Cursing Disables Google's AI Overviews 11
Google users have discovered that adding curse words to search queries disables the company's AI-powered overview feature. While Google's Gemini AI system typically avoids profanity, inserting expletives into search terms bypasses AI summaries and delivers traditional web results instead. Users can also disable AI overviews by adding "-ai" or other text strings after a minus sign to their queries.
Finally fucking search again! (Score:3)
Not that Google search is worth much, even with this hack.
Re: (Score:2)
IF you don't want search look-ahead, begin every search with "fuck" or the equivent in your local language.
Thanks for the PSA! (Score:5, Informative)
Cursing Disables Google's AI Overviews
Hey... it worked, thank you! This article should be considered a PSA.
the -ai in search also gets rid of ads (Score:4, Interesting)
When I added -ai, it also got rid of the "sponsored" links across the top.
uBlock filter (Score:3)
This seems to work in uBlock (for now):
! 2024-05-18 https://www.google.com/ [google.com] Block A.I Search Results
www.google.com##.M8OgIe > div:nth-of-type(2) > div
(Let me know if it can be improved...)
Re: (Score:3)
it's in. That's cool.
Not sure many people care, but just putting it out there that I prefer the solutions (sorry, make that -AI FUCKING SOLUTIONS) that stop the generation of the results in the first place, and so don't fry the planet as a side effect. YMMV.
Re: (Score:2)
Although I deeply object to the amount of carbon and overall impact on electrical generation produced by power demands for AI, I'm -perfectly happy- for Google to pay that power bill (and the associated cooling costs) with the AI results sent to /dev/null.
Youtube videos drop rude words :o (Score:2)
Best thing I've read today. (Score:2)
Now I can just search "[technology] [task] fucking how" instead of "[technology] [task] how" and it loads faster without their broken AI bullshit wasting my time and screen real estate.
This makes google marginally useful again.
Re: (Score:2)
FWIW, this also works fairly well for getting stupid CS chatbots to give you a human agent, either by voice or text.
Or ... (Score:1)