there
Yes, and rather appropriately, Apple is acting like complying with all their idiotic regulations might be too much trouble. Sounds to me like it is too much trouble. Let's see how the EU acts when Apple simply leaves and they can have Android or suck a lemon. Did Symbian ever get LTE support? Maybe they can switch to that? Oh, oh, I'll be so jealous if they adopt PalmOS or BB10.
Re: (Score:2)
Android, open source and customizable/ rebrandable
Android Vendors: Samsung, Moterolla/google, HTC, LG, oneplus, Xiaomi, Huawei, Asus, Sony
Consensus: plenty of competition
Opinion: Fuck Apple
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Again...you HAVE CHOICES...if you don't like Apple iPhone...get an Android from various other brands.
Re: Let me get this straight. (Score:2)
No matter who you are, if you deal with apple, you're going to get roofied. Most apple fans love that, so they keep coming back for more.
Personally I think not getting roofied by Apple Intelligence Ultra Pro Max Plus Ultimate is a good thing, so I don't know why the EU is getting their knickers in a twist over it. Unless they actually WANT to get roofied, which is fine if so, but if you're accusing somebody of a crime because they won't roofie you, then you've got some serious issues.
Re: (Score:2)
And all that is fine, b
Re: (Score:2)
The EU enjoys treating US big tech (for whom I have zero sympathy,) as a big piñata full of money. Apple understands that they will be found guilty regardless of what they do or don't do. Case in point: they're intent is to not "compete" at all by forgoing the EU market: yet that is somehow "anti-competitive."
how does "interoperability" compromise "integrity"? this is bullshit by definition just to weasel out from a situation where they knew they were on the hook, probably to gain time to make the product they said was compliant ... you know, actually compliant.
Not trying to defend Apple at all here, I couldn't care less about them but If you don't know that yet, maybe you should document yourself a little, it seems obvious to me at least.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/... [csis.org]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... [nih.gov]
There are many other fine papers out there, just do a simple search for them. It's a well recognized concept and it must be why Apple used that argument.
Re: (Score:2)
your first link is bullshit, besides completely unrelated to this case.
the second link must be wrong, because it points to a paywalled medical archive.
since you are so ilustrated, care to "educate" humble and poor me in simple words (and preferably without bullshit) on exactly how "interoperability" inevitably compromises "integrity of user privacy and security"? i'm all ears ...
Re: (Score:2)
your first link is bullshit, besides completely unrelated to this case.
the second link must be wrong, because it points to a paywalled medical archive.
since you are so ilustrated, care to "educate" humble and poor me in simple words (and preferably without bullshit) on exactly how "interoperability" inevitably compromises "integrity of user privacy and security"? i'm all ears ...
Here is the simplest example I can give you; I have seen systems that don't interoperate with any other systems at all and have no connectivity at all to other systems in order to guarantee their integrity. The more you interoperate with other systems, the more you put the integrity of the system at risk.
I don't get what is so hard to understand...
Re: (Score:2)
thanks. that's still bullshit. life has risks and people deal with them. apple deals systematically with a lot of risk because it suits them. but they won't add another endpoint or whatever because that would break ... what? their whole monopolistic approach? because it would be a huge risk to the children? come on ....
i mean, if that really were true they shouldn't be able to operate anywhere, not only in europe, for sheer incompetence.
https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
It may not be "inevitable" but it's definitely a security risk that would otherwise not exist.
A very simple example would be allowing a login
that does illustrate the point, but it doesn't dispell it as a bad and sorry excuse. any service provided has requirements and an attack surface, and every provider is expected to comply with the former and deal with the latter ... like everyone else. if the point is that apple can't comply with the requirement of not hampering competition without endangering users privacy and security (like everyone else does) then they're just making fun of themselves because it means they're not fit to provide the servi
Re: (Score:2)
> how does "interoperability" compromise "integrity"?
I think the disaster that is RCS demonstrates precisely how.
Apple's implementation is generally usable, and no one does.
Google's implementation is (was?) bug-ridden and they don't even turn it on (didn't?) by default.
Microsoft supports it only on Samsung devices.
The EU has fixed the world, yay!
