data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eb26/7eb26f595004bd4ab93d92b648ed72cd41d99f2d" alt="Transportation Transportation"
Tesla Moves Towards Launching an Uber Competitor (axios.com) 203
"Tesla is taking steps to launch a ride-sharing service that could compete directly with Uber, Lyft and Waymo," reports Axios, noting that Tesla "has filed for a transportation charter-party carrier permit from the California Public Utilities Commission, Bloomberg reported Thursday."
"That classification means Tesla would own and control the fleet of vehicles," Bloomberg reported... "In its communications with California officials, Tesla discussed driver's license information and drug-testing coordination, suggesting the company intends to use human drivers, at least initially," Bloomberg reported. The company is seeking the same type of permit that Waymo uses to run its robotaxi business.Uber is gearing up to begin offering autonomous vehicle services in partnership with Waymo in Austin and Atlanta later this year.
The article also adds that Musk "told investors in January that 'I'm confident that we will release unsupervised FSD in California this year,' referring to the company's Full Self-Driving system." But "Tesla has yet to apply for a permit to operate driverless vehicles..." notes the EV blog Electrek, adding "This is just a step for Tesla to test ride-hailing services ahead of autonomy."
Reuters also points out that "Earlier in October, Tesla revealed the Cybercab, a robotaxi concept that had no steering wheel or control pedals... He has said the Cybercab will go into production in 2026 and will also be available for customers to buy for less than $30,000."
The article also adds that Musk "told investors in January that 'I'm confident that we will release unsupervised FSD in California this year,' referring to the company's Full Self-Driving system." But "Tesla has yet to apply for a permit to operate driverless vehicles..." notes the EV blog Electrek, adding "This is just a step for Tesla to test ride-hailing services ahead of autonomy."
Reuters also points out that "Earlier in October, Tesla revealed the Cybercab, a robotaxi concept that had no steering wheel or control pedals... He has said the Cybercab will go into production in 2026 and will also be available for customers to buy for less than $30,000."
own and control comes with a lot of liability! (Score:2)
own and control comes with a lot of liability!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
can customers in their own Cybercab get an DUI? (Score:2)
can customers in their own Cybercab get an DUI? Will Tesla cover court costs in case it happens?
Re: (Score:2)
Per TFS, The Cybercab will have "no steering wheel or control pedals." So there's no way for the occupant to control the vehicle directly, even if s/he wanted to.
Short answer: no, I don't think someone riding in a Cybercab could be liable for DUI, because they wouldn't be "D"-ing.
Tesla might wind up on court in the case of a crash, but not for a DUI, because the Cybercab, bless its heart, cannot drink.
Re: (Score:2)
bless its heart, cannot drink.
AI models can, however, hallucinate. I'm dealing with a lot of that now at work, albeit on LLMs not what Tesla is doing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That EULA surely would be unenforceable. How can you shift liability to someone who is simply riding in the vehicle, without control over it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
DUI is about being in control of a vehicle, so as long as you can tell it to do something, you're in charge. There's been cases of DUI's while operating a horse https://horserookie.com/can-yo... [horserookie.com]
A horse is likely better at self driving then any vehicle and in some States is considered a vehicle, especially if hooked up to a cart. Seems I remember a case where the rider got busted going home from the bar even though the horse knew the route very well and self drove home.
leon (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:leon (Score:5, Informative)
No head of any federal department or bureau is ever elected, they are selected or nominated by The President.
Principal officers are subject to senate confirmation under the appointments clause of the constitution.
DOGE is no exception.
Oh, that reminds me. Before you can even think about confirmation congress has to create the position because you obviously can't confirm someone for a role that doesn't exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
What DOGE seems to have done is rather than follow the law they merely mooched off of USDS and assumed powers neither the president has to delegate in the first place nor has been authorized via congressional legislation.
Re:leon (Score:4)
Confirmation hearings are only needed for certain cabinet positions, primarily those positions designated by the constitution or by congress. Anything else, the president may appoint himself, and that would place them firmly in the executive.
Even the very first president did such things, sometimes just to spite his own political opponents, among which was vice president Adams.
