Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Portables (Apple) Apple Hardware

Apple Faces 'Massive Dilemma' With Success of the MacBook Neo (macrumors.com) 143

Apple may have a supply problem on its hands with the MacBook Neo... The laptop reportedly relies on "binned" A18 Pro chips with one GPU core disabled, and demand is so strong that the supply of those cheaper leftover chips could run out before the next model is ready. That leaves Apple choosing between lower margins, shifting production plans, or changing the lineup to keep its $599 hit product in stock. MacRumors reports: The all-new MacBook Neo has been such a hit that Apple is facing a "massive dilemma," according to Taiwan-based tech columnist and former Bloomberg reporter Tim Culpan. [...] In the latest edition of his Culpium newsletter today, Culpan said the MacBook Neo is selling so well that Apple's supply of the binned A18 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU will "run out" before the company is able to fully satisfy demand for the laptop. Apple's initial plan was to have suppliers build around five to six million MacBook Neo units before ceasing production of the model with the A18 Pro chip, he said, but it sounds like demand is so strong that Apple might run out of A18 Pro chips to put in the MacBook Neo before the second-generation MacBook Neo with an A19 Pro chip is ready next year. Apple is unlikely to mark the MacBook Neo as temporarily sold out, so it may be forced to take action, but profit margins might be affected.

A18 Pro chips are manufactured with TSMC's second-generation 3nm process, known as N3E, and Culpan said TSMC's N3E production lines are currently operating at maximum capacity. As a result, he said that Apple may have to pay a premium to restart A18 Pro chip production for the MacBook Neo, which would lower its profit margins. Apple would have to disable a GPU core on these chips to ensure that they have only a 5-core GPU, like all other MacBook Neo units sold to date. Alternatively, Culpan said that Apple could reallocate some of its chip production that was originally planned for other devices, but he said the cost would still be higher than what it paid for its initial batch of A18 Pro chips.

Culpan speculated that Apple could also opt to discontinue the $599 model with 256GB of storage, leaving the $699 model with 512GB of storage and a Touch ID button as the only configuration available. This is unlikely to happen any time soon, in our view, given how heavily Apple has been promoting the MacBook Neo's affordability. Apple might also be able to move up the release of a MacBook Neo with the iPhone 17 Pro's A19 Pro chip, but that too would be a costlier option, at least until the company achieves a sufficient stockpile of binned A19 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU. In any case, Apple could opt to keep the starting price of current and future MacBook Neo models at $599 and simply accept lower profit margins on the laptop, especially given that it attracts customers to the macOS and broader Apple ecosystem.

Apple Faces 'Massive Dilemma' With Success of the MacBook Neo

Comments Filter:
  • by Tomahawk ( 1343 ) on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @07:18PM (#66082262) Homepage
    (and good eyesight and a really steady hand) Sorted!
  • by Local ID10T ( 790134 ) <ID10T.L.USER@gmail.com> on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @07:24PM (#66082268) Homepage

    Imagine the conversation in the boardroom:

    "It's nearly 100% profit. We built it out of leftover parts!"

    "They are selling out -we need to make more."

    "...shit. We are running out of leftover parts."

    "Call it a 'Limited Edition' and double the price."

    • by leonbev ( 111395 )

      I'd imagine that they'll just discontinue the $599 model and put new A18 Pro chips with a GPU core disabled in the $699 model until it's time to upgrade to a new $699 model with the A19 Pro and 12 GB of RAM.

      Sure, it would be nice if they didn't needlessly disable that 6th core, but Apple is probably already losing M5 Macbook Air sales from this thing as it is.

    • by Whateverthisis ( 7004192 ) on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @09:03PM (#66082358)
      Totally different business but exactly the same problem. Nordstrom generally has the latest trend clothes in fashion and pretty good quality; it's known for it. But when it had leftover inventory it knew there were people a step down from their target demographic that would love Nordstrom's quality products even if they're a season or two out of fashion for cheaper, so they opened Nordstrom's Rack to sell off the excess inventory.

