China Displays New Stealth Fighter in Race To Match US (msn.com) 103
China's air force showcased a suite of new armaments this week, including a new stealth fighter and an attack drone, demonstrating its advancing ability to challenge the U.S. military presence in the Asia Pacific. From a report: The public debut of the J-35A stealth fighter and other weapons systems at China's premier airshow, which started Tuesday, represent the centerpiece in the Chinese air force's celebrations of its 75th anniversary -- a milestone in Chinese leader Xi Jinping's sweeping campaign to modernize the People's Liberation Army.
A single J-35A soared over crowds of spectators in a brief flypast on the opening day of Airshow China in the southern city of Zhuhai, making a steep climb with afterburners before rolling away and streaking out of view, state television footage showed. Other new weapons -- including the "Jiu Tian" reconnaissance and attack drone and the HQ-19 anti-ballistic-missile system -- were also prominent in ground displays at the biennial airshow, as examples of the PLA's growing prowess in aerial warfare and air defense. Much remains unclear about these systems and their capabilities. Even so, Chinese officials and state media say the new armaments reflect the significant advances that Beijing has made in developing its air power and enhancing its ability to defend China's strategic interests.
A single J-35A soared over crowds of spectators in a brief flypast on the opening day of Airshow China in the southern city of Zhuhai, making a steep climb with afterburners before rolling away and streaking out of view, state television footage showed. Other new weapons -- including the "Jiu Tian" reconnaissance and attack drone and the HQ-19 anti-ballistic-missile system -- were also prominent in ground displays at the biennial airshow, as examples of the PLA's growing prowess in aerial warfare and air defense. Much remains unclear about these systems and their capabilities. Even so, Chinese officials and state media say the new armaments reflect the significant advances that Beijing has made in developing its air power and enhancing its ability to defend China's strategic interests.
Yeah, sure (Score:1, Troll)
Another Gen 4 fighter (see also the SU57 Faker, er, Felon) masquerading at Gen 5.
Re: (Score:3)
The whole thing is a scam.
Israel just ordered 25 F-15's for delivery in 2031.
Did they forget they're "obsolete" or do they like burning a pile of $4B?
Re:Yeah, sure (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
The old girl is still a heck of a mule once the air defenses are sufficiently reduced.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They've been using F-15s for a long time now and having pilots already familiar with them and the support logistics for keeping the planes maintained and combat ready is also important.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Yeah, sure (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anyways, Israel has both, and plans to buy more of both, so they clearly see relative advantages to each.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, for air to air, we're going to see a shift as people start realizing that it's going to be a rarity for aircraft to perform a traditional dogfight. Heck, if they get within visual range it's going to be strange.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
With the kind of anti-aircraft defense IDF is expecting to go up against, F-35 is a bit of overkill.
Re: (Score:2)
With the kind of anti-aircraft defense IDF is expecting to go up against, F-35 is a bit of overkill.
The Russian S-400 is in Syria. Iran is looking to buy it. Many countries in the Middle East have the Russian S-300
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
Spending $4 billion is easy when you're given literal fortunes.https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-war-us-military-spending-8e6e5033f7a1334bf6e35f86e7040e14
Re: (Score:1)
The whole thing is a scam.
Israel just ordered 25 F-15's for delivery in 2031.
Did they forget they're "obsolete" or do they like burning a pile of $4B?
As long as the US is paying for it via defense aid, would they really care?
Re: (Score:2)
F-22 and F-35 aren't meant to be value buys (in any terms other than internal), they're meant to deliver an absolute. Apples and oranges. Or like saying plate armor is a scam because chain mail is way easier to mass-produce.
Re: (Score:2)
F-22 and F-35 aren't meant to be value buys
And yet, the F-35 can be bought in the range of ~$100 million per unit. It's damn near impossible to get an apples to apples comparison (e.g., does the Israeli F-15 contract include a bunch of missiles, spare parts, maintenance, etc.), but the F-15 and F-35 aren't in fundamentally different price brackets.
Re: Yeah, sure (Score:2)
What are the running costs like? What about ground infrastructure - are they the same?
Re: (Score:2)
Fair points. But there's another side to the coin about parts, maintenance, familiarity, etc. The more rapid a fleet switches to F-35, the higher the overhead of training, industrial inertia, supply c
Re: (Score:2)
On an "almost" apples to apples comparison, the F35 unit price for the VTOL variant is around $115 million, and I assume the CTOL variants are cheaper. The latest JAS39 Gripen, that has no VTOL variant and is not stealthy to the same level, costs £85 millions. Then you have to factor in the additional costs of servicing infrastructure ETC, where the Gripen might pull slightly ahead. But even "cheap and simple" fighters are expensive things. Where the Chinese fighter might have an edge is on how many
Re: (Score:2)
They're not effective as a front-line fighter against the top tier enemies, but against the typical adversaries in the middle east an F-15 is still incredibly capable.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
you don't need fifth generation stealth fighters to bomb women and children.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
why would anyone *not* feel for human shields ... except for considering them "sub-human"?
