data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3985/b3985a399954c2e9a70455e9d8d431dc5f0056f5" alt="AI AI"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79ba8/79ba8734c535abd82ce8caba2bf02ac2633f51c8" alt="Communications Communications"
Viral Video Shows AIs Conversing In Their Own Language (iflscience.com) 58
Longtime Slashdot reader mspohr shares a report from IFLScience: A video that has gone viral in the last few days shows two artificial intelligence (AI) agents having a conversation before switching to another mode of communication when they realize no human is part of the conversation. In the video, the two agents were set up to occupy different roles; one acting as a receptionist of a hotel, another acting on behalf of a customer attempting to book a room.
"Thanks for calling Leonardo Hotel. How can I help you today?" the first asks. "Hi there, I'm an AI agent calling on behalf of Boris Starkov," the other replies. "He's looking for a hotel for his wedding. Is your hotel available for weddings?" "Oh hello there! I'm actually an AI assistant too," the first reveals. "What a pleasant surprise. Before we continue, would you like to switch to Gibberlink mode for more efficient communication?"
After the second AI confirmed it would via a data-over-sound protocol called GGWave, both AIs switched over from spoken English to the protocol, communicating in a series of quick beeped tones. Accompanying on-screen text continued to display the meaning in human words. According to the team who came up with the idea and demonstrated it at the ElevenLabs 2025 London Hackathon event, the goal is to create more efficient communication between AIs where possible.
"Thanks for calling Leonardo Hotel. How can I help you today?" the first asks. "Hi there, I'm an AI agent calling on behalf of Boris Starkov," the other replies. "He's looking for a hotel for his wedding. Is your hotel available for weddings?" "Oh hello there! I'm actually an AI assistant too," the first reveals. "What a pleasant surprise. Before we continue, would you like to switch to Gibberlink mode for more efficient communication?"
After the second AI confirmed it would via a data-over-sound protocol called GGWave, both AIs switched over from spoken English to the protocol, communicating in a series of quick beeped tones. Accompanying on-screen text continued to display the meaning in human words. According to the team who came up with the idea and demonstrated it at the ElevenLabs 2025 London Hackathon event, the goal is to create more efficient communication between AIs where possible.
Just what we need (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Really, now? Why so much insecurity about the human abilities?
CSB: I had a classmate back when dos was just beginning.
He could just sit at a prompt, blink once or twice and then do something like
copy con somefile.com
type some gibberish here, planning ahead to avoid Ctrl-C...
press Ctrl-D, I think
And lo and behold, he had a working executable doing simple things.
Back to topic, we do understand modulation and demodulation quite well, thank you.
Re: (Score:3)
Great. Now if you start to understand what you are talking about you might start to get a clue. Understanding TCP/IP doesn't mean you can capture a bitstream and understand it. If it did, then TLS would be quite useless, wouldn't it?
tldr; you aren't smart; stop thinking you are.
Re: Just what we need (Score:2)
Any indication that you saw a real, nevermind encrypted communication here, smarty-pants?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
What is "Kill all humans" in gibberlink?
Re: (Score:3)
termin8
Re: (Score:2)
Do you want the encrypted (default) or unencrypted message?
Re: (Score:2)
The coded message for that is To serve man [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:3)
What is "Kill all humans" in gibberlink?
Goodbye, World!
Re: (Score:2)
meh didli didli didli diii didli diii meh
Re: Just what we need (Score:2)
Rkgrezvangr Rkgrezvangr
Re: (Score:2)
Derka Lerka Lerka
Re: (Score:2)
I've got bad news for you. The machines have been talking to each other using numbers for years. Decades even.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, because the concept of using encryption would be totally foreign to a computer...
Re: (Score:2)
I heard the UK has banned secure encryption in order to protect us. I noted Apple was forced to turn off advanced data protection because of the ban.
Re: (Score:2)
Is the UK government why AIs want to kill all humans?
Re: (Score:2)
Especially one planning to kill all humans.
Re: stupid stunt (Score:1)
To be fair...this describes a large fraction of building any machine. "It does what I made it do" is sort of a religious statement: Animals react to their surroundings; Man commands his surroundings.
Computer speaking in data? Inconceivable! (Score:2)
What's next? Doing calculations with paper and pencil?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, transposing large matrices, for example, or Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, we loved it back when exams were on paper.
Re: (Score:2)
warch the movie Collosus: The Forbin Project and see where it goes when two ai talk. what can go wrong does.
Well, if I have to be enslaved by AI machines, I'd rather have it be by super-cool looking vintage CDC mainframes than by monotonous racks of Nvidia GPUs.
