


Apple Set To Unveil Boldest Software Redesign In Years Across Entire Ecosystem 138
New submitter CInder123 shares a report from TechSpot: Apple is undertaking one of the most significant software overhauls in its history, aiming to revamp the user interface across iPhone, iPad, and Mac devices. This ambitious update, set for release later this year, will fundamentally transform the look and feel of Apple's operating systems, enhancing consistency and the user experience.
The updates are part of iOS 19 and iPadOS 19, codenamed "Luck," and macOS 16, dubbed "Cheer," according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. He cited sources who requested anonymity since the project has yet to be officially announced. These major upgrades will introduce a new design language while simplifying navigation and controls. Apple's push for consistency across platforms aims to create a seamless user experience when switching between devices. Currently, applications, icons, and window styles vary significantly across macOS, iOS, and visionOS, leading to a disjointed experience.
The updates are part of iOS 19 and iPadOS 19, codenamed "Luck," and macOS 16, dubbed "Cheer," according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. He cited sources who requested anonymity since the project has yet to be officially announced. These major upgrades will introduce a new design language while simplifying navigation and controls. Apple's push for consistency across platforms aims to create a seamless user experience when switching between devices. Currently, applications, icons, and window styles vary significantly across macOS, iOS, and visionOS, leading to a disjointed experience.
So instead of fixing existing bugs, (Score:5, Insightful)
Instead of fixing existing bugs, they'll add a slew of new ones, while adding confusion for existing users. Yup, total winning strategy.
And since they're already behind with their new AI Siri, this'll just add to the mess and delay.
Re: (Score:2)
> they're already behind with their new AI Siri, this'll just add to the mess and delay
I think they have like 14,000 developers.
Probably different teams.
Re: (Score:2)
> they're already behind with their new AI Siri, this'll just add to the mess and delay
I think they have like 14,000 developers.
Probably different teams.
Different Teams; Different Layers of the OSes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Macrumor's article is calling this a distraction. I think it's an enormous misstep and I've already contacted our local Apple engineer to tell them so.
windows 8? (Score:3, Insightful)
Touch devices and functional computers should not have the same UI. Normally Microsoft is the one whose "purpose of [its] life is only to serve as a warning to others."
Apple does dumb shit but normally not by consciously disregarding the most hated version of Windows of all time.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
When hasn't that been the Apple approach? But locking out innovative hardware doesn't make a computer "content consumption-only", and what do you mean by "interesting production work"?
It sounds like you have more of an axe to grind that a valid perspective. Apple has mostly always been a closed ecosystem, yet one for "context creators", see the problem?
Re: windows 8? (Score:2)
I don't have an axe to grind (I like macOS and use it daily) but he's not wrong. Each successive macOS release makes it more difficult to access the hardware, in the name of better security. In Sequoia your app needs to get the user's permission just to send or receive packets on the LAN, which would be annoying enough if it worked reliably, but the permission state seems to be revoked at random times, with no way for your app to even know what has happened. The result is that to the user it looos like y
Re: (Score:2)
This is true from a development perspective, too. Each revision of macOS makes it increasingly difficult to provide device drivers for interesting hardware. It's getting to the point that if your device doesn't work with the generic USB Class drivers then you're shit out of luck. macOS is already at the point of becoming a content consumption-only platform, with all the interesting production work heading over to Linux and, erk, Windows platforms.
Yeah; nothin' but watchin' TickTock Here...
A couple of Mac Pro I/O Cards I was recently looking-up:
https://archiv.rme-audio.de/en... [rme-audio.de]
https://www.blackmagicdesign.c... [blackmagicdesign.com]
Just one little niche out of many...
Re: (Score:2)
If you haven't already noticed apple's direction, the mac book will eventually just be a "tablet" with a fold out keyboard. Hell soon they'll probably just drop the mac book line tell you to buy an ipad with a magnetic attaching keyboard sold separately for $500.