Re:Yeah, sure (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
nice weaseling but you already gave yourself away, psycho.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a statement of fact. The vast majority of bombs that the Israeli Air Force drops are on civilian areas, and the vast majority of casualties are civilians. 70% of them are women and children, according to the UN.
When the Israelis want to attack specific targets with precision, they don't use aircraft. They use precision guided missiles. If they start a war with Iran, that will most likely be how they attack Iranian SAM sites and other military targets. Those and drones. The aircraft are for after they h
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why couldn't they end the occupation? Hard to have a resistance when there is nothing to resist.
Re: (Score:2)
An equally simple question to yours would be why can't neighboring countries just adopt the population they so loudly endorse? Surely those regimes who are so generous with funding
Re: (Score:2)
Jews were in fact living in those areas before Israel was created. It's Israel and it's aggressive and illegal expansion that is the problem here, and the only way to end it without total genocide is for Israel to start obeying international law.
They recently announced that they have ethnically cleansed northern Gaza. That's not the actions of a legitimate, peaceful state.
Re: (Score:2)
For damn sure you can't be comparing them to their neighbors and seeing that as a negative contrast. The
Re: (Score:2)
Israel is the only country in that region committing genocide.
You might suspect that others would do it if they had the chance, but that's speculation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Pops off"? As if Israel doesn't have its boot on their necks.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So bombing woman and children who had nothing to do with what you detail in your post for revenge is okay then? The people who did horrible shit to Israel were Hamas, not every man, woman, and child in Gaza. Dropping oversized, unguided munitions on one of the most density populated places on earth isn't even close to being proportional to what Hamas did. The Palestinian death toll is FAR ahead of the Israeli one and that's not even going into the property damage and suffering caused by all this.
99.9% of I
Re: (Score:3)
The two choices you're faced with are: Buy into the totalitarian, narcissist ideology of a cult who have made hate for another people their one and only moral value; OR you admit some places are just toxic and prioritize other things.
Your concern is
Re: (Score:2)
Hahaha, what a moral degenerate. Just because you're a degen doesn't mean everybody is.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also never forget that the current Israeli right wing leadership, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, made sure money flowed to the group that attacked. They kn
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
lol, still butthurt?
Re: Yeah, sure (Score:2)
You don't need a degree from Harvard to use sophistry.
Re: (Score:2)
the majority (70%) of officialy acknowledged casualties inflicted by the idf this year are women and children. do you know what sophistry even means?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you know what believing terrorists makes you?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you know what believing terrorists makes you?
so the un human rights office are terrorists now too?
The UN Human Rights Office has been verifying the personal details of those killed in Gaza by strikes, shelling and other conduct of hostilities. Of those fatalities, it has so far found close to 70 per cent to be children and women, indicating a systematic violation of the fundamental principles of international humanitarian law, including distinction and proportionality.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press... [ohchr.org]
you are trying to question my moral by throwing a nonsensical incrimination and misrepresenting reality? you are either ignorant or you are simply being dishonest. either way yo do not get to define who's a terrorist, and you don't have any moral ground at all to argue from. in the former case, do yourself a favor and get a clue, preferably not in zionist controlled media (which is mostly all of western mainstream media with few exceptions). in the latte
Re: (Score:2)
F15s work great for attacking anything other than a modern jet in the air. They ain't dog-fighters these days. Good delivery vehicles for short-range missiles though. And also intimidating as hell if you're on the ground and get buzzed by them. My uncle damned near wrecked his Harley trike over that little stunt out near a weekend warrior air facility.
Re: (Score:2)
Good delivery vehicles for short-range missiles though.
Why short range? Let your stealthy F-35s get up close and personal, and feed sensor data back to the F-15s so they can lob a few of the Meteors or AMRAAMs they're hauling.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The F15 is made by Macdonell-Douglas so its Boeing getting the $$$$$$
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Yeah, sure (Score:2)
I vote that the pogrom comes for your family first.
Re: (Score:1)
Electronics and force integration often make a bigger impact than physical plane design. Upgrading an old plane's electronics can greatly improve it and extend its life. Plus, non-stealth planes are generally more maneuverable if one has to dog-fight because ground control etc. got nuked.
Re: (Score:1)
Bear in mind that Israel isn't trying to be a major world power. They just want to stay ahead of their neighbors. The F-15 isn't state of the art any more, but it's not useless WWII-era trash either, especially in its more recent variants. Its combat record remains quite solid so far.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now the F15 is great, especially when you're shooting at people who have no modern way to shoot back. I mean, let's be brutall
Re: (Score:2)
On the flip side, I bet that it would still be pretty fun to fly around in the Chinese version of the F-35.
Sure, it's like getting the Temu version of the real thing, but it's still better than nothing if you're a Chinese jet pilot.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't let the appearance of cheap Chinese products fool you. They are by no means dumb or naive when it comes to manufacturing quality products for their military.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't let the appearance of cheap Chinese products fool you. They are by no means dumb or naive when it comes to manufacturing quality products for their military.
