Apple and Google Asking Some Employees With H-1B Visas To Avoid International Travel (sfchronicle.com) 63
Tech giants Google and Apple are asking some employees with H-1B visas to reconsider international travel, as their legal teams warned that visa processing delays could keep employees abroad for months, according to Business Insider. From a report: Law firms representing the tech giants sent memos advising staff who require visa stamps for reentry to stay in the U.S., warning that international travel could entangle them in visa screening delays following the introduction of a new social media screening requirement, according to the news agency. The policy subjects H-1B workers and their dependents to reviews of their social media histories.
"Please be aware that some US Embassies and Consulates are experiencing significant visa stamping appointment delays, currently reported as up to 12 months," BAL Immigration Law, which represents Google, said in a memo obtained by Business Insider. The law firm said the delays were affecting H-1B, H-4, F, J and M visas.
"Please be aware that some US Embassies and Consulates are experiencing significant visa stamping appointment delays, currently reported as up to 12 months," BAL Immigration Law, which represents Google, said in a memo obtained by Business Insider. The law firm said the delays were affecting H-1B, H-4, F, J and M visas.
Christ in a chicken basket. (Score:4, Insightful)
These tech companies bent over backwards to appease that clown in the half-a-white-house, and he responds by making it more difficult for the very employees that help them operate their company to come back to the US. The racism is on full display, and yet these tech companies are too chicken-shit to stand up to that clown and his literally evil minions.
Re:okay? (Score:5, Insightful)
Having spend time there working I am acutely aware of the problems white South Africans are facing but this time do believe Trump has (again) been fooled.
Although the South African government deserves a kick in the butt, there is no sane reason to give the white farmers preferential treatment when it comes to US visas.
Re:okay? (Score:5, Informative)
You mean how he/they produced fake documents to ask a question about a fake problem?
This is well documented, this questionning of the South African delegation is one of the most blatantly made up facts situation.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-makes-false-claims-white-genocide-south-africa-during-ramaphosa-meeting-2025-05-21/
Re:okay? (Score:4, Interesting)
Afrikaners aren't a race or ethnicity. And they bloody well don't need or deserve any "help." Afrikaners are the *DUTCH* colonials who invaded South Africa, set up apartheid, and oppressed the majority of the population for decades. The word describes people who took a particular, and utterly reprehensible ACTION. This is more akin to saying the Hell's Angels or Teamsters or Atlanta Braves or the Klan are a refugee group that deserves help. They may be mostly comprised of a particular race or ethnicity. But they are not a group defined by it. They are a group defined by their actions... in this case, Apartheid.
Fuck 'em.
Need an end year (Score:1)
Not responsible to pay for, be penalized via higher taxes, government/corporate sanctioned discrimination for something that you did not do, did not vote for and happened before you were born.
If they want to enumerate who should fund and apologize for past events, they need to pick a cutoff year so that anyone born after that year is not grouped into the older people who did negative things.
A person could via this blaming and "making them pay for the past" include most of the entire world's population https [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
There is a difference between traits that you're born with, like race, gender, et cetera; and groups you are a member of based on actions or ideology. "Dutch" is the first. "Afrikaners" is the second.
Just as I do not judge a white klansan as reprehensible scum for being white, but do so for being a klansman; I do not judge a Dutch Afrikaner for being Dutch, but for being an Afrikaner.
Re: (Score:2)
Misses the point.
Someone 18 years old and working today is not responsible for things which happened before they were born and that they were never able to vote for.
That 18 year old did not directly participate in past events and should not have different level of government service, less favored status in getting a job, pay higher taxes, and have extra obligations for something they could not do as it happened before they were born.
The perpetual blank check that long deceased ancestors faced discrimination
Re: *xenophobia (Score:4, Interesting)
Small sample size and impossible to know all the circumstances but a troubling trend none the less.
Anyone claiming race/ethnicity is not playing a big part in the screening process right now had their head buried.
Re: *xenophobia (Score:4, Insightful)
Returned from an overseas trip earlier this month. Watched multiple Latino families with green cards get escorted away for additional screening while not a single Asian or Caucasian was held up for more than 30 seconds.
This is the paradox of politics. The Latino vote significantly contributed to the Trump victory in 2024. Many Latino bought into the Trump ideas and ignored the historical and current discrimination by Republican ideology against Latinos, perhaps rationalizing the treatment as either made-up or only targeted against the "bad" Latinos. This same thinking arises for poor whites who irrationally support Republican economic policies that strongly disadvantage the poor white demographic.
All this shows is that demagoguery works. Always has and always will.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
We stuck out like a sore thumb. Going in I was nervous, I mean there was a lot ridding on the interview. I made sure to learn
Re: (Score:1)
The rule applies to everyone with an H-1b no matter your skin color. It is xenophobia (arguably) but not racism.
