New GNOME Executive Director Named (phoronix.com) 40
Phoronix's Michael Larabel reports: Last July it was announced Holly Million was stepping down as the GNOME Foundation's Exeuctive Director after less than a year at the helm. Richard Littauer took over as interim Executive Director while this week a new GNOME Foundation Executive Director was hired.
GNOME's new Executive Director is Steven Deobald. Steven Deobald is a Canadian free software advocate and has been a GNOME user since 2002. As the GNOME Foundation Executive Director, Steven wants to focus on transparency and to better ensure financial stability of the GNOME Foundation. You can read Deobald's welcoming statements on blogs.gnome.org.
Further reading: Is It Time For a Change In GNOME Leadership?
GNOME's new Executive Director is Steven Deobald. Steven Deobald is a Canadian free software advocate and has been a GNOME user since 2002. As the GNOME Foundation Executive Director, Steven wants to focus on transparency and to better ensure financial stability of the GNOME Foundation. You can read Deobald's welcoming statements on blogs.gnome.org.
Further reading: Is It Time For a Change In GNOME Leadership?
Is there anyone here (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: Is there anyone here (Score:2)
My laptop is running Gnome right now. My previous distro ran KDE, but due to a minor catastrophe I had to install something fresh.
Unfortunately, I was pressed for time and the one thing Gnome does well for me is it has a quick setup time. KDE takes me a good hour to get setup how I like it. XFCE and others take even longer.
Gnome is stupid out of the box, but I can quickly add Dash to Dock and a couple other extensions and get to work.
The window manager I use is not GNOME... (Score:3)
GOOD! (Score:2)
The leadership for GNOME Foundation has been rudderless for oevr a decade. I'm hoping that the fact that Steven Deobald is going to be the first CEO since forever that actually uses the Gnome Desktop means that he will be working to fix the bizarre behaviors that have taken root.
At this point, I don't see how he could make things any worse than they already are.
Re: (Score:3)
The leadership for GNOME Foundation has been rudderless for oevr a decade. I'm hoping that the fact that Steven Deobald is going to be the first CEO since forever that actually uses the Gnome Desktop means that he will be working to fix the bizarre behaviors that have taken root.
The GNOME foundation CEO does not directly control the technical direction of the GNOME project. Just like the Mozilla Foundation CEO does not directly control the technical direction of the Firefox browser, or the Linux foundation CEO directly control the technical direction of the Linux kernel.
Re: (Score:2)
If he doesn't have influence over the project, then he is not really a CEO.
How bout focusing on not sucking (Score:4, Insightful)
Make GNOME great again by making it more powerful and complicated again. Oversimplifying it was dumb. It's fine if you want to have a dumb-dumb mode, but that can't be the only thing you do and it can't take precedence over functionality.
I'm all for touch capabilities, but touch was never going to dominate Linux except in Android-land.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
There are extensions for the complexity, some of which are shipped with any standard installation of GNOME. Workspaces are built in. Instant keyboard search and execute is built in.
Re: (Score:2)
Every desktop has a target audience, and those target audiences are different. And that's okay too.
So who's using it?
So how about: GNOME continues to pander to its current target audience (which apparently is people who want simple and touch compatible)
People stopped using it in droves when they made that change.
Re: How bout focusing on not sucking (Score:2)
It is still the default for Ubuntu and Fedora, which means that most people are introduced to desktop Linux with Gnome.
That probably is not a good thing, but it probably accounts for the why Gnome remains one of if not the most popular Linux DEs.
Re: (Score:2)
That probably is not a good thing, but it probably accounts for the why Gnome remains one of if not the most popular Linux DEs.
Yes, exactly, they are being force fed the worst DE option by the worst distribution options. I know you're not making it, but appeal to popularity has always been a logical fallacy.
Re: How bout focusing on not sucking (Score:2)
I use gnome. I hated gnome 2 and 3, but the current 40 is wonderful. Everyone has their own preferences though and that is what makes linux desktop great. You can have it your way. There are alternatives for every piece of software and you donâ(TM)t have to use the same thing I use.
Cautiously Optimistic (Score:1)
GNOME has had kind of a weird few years. Objectively great releases, a lot of under the hood features people have wanted (HDR, triple buffering), big developments like sovereign tech fund contracts . . .
But they've also had budget drama, board shakeups . . .
It's an exciting time for the Linux desktop generally, hopefully they can really capitalize on that interest in the next few years.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an exciting time for the Linux desktop generally, hopefully they can really capitalize on that interest in the next few years.
Much to the disappointment of some here, it is not, and will never be, the year of the Linux desktop. And I say that as someone who has used only Linux as my primary desktop for decades. None of the major DEs (GNOME or KDE) are going to change that dynamic. While those that support the apps that run the world (mostly on Linux) are a force, they are never going to amount to more than a rounding error in desktop usage.
