Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Government The Almighty Buck

SEC Approves Texas Stock Exchange (cbsnews.com) 43

The SEC has approved the Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE), the first new fully integrated U.S. stock exchange in decades and the only one based in Texas. TXSE is set to launch trading services, as well as exchange-traded products, known as ETPs, and corporate listings, in 2026. CBS News reports: Exchange-traded products are financial instruments that follow the performance of underlying assets such as stocks, indexes or other financial benchmarks. Like stocks, ETPs are traded on public exchanges, allowing investors to buy and sell them throughout the trading day at market prices that fluctuate in real time.

TXSE was backed by wealth management giant BlackRock and market maker Citadel Securities, among other firms. The Texas company said in June 2024 that it raised a total of $120 million from more than two dozen investors. TXSE's headquarters in Dallas opened this spring, the group said.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

SEC Approves Texas Stock Exchange

Comments Filter:
  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Friday October 03, 2025 @08:13PM (#65702202)
    There's 10 trillion dollars in there and the billionaires wanted and they're going to get it. Texas is ludicrously corrupt. There is no way in hell your money isn't going to end up in their phony bologna stock exchange.

    Yeah I know technically you can control where your money goes. Right now anyway. It won't last. I guess you could withdraw the money and take the tax penalties...

    You put crooks in charge of everything. You think they're going to leave you alone? It is to laugh...
  • After that guy in NYC gets elected mayor, the NYSE will probably move OUT of NYC...move to Texas?
  • BlackRock, eh? Where are all the conspiracy nuts talking smack about this?

  • by ctilsie242 ( 4841247 ) on Friday October 03, 2025 @08:56PM (#65702270)

    HFT trading there will be interesting. In NYC, the success you have for that is measured by the foot your Internet pipe is from the stock exchange, so it will be interesting seeing a scramble for real estate physically close to this.

  • Such an unnecessary, worthless endeavor altogether. I wish we could just make them illegal.

    • I disagree. I want there to be low-friction ways to buy tiny parts of large companies. A stock exchange is waaaaay better than every investor independently evaluating every potential company. No system is perfect, but the SEC and stock exchanges are MUCH better for the little guys than the law of the jungle.

      • "A stock exchange is waaaaay better than every investor independently evaluating every potential company."

        They should actually. What you're pitching is ETFs and mutual funds. "Take my money, smart man, and invest it." Stock market exchange, unless its an ETF or some packaged security, you literally do invest in single companies.

        There was a time before computer trading, when investors in the stock market did evaluate every potential company. Its only laziness in the last 30 years that people throw money a

        • No, you're confused about what they meant. What you're implying by evaluating individual companies is going over their public filings. What they meant is if the company was not public, on the stock market, and required to generate those filings, what would you be looking at exactly?

          If you're investing in a private company, what are they required to tell you? Are there any standards? How would you decide to trust them? Do you see the value of a regulated market now?

      • by Bahbus ( 1180627 )

        I'd rather large businesses don't exist altogether, but I would accept them if they transitioned into either a non-profit or a coop. All businesses should fall under those two categories. Businesses should not be beholden to shareholders or investors who don't know dick about the business and don't actually do any work for the business.

    • They serve an important function, when you have more money than you want to spend, you can trade it to someone that does want to spend it. For a share in a company that hopefully grows.

      A bank does that with loans from your deposits too, but you have no say where the money goes.

      The alternative is keeping money under your mattress. That's not healthy for the economy no matter what end of it you're in. You may have problems with how much money too few people have and that's fair, but you still need these funct

      • by Bahbus ( 1180627 )

        No one should have that much money to begin with and only people that actually do any work for the company should have a share in said company.

        I wish banks didn't do that, but I also wish there was no such thing as a for-profit bank.

        and that money should stay circulating in the economy

        Yes. But the ultra-rich don't actually do this at all. So instead of letting them do whatever they want with it (which is nothing), they shouldn't be allowed to have that much to begin with. The entire concept of professional investors, hedge funds, etc, is fucked up.

  • by fjorder ( 5219645 ) on Saturday October 04, 2025 @06:06AM (#65702720)
    Another step toward the division of America. I all for it, let the Reds have their own country and we can have ours.
    • let the Reds have their own country

      They lost the war, it's our country. Fuck 'em, we'll beat 'em again.

      • by Anonymous Coward
        This time, they have the enemy in the White House, so it's a loaded deck.

The easiest way to figure the cost of living is to take your income and add ten percent.

Working...