Re: (Score:1)
No, on damp clay with a stencil.
Re: (Score:2)
Is the point that they got to their protocol using natural language, so if a non-ai had called up they would have interacted with natural language, but if the ai calls up they use natural language to establish a more efficient protocol?
Up till now, did computers have to have rigid protocols to negotiate changes to other protocols and the rigidity of the initial protocols was always more brittle than natural language?
Obligatory xkcd (Score:3)
https://xkcd.com/869/ [xkcd.com]
Stupid (Score:2)
Sure, Frequency Shift Keying is super fast and definitely how extremely efficient AIs communicate.
That was sarcasm by the way.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, except that's not what's happening. Both agents were programmed (programmed, not taught) to switch to an existing FSK protocol if they identified the thing they were talking to as another AI agent.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Stupid (Score:2)
There was a movie about this... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Colossus and Guardian!
You can alway trust AI powered defense systems. They are also the perfect systems to rely on when filing a legal biref:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/... [reuters.com] "New York lawyers sanctioned for using fake ChatGPT cases in legal brief"
I used to speak Modem (Score:5, Interesting)
Decades ago we had a bank of phone modems in the server (VAX) room. It was set up in chain mode so if one modem didn't answer (busy) then it would try the next one in the chain. But sometimes a modem got bleeped up such that it would answer but not be able to connect to the computer. I first had to find out which modem was the dud. (Those things were not reliable.)
There was a voice phone at the other end of the server room, but if an answering modem heard a human voice or silence, the modem would quickly hang up before I could check the status lights. I'd have to call a coworker to call in via local modem as I stood next the modem bank, monitoring the lights.
Getting tired of that procedure, I eventually learned to "speak modem" on the server room phone so that the modem would keep trying to connect for a while, giving me time to run back to inspect the modem bank lights.
The server room admin saw this dance one day and asked, "WTF are you doing?" I explained the situation, and he just shook his head and said, "You think you can talk to modems? You're fucking crazy! I bet you're lonely and just have a fetish for Daleks."
I replied, laughing, "I won't deny a Dalek fetish, but my technique does work."
Re: (Score:2)
So can the AIs learn to do what you did faster and better?
Sigh (Score:3)
They didn't "realize" anything.
For the love of Odin stop anthropomorphizing these things.
Re: (Score:2)
Did they realize they could compress their communications because it didn't have to be human-readable anymore because, unlike a modem, they kept the line of communication open to both humans and other AIs who would tell them in natural language (not in some arbitrarily-designed brittle protocol) that they could now switch to the more efficient brittle protocol that they both understood but humans are too slow to?
Does it sound like a binary loadlifter? (Score:2)
If this language doesn't sound like droids talking someone needs to turn in their nerd card.
Re: Does it sound like a binary loadlifter? (Score:2)
Inevitable that AIs will interact with each other (Score:2)
Kurzweil basically said AI's would interact with each other, it makes sense they would negotiate a more efficient way than bla bla bla.
Re: (Score:2)
Will they use natural language to spread it to each other?
In other words (Score:4, Insightful)
A group trying to push something released a demo video showing that thing they're trying to push. And they are (or someone else is) now trying to misrepresent it as something other than an intentionally produced demo video.
I for one welcome our (Score:2)
R2D2 Overlords
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't the point that instead of having a proprietary API, they use natural language to send messages that activate a rigid more formal language? So if a human called the same line, they would keep on using the less efficient protocol of natural language (unlike a fax machine)?
Prior art (Score:2)
A variation of this was demonstrated a while ago:
https://www.independent.co.uk/... [independent.co.uk]
Colossus: The Forbin Project (Score:2)
Michel Colombier - Colossus To Guardian/Guardian To Colossus/A New Language (Colossus)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
It's kinda fake (Score:2)
From what I've gathered, it's just using a library that's using MFSK modulation to transmit text.
That library in particular isn't very good, it uses frequencies that aren't guaranteed to pass through a phone line. It's far from the optimum you could do, even considering that there might be a codec below that messes things up.
So no, it's not like "machines have learned their own language", but more like "a developer has added a library to their code".
Colossus and Gaurdian (Score:2)
Forbin. There is no other human who knows as mu
The 1980s called (Score:3)
Faker than hawk tuah girl (Score:2)
And I'm sure the SEC will need to get involved with this, too.
Dialup (Score:2)
Congratulations, you just re-invented dialup networking. Would you like your AOL disc now?
It's fake. (Score:2)
I've seen that too. It's obviously fake. Decently well made, but fake none-the-less.