

India Hits 50% Non-Fossil Power Milestone Five Years Ahead of Paris Agreement's 2030 Target (reuters.com) 28
India has achieved 50% of its installed electricity capacity from non-fossil fuel sources -- five years ahead of its 2030 target under the Paris Agreement, signalling accelerating momentum in the country's clean energy transition. From a report: The announcement comes as India's renewable power output rose at its fastest pace since 2022 in the first half of 2025, while coal-fired generation declined nearly 3%. Fossil fuels still accounted for over two-thirds of the increase in power generation last year. India plans to expand coal-fired capacity by 80 GW by 2032 to meet rising demand.
It's cheaper (Score:5, Interesting)
The only reason to keep using fossil fuels is the prop up fossil fuel companies and fossil fuel dependent countries like Saudi Arabia.
We all know that but those companies spend a lot of money buying our elections. Mostly with propaganda to trick us into voting for people who are currently crashing our economy and getting ready to lay us all off
Re: (Score:3)
It's interesting that India is a democracy and has managed to do this 5 years ahead of their goal. Their goal wasn't as aggressive as China's, but still.
It's a good sign because it proves that democracies can do this kind of thing. Of course for India it's been a massive benefit. Not just cleaner air, but lots of jobs in manufacturing and installation. It has helped develop their energy grid too, improving it and getting power to under-served areas. They have new micro and mini grids too.
It's a shame so man
It's not just a democracies can do this (Score:2)
The Chinese dictatorship has survived because it became the world's factory. And because it had a huge surplus rural population it could churn through. None of that is sustainable and the cracks are showing and they are working on moving to a wartime economy similar to how America did in order to maintain their economy without actually implementing socialism.
Empires never last because corruption sets in and they im
Re: (Score:2)
The Chinese Empire has been going strong for six millennia, when do you expect the rot to start setting in? BTW, the kind of corruption being exhibited by the current American President is punished by execution in the PRC.
Re: (Score:2)
The Chinese Empire has been going strong for six millennia, when do you expect the rot to start setting in?
The concept of any kind of Chinese empire goes back maybe 4000 years, and even then the ruling families and the borders they ruled over changed many times since. Once an imperial family was removed then that was the creation of a different and distinct empire or empires. If there was a Chinese empire before 2000 BC, give or take a few centuries, then there's no real record of it. Even then the last recognized emperor of China was removed in 1912 or 1945, depending on how one chooses to define "China" or
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: It's cheaper (Score:2)
Re:It's cheaper (Score:4, Interesting)
The only reason to keep using fossil fuels is the prop up fossil fuel companies and fossil fuel dependent countries like Saudi Arabia.
That's the only reason? Not to keep the lights on when the sun doesn't blow and the wind doesn't shine?
Metrics like LCOE, levelized cost of energy/electricity, make certain assumptions when making their calculations. One common assumption for wind and solar is that there's an existing backup somewhere on the grid. It's pretty safe to make that assumption if half of your electricity comes from fossil fuels still, and there's ample reserves in that given that for large portions of the year there could be idled power plants due to a wide variation in demand over the year as people use less energy in the mild temperatures of spring and fall but quite a bit more in the summer and winter. That can mean with each marginal addition to the grid of wind and solar capacity those existing fossil fuel plants still see plenty of use but that use becomes more variable, changing with the day/night cycle to match solar output than the seasonal cycle as people switch their heating and cooling demands.
I expect the next big thing on the move to lower CO2 emissions is nuclear fission with thermal energy storage. There would be a nuclear fission reactor to heat up something like a molten salt, that molten salt would be the thermal mass to store energy, and as energy is needed that heat can be drawn from the molten salt to run a turbine. This removes what may be the largest criticism of nuclear power, not being able to shift output with demand and remain economical. This would make nuclear fission a good pairing with intermittent wind and solar power, and could perhaps remove the need for any other kind of energy storage on the grid.
Re: (Score:2)
Fossil fuels are such a pain to deal with geopolitically as well. Nobody is likely to invade in order to steal my sunlight. You almost need a huge standing army to have any influence on fossil fuel prices.
We all know that but those companies spend a lot of money buying our elections. Mostly with propaganda to trick us into voting for people who are currently crashing our economy and getting ready to lay us all off
Pretty much every organization that accumulates more power than the people will take control. It's almost impossible to peacefully hold onto a democracy for any length of time.
Well done! (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Remind me how much emissions have declined in India, and how much the climate has cooled?
Re: (Score:2)
here you go (Score:2)
https://www.perplexity.ai/sear... [perplexity.ai]
describe in extreme detail failed USA recycle policies and plastic overuse. meanwhile India has successfully banned single use plastics for years now. e
g. McDonalds there and malls use better utensils.
## Americaâ(TM)s Failed Recycling Policies and Plastic Overuse
### The Scale of Plastic Overuse in the USA compare to worls most populous democracy India
Re: (Score:1)
Just put the plastic in a properly-managed landfill and be done with it. Recycling, like bio-fuels and other performative greenwashing, does not help the environment.
I bet you see a lot more plastic waste blowing around in India than the USA. Funny, that...
Re: (Score:2)
Burying 'chemicals' is generally a bad idea. You contaminate your water sources over time.
There have been proposals to burn waste, i.e. turning petro-chemical plastics back into their constituent petro state as fuel. Of course, burning shit sounds like a toxic mess for anyone standing down-wind of the chimney.
For that to happen, governments regulate away production of 'bad' plastics in the first place ensuring a cleaner burn. And, over time, you switch away from petro sources to more vegan-friendly plastics
Re: (Score:2)
"But I am not a chemist..."
That much is obvious.
Re: (Score:2)
No, I am a pragmatist, even fully embracing renewables.
However... The end goal should be reducing the amount of plastic produced in the first place but what do you do when industry, our supermarket duopoly, insists on wrapping everything in film?
Here in Australia we had a soft-plastic recycling scheme that was exactly that, a green-washing 'scheme'. It couldn't scale, so instead of recycling they stored the plastic bags in a huge warehouse - the project was shut down as a fire risk.
Re: Well done! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
NOOOOO (Score:4, Funny)
Only last week I complained that I can't complain about China anymore, now India is doing something? WTF. Who else can I complain about to justify not doing anything myself? Help me out here. Which one of your roll coal who I can point to in order to justify keeping the AC turned on when I'm not at home?