Sure, in the same way that the literacy test for voting applied to everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
That fee matters a great deal if you're trying to get health care workers like nurses that we are in short supply of.
Why the hell would you pay $100k to the government to get an employee you are going to pay $70k a year? You won't. And everyone's health care will suffer for it.
Also, if you're a doctor who is looking for work abroad and you have a choice between having to deal with the US government bullshit and this fee, or Canada with no bullshit or fee; which are you going to choose?
Re: (Score:2)
Also, if you're a doctor who is looking for work abroad and you have a choice between having to deal with the US government bullshit and this fee, or Canada with no bullshit or fee; which are you going to choose?
Canada has quite its own problems attracting health care professionals.
Re: (Score:2)
Healthcare professionals as a group, including nurses, comprise 4.2% of the H1B allocations. I don't disagree with you about the issue in healthcare, but nurses on H1Bs are a rounding error.
Re: (Score:2)
And I doubt that share will increase, because the government has enacted this policy which makes it a non-starter for any business.
See the problem? We could be alleviating the worker shortage in health care through H1B because there clearly isn't enough talent here already. But now we can't, so heath care prices are only going to increase, and availability will only decrease.
Re: (Score:2)
When did I claim otherwise?
Why would that make a liar out of me?
What, specifically, does that job growth statistic do to argue against what I said?
Why are you a moron just throwing out random bullshit?
Oh it'll fuck over rural hospitals (Score:2)
And they won't die fast enough or in big enough numbers to affect voting or Trump's re-election to a third term. Gerrymandering means that they have way more power than they should have and they use it to stick it.
But what it doesn't do is reduce the number of applicants or immigrants. Meanwhile Trump said himself up so he can wave it anytime he wa
Re: (Score:2)
They don't care as long as the stock price goes up.
Re:Christ in a chicken basket. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
You do realize that the number of H-1B visas granted each year is capped, right? And that there are significant procedural hoops to jump through, and (now) very high fees.
I'm all for a discussion about the balance of immigrant workers vs. US-based workers. People of goodwill can disagree on what that balance is. But you can't claim companies are "abusing" a program that is so strictly controlled by the government.
Re: Christ in a chicken basket. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I am a former H1B holder that is now a citizen, however, I know other former H1B holders who have gone home, some of whom had citizenship or green cards.
I also know Indian H1B holders who are considering a move home now, since they are unlikely to ever get a green card. Note that, if an Indian citizen moves home without getting citizenship, they won't be able to claim any Social Security payments when they hit retirement age.
Re: (Score:2)
H-1B is known as a "dual-intent" visa. People who obtain them may or may not stay and change status when their visa runs out. The usual transition is to permanent residency (green card) but it is not guaranteed. If you don't change status, you have to leave.
Note that, if an Indian citizen moves home without getting citizenship, they won't be able to claim any Social Security payments when they hit retirement age.
Not true. If someone from any other country works in the USA for long enough to obtain Social Security credits, then can claim and receive benefits from anywhere in the world. What they cannot do is claim and receive them while being present in the USA u
Re: (Score:3)
Not true. If someone from any other country works in the USA for long enough to obtain Social Security credits, then can claim and receive benefits from anywhere in the world.
Sorry, but you are wrong about this:
"1. Can I receive Social Security benefits if I am not a U.S. citizen and I live outside the United States?
Generally, we cannot pay Retirement, Survivors, and Disability Insurance benefits to noncitizens after their sixth calendar month outside the United States."
https://www.ssa.gov/internatio... [ssa.gov]
There are exceptions:
1. People who claim as a dependent of a US citizen (widow, etc.)
2. Countries with which the US has a totalization agreement. THis includes the UK, for example
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the improvement. I was about to post what you just did.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Christ in a chicken basket. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
There is no shortage of examples of such abuse [epi.org]. The enforcement has been lax and Labor Certification approvals were largely a rubber stamp. In the end, it puts foreign workers into precarious positions when labor market deteriorates or enforcement action like above happens.
The balance of immigrant vs US-based workers would be nice but that balance was upset a long time ago. H1B lottery is one example. How can the lottery decide who qualifies for the job? Why temporary workers? If these workers are so spec
Re: (Score:2)
There is no shortage of examples of such abuse [epi.org]. The enforcement has been lax and Labor Certification approvals were largely a rubber stamp. In the end, it puts foreign workers into precarious positions when labor market deteriorates or enforcement action like above happens.
Oh, you mean the companies abuse the foreign workers. Well, okay.
How can the lottery decide who qualifies for the job?
It doesn't have to. The workers are already qualified before they are put into the lottery.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Tech unemployment rate is pushing 5%, layoffs climbing to 200k surpassing prior years and record numbers of CS grads cannot find work. Tech companies are bending backwards because they have been abusing H1B program for years.