Re: (Score:2)
this interoperability https://ec.europa.eu/commissio... [europa.eu] has nothing to do with rcs. it has everything to do with anticompetitive behavior vs developers and users. try again.
Re: (Score:2)
if they want to pull out of the eu for good then godspeed and good riddance!
Yeah, who needs all that consumer choice! Just lock them into a Chinese version of Android and be done with it, eh?
Re: (Score:2)
so apple should be allowed to continue their anticompetitive bullshit all over the world or else the big ramen monster from evil china will devour us all.
okay, sir. just sit down, breathe a bit, relax, that's right ... all is going to be fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Compromised privacy (Score:2)
Base solely on how Apple has advertised its "Apple Intelligence" feature set, and what I got from skimming the summary here, I think it might work like this:
Applie Intelligence trains itself from data on your phone. It reads what you type, looks at your pictures, etc. It gets really up close and snugly with everything you put on that phone. It does this so it can do things for you, acting like a personal assistant who actually knows your preferences, habits, etc., to try to save you time and make your li
Re: (Score:2)
no that's quite informative, and i agree with your diagnostic. although imo the dma is really the same for "apple intelligence" than for "apple stock email client", the volume of personal information makes no fundamental difference, these are just services that apple provides, has to allow other developers to provide too, and has to allow users to choose. the users grant data access and this exonerates apple from any liability (despite the "we handle your privacy" placebo). simple.
unless they do not want to
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They will only face a fine of that magnitude, or any fine at all, if they break the law.
Or leave. This is a big win for the EU. Let others see what Apple did, and remove their offending products from the EU.
Next up, since the EU has declared Microsoft's bundling of Teams with the OS as somehow anticompetitive and wants money, Microsoft could follow Apple's lead and make Teams use in the EU unallowable.
I catch a lot of crap for my disdain for the extortion model the EU has been using, demanding billions of dollars for inconsequential things like what comes bundled with the OS. Just because
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
There's the door, don't let it hit your ass on the way out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, let's let all those alternative phone operating systems designed in the creative depths of the European Union have a better chance. Oh... wait...
As well, the fact that the software produced in teh EU is the best that has ever..... oh hell, I can't even finish that. ;^)
Re: (Score:2)
Or leave. This is a big win for the EU. Let others see what Apple did, and remove their offending products from the EU.
Exactly why are EU and others complaining still? They should simply say "good riddance". Some always complain whatever you do.
Re: (Score:2)
Or leave. This is a big win for the EU. Let others see what Apple did, and remove their offending products from the EU.
Exactly why are EU and others complaining still? They should simply say "good riddance". Some always complain whatever you do.
Mostly because they want the money. They found the limits - at least for Apple. The business of extortion - and that is exactly what this is - does tend to find a line in the sand where the person or group decides "no more".
In Europe, in addition to the extortion culture, they also largely believe that there should not be profits - that profit is obscene. You can see that in the apologists posting here.
Re: (Score:2)
They should simply say "good riddance".
Total mystery, eh? Maybe it's because the EU has a hard time keeping software businesses? Remind me again of all the modern phone operating systems designed and released in the EU? Nokia is long dead, guys, you need an alternative plan before you saw off the branch your standing on.
Maybe it's time for the EU to put on their big boy pants and actually compete, instead of standing at the finish line, picking the winners, and demanding tribute.
Fat bloody chance. They've managed to breed the competitive drive out of themselves, and act like it makes them superior.
Re: (Score:2)
They've managed to breed the competitive drive out of themselves, and act like it makes them superior.
Ouch. That has the ring of truth to it! Brace for -1 Troll rating incoming.
So far so good! Maybe it's getting through to some people? The Apple issue is one thing, but now that Teams for free might be removed, it seems like the continued extortion is going to harm their citizens, not "protect" them.
Re: Stunning (Score:2, Insightful)
The law was crafted specifically to extract money out of big American tech companies. It might as well be a tariff.
Re: Stunning (Score:2)
As I have said before here, time for Congress to retaliate. Maybe 10x the annual global revenue of all EU-based companies making over $100 billion. (Hmm are there any?). In that case maybe 10x the annual revenue across EU companies in all parallel universes as well.