Re: leon (Score:2)
Pretty much, and a few three letter agencies started exactly this way.
seriously? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Thank you. So he's a special government employee you say?
That means he can't be employed for longer than 130 days per 365 consecutive days. https://www.doi.gov/ethics/spe... [doi.gov]
I guess he's out of work about memorial day?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
You mean companies that make use of subsidies governments provide? .
Name one person in government that cancelled a 2.4 billion dollar contract and had it awarded it to his own company. It turns out crime/bribery does pay. Other countries get it, Canada cancelled a contract with leon over the tariffs*. *I assume they will be cancelled again
Re: (Score:2)
Branding (Score:3, Informative)
The new service will be branded "Swasticab" and will only make right turns. (Actually, Muskler is pissed that "Uber" was already taken.)
Re:Branding (Score:5, Insightful)
Before any RW mods moderate the parent as Troll/etc, bear in mind he's making an important point: Musk's reputation right now is toxic. Sales of Teslas are down across the world including the US where sales of electric cars are up in general. The term "swastikar" has entered the public lexicon (together with "Wankpanza" specifically for the CT.) Tesla owners are putting stickers on their cars begging people not to make assumptions because they bought the car before it became known Musk was a Nazi. Teslas are even being vandalized and Tesla dealerships suffering vandalism and worse from people on the furthest ends of the anti-Musk spectrum.
So this is probably the wrong time for Tesla to try to launch an Uber competitor, in California of all places.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Before any RW mods moderate the parent as Troll
Since when applying Godwin law [wikipedia.org]is a right wing?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Since the Nazis started doing fucking Nazi salutes.
https://www.politico.com/news/... [politico.com]
Re: Branding (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Alienating the left, a major part of the customer base for Tesla, during a period of significantly increased competition is a dumbshit move any way you want to cut it.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, he also "relocated*" Tesla to a state that hates electrics so much that it's actually still illegal for him to sell them there. You can still get them in Texas, of course. But you have to jump through some legal loopholes where you actually "buy" them in another state but merely "take delivery" or your car in Texas. So to say his thought processes are rather skewed is not new news. I think he just believes his own PR so much that he actually thinks he *can't* alienate anyone and that anyone who boug
Re: (Score:2)
Also you can really tell that Google's AI isn't very good. The Cyber truck is not overpowered. The damn thing can't even complete off-roading challenges that a Subaru can.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
‘I felt nothing but disgust’: Tesla owners vent their anger at Elon Musk [theguardian.com]
Re:Branding (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
The stickers you should look for are supposed to say "I bought this before Elon went crazy" (according to news reports).
Re: (Score:2)
You can buy the sticker on Amazon [amazon.ca] and there are photos [threads.net] of similar stickers in the wild.
Re: (Score:2)
You misunderstood. "Swastikar" is just a slang name for a Tesla. The stickers are something else.
Re: Branding (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
> the distinction between owning a tesla and
> supporting that weirdo
There IS no distinction in the here-and-present. When you buy a Tesla now, you are giving the company.. and via his stock holdings, the muskrat... your money. You are literally enriching (ie. supporting) him and dear leader and DOGE and bigballs and their agenda. The counterpoint is that there are >6-year-old teslas still on the road from before he either changed or showed his true colors. So the question becomes how to tell th
Re: (Score:2)
These stickers were mentioned in today's news in France (they were saying "like in the USA"). The same paper discussed sales down 26% year to year in February, after being down 50% year to year in January.
Re: (Score:2)
Tesla's popularity in Europe has dropped significantly since the US election in 2024, especially in Germany. And there have been stickers and other manifestations mocking or protesting the company. See here for some details. [npr.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You live in a civilized country where people value education.
Re: (Score:2)
Is that "western europe" a name of a town in the USA? Because the latest ACEA report says the registration of new tesla cars fell by 50% despite the registrations of BEVs risings by 34%.
https://www.acea.auto/files/Pr... [acea.auto]
Re: (Score:2)
LOL. Who are the ones doing the canceling [grantwriti...unding.com]? Ooh, the word "female" is now verboten....
