Arm To Cancel Qualcomm's Chip Design License As Tech Feud Deepens

Arm has moved to cancel Qualcomm's architectural license agreement, escalating a legal battle that threatens to upend the global smartphone and PC chip markets. The British chip designer issued Qualcomm a 60-day termination notice for the license that allows the U.S. chipmaker to design custom processors using Arm's intellectual property. The cancellation could force Qualcomm to halt sales of products that generate much of its $39 billion annual revenue, Bloomberg reports.

The dispute stems from Qualcomm's $1.4 billion acquisition of chip startup Nuvia in 2021. Arm claims Qualcomm breached contract terms by using Nuvia's designs without permission, while Qualcomm maintains its existing agreement covers the acquired technology. The companies are set for a December trial to resolve Arm's 2022 breach-of-contract lawsuit and Qualcomm's countersuit. Arm is demanding Qualcomm destroy Nuvia designs created before the acquisition.

This seems like a really bad idea

[rsilvergun]

Depending on how the election goes here in America you're going to see some major antitrust law enforcement and this sets off so many red flags I don't know where to even begin.

There's already a lot of attention on market consolidation because the hurricane hit a single factory that made IV fluid and it turns out 70% of all the IV fluid in the country comes out of that one factory. Never mind the massive baby formula shortages we had several months back because again market consolidation meant a single factory shutting down completely crushed the supply.

And at this point we have more than an update to prove that inflation we've been facing is just price gouging by monopolies.

I'm saying people have noticed the effects of market consolidation and antitrust violations. This is likely to bring a hammer down in a lot of ways. Again assuming the election goes the right way. We all remember when the Microsoft antitrust law case was dropped by the Justice department immediately following an election

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

What evidence do you have that inflation is caused by price gouging (as if companies only just figured out they can raise prices in 2021) and not from trillions of trash dollars getting printed up and dumped into the near zero interest rate economy?

I'll wait.

Re:

[rsilvergun]

https://fortune.com/2024/01/20... [fortune.com]

Search for "greedflation" and you'll find plenty of good articles with studies to back them up.

It's no coincidence that right around the time Joe Biden started talking about anti-trust law enforcement inflation got under control. If he had more political capital he could've done it sooner. But he was busy trying to keep the Twitter Faction in the House of Reps from crashing the economy with a pointless government shutdown. Which to Joe's credit he did.

Re:

[DarkOx]

STFU - Harris is the most bought and paid for sack of crap ever to run for office. She isn't going let Trust busters do jack or shit.

https://capstonedc.com/insight... [capstonedc.com]

but hey the only way to make a Democratic candidate look good is to aggressively lie and misdirect about their intentions. I get it; gaslighiting everyone all the time must be a real challenge.

Ya triggered bro?

[rsilvergun]

Nobody mentioned Harris but you.

Re:

[MachineShedFred]

You won't have to wait long. [bloomberg.com]

Under oath testimony from one of the nation's largest grocery chains admitting to price gouging above inflation, under oath, in a hearing where they're trying to buy one of the other largest grocery chains in the nation.

If you don't even believe them when they tell you what they're doing under penalty of perjury, then you just are un-anchored from reality.

Re:

[MachineShedFred]

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Qualcomm is famous for levering their customers into positions they don't want to be in through patents and malignant licensing terms. It's a damn shame that it's their turn to get bent over.

Go RISC-V Qualcomm!

[bartoku]

I would love to see Qualcomm get behind RISC-V and kill ARM.

Re:Go RISC-V Qualcomm!

[UnknowingFool]

If Qualcomm gets behind RISC-V do not expect their version to be widely adopted. Any RISC-V chip Qualcomm makes will be behind high licensing fees and an army of lawyers.

Re:

[AmiMoJo]

What do you mean "their version"? It's an open ABI, anyone can build a compatible chip without licencing fees. You mean their specific design? Obviously that will be proprietary, like most of the other RISC-V implementations out there.

There was an official Android kernel for RISC V, but Google discontinued it for now, saying they would come back to it later. It may well end up being one of the Chinese variants of Android for their domestic market that really sparks the boom in RISC V mobile devices. Compani

Re:

[UnknowingFool]

What do you mean "their version"? It's an open ABI, anyone can build a compatible chip without licencing fees. You mean their specific design? Obviously that will be proprietary, like most of the other RISC-V implementations out there.

1) Who says Qualcomm will build a compatible chip? 2) If Qualcomm builds a proprietary design that has high licensing fees, how will that help RISC-V adoption in general. It does not as no one else would work with their design.

Re:

[AmiMoJo]

Seems a bit pointless building an incompatible chip.

Re:

[UnknowingFool]

Some of the incompatibility will be for practical reasons as they customize RISC-V in ways that others will not. Some of the incompatibility is they want to distinguish their own chip as their entire business is to sell proprietary designs in ARM now. Why would anyone think that Qualcomm is interested in selling a chip that can be replaced with one of their competitors easily.

Re:

[AmiMoJo]

You mean like an ARM CPU? There are loads of people making those.

Re:

[bill_mcgonigle]

Wider adoption wouldn't really matter.