A lot of people would give a nonessential Body-Part for an M4 iPad Pro running macOS.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, maybe it's about time (Score:3, Interesting)
I understand that Linux works reasonably well on Apple Silicon Macs now - might be worth giving that a try.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why would they? Despite the moaning on here, a lot of people like both IOS and MacOS - and for a lot of people it is a differentiator for them from Linux/Android and Windows.
Re: (Score:3)
MacOS isn't BAD, there are at least a few features baked in that are arguably better than Windows / Linux alternatives. Quicklook is one that jumps out. Bash / ZSH, and the availability for pure BASH scripting being natively available is also a really nice feature.
That being said, there are tons of really annoying issues that Apple refuses to fix at any cost. The primary one being Finder is a steaming turd that makes the Windows Explorer file manager look like the pinnacle of file management in comparison.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair there is a paid replacement for Windows Explorer too, called Directory Opus. Started out on AmigaOS. I wouldn't be without it these days, and even though they just moved to a subscription model for updates I'll probably stick with it.
Re: (Score:2)
I have my complaints about Finder, but none of them are the same as your complaints. Mine are:
1) Samba is old and broken on Finder. Try searching a remote filesystem via Samba. If it's a decent size you might be waiting up to 15 minutes. Just displaying the folders/files on a remote system takes about 30 seconds, whereas on Linux and Windows the same NAS will literally list all of the folders/files in a second or two. I've pointed this out to Apple. Many other people have pointed this out to Apple. Fixing i
Re: Well, maybe it's about time (Score:2)
"the availability for pure BASH scripting being natively available is also a really nice feature"
Are they still using some ancient outdated version of bash? Cause bash on OSX sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
>Seems you never used either of them.
Yeah, I've never used finder after *checks notes* "Describing the shortcomings of finder in detail, along with the workarounds that people used for over a decade". Yep, sure haven't used Finder from 2013 through 2023 on a MBP. Oh... wait...
>No: "Home" is not D:\users\angelo - it is a fantasy folder no one knows where it is.
Because it's not an actual folder? It's a link that displays all of your shortcuts to folders you designate. My "Home" on Windows 11 Pro points
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Why would they encourage people to use their App Store clients for another purpose?
Re: Well, maybe it's about time (Score:2)
As long as it can connect to Azure, Microsoft won't object.
Re: (Score:2)
If I wanted to run Linux, I would have bought a cheap $300 computer, not an expensive Mac.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Well, maybe it's about time (Score:4, Insightful)
If you already own a Mac, the cost of trying out Linux on it is $0.
I actually have been reasonably happy with macOS... but one has to wonder whether "fundamentally transform[ing] the look and feel of Apple's operating systems" will mean the neutering of macOS to more closely align with Apple's device OSes.
For example: Will they remove people's ability to install apps from outside Apple's walled garden? Will they kill the terminal?
Re: (Score:2)
Every time a story about an Apple UI resign comes along (every two or three years) Slashdot loses its collective mind about "neutering" MacOS.
Relax. They're going to tweak the colours of some icons. Maybe, if they're feeling particularly spicy, they'll change the name of "System Preferences" to "Settings."
Re: (Score:2)
The best thing they could do is bring back the NeXT interface. In particular, wide screen monitors ought to have the dock at the left or right. It's bananas to have it at the bottom center, and when you have it there both autohide and not having autohide are just irritating in different ways. I use XFCE with a toolbar set up like NeXT on a 4k TV, it's basically the same thing and there's plenty of real estate for lots of icons.
The thin strip across the top of the classic Mac OS was pretty slick as it did ev
Re: (Score:2)
The best thing they could do is bring back the NeXT interface. In particular, wide screen monitors ought to have the dock at the left or right.
Eh? Apple has supported moving the dock to the left or right sides for well over a decade (bottom/left/right are all supported, not top though). You can’t move the menu bar off of the top with Apple’s standard software thoguh.