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't have to be more than a rounding error of the overall market share to be a big year. I mean, double a rounding error may still be a rounding error, but it's still 100% growth.
And that has literally happened, not so much in North America, but the growth in mostly India is insane. It's not a rounding error in places that don't speak English anymore. It just isn't, and that doesn't look likely to reverse.
I don't get the need to be like, if it doesn't unseat Windows it's not a big deal. No one said "Y
Using GNOME on a tablet (Score:2)
I recently bought a second-hand Microsoft Surface Go tablet and installed Debian on it, and lo and behold, GNOME actually works decently on it. Not quite as polished as Android or iOS in some places, in others it actually works better, but the fact that it's all well-known standard Linux stuff is just incredible. I was wondering how to sync books from my OpenWRT router. Well, I could install some kind of dinghy - or I could just write a one-line script calling rsync over ssh. Job done.
I don't have the weird
Re: (Score:2)
> GNOME actually works decently on it
On a Surface Go? Touchscreen and all?
Is it usable without a keyboard and mouse? And if so, fully usable?
I have other questions but those are the significant ones. I don't know how anyone syncs books from a router -- huh? -- or how a dinghy would help. To me that is a small boat, either a sail powered or a rubber inflatable boat.
This is intriguing to me.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a certain kind of person, the type who will not ever shut up about "woke" who are absolutely obsessed with gender etc and drag it into every single thread no matter what. Please stop.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They don't like it when DEI hires are sacked and people get hired on merit.
Now is the time for all those sexist, racist cunts to quit their pathetic, hateful woke whining and STFU.
Re: (Score:2)
There is a kind of sexist, racist person who thinks people should be hired based on their genitalia or the color of their skin and not on their qualifications for the job.
Yes, we call them conservatives.
They don't like it when DEI hires are sacked and people get hired on merit.
Which letter in DEI do you oppose?
Now is the time for all those sexist, racist cunts to quit their pathetic, hateful woke whining and STFU.
You're still whining.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, "equity" is opposed to equality, so that's a bit of a problem.
No, equity is how you get equality. If you give the same aid to people who need it and people who don't, you'll never achieve equality, because you're willfully maintaining the status quo. Same if you give no aid, only that's even more cruel.
Re: (Score:2)
Previous hateful woke commenter strangely silent:
"There's a certain kind of person, the type who will not ever shut up about "woke" who are absolutely obsessed with gender etc and drag it into every single thread no matter what. Please stop."
And you're still whining.
Re: (Score:2)
genitalia
You are so obsessed with genitals: you keep on bringing it up in threads where it's not on topic. Why do you feel the need to always comment on people's genitals?
You keep trying to claim it's other people but you're the one who keeps bringing the topic up. I think people might rightly be concerned about a genital-obsessive such as yourself making decisions based on genitals rather than, merit. There's no way you manage to separate your online obsession from your actions AFK.
Re: (Score:2)
Then stop supporting hiring based on a person's genitalia, support sacking people who were DEI hired for their genitalia, and support replacing them with people hired on merit.
Then no-one has to concern themselves with other people's genitalia, or skin colour, ever again.
Because sexism and racism is wrong, you hateful woke turd.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't want to discuss genitalia?
Not really, because I'm not obsessed with them. So unlike you, I can hire on merit. You clearly hire based on genitals because frankly you can't stop obsessing over them. You should try hiring people based on skills and knowledge instead.
Re: (Score:2)
Good, schizo, good.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you are answers with genitals and this will affect your fitting decisions.
In other words you are living proof of why DEI is necessary: so muppets like you don't let your genitalia obsession drive hiring decisions. Could you do me a favour and not? If everyone like you stopped obsessing over genitals and focused on skills, there'd be no need for all this stuff you hate so much. Funny really, you're part of the reason it exists.
Re: (Score:2)
Bad, schizo, bad.
Re: (Score:2)
You hire based on genitals. You are so obsessed with them there is no way you aren't.
Re: (Score:1)
You are so/not so obsessed with them there is no/every way you are/aren't.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you keep bringing up genitals? You are obsessed. Maybe you should consider merit based hiring instead of thinking about genitals all the time.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you keep bringing up genitals?
Oh dear the LLM suffered mode collapse. Or maybe it exceeded the token buffer and so forgot who raised the topic first.
Re: (Score:1)
Explains the inability to discuss genitalia like a grown-up.
I was banned from Gnome for mentioning change (Score:2)
It probably won't happen, but I want to Gnome return to more graphic, without things such as "Activities", a more desktop-centric metaphor, and perhaps a agreement/merger with Cinnamon, to avoid duplication of effort. I appreciate all that the Gnome programmers have done for Gnome's many utilities and parts; it is only the design leadership that I hope changes.