The community benefit would be more tooling in RISC-V and more eyeballs on the ISA.

ARM has been the go-to arch for a long time in embedded. My first ARM device was in the early 90's.

e.g. if the Raspberry Pi project were first started today it would be RISC-V based, not ARM.

ARM went from innovative to a drag on the industry sometime in the past few decades. Remember how hard MALI was to work with for no good reason except a lack of competition?

You can already buy a RPi

Re:

[gabebear]

RISC-V has an interesting design process... but I'd expect a LOT MORE of these types of lawsuits in a world where RISC-V devices were common.

If Qualcomm did switch whole-hog into RISC-V they would have the opportunity to completely define the way consumer RISC-V systems work since nobody has shipped any yet.

Re:

[UnknowingFool]

One of the major advantages that RISC-V is flexibility but that also might introduce incompatibility if companies go in different directions. Also being very new, RISC-V currently lacks comprehensive testing tools from what I know. Designing a chip is great but that involves each designer to build their own testing patterns and tools which adds to timelines.

Re:

[kwelch007]

RISC-V is not new.

Re:

[UnknowingFool]

Compared to 50 year old x86, 40 year old ARM, and 40 year old MIPS, RISC-V launched in 2014 is very new.

f*ck ARM

[migos]

Nuvia had architectural license. Qualcomm had architectural license. Qualcomm bought Nuvia and ARM wants to shake down. Qualcomm is their best chance of taking some windows PC market. Dumb move.

Re:f*ck ARM

[UnknowingFool]

Nuvia had architectural license.

Nuvia had a special architecture license which specifically stated any IP could not be transferred in the event of company sale. This was because as a startup Nuvia could not afford the true architecture license fees and paid way less. Qualcomm wants to ignore that part of the license.

Re:

[Ed Tice]

I don't know if your statement is true or not and have no way to confirm, but it's the most plausible thing I've heard for sure.

If this wasn't disclosed as part of the sale, the sellers of Nuvia should expect legal action from Qualcomm. If this was disclosed as part of the sale and Qualcomm didn't enter a three-way negotiation with ARM as part of the purchase, that's borderline negligent.

This story was originally a yawn but now you have me interested.

Re:

[gabebear]

We aren't allowed to actually read the contracts but Nuvia didn't have the same agreement with Arm that Qualcomm has/had. Nuvia's contract was specifically to develop server CPUs and Qualcomm/Nuvia agreed to destroy designs produced under it during the acquisition... Qualcomm obviously wasn't going to destroy that work and should have just renegotiated. Instead of negotiating the management at Qualcomm ignored the problem and it's now going to cost them way way more than if they had done it during the acqui

Re:

[paulpach]

To be clear, ARM does not really want to kill Nuvia designs. I would even imagine they are happy their ISA has a foot in the door in the windows PC market.
The threat of killing Nuvia designs is the same as North Korea's threat to use nukes. It is simply a scare tactic to force Qualcomm to pay additional licensing fees.

Re:

[UnknowingFool]

The threat of killing Nuvia designs is the same as North Korea's threat to use nukes. It is simply a scare tactic to force Qualcomm to pay additional licensing fees.

Or given the legal history Qualcomm has faced with Nokia, Apple, the EU, the FTC, etc, Qualcomm might not be angels when it comes to legal and contractual matters.

I remember when tech was about innovation

[MpVpRb]

Now, it seems to be all about social media and lawsuits

Re:I remember when tech was about innovation

[sid crimson]

Now, it seems to be all about social media and lawsuits

Your memories must be from before the days of SCO, circa 2002.

Re:

[iAmWaySmarterThanYou]

Or before Windows / OS2.

Re:

[rsilvergun]

To be fair there was a lot more cool stuff going on back then. It was when the major india outsourcing hadn't completely taken over the world, the 2008 market crash hadn't hit yet so we still had the housing bubble to blunt some of that mess and there were tons of cool new tech gadgets because the iPhone hadn't yet devoured them all yet and there were tons of amazing games because Fortnite & COD hadn't consolidated half the industry.

The theme of the last 20 years really has been market consolidation

Re:

[UnknowingFool]

Qualcomm has always been involved with legal disputes as far as I remember including actions from the EU and the FTC.

Is an instruction set even copyrightable?

[Blackman Tukey]

I am thinking if the Google v Oracle Supreme Court case, where it was found that the Java API was not copyrightable for Android. Why not just decide an ISA is an API?

Re:

[UnknowingFool]

This case does not involve copyright. This is a dispute about contracts and licensing. According to ARM, Nuvia's license with them had a provision that their technology could not be transferred even in the event of company sale. This was because Nuvia could not afford the full price of an architecture license. I imagine Qualcomm's argument is that their full architecture license includes everything that ARM has. We will see in court.

Re:

[stabiesoft]

Devil will be in the details. Qual probably has some super license and probably expected to be able to acquire companies with lessor licenses and supercede the lessor license with their own terms. The wording in qualcomm's license I am sure will be picked over ad nausium. The only real winners are going to be the lawyers billing at 2 grand an hour. Pity, all that capital could be put to innovation, but the west now prefers courthouse casino instead.