Re:Branding (Score:5, Informative)
So if you're a researcher applying for a grant to study (for example) treatments for ovarian cancer... you can't use the term "female" in your application because it's too... what, woke? DEI?
You RW douchebags are insane.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Branding (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Trump is a moron, but from what I see, JD Vance is the actual really dangerous Hitleresque figure.
Re: (Score:2)
Meanwhile, Musk is far more dangerous than Trump or Vance. Trump doesn't necessarily want to be a villain, but he has no problem doing it if it's necessary to get what he wants. Elon, on the other hand, takes extreme pleasure in making others suffer just because he can. The main reason he's staffing DOGE with peo
Re:Branding (Score:5, Insightful)
No, it is radical leftist phenomenon, since cancelling no longer works they just now call everyone they disagree with Hitler or Nazi.
I mean if you sieg hail in front of a crowd and shill for a far right wing German political party https://www.thetimes.com/world... [thetimes.com]
Well people might start to think things.
Re:Branding (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, they made it really blatantly obvious a few years back when they built their main CPAC stage matching the design of the nazi SS's Odal rune logo... or in Charlottesville where they were literally marching under the banner of the swastika. After a certain point, when it looks like a duck, talks like a duck, goose-steps like a duck, and sieg heils like a duck, it's a fucking duck. And in no way is it unreasonable or unfair to call the duck a fucking duck.
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine if these bums had to actually work for a living.
They defraud and rip off their own supporters. Why do you think Bannon was in federal prison?
Re: (Score:2)
Wait JD Vance is a radical leftist now? Did that mean Trump is too? Did that mean you are?
Re: (Score:2)
Says an AC talking down to a poster that’s actually from Europe!
Narrative trumps reality, eh, AC?
Re: (Score:3)
Xwasticab
Oh good (Score:2)
Somewhere to take a dump while on the go.
Re: (Score:2)
Somewhere to take a dump while on the go.
Normally I'd thank you for the belly laugh, but I've caught some nasty bug and laughing at your comment literally hurt me. Still, it was worth it. Cheers!
Should be easy now (Score:3)
Just have your buddy write an executive order to shut down Uber and Lyft. Since EO carries the weight of law and cannot be challenged anymore.
Meanwhile (Score:2)
Meanwhile Musk's political nonsense means a third of the country or more won't touch his new service.
Re:Meanwhile (Score:4, Funny)
... a third of the country or more won't touch his new service.
My - what a polite euphemism for Trump offering his chin for Elon to rest his balls on.
Re: (Score:2)
Meanwhile Musk's political nonsense means a third of the country or more won't touch his new service.
Exactly, vote with your wallet. Forcing things on people without consent is a left-wing thing.
Re: (Score:2)
What are you talking about? Women dont even have full autonomy over their own bodies in some states now because of right wing efforts. Or how about book banning which the right does far more than the left? The right has no problem telling people how to live their lives.
Re: (Score:2)
A fetus isnt a baby.
Re: (Score:2)
You can use google all on your own. You know that right?
It doesnt even have to google either. There are all sorts of search engines you can get answers to questions like this from.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Meanwhile (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Product boycotts only work when right wing culture warriors do them, right?
Re: Meanwhile (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.ethicalconsumer.or... [ethicalconsumer.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Sure. Having scared off at least a third of your potential customers is a shit place for a new business venture to be though. This is why other billionaires don't do what Musk is doing right now, they have more business sense than that.
Re: (Score:2)
Which means that two thirds might.
MAGAs typically have their own ICE-powered pickup trucks (ironically, usually foreign brands like Toyota) that they drive themselves around in. Rideshare services are mostly for hipster urban dwellers to use when all the nearby Bird scooters are in the lake again.
Introducing the new Tesla M - for Molotov (Score:2)
Bursting into flames in a city near you.
Re: Introducing the new Tesla M - for Molotov (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He may be implying that unmanned Teslas will be targets for vandalism. That being said, it's much easier to put out a burning ICE vehicle than a burning EV. Lion batteries can be major environmental hazards when compromised.
Re: (Score:2)
https://apnews.com/article/tes... [apnews.com]
Will any hailing do? (Score:3)
Or will it have to be a specific hailing for Tesla car to stop?