Re: (Score:2)
They break the law by existing. The EU is out to get any and every successful US company. And I say that despite my intense dislike of Apple.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Not really, they would still have to pay the fine. If they tried to remove all their assets from Europe to avoid it, they would be prevented from doing so. Assets frozen and seized.
Re: (Score:2)
That's only applicable if you're actually fined. Apple has not been fined $32 billion dollars. That's the theoretical max fine (per year) if they were to violate the DMA. Hence, the desire to avoid risking violating the DMA.
Re: (Score:2)
So the suggestion is to pull out of Europe, responsible for 25% of global revenue, in case they decide to ignore legal advice and piss off the EU so much that they get the maximum fine possible?
Seems like a better business plan would be to simply comply with the rules.
Pulling out would probably cost them more anyway. As well as the lost revenue, they will have big employment liabilities, fixed term rental contracts, on-going warranty liabilities etc. Because Apple is both a manufacturer and a vendor, they a
Re: (Score:2)
They're (Apple) not pulling out of the EU. They are simply not going to offer AI services in the EU in their current proposed model. This is likely only a temporary stop gap measure until they can find a way that doesn't run afoul of the Digital Markets Act.
Re: (Score:2)
If they do pull their AI, would anything of value be really lost? I doubt it would be.
Re: (Score:2)
> If they do pull their AI, would anything of value be really lost? I doubt it would be.
Considering it doesn't really even exist yet, the answer is an obvious "no".
Of course, the EU could sue them for announcing a product and then not shipping it.
Re: (Score:2)
The current value of AI is business automation like processing emails and analyzing financial PDFs. There's some very minor value in being able to turn on and off your lights with voice but Apple isn't doing any of that as far as I know. Maybe the voice activated light stuff with siri. Siri helps sell iphones but "modern" AI is just as good at that as classic siri.
Re: (Score:2)
If Siri is anything to judge their capabilities by then my answer would be no. But it shouldn't be difficult to create a competitive system allowing for competition to decide which the consumer chooses. I wouldn't hold my breath though. I'd still like to be able to use a real browser on my iPad/iPhone instead an intentionally hobbled safari.
EU != Europe (Score:2)
The EU only makes up 7% of Apple’s revenue, so not worth risking a 10% fine for.
Re: EU != Europe (Score:2)
I've got no love for apple, but that's the real issue isn't it. The EU made the fine so ludicrously high, and have shown themselves to be so hard to work with in a regulatory sense, in might actually be cheaper to just... leave.
Setting those fines based on global revenue was obviously meant as a way to extract far more money than could be gained by only fining based on EU revenue alone, but it may very well be a bridge too far. If I were a leader at a big tech company I'd be seriously questioning if we shou
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Apple may not have been thinking of pulling out of the EU, because they generate a decent amount of revenue there. But if this is true, and they face a $32 billion dollar fine (which I believe would be the largest ever) then suddenly pulling out of the EU makes economic sense.
And will achieve the EU objective of protection of its citizens who have loudly complained about everything Apple. The EU should turn this day into a national holiday, having turned the Visigoths away at the gates.
Re: (Score:2)
Does it make more sense than not violating EU law, and getting to stay there and make money without being fined?
The problem is that when you are being extorted, it does not stop. 32 Billion - even the great satan Apple doesn't have infinitely deep pockets.
Or Microsoft - for those who hate all things Apple, Microsoft is going to be extorted for bundling Teams with their OS.
There is a fundamental difference between the US and Europe. We tend to look at things like Apple's AI model and Microsoft Teams as software. If Teams comes with the OS - fine. It doesn't mean we have to use it. My groups all use Zoom. I use the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm wondering when they try to fine Linux or *BSD for some of the idiotic ideas they come up with. Maybe they can get all the open source operating systems banned and then when Apple and M$ pull out after too many fines they can all run QNX or something. You could probably compute EU taxes with an Abacus, too. Sounds like maybe they will FAFO.
I suspect. Can you imagine the surprised Pikachu face when they can no longer extort Apple, and I suspect Microsoft will start pulling back soon with looking at being fined for including Teams for free in their OS.