      Nordstrom's Rack got so popular they couldn't keep it stocked, and eventually started developing their own dedicated Nordstrom Rack brands, which sort of defeated the purpose of Nordstrom's Rack as it's entire value was Nordstrom's quality, late season, at a discount, but now it's discount quality with the Nordstrom's name on it.

      Law of unintended consequences I guess.

      • This is not unintended consequences. This is the discount store model.
      • by drnb ( 2434720 )

        Nordstrom generally has the latest trend clothes in fashion and pretty good quality; it's known for it.

        It is "known", but not really true anymore. Many items come from the same production lines in China.

        A friend works at a distribution center east of Los Angeles. Ship comes into port, container put on truck, its taken out to the distribution center. There the container from China is opened and the exact same items are given Nordstrom store tags or the store tags of "lesser" stores. Then the tagged items are sent to their respective stores to fulfill orders.

  • by karmawarrior ( 311177 ) on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @07:35PM (#66082280) Journal

    Apple has rarely dipped into the mass markets before now when it came to computers, the Mac mini being the rare exception, which was just a little too nerdy (needing your left over keyboard, mouse, and monitor) to actually be a mass market product. Maybe the success of their mass market non-computer stuff has helped them dip a toe in the waters.

    In any case, I'm happy they're trying it and having the right kinds of problems.

    • Apple //c?
      • $1,295. In 1984. Wouldn't even qualify as mass market today, but in 1984... phew. To put it in perspective, by then you could get IBM PC clones for under $1,000.

        • by bn-7bc ( 909819 )
          1294 in 1984 is 4010.23 today (according to the freds inflation calculator). I agree a USD4k+ computer is not a mass market thing in 2026
      • Apple //c?

        That was £499 here in the UK in 1984. Meanwhile you could buy a ZX Spectrum for £175 or Commodore 64 for £299.

    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

      iMac, iBook, white Macbook, eMac. The Classic and LC were aimed at the lower end too.

      The last 15 years when Apple hasn't had a real mass consumer machine except for the mac mini have been kind of an exception. I guess that's also how long your memory works for.

      • 13" macbook air? Just... come on.
        • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

          Yeah, I didn't include the Air because it's kind of dual use. There are enough examples of machines specifically targeted at home users it wasn't necessary to give the trolls more room for pedantry.

          I was actually there when Jobs announced the Macbook Air. Apple was very much talking up how great it was for business users and people who travel a lot, and BTW probably a good choice for students too. Not like e.g. the clamshell iMac. It only recently got a real colour choice too, and only barely.

          • I recently paid ~350 for a new in box macbook air M1/8gb/256gb. Still has warranty left and only 2 battery cycles. I think it's about as good as the Neo, but about half the price. I actually haven't touched a Neo, though, so maybe there are differences? Anyway, I consider the Neo just an M1 Macbook air with a newer, cheaper chip.
      • There's a difference between lower end (none of these computers were even low end, just "on the lower end of Apple's offerings") and mass market. None of those devices are mass market, they're just the "non-pro" items.

        The Classic, for example, was $999, which until the 2000s I believe was Apple's cheapest Mac. This was in 1990. It was still an upscale item, just slightly more accessable price wise than their Macs had been before. And its spec was basically identical to the Mac Plus, launched 5 years earlier

        • by mccalli ( 323026 )
          I always dislike the nostalgia for the Classic. When brand new, it was already nostalgia bait and seriously under specced for the price. The original 9" Macs I really like, worked with and owned as a retro computer (I owned a contemporary LC). The Classic I always thought was a cash grab.

          Colour Classic...yeah maybe, and again as a retro machine I like them. As a contemporary machine though they were way overpriced for what they were.
        • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

          Computers were more expensive in the past. Particularly 40 years ago.

      • The last 15 years when Apple hasn't had a real mass consumer machine except for the mac mini have been kind of an exception.

        If you're talking about a span of hundreds of years, a span of 15 years may be an exception. A span that's one third of the company's existence is not.

    • I think they see a clear attack point. Big enough to make it worth trying it. It also helps that these computers are incredibly cheap to build not just because the leftover parts but because it's literally just a phone SOC.
      • It's certainly a perfect time to dip their toes in the water. The last time would have been Windows Vista, and for whatever reason mass market computers, despite his success with mass market music players, didn't seem to be something Jobs was ready to do.