Musk is a genius, who I have defended here. (Score:3, Insightful)
Musk did amazing things at Tesla, and even more amazing things at Spacex. He is changing the world, often for the better.
But somewhere along the way, around the time of the cave diver slander and before he fell for a ludicrous Pelosi hoax story, he lost it. He started believing in nonsense.
Musk got where he is by taking dangerous risks. Those were business risks and only his own companies were threatened.
But now a demented Musk is risking American democracy and - after yesterday - helping Trump bring the world to the brink of disaster.
It is everyone's moral duty to oppose him.
Re: (Score:2)
Care to list out the things he did? (Score:5, Interesting)
Musk's greatest achievement was getting fired from PayPal when they realized he was incompetent. Because he was c level that got him a 22 million dollar gold in parachute and a shitload of stock options that if he was a lower level employee would have been stolen from him but instead gave him the capital to get in on that aforementioned carbon credit scheme.
After that it's just been pumping dump after pumping dump leading all the way up to the cyber truck.
There's no genius there just dumb luck, taking advantage of his father's connections and money to get in on the ground floor and then sucking at the teat of government. There's a certain level of cleverness I'll give you that but it's the kind you get from a carnival barker taken to a ludicrous degree because our civilization is gradually collapsing. He's this generation's Nero.
Re:Care to list out the things he did? (Score:5, Informative)
It's the same reason Jobs got the limelight when it was really Woz who made Apple possible. The brains behind Musk's innovations were the people he'd hired. They deserve all the credit, but we've structured our society so the figureheads get the recognition and profits, while the person toiling away in some lab gets a footnote in a Wikipedia entry. We collectively consider winning at the game of capitalism to be more important than being a genuine innovator. Seriously, we've even got a television show where inventors beg for money from some wealthy folks, since their ideas generally don't have a snowball's chance in hell of success without financial backing.
This is why the whole Ferengi as a satire of capitalism in Star Trek was so spot-on. If you have money, you can exploit those beneath you and take all the credit, and that's just considered good business.
Re: (Score:3)
The one time Musk did something product wise we got the cybertruck which has entire YouTube channels dedicated to all the breakdowns and failures and laughable parking lot princesses that bought it.
To be fair the cybe
Re: (Score:3)
You are wasting your time, the dude is "extremely autistic" and he repeats himself in loops posting here all day long 20+ times daily and he does the same on Reddit and other forums every day.
Gee - substitute 'X' for 'here' and for 'Reddit and other forums'. Then substitute '60+' for '20+'. With those changes, you've described much of Musk's activity in a nutshell.
I have an autistic nephew and he is doing admirably well compared to him because he understands the implication of his condition and how to deal with it. He also welcomes help, this dude obviously doesn't.
Again, it's kinda spooky how applicable your description is to Musk.
The dude is also obsessed with moderation.
Hmmm... does that sound like somebody at Twit-X that we all know?
Ding ding ding! Ladies and gentlemen, we present the winner of today's trifecta!
Re:Musk is a genius, who I have defended here. (Score:5, Insightful)
Never mind more Americans than not arent thrilled with what's going on
https://www.axios.com/2025/02/... [axios.com]
-In a Feb. 13-18 Washington Post-Ipsos poll, a net 34% of respondents said they approved of how Musk was handling his job, compared to 49% disapproving and 14% not sure.
-Over half of respondents (55%) in a Quinnipiac University poll conducted Feb. 13 to 17 said Musk has too much power in making decisions affecting the U.S., while 36% think he has about the right amount of power.
-A Pew survey of U.S. adults taken Jan. 27 to Feb. 2 showed that Americans had more negative (54%) than positive (42%) views of Musk (DOGE's dissection of the federal government has dramatically escalated since the poll was conducted).
-And a Feb. 15 to Feb. 17 Emerson College Poll showed 45% of respondents disapproved of the job Musk was doing, while 41% approved and 14% were neutral.
I support Musk's work [doge.gov] with DOGE. Bureaucracy needs to be accountable to people.