Linux will find themselves on the radar soon - perhaps fining all users of the OS. Sounds crazy, but it is crazy. Even if not the users, the servers might be able to extort money from.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I've wondered when they'll issue a "server tax", IPv4 usage tax, or OS tax (especially one that could make free software illegal).
A most interesting thing also is the surprising lack of the apologists rationalizing how this is the best thing ever. Every other time that the EU has attempted to eliminate competition in the name of preserving competition, they are out in full force in support. A bit quieter this time.
From the EU's spittle flecked rage over iTunes (in support of their EU product Spotify, now this Apple AI business, and don't forget, it is Bad! to provide Microsoft Teams with a Microsoft OS.
So 100 percent agree, as
Re: (Score:2)
I'm wondering when they try to fine Linux
Then let me put you at ease: they will never try to fine Linux, because Linux is not a company and is not selling stuff inside the EU. However, they might sue the likes of Red Hat (IBM) or Canonical when they break the law.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Stunning (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple management is saying they don't believe they can adhere to the law without increasing security and privacy concerns for their users.
I don't know if that's true but that's the basis for their decision.
It's laughably untrue, but it is no surprise that the kind of company that attempts malicious compliance at every single turn would lie and whine "but it hurts the users" to try to weasel out of complying with the law.
Re: (Score:3)
Shrug, so what's the problem with them simply not providing the questionable feature in the EU?
Because they're still paying full price for the phones, but getting a subpar experience, all because Apple is being spiteful?
Re: (Score:3)
Does it make more sense than not violating EU law, and getting to stay there and make money without being fined?
Yes, of course it does. You say "not violate EU law" as if there was any possible way to do that.
What exact actions do you think Apple can take that will not break EU law?
Simple:
Re: Stunning (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The law is vague and the EU will only tell you if you have breached it after you have ship the product.
How would you comply with a law which says don’t do things I don’t like and I will only tell you I don’t like them after you have done it?
Re: (Score:2)
That's not true, companies affected by the DMA can discuss their plans with the regulator if they want to. The laws are clear and use well established legal principles, so any decent corporate lawyer should be able to warn Apple about these issues before it runs into them.
It just seems strange and mysterious to Americans because the concept of not shafting the consumer as hard as you possibly can to extract every single cent is so alien.
I guess Apple is finally going to understand (Score:5, Insightful)
The EU is a train currently at full steam, and Apple is standing on its rails expecting it can stop it with malicious compliance tactics. They will soon understand this does not work with the EU.
You see, Eurepean courts don't just use a literal interpretation of the law, contracts, etc. They also interpret how the actions were reasonable. In Apple's case, they were entirely unreasonable. Apple is going to get the EU train rammed through its anus in a very unpleasant way.
And before people say "Oh, if Apple doesn't like the fine, it'll just leave the EU", I wonder what Apple's shareholders are going to think of that. Apple is not going to just dump one of the three markets where it does most of its business.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is the EU going to find Apple for *not* bringing products to market?
That is what the OP and others have suggested. As if Apple is completely toothless and cannot choose to release government-crippled products in the EU. They can people, and they are already doing this. The question is how butthurt will the courts be that they simply bowed out of their game. The OP seems to think the answer is "very butthurt and vindictive". Big surprise as we are talking about EU courts. The funny thing about courts is that when the defendant has deep pockets, they can keep playing legal ga
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe I misunderstand what just happened here. But it seems that Apple did exactly that. They decided that the EU's marketplace rules are such that they don't want to launch their AI product there. Is the EU going to find Apple for *not* bringing products to market?
AI is not a product. It's a product feature. They're arbitrarily turning off features, penalizing European purchasers, in retaliation for being forced to comply with local laws. There is no obvious connection between AI features on the device and third-party app stores, except perhaps if some of the work is not truly being done on-device, in which case using those APIs from third-party app store apps could cost Apple money. But if that is the case, then nothing prevents Apple from requiring apps to pay
Re: (Score:2)
Or they could argue that they are removing features which do not comply with EU laws.
Here is an example of something that is legal in one country and not in another. In the UK, it is completely legal for your GPS navigation to tell you where any speed cameras are, while it is certainly illegal in France. Thereofore, (I imagine) Google does not include cameras in French maps. I also doubt the French government could object to Google removing features for French users.