Apple's designs have been going in the wrong direction for years — they reduced contrast
Agreed, the translucent menu bar with the blur effect carefully chosen by Apple to minimize the damage of the translucency is nuts. Like they spend so much effort to make the translucence less damaging when they could just...make a black background on the bar, or anythin
Re: (Score:2)
You can move the Dock to any side but that's still only half the battle. You really want to move it so that it's in a corner on a side, where it was on NeXTStep, because then the menu is always in the same place. Having it move around when you open things is stupid and irritating. Last I checked you could not get proper behavior without plist editing, which is also stupid and irritating.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps you should get a monitor that is less than 40 years old. The claim that the corners are faster to use, if it ever had merit at all, died when Macs got screens bigger than 9". This is more a fanboy talking point than it is reality, and my personal experience was that using a NeXT machine sucked. MacOS has plenty of issues, where the dock is is NOT one of them. Also, the "menu" IS always in the same place on the Mac, it is not a function of the dock location.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps you should get a monitor that is less than 40 years old.
I have a 42.5" 4k display, and I got an OS which doesn't treat me like an idiot.
This is more a fanboy talking point than it is reality
I've had a lot of Macs, including some which ran OS X. What do you think I'm fanboying by criticizing OS X? Everything else, all of which has a better UI? Even Windows' makes more sense, although the implementation is fragile garbage.
Also, the "menu" IS always in the same place on the Mac, it is not a function of the dock location.
Right, Apple made the Dock shittier when they made NeXTStep into OSX. The first icon on the Dock used to do stuff that Apple moved to another location, so you need a menu bar AND a dock. 40 years ag
Re: (Score:2)
No and no. They're changing the curtains, not the terms of your incarceration
Re: Well, maybe it's about time (Score:2)
You're referring to the .dmg format, where you mount a disk image file, then drag the app icon to where you want to keep it on your hard drive.
It's really slick, and it works great, and... Apple has deprecated it in favor of always using .pkg instead, which is a windows-style installer-wizard.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup. I've used MacPorts, I've used Fink... I've even "./config && make && sudo make install"ed them.
Most of what I need is already in macOS, but at a minimum I typically add the following:
py-ansible / ansible
coreutils (to get the gnu versions)
git (to have the newest one available)
nmap
tmux
wget
I used to install zsh as well, but Apple's keeping that more up to date nowadays.
W8 zombies return! (Score:2)
This poorly implemented idea was already done by M$ as Windows 8 and the Windows Phone. I hear the phone was okay, but W8 was a confusing mess. It doesn't really matter to me. Apple's "intuitive" interfaces are not so intuitive unless you grew up on them and I won't be buying any of their stuff. I admired Apple's interfaces until I had to use them.
Re: (Score:2)
W10 and W11 are just refinements of W8, a step back towards Windows 7 in some ways but also steps forward in many others. W10 and W11 are, except for the spyware and cloud stuff (the latter of which can be easily turned off), pretty decent OSs.
That code name will bite them (Score:2)
Code named luck.
The street name will be "you're fucked".
It doesn't matter if it's objectively good or bad. People equate easy with familiar. Any change is going to get screamed about on Reddit and the apple tech sites.
It also doesn't matter because people who buy apple products don't look to buy anywhere else. It's not like what Microsoft has been doing with the Windows store and Live365 accounts to login to your computer will attract anyone new to the platform.
Re: (Score:2)
People loathe and fear change. Big Tech has be shoving unnecessary forced upgrades at us for many years now. I don't know anyone who wants a reorganization of software they already know. While the Apple faithful will defend all manner of getting fucked as somehow innovative and quite desirable, unfamiliarity will cause customer attrition. Apple can join Microsoft, Amazon, Goo, etc as experiences to just get thru not enjoyed.
Re: That code name will bite them (Score:2)
I just want to get my work done, I don't want to spend time every year chasing a moving target motivated solely by Apple's business need to have something different to show at their convention.
Re: (Score:2)
Code named luck.
The street name will be "you're fucked".
It doesn't matter if it's objectively good or bad. People equate easy with familiar.