Appearances can be misleading. The only real way to evaluate advanced weapons is in real combat. Something like the 1982 war between Israel and Lebanon/Syria where American-made fighter jets significantly outperformed Soviet-made jets (1 American jet downed compared to 80+ Soviet jets). Of course, the Israeli pilots were likely also greatly superior, so that has to be considered.
Re: (Score:2)
American-made fighter jets significantly outperformed Soviet-made jets (1 American jet downed compared to 80+ Soviet jets).
According to Wikipedia, the Syrian jets lost were largely ground attack planes, not air to air fighters. The problem with all the public comparisons out there is that they are commercial ventures trying to sell their products, not military assessments. And in war, they are propaganda.
My guess is... (Score:2)
They are getting more experience than you think (Score:1)
Re: They are getting more experience than you thin (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
There is also. . . (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
This is hugely misleading. Two Chinese volunteers don't constitute exactly what one would think as "Chinese soldiers in Ukraine".
If you would than I guess you must also count all the other foreigners: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
That isn't the problem with this aircraft. The overall design is reasonably solid and, in fact, bears more than passing resemblance to the American F-35. The biggest issue (apart from things not directly related to the plane itself, like pilot training and command officer experience) is the jet engines: the PLA is not able to source the really-high-end ones from Western companies. They have been working on attempti
Re: (Score:2)
...China hasn't been doing much war in recent decades, at least not as much as the USA & NATO
The USA and NATO haven't been involved in a war against anything like a near peer since Korea. And the results of Ukraine's attempt at a counter-offensive using NATO equipment and training are not reassuring. Obviously Ukraine lacks control of the airspace, but that may be the future for all wars.
Whether even the F-35 can evade the Russian s-400 air defense and establish control of the battlefield airspace is
Re: (Score:2)
...lacks control of the airspace, but that may be the future for all wars.
Wow, what a valuable insight! Maybe you can build a time machine to go back to WWI to warn somebody!
It flew, so at least (Score:2)
JSF was a good investment (Score:2)
As long as China are spending money on this useless prestige shit they aren't making anything more dangerous. The USA can far more easily waste money than their potential opponents, so for the USA it makes sense to do so as long as the idiots stuck in WW1 mentality follow along.
Re: (Score:3)
Don't kid yourself nobody knows what a real gloves off near-peer conflict would look like, let a lone if it is even possible.
By possible I mean politically, while the neuclear genie prevents conflicts from turning hot in the first place if a real hot war between US and China, broke out nobody knows if a drat + more body bags returning than in generational member, that public option does not move to 'lets light those candles and roll the dice'
We have done nothing by war games and proxy conflicts in the way o
Exhaust (Score:5, Informative)
Looking at the video, one issue is readily apparent even to a layperson like me. The engine exhaust is totally exposed. You can see the round nozzles and jet plume totally exposed, which makes it very easy for heat seeking missiles to identify and track the heat source.
The F-22 in comparison has rectangular ports with vectoring for the exhaust with radar-absorbing materials hiding the hot engine surfaces.
Here's what I'm talking about with the F-22. [youtu.be]
Then the J-35 in comparison, where the engine nozzles are totally exposed [youtube.com]. They don't appear to be vectored either.
Basically what this means is 1980s heat seeking technology would have no trouble shooting down that jet, especially air-to-air launched from behind the J-35.
Re:Exhaust (Score:5, Informative)
If your adversary is in range and on your six you have already done something really wrong. And by then RCS is not as important as IR signature. Anyway, this is not the F22 equivalent, it's the F35 equivalent. It's the cheaper multirole fighter to complement the J20, that is supposed to deal with gaining air superiority.
I thought the new thing was lasers (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You know what else you can see when you can see the exhaust in IR ... the entire plane in the visual spectrum.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
They are prototype engines. The final ones are still in development and they likely didn't want to show off any of the technology even if they are in testing.
New Chinese Stealth Fighter (Score:3)
I'll believe it when I see it.
Re: (Score:2)
This is the PLA air-force version (so, intended to be operated out of a land-based airbase) of the existing J-35 that we've known about in its carrier-based iteration for a while. You know, the one that is obviously supposed to be a clone of the F-35 but has about half the effective range, for lack of really-high-end jet engines that the PLA can't buy from the West (because certain governments don't trust them with such things). Remember that? Yeah, it's that,
Re: (Score:2)
No one knows the range of the Chinese aircraft. The performance parameters of the aircraft are all classified.
Re: (Score:2)
Does it count as a "new" aircraft when the big change is whether it's the carrier-based version or not?
Don't know. After the F-35A came out, were the F-35B and F-35C "new"?
Is the Furbish Lousewort a "new" (and endangered) species because Ms. Furbish found one growing in her back yard? Or is it just another weed endemic to the larger region? Depends on how much attention you want for your cause.
Re: (Score:2)
F-35 JPO (Score:2)
5th Generation? (Score:2)