Re: (Score:3)
Or they could argue that they are removing features which do not comply with EU laws.
Unless I'm missing something *huge*, the only way the AI features can realistically not comply with EU laws would be if they refused to allow other companies to use third-party AI tech, but that's clearly not the case, because other companies are already using third-party AI tech and have been for a long time.
Now the screen sharing/mirroring feature arguably could be problematic, but only if Apple is refusing to provide APIs for arbitrary companies to support screen sharing/mirroring, which I'm assuming is
Re: (Score:2)
On the AI front, Apple doesn't allow other apps to replace certain features that iOS offers. They can't, for example, replace voice prompt detection (hey Siri) or control certain features of the phone. At least not without rooting.
Punishment to Europeans (Score:2)
If anything, this a punishment to Europeans buying Apple iPhones.
How does a plan to not increase machine (and probably, human) stupidity ^H^H^H^H^H, sorry intelligence, sorry 'intelligence', stop other people increasing whatever, on their not-Apple phone?
Correction (Score:5, Interesting)
Seems as if Apple not allowing something in the EU that the EU considers anticompetitive would make the EU equally happy that whatever it is they are afraid of won't be available there. Why would anyone in the EU care that Apple simply decides not to pay the extortion, and removes it - is this not the same thing? Their citizens have been protected, and they should pat themselves on the back for stopping Apple at the borders.
Differential analysis - The EU is worried that this is the first shot in what a might be called alternative compliance to their extortionate model. Hopefully other companies will follow - we'll see how Microsoft responds to the EU claim that bundling teams with Windows is anticompetitive. Hopefully, Teams will be excluded to protect the good citizens of the EU, as the citizens of the EU demand.
Re: (Score:2)
There is zero reason to do business in the EU today. The entire EU is stagnating because of stuff like this. There is no innovation coming out, new businesses are practically nonexistent.
Really sad watching the EU become a Government version of Rambus that just sues everyone for money when the ideas run out.
Exactly. When you stand at the finish line, pick the winner, then extort them for "reasons", you stifle progress. They definitely do not create, they only demand to regulate.
Re: (Score:3)
There is zero reason to do business in the EU today.
Yeah. Who would want to do business with a market twice the size of the USA with mostly wealthy westerners. /s
Your comment is just a stunning display of stupidity. But I guess that's why you're posting on Slashdot rather than running a major multinational company.
The entire EU is stagnating because of stuff like this.
Stuff like what? Virtually all companies currently under investigation by the EU are also currently under investigation by the DOJ. What's left? Apple should just turn into a Chinese company based on your views?
Really sad watching the EU become a Government version of Rambus that just sues everyone for money when the ideas run out.
The laws are written. Your can choose
Re: Correction (Score:2)
Twice the size of the US? By what metric? The data I've seen puts the EU at 2/3 the GDP of the US, with significantly lower personal consumption spending. That isn't bad necessarily, the statistics would seem to indicate the productivity gap is mostly due to Europeans valuing leisure time and part time work higher than monetary gain, and a lot of the reason spending power is lower is money being funneled to infrastructure and welfare programs. But it does mean there's less free money floating around to buy
Nice! (Score:3)
Now, can the EU get tough with Google and Microsoft too please?
Re: (Score:2)
Now, can the EU get tough with Google and Microsoft too please?
At some point, the victims of extortion decide that it isn't worth paying the extortion.
You might be happy that Microsoft is under the gun now because they bundle Teams with the OS.
Pull out, and perhaps the EU can make Yandex their official partner - then try fining Vladimir.
Re: (Score:2)
Now, can the EU get tough with Google and Microsoft too please?
They literally are. This may shock you but there's more than one person in the EU and they do more than one thing at a time. Also Google has already been found guilty and had the largest fine ever levied against it.
Re: (Score:3)
Yay, what a win for their subjects!
Is IS a win: it creates a space where competition can happen and isn't stifled by the monopolies.
Re: (Score:2)
Is IS a win: it creates a space where competition can happen and isn't stifled by the monopolies.
