

Meta Uses Open Source AI To Design Greener Concrete For Its Next Data Center (nerds.xyz) 36
BrianFagioli writes: Meta has partnered with Amrize and the University of Illinois to develop an "AI-optimized" concrete mix that cuts carbon by 35% for its new data center.
No it's not (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Does it cut carbon by 35% or does the AI say it cuts carbon by 35%? Assuming it does, does the new formula substituting in Elmer's glue actually hold up?
I've noticed a lot of people even really really high level people are trusting what it says waaaaaay too much.
Re: (Score:2)
The AI is still faulty.
Limecrete and Hempcrete exist and are far better than 35 % , they are carbon NEGATIVE!!!!.
Why did the AI not suggest this ?
We continue to stay on the path to extinction.
Re: (Score:2)
The AI is still faulty.
No.
Limecrete and Hempcrete exist and are far better than 35 % , they are carbon NEGATIVE!!!!.
They do, and they are.
Why did the AI not suggest this ?
Because they have terrible compressive strength, and are generally used as insulation, not load bearing, what was not what they were looking for.
We continue to stay on the path to extinction.
The Earth naturally sequesters and emits carbon in the various carbon cycles of varying lengths.
It's not quite so simple to point at any single carbon emissive behavior and say "that there- that's leading us toward extinction!"
The biggest target needs to be fossil fuels. But in the interim, less carbon-intensive concrete will help.
Re: (Score:2)
Does it cut carbon by 35% or does the AI say it cuts carbon by 35%?
They replace about a third of the cement with fly ash.
So, yes, that reduces carbon since it uses less cement.
The fly ash comes from burning pulverized coal, so this technique won't work after coal is phased out.
Re: (Score:2)
The fly ash comes from burning pulverized coal, so this technique won't work after coal is phased out.
Whew! Good thing we're "reinvesting" in coal, then, isn't it? /s
Re: (Score:2)
that's the f'up thing about this whole thing.... the company in charge "estimates" it cuts carbon by 35%.... Why estimated? it is something one can actually measure and calculate... no reason for an estimate
Re: (Score:2)
AI *is* math.
Mind = Blown.
Re: (Score:2)
No. AI of this variant is statistics with is a small part of Math and one that basically has no connection to concrete mixes.
Re: (Score:3)
Bayesian optimization is good way to find better ways to do things if you have enough data to train a sound surrogate model.
The alternative is a physical simulation which may require supercomputers to do reasonably.
or... (Score:3)
you could not build it for 100% green plus the bonus for not actually burning more energy for AI porn generation.
Re: (Score:2)
also my understanding is this will be biggest center to date... 35 percent less of 200 percent bigger?
Re: (Score:2)
What's better, 0% less of 200% bigger, or 35% less of 200% bigger?
You wouldn't think this would be a difficult math problem.
Re: (Score:2)
i am questioning the purpose of growth, sometimes obesity is just bad
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Disclaimer - I'm not a concrete expert. But I do know that there are many varying grades and mixes of concretes depending on application. Sure, this may not be a fix for all concrete applications, but then no concrete formula is. That doesn't mean that lessons from this application can't be applied to others.
Re: (Score:2)
There exists concrete products already that are carbon negative.
Hempcrete and Limecrete.
You and the AI are both wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
*crete is not a set of synonyms made from different things.
They have a set of requirements, neither of which are met by the poor structural strength of limecrete and hempcrete.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't knock AI porn too soon... it eliminates human/child/sex trafficking needs and a whole shit ton of evil if porn was strictly/wholly AI generated...
people will do what people will do... AI porn generation would reduce victims to a degree from the loop...
I used AI the other day (Score:2)
I used AI the other day to invent anti-gravity. A few weeks ago it helped me solve world hunger.
AI used more than the savings (Score:3)
Too bad using the AI was a non-green solution to a green problem. How many times over will the AI in that datacenter burn though the savings that the concrete created, in a day?
What is the win from ditching the AI completely? You won't even need that datacenter, talk about going green.
Re: (Score:2)
Worse that its solution is wrong, and therefore a total waste of resources. ... ie waaaay better than 35% and these products are already commercially available.
Hempcrete and Limecrete are carbon negative
We are "Led by donkeys"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It was a surrogate model for a physical simulation- far cheaper in energy terms than a traditional physical simulation.
Whether or not that was all cheaper than just using traditional concrete is a quite simple "Yes."
Cooking limestone into calcium oxide emits 1 CO2 molecule per calcium oxide molecule. It's a fuck-ton.
The Iciocracy ... No need to do this. (Score:3)
Hempcrete is carbon negative.
If the AI doesnt reccommend this , then the AI is defective.
Once again more bullshit and #greenwash from the worlds billionaire cretins.
Heres a few citations in case you think im a loon.
( Im not ! thats the idiocracy )
https://www.researchgate.net/p... [researchgate.net]
https://www.researchgate.net/p... [researchgate.net]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
https://www.anthropocenemagazi... [anthropocenemagazine.org]
Re: (Score:1)
You've commented multiple times about hempcrete in this story, while completely disregarding that (according to your own Wiki link) it is not fit for purpose, as it's not load-bearing. The majority of concrete in any build is in the slab, which is load-bearing by definition.
Re: (Score:2)
The AI didn't invent something ...
What I'd like is some clever additive... such as carbonated water makes it better and greener concrete... and how it could be used for structural footings then a way to fill the rest with limecrete and foam blocks.
Re: (Score:2)
Since we seem to be calling this particular Bayesian Optimizer "AI" (fine by me), the AI did, indeed, invent it.
Re: (Score:3)
During WW2, the Japanese mixed coconut fiber into concrete to make bunkers.
The fibers reduced the amount of cement needed, and made the concrete more flexible so it was resilient to shelling.
Re: (Score:2)
Beautiful news .. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Unfortunately not
Hempcrete exists and is carbon NEGATIVE.
That the AI didnt suggest this proves your assertion that AI is going to save us is wholly incorrect
In all honesty though that the AI didnt suggest either Hempcrete or Limecrete which are commercially available and CO2 negative tells us either that the AI is unfit for purpose or for some reason these products were deliberately excluded. It tells us that those who enlisted the services of the AI have been promoted to a high level of incompetence.
There
Re: (Score:2)
Meta AI (Score:2)
How is most of that 'savings' created? (Score:2)
If they are increasing aggregate size to reduce the refined parts of the mix, that's also cause for concern.
And if this new mix is kept as a trade secret, why are they hoarding information that could help save the world?