The tech companies in the article are Apple and Google, and they do not abuse the program. I used to be a manager at Google, and know a lot of people who are or were managers at Apple. Those companies use H-1B to bring in highly-skilled engineers (my H-1B reports were all PhDs, and extremely good) and pay them market rates (by which I mean Silicon Valley market rates, i.e. $400k at the low end, climbing rapidly into seven figures for senior folks). Apple and Google also help their H-1B employees get to a
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Tech unemployment rate is pushing 5%, layoffs climbing to 200k surpassing prior years and record numbers of CS grads cannot find work. Tech companies are bending backwards because they have been abusing H1B program for years.
H1-B visas and AI are both impacting tech hiring. However, they are both relatively minor compared to primary economic factors, specifically the correction from the 2023 overhiring and the current depressed economy. The economy is far more important and when the overhiring correction finishes and the economy starts expanding again, H1-B visas and AI will be noise.
Re: (Score:2)
Mod parent Funny for the Subject, but I think it justifies a YOB joke. The tech link is the low-tech creators of the robotic tool in question... Premise of the joke is that my own handwriting is getting worse as I age, and I'm significantly younger than the YOB. Comparing my signature now to my signature of a few decades ago? I'm glad I so rarely have to sign anything now.
What if the YOB can't sign his own name in a recognizable way? Certainly can't use an autopen as much as he's screamed about that tool--s
Re: (Score:2)
What if the YOB can't sign his own name in a recognizable way? Certainly can't use an autopen as much as he's screamed about that tool
Just going to apply a bit of Occam's Razor to this here.
You are inventing a conspiracy in your mind because you still haven't figured out that this guy is the biggest hypocrite and liar in the known universe. I assure you he has no actual objection to using the autopen himself, as literally thousands of pieces of paper that require executive signature go through the White House every week. It's already been proven that he used it on pardons [pbs.org].
If there isn't an automated way to affix the President's signatur
Re: (Score:2)
I was trying to justify the joke. Sounds to me like you're just being literal minded for the sake of... What?
However, I wouldn't be surprised if the YOB claims (AKA lies), in public no less, that he never allows the autopen to be used except to repeat his signature on stuff that he really signed earlier. And no comprehension tests allowed, either. You certainly can't expect the YOB to understand all those complicated details and stuff just because he put his name on it.
I actually think the hand bruising is
Re: (Score:2)
FAFO (Score:2, Troll)
1) Choose fascism.
2) Get F*cked. Everybody gets F*cked.
Re: FAFO (Score:2)
Re: FAFO (Score:2)
Don't self censor just say fuck or don't say it at all.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
2) Produce useful items , marry your sweetheart & raise a family. Spend years rebuilding a 1959 Plymouth Fury with Hurst 4-speed ! Live a life of Enlightenment culture and Western civilizati
Re: (Score:2)
I'm German.
I know very well what utter destruction is the inevitable consequence of fascism.
My family did not spend 1959 rebuilding a nice plymouth, but rebuilding a very broken country from just rubble....
Don't they have to return though? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My understanding of some of them in my company they HAVE to by LAW return back for about a month per year. If they stayed in the USA the entire year they would be in violation. My understanding is that departments heavy in H1B holders just have to staff accordingly knowing that their staff is going to be on a mandatory month long "PTO" sometime though the year.
I never saw any such requirement for the H-1Bs I managed. I think maybe you're confusing H-1B with another status -- though I did some searching and I couldn't figure out what it might be. H-A and H-2B visas are seasonal, so they go home at the end of the season, but that's the closest I could find.
Many H-1B visa holders do return home regularly, but that's because they want to visit friends and family, and H-1B allows them the freedom to travel back and forth without restriction (at least, normally it
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the poster above you might be confusing things with the requirement that they reapply back in their home country? My understanding is that if they wish to renew, they must do it at an embassy or consulate in their home country, they can't do it in the US itself.
Maybe. I never saw that... but that's the sort of thing that can easily be worked around if you have good legal representation, and Google has very good immigration lawyers.
Re: Dot they ever really return ? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
"... department with a lot of H-1Bs ..." Why does your department hire H1-Bs.
I don't know about other places, but Google hires a lot of H-1Bs because when you're trying to hire the top hundredth of one percent of talent, and you need tens of thousands of such people, the US just doesn't produce enough. Not because the US is bad at producing top software engineering talent, but because the US is only 4% of the world's population. Expanding the scope to include the whole world lets you find a lot more smart people.
The distribution at Google seems to be (from where I sat) about 1/3
Re: (Score:3)
Do you have any reference for your understanding? Because I can't find anything of the sort, and I know several H-1Bs working for us definitely haven't returned home, and we do have some high priced immigration attorneys on staff (as would Google or Apple), so I suspect they would know if this is a requirement.
Not only H1B visa holders (Score:3)