I understand the theory, and intellectually agree with your point. However I don't see the results the European approach is supposed to foster. There are still no large cloud providers in Europe, and few large software companies. Even the largest ones are small compared to the American (or Chinese) giants. Moreover, those are established companies in specialized fields like SAP, Dassault or Accenture, none of which directly competes with Apple, Google or Microsoft.
So it doesn't appear to me that all the win
Is it anti-competitive? (Score:3)
Or is Apple just exercising it's right to do business where it pleases and according to the rules it wishes to abide by?
BTW, I'm not an Apple fan.
Re: (Score:2)
It is both. Just because you decide to not launch something in a market doesn't make it less anti-competitive - especially when you cite the competition requirements as a reason for not launching.
Vertical Integration (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
if I were Apple I would turn off iCloud, their App Store, and anything else which could be considered vertical integration, then append the EU warranty terms that any leaks, loss, or damage caused by 3rd party software is entirely OOW damage.
One of the many reasons you aren't Apple is that you don't seem to understand that there are laws about what warranty terms you may offer, how you amend contracts, or indeed whether your devices must be fit for advertised purpose in the EU.
What interoperability with Apple? (Score:2)
Serious question:
What interoperability is the EU talking about? Interoperability with Apple AI or other AI products interoperability with Apple ecosystem?
Re: (Score:2)
So companies are blackmailing countries now (Score:2)
So wait.. (Score:3, Insightful)
If so, that's some 1984 level doubleplusgood speak there.
Re:So wait.. (Score:4, Interesting)
No. The EU asked for interoperability, and Apple decided their new AI features violate that interoperability rule, so they aren't releasing their AI features at this time in Europe. The fine would be if they DID release the features and were found to be not interoperable.
Despite what half the folks here seem to be claiming, the EU is not "mad" that Apple is not releasing these features. They are, with a grin, pointing out that Apple's actions are malicious compliance that clearly tells everyone that their new AI stuff is anti-competitive by design. The EU long ago decided that the biggest tech companies are very anti-competitive and have an unfair advantage in the marketplace, and have chosen interoperability as something they will use to fight this ongoing stagnation of business practices via vendor lock-in.
And hey, look, it's started working.
Re: (Score:3)
No, the EU is saying that Apple's decision not to release in the EU is an admission by Apple that their product is anticompetitive
How is this anti competitive. (Score:2)
It's a trap! (Score:2)
EU: You're implementing features in ways that we don't like! If you don't do it our way, we'll fine you for being anti-competitive!
Apple: Got it. In that case, we won't be implementing our latest whiz-bang features in the EU. Other companies can just fill the void by competing against each other in that market, and we won't interfere.
EU: Your decision to not implement your version of those features in the EU is proof that you're anti-competitive! We're going to fine you!
Apple: (eyes bulging in exasperation.
EU just dodged a bullet. (Score:2)
WTF? (Score:2)
Apple: "We have chosen not to offer product X in the EU"
EU: That's anticompetive!
WTF? How is not competing anticompetitive behavior. I guess they're going by the literal definition "anticompetitive = not competing"?
Anticompetitive for NOT offering a product? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL! I paid 100$ for my iphone and I am on a 15$/month plan. Not that I use it much although, no apps installed and everything like bluetooth, wifi, data, gps, siri etc. disabled and only enabled when I use it. I don't do anything on cell phones, don't matter if Apple, Android or what not. I have a voip number redirected to the cell and go through my pbx to place a call from the iphone so voip number is shown as callerID,
I understand very well it wouldn't fit most people use case although :)
Re:oh heck yeah (Score:4)
This is incorrect. There was no app store on the original iPhone. Steve Jobs fought against the app store idea until they showed him the revenue and lock in it generated.
Re: (Score:2)
Almost all apps on any phone OS are a security threat anyway /s
Just provide a responsive web interface which adapts to the phone displays, bootstrap isn't bad.
Re: (Score:2)
First of all, the parent poster did not suggest that there was an app store on the first iPhone.
Secondly, Apple has never allowed sideloading generally - on any version of the iPhone. Thei pitch, since they allowed users to download and install their apps, was that those apps would be from their app store.