        • Yeah Vista was when I switched over to the mac. Got a new "Made for Vista" Asus laptop that almost immediately started bluescreening and ran like shit. After the computer store refused to let me get a license for XP for free to replace Vista I just returned it as "not fit for purpose" and drove over to the Apple store and told them to give me the "elevator pitch" on why I should switch and they succeeded , and that 2006 mac ran fine till I upgraded to the 2011 which I stuck with till the M1 in 2020, though

      • Windows 11 really isn't that bad. It's mostly that PC laptops at this price point are generally flimsy plastic crap, with washed out screens, tinny speakers, and keyboards that'll make you regret your life choices. The thing Apple really got right about it is that it's a cheap laptop that doesn't feel cheap.

        • Yes, Windows 11 is really that bad. It's cluttered, slow, inconsistent. I've seen it on pretty high end hardware, and it's a dog. And that's before we even talk about how they tried to insert Copilot into everything. It's a shitty version of Windows and even Redmond acknowledges it. It was the impending EOL of Windows 10 that lead me to buy an M1 MacBook Pro, and I've never looked back. If I want to run Linux, I've got servers set up to do that kind of heavy lifting, but I have absolutely no need for whatev

        • Windows 11 really isn't that bad.

          That depends on your pain sensitivity. At work, they upgraded our machines from 10 to 11. Even though our version is customized to remove the ads, there are still pain points. For example, coming out of sleep does not seem like a major difference until you have to do something immediately like open Outlook calendar to see the details of your next meetings. In 10 it was responsive. It takes a full minute before Outlook responds to a basic function. Something is definitely clunky with the File Explorer as it

      • Windows 11 runs fine. Been using it since launch alongside my Macbook Pro and it's been fine.
    • I remember when the Mac Mini launched at $500. It didn't take long before it re-launched at $900... and you still didn't get a mouse or keyboard.

    • by Jeremi ( 14640 )

      the Mac mini being the rare exception, which was just a little too nerdy (needing your left over keyboard, mouse, and monitor)

      If that's a barrier to entry, it's one that is shared by 90% of the (non-laptop) PC market, and it never seemed to bother PC users. It's not like Apple won't happily sell you a keyboard, mouse, and monitor along with your Mac Mini, if that's what you want to do.

      • by unrtst ( 777550 )

        the Mac mini being the rare exception, which was just a little too nerdy (needing your left over keyboard, mouse, and monitor)

        If that's a barrier to entry, it's one that is shared by 90% of the (non-laptop) PC market, ...

        How do you figure?!?!

        I just went to dell.com, picked PC, sorted by price, clicked on the cheapest one:
        https://www.dell.com/en-us/sho... [dell.com]

        It includes a keyboard and mouse.
        FWIW, it's $499, Ryzen 5 150 (6core), 8gb ram (with options for 16gb or 32gb), and 512gb SSD (with option for 1tb).

  • by david.emery ( 127135 ) on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @07:39PM (#66082286)

    Apple makes a superior product from 'spare parts' that has the low end PC community worrying how they'll match it at that price and now they can't make enough of them to meet demand. And they do this when other vendors are worrying about where they'll find memory chips. Yup, Apple is Doomed!

    • No PC vendor is seriously worried about a $600 Mac iPad w/ keyboard attached - they mostly all offer a lower price model Windows laptop.

      It's an interesting product, it's targeted at the lower-end of the market, but it's not going put a serious crimp in any Win laptop Mfg sales.

      • by stripes ( 3681 )

        You may be right, but there are definitely PC vender executives who claim to be very worried about the Neo. Maybe foolishly, or maybe for once they are seeing a bigger picture, Apple is hitting one narrow slice here but in ways they can’t counter. They may be legit worried about other configurations taking other slices with no real counter.

        I think Windows will provide an extremely large area for that market to “retreat” into though where Apple won’t really follow. I mean with so

      • Actually they are and vendors like Asus have openly said so. They do offer lower price model Windows