Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Google

Google Tests AI Search on Its Homepage (cnbc.com) 6

Google's stalwart search button has a new neighbor: AI Mode. From a report: The artificial intelligence feature is being tested directly beneath the Google search bar beside a "Google Search" button, replacing the "I'm Feeling Lucky" widget. The new feature, though not widely available yet, is being tested in a location where Google rarely makes changes.

Google Tests AI Search on Its Homepage

Comments Filter:
  • At this point in time the two letters "AI" in front of a piece about a product signify only one thing - as evidenced by the brief, meaningless summary - dumb marketing drivel.

    And no, I'm not clicking your bait.

    • Google has been giving me AI answers before search results for about a year now. I am skeptical, however, I find the AI answers very informative. I only use google for things like: "are tomatoes healthy?", and simple things. Some recipes. Sometimes things like: "why is thee sky blue". Nothing that they can track me on, try not to, sometimes I slip up. The AI does pretty good, and they give links below that I find credible, and supports the AI's assertions.
      • My experience is the opposite, the results have been less and less relevant for years - ever since google started sprinkling advertising in-between them - and now it has gotten to the point that the relevant stuff is sprinkled on page 6 or 7 among chaff.

        Even looking up shit on wikipedia and following the references is now way better, plus it usually has correct translation to a number of languages and at times real nuggets in the "wikipedian" discussions and histories.

        And all of that - look, ma - with no "A

        • by XXongo ( 3986865 )

          I am skeptical, however, I find the AI answers very informative....

          My experience is the opposite, the results have been less and less relevant for years -

          My experience is both.

          Search results have indeed been getting worse. I particularly am annoyed by searches in which my search term is not present on the page in the results.

          However, although I make a habit of NOT relying on the "AI" summary, I have noticed that, in general, the "AI" summary accurately reflects the information in the pages.

          I still don't trust it, though, and I want the original source, not the digested version.

You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish. You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tuna fish. -- from the tunefs(8) man page

Working...