As a long time Apple user, I’ve survived various changes from Apple’s incessant desire to create a cool new interface. I can live with cosmetic changes but if they start changing how things work to create some grand unified field interface we are fucked. Apple fans will rave about how much better it is or rant about how Steve would never let this happen and Cook is an idiot, while the rest of us will just try to adapt.
Code name LUCK (Score:2)
Here is my guess.... (Score:2)
They will introduce a bunch of changes that nobody needs, nobody asked for, and nobody wants. They will modify things that everyone has gotten used to, irritating users as they have to adjust and get used to all the changes that nobody needs, nobody asked for, and nobody wants. They will completely ignore fixing broken shit and fixing stupid shit. They will stir the pot, piss people off, and manage to add no value whatsoever. It will be hailed as revolutionary. Same as it ever was. Good "luck" with all th
Re: (Score:2)
All that will happen, and their share price will still go up
Mac Mode (Score:2)
Jobs had the goal way back in '06 of a KVM mode for a phone that would be your desktop computer.
This seems like the penultimate step.
I beta tested a MacNC back in the 90's with netboot via tftp and AFP instead of a hard drive. He and Larry realized not everybody had a T-1 to their house so they pivoted that hardware to iMac instead.
Sometimes these ideas take a while to come to fruition.
FWIW I got the docking station for a Pine64 many years back and it worked fine. Not fast but OK for light office work.
Mos
Based on how they are behaving currently? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
iOS 18 hid almost all application preferences behind a secondary menu. macOS hid AirDrop. Both are now trying to predict my writing incorrectly. Notes is turning into bloated trash and hashtags. TextEdit was ruined long ago. Passwords is this new incantation that might work in the future but currently gets in the way asking stupid questions. I am going to be cussing at equipment for weeks after this comes outâ¦at least I can locate and override some of the nonsenseâ¦but my poor customers will be cussing for years.
No matter how often they ask, no, I really do want to use Keychain Access. It does what I need, and doesn't get in my way.
Management without direction (Score:2)
This seems more like Apple management has no direction of where to go, and is just trying something to see what sticks.
Since iPhone 3G, the basic interface of the iPhone had been basically consistent, and that means grandma can do FaceTime with her grandkids without much trouble. Nearly zero support effort is a great incentive for the breadwinner of the family to choose iPhones for family members over other options.
Ok, and now Apple is going to drastically change the iPhone interface? Maybe it is time to
Re: (Score:2)
They mean what they've always meant: make everything else look like an iPhone screen.
Disjointed? (Score:2)
" Currently, applications, icons, and window styles vary significantly across macOS, iOS, and visionOS, leading to a disjointed experience."
They just spent the last decade throwing out all the skeuomorphic UI elements and making all these devices have the same look and feel. The got rid of the old macOS System Settings for one that looks like iOS. What in the world do they mean disjointed? Maybe they mean macOS users don't want their laptop to look like an iPhone screen? How old are these developer tea
Re: (Score:2)
MS Windows already destroyed graphical structures for the sake of Android-like lists of text. This was/is departure from the core interface ideas. Not to mention disastrous Win8 monster. Please, experiment without rushing it to the user base.
I wrote an OS myself. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unfuck your current system first (Score:3)
I mean, look at Photos. Worked fine. Now it is a mess. Can't do proper slide shows anymore (something that worked perfectly since I used it first on the first ipad), can't connect to a remote display: it just mirrors ... And lets think about all these small issues on macOS eg when you have multiple desktops and pin an app to all, after a reboot it is stuck on desktop 1 ... at the bottom of all other windows and it can't be brought to top. Or that macOS will never remember what app windows where on which monitor if you unplug one and plug it back in ... absolute top after your macbook goes to sleep and you can remove all the windows again.
But lets add an even wore UI on top
I, for one, welcome this (Score:2)
UX consistency at Microsoft gave us the evergreen gem that is Windows 8.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And before that, when IBM did it we got Presentation Manager. It's a lofty goal that really means disappointment is headed our way.
iOS (Score:2)
If they don't implement the universal back button/gesture iOS will continue to be the absolute crap that it is now.