If they were really making the bureaucracy accountable to the people they would be conducting meaningful reviews of government departments and basing their decisions on their findings. Instead, they've gone in and just started laying people off almost at random which is how we've already gotten a bunch of vital FDA employees laid off in the middle of a bird flu outbreak that's crippling our country's egg industry and jacking up our grocery bills https://www.politico.com/news/... [politico.com]. , It is also how they ended up laying off a bunch of employees vital to maintaining our nuclear arsenal https://www.bbc.com/news/artic... [bbc.com] . This is also true for many other vital positions within government as well https://www.reuters.com/world/... [reuters.com] .
Then there's the fact that all the massive uncertainty and chaos this shit is sowing is already having negative impacts on the market.
There's nothing wrong with a proper review of government and how it's spending our money, it's the blatant incompetence on display that's so concerning to people as there hasnt been even close to enough time or effort spent on understanding the repercussions of these layoffs.
Re:Musk is a genius, who I have defended here. (Score:4, Informative)
Also,
More so, Trump favoriability is only growing [fivethirtyeight.com],
That isnt true at all even going by your own citation. Your link also shows Trump approval rating dropping and disapproval rating increasing.
Re: (Score:2)
More so, Trump favoriability is only growing [fivethirtyeight.com], meaning that Americans support what he is doing, and that includes DOGE.
It must be embarrassing to be in your shoes. You just posted a citation that shows exactly opposite of what you're peddling. LOL.
It's just pump and dump (Score:5, Insightful)
Every time the stock drops Musk does something like this and the press eats it up. The SEC meanwhile wasn't doing their job when Biden was president let alone now that Musk is.
I'm not sure it's going to work this time. The last time he tried it with that silly event with the robots that were being controlled by wire the stock market didn't buy it. It's pretty well known that Tesla doesn't have the tech to run robotaxis
Re: (Score:2)
Every time the stock drops Musk does something like this and the press eats it up.
Yes, he is good salesman. Feel free to short his stock.
Re: (Score:2)
A good salesman would stay out of politics themselves so as to not draw controversy and instead pay people to do stuff for them. Tesla sales are already in decline https://nltimes.nl/2025/03/01/... [nltimes.nl] and the numbers we have now dont even reflect Musk's current levels of political involvement.
He's choosing to dive into highly controversial political stuff right when the rest of the auto industry has started to catch up to and even surpass Tesla, his most valuable asset. There's a reason billionaires dont usual
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It is interesting to see anti-market views getting unthinkingly spewed by tech people. You do understand that there wouldn't be Internet, PCs, etc. if it wasn't for markets?
I'm not against markets per se. I'm against markets which are uncontrolled to the extent that they gain extreme concentrations of wealth and power.
Markets exist in the context of a society, and everyone in said society contributes to those markets in some way or other. Power and wealth concentrations are necessary, in the same way that batteries are necessary - they concentrate the resources to a degree that allows for useful work. But extreme concentrations which marginalize a huge percentage of people - a
Re: (Score:2)
What are you, the same person that trolls rsilvergun?
Re: (Score:2)
oh wait, "OP". Yes, you are that obsessed idiot.
Re: (Score:2)
Hahaha, you can't even read. No, my nickname isnt "scam". You come up as "Anonymous Coward" though and that seems about right for someone who feels the driving need to troll and harass other Slashdot users.
I don't know when Musk will pump (Score:2)
I will give Musk credit, he makes sure that anyone what really matters (read: not me. Or you) doesn't lose money. He doesn't make the mistakes Madoff or Holmes made.
Free Luigi (Score:3)
And it is called ... (Score:2)
... suicide squad. I presume.
Nazi Uber? (Score:2)
Bold move Cotton!
Maybe there are enough cultists out there to support this.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Work for Boeing, eh? How’s that working out for you?
Now ask yourself how much the government has saved for doling out that “pork” to Musk companies that actually deliver value for the money.
90% cheaper rocketry ain’t chump change.
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you're family, you're expendable.
Even then they're at least in exile. Has anyone even heard a peep out of any of the trump family, other than the green card seeking, illegal immigrant Melania?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Mary Trump, sued by uncle Donald for $100 million for talking and writing about her uncle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]