I see iOS users struggling with going back daily.
Re: iOS (Score:2)
They can't admit Android was right and Apple was wrong.
Longtime Mac user, never had issues like trolls.. (Score:2)
No no no.... seriously... (Score:2)
This ambitious update, set for release later this year, will fundamentally transform the look and feel of Apple's operating systems, enhancing consistency and the user experience.
How the fuck can you, in ONE sentence, contradict yourself so bluntly?
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is milking the cow (Score:2)
"will fundamentally transform the look and feel of Apple's operating systems, enhancing consistency and the user experience." This is an outright contradiction, you do not "enhance consistency and the user experience" by changing everything. This is just plain stupid in my opinion.
But we already have teeny-tiny UI elements in iOS (Score:2)
Or did you mean they're going to phone'ify the Mac?
It's Apple's Windows 8 moment (Score:2)
This is exactly what Microsoft tried to do with Windows 8: create a consistent environment across desktop and mobile devices. We all know how well that worked. Microsoft eventually got the hint too and stopped that nonsense (mostly).
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The Mac Pro has 6 full-length PCI Express gen 4 slots (Two x16 slots, Four x8 slots) and one half-length x4 PCI Express gen 3 slot with Apple I/O card installed.
Re: (Score:2)
The Mac Pro has 6 full-length PCI Express gen 4 slots (Two x16 slots, Four x8 slots) and one half-length x4 PCI Express gen 3 slot with Apple I/O card installed.
How in the Holy Hell did they get THAT I/O to work with their highly-optimized SoC Architecture? It must have been facilitated by the Interconnect Fabric for the Max and Ultra Mx Variants, no?
Re: (Score:3)
Can it be any worse than what they ship right now? Just kidding. Of course it can.
Re: (Score:2)
Can it be any worse than what they ship right now? Just kidding. Of course it can.
Every release, I ask myself the same question. Maybe if I stopped asking, they would stop finding ways.
Re: (Score:2)
Does anyone have proper scaling? For a while it seemed like we were finally heading towards resolution independence but now we're stuck with some kind of weird pseudo-pixel system based apparently on a base pixel that is 1/160th of an inch. But not always. And instead of UIs based on scalable vector elements, we still are generally stuck with scaled pixmaps.
That said, on a 4k screen macOS looks a lot better than most other operating systems, including Windows and Gnome. One thing stopping me from buying
Re: (Score:2)
XFCE is great at 4k. No problems whatsoever. I'm doing it right now. NVidia, on the other hand, is kind of a little PITA when it comes to using it with this TV. I have tried I think every different mechanism for forcing output to a specific display, but it still can only seem to detect and react to when my display disconnects, and not to when it connects. If it weren't for my using CUDA regularly, I would regret my choices enough to actually think about buying an AMD card, which is what I expect to do next
Re: (Score:2)
Yes that's what I'm getting at. Qt apps seem to do okay, and GTK4 is a lot better in recent releases with support for factional scaling finally. I understand what fractional scaling is and how virtual pixels now forms the device-independent base unit of measurement, but I still don't like how it's done. 100% scale should mean the button, font, line, circle, whatever is the same size regardless of screen resolution, and changing that percent simply
Re: (Score:2)
Windows handles all kinds of fractional scaling just great. I don't know if it's by pixel or by vector, but shit works. I can go from a 125% screen at 4k to a 100% screen at HD and the scaling just resizes.
Re: (Score:2)
X11 has had the ability to scale based on DPI for many many years, but the problem is that most software is written on the assumption of pushing fixed size bitmaps instead of vectors.
SGI had a nice vector based UI on IRIX, which was built on top of X11.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
> They don't have proper scaling.
What on Earth are you on about? MacOS has better scaling than any other OS out there.
> Multi-monitor hardware support only properly exists in the M4.
Again, what on Earth are you talking about? I've run multiple monitors on MacOS for over a decade without an issue. What, exactly, did you have a problem with?
Re:OS X is a mess (Score:4, Informative)
What on Earth are you on about? MacOS has better scaling than any other OS out there.
I tried using a Mac from my TV recently. The only way to make the interface larger so that I can comfortably read it from a distance is to turn down the resolution. Why????? There is a hacky way to force the TV as a retina display, but MacOS just 2x scales the whole interface on retina displays which is way too big for my TV's lower resolution. Both Windows and most Linux desktops have true fractional scaling, in fact Windows high DPI scaling has gotten quite decent recently. When I set my scaling to 125% in Windows on a 1080p monitor, it doesn't just set the resolution to 900p or something, it actually scales up the size of UI elements to make the interface bigger. Yes, some programs don't understand high DPI scaling and become blurry, but day to day I rarely encounter any software with this issue. All of my most frequently used programs handle high DPI displays just fine. MacOS appears to have no equivalent to this behaviour. Even with a retina display, the interface scaling options are just changing the resolution of the display. They just don't label it as such. Unless you leave the scaling at default, everything becomes a bit softer and blurrier whenever you use any scaling options on MacOS and it sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
> I tried using a Mac from my TV recently. The only way to make the interface larger so that I can comfortably read it from a distance is to turn down the resolution.
I have no idea what your TV is doing but when I adjust the scaling on mine- it outputs the native resolution to the display and just adjusts the UI element sizes.
The resolutions listed under the items in the scaling menu are _equivalent resolutions_ not the actual resolution output to the display. For example- if you choose "Larger Text" - t
Re: OS X is a mess (Score:2)
I would not be able to use my Mac without its amazing control swipe to zooms. On the last iOS update a font size widget was added and I am really hoping it will appear on MacOS. But otherwise I really do not want my desktop to become a phone, except I want to be able to call from WhatsApp on it..
Re:OS X is a mess (Score:4, Informative)
> What on Earth are you on about? MacOS has better scaling than any other OS out there.
I don't think so? I'm 50yo so my eyesight is getting worse. I need large text to be able to read it. My monitor resolution is 3840x2160.
When I used to use Windows, to get everything in large text (menus, dialogs, prompts, ...) I'd stay in 3840x2160 resolution and choose "large fonts 150% or 200%". The UI adjusts: I get the large fonts I need, but staying at native resolution, so all the lines+curves in the fonts are clear and crisp, and photos have all their detail.
On Mac to get everything in large text, the only option I have is to bump down the resolution, currently 3008x1692 but I'll probably have to go to 2560x1440. This gives me the large fonts I need. But it's at a lower resolution, so the fonts look pixelated, and pictures can't be displayed in as much detail.
Did I understand you wrong? Is there some other way to get MacOS to have nice scaling? I haven't found it, but I'd dearly love to.
Re: (Score:2)
But... but... Steve Jobs is a god!
Re: (Score:2)
Steve Jobs is long dead and that has nothing to do with whether parent is mistaken or not. Scaling in MacOS does not change the resolution output to the display- the resolutions shown under each scaling option are equivalent resolutions, not the actual resolution. If I change the scaling option- the display elements get larger or smaller, but the resolution being sent to my 4k monitor is always 3840x2160 which is easily verified by selecting Display Status from the menu on my monitor- It clearly says 3840x2
Re:OS X is a mess (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Nope. Doesn't work on a 2k monitor at least a generic non apple 2k monitor. That sort of scaling is not available on settings. Macos seems to only turn that on for 4k. It's super annoying. I found a hack shareware program that would create a virtual screen and do the scaling on that and then copy the results to the real screen. That worked about as you'd expect.
Re: (Score:2)
That sort of scaling is not available on settings. Macos seems to only turn that on for 4k.
I have a Dell P322QE with native resolution 3840x2160, i.e. 4k. But MacOS still doesn't turn on proper scaling for it.
Re: (Score:2)
It works on my old 27" LG 1440p monitor. What version of MacOS are you trying this on?
Re: (Score:2)
I think it was Ventura. The last Mac Mini before the A1 was released. I have read it really depends on the monitor whether macOS will enable scaling or not. Using a curved 2k monitor. Definitely no scaling available. I can, however, choose a lower actual resolution, which is just fuzzy as the monitor tries to fake the resolution. I was also upset to learn on another new mac mini that at 1080p resolution they no longer implement subpixel rendering, so everything looks blurry and garbage. Gnome 3 and GT
Re:OS X is a mess (Score:4, Informative)
> System Settings -> Displays -> Larger Text vs. More Space. It changes scaling, not the resolution.
What you describe changes the RESOLUTION (at least it does on my mac connected to my Dell P3222QE). Indeed when you hover over one of the icons in "larger text vs more space", a little hover text shows the resolution that it's going to pick.
And if you click "Displays > Advanced > show resolutions as list" then it replaces those "Larger text vs more space" options with a dropdown of available resolutions.
Re: (Score:2)
That is absolutely not how it works on my Mac. You choose scaling, not a resolution and my 4k monitor _always_ shows 3840x2160 regardless of what I have my scaling set to.
The resolutions displayed are _equivalent resolutions_ not the actual resolution. Go ahead and try setting larger text but then check the actual resolution your monitor is displaying. No matter which text size I select- from more space all the way to larger text- the resolution on my monitor is always 3840x2160.
I can force an actually diff
Re: (Score:2)
It does not change the resolution. The setting you are describing shows the equivalent resolution, but if you go into the menu on your monitor itself and look at the actual resolution it will be 4k. I literally just checked this on my system and no matter what scaling I choose- all the way from more space to larger text- the actual resolution output to the monitor is always 3840x2160.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry- ignore my reply below- we're saying the same thing because I replied to the wrong post like a moron.
Re: (Score:2)
You might be right ... or maybe you're just looking in the wrong place. In macOS, the settings to change text size aren't under Display, but Accessibility. (Yes, you may have to admit that your failing vision is a disability.)
Re: (Score:2)
That's not how scaling in MacOS works. The resolutions displayed under each item in the scaling menu are equivalent resolutions- not the actual resolution output to your display.
So for example- if I select Larger Text- the resolution under the icon shows 1920x1080 and that's what it looks like size wise- but the actual resolution output to my monitor is still 3840x2160- the native resolution of my 4k display which I can check by going to the settings menu on the monitor itself and having it display the stat
Re: (Score:2)
OS X doesn't really do fractional scaling. It looks like ass.
Re: (Score:3)
"Forever to find"? You've gotten used to the shit sandwich that's Windows and just assume that if it's different from Windows it's worse.
Windows is a special kind of disaster, where configuring a network interface properly means dropping down from the nice new UI that only includes half of what you need into an unholy thing that looks like it dates back to Windows 95 that includes all of the settings, but organized in a way that no sane person would think is anything but an abomination.
But no, macOS in recent versions is a disaster, too. When they iOS-ified System Settings, it became way harder to find anything. Every version of macOS prio
Re: (Score:2)
But no, macOS in recent versions is a disaster, too. When they iOS-ified System Settings, it became way harder to find anything. Every version of macOS prior to Ventura was easy to use. Now, it is four or five clicks deep to change basic network settings, i.e. almost as bad as Windows. I never thought I would utter something like that.
Totally. If I have one regret about updating from my 2013 imac running mojave (didn't want to lose 32-bit compatibility for Team Fortress 2) to an M4 mini, this is it. The use
Re: (Score:2)
... All over again
At least FCP X burned so many people that Apple has given us fourteen years of free updates as penance. And in truth, after a few years, most of the stuff that FCP X didn't support wasn't stuff I cared about anymore anyway, once I moved away from HDV. But yeah, those were not good times.
Re: (Score:2)
All of your apps will break but the emperor will have new clothes.
Not even Remotely-Related.
Re:In other words, break everything like Elon Musk (Score:4, Informative)
We've all known this since the beginning, but like everything else Trump it is projected on exactly the wrong people. TDS victims are self-identifying, they all wear red baseball hats and say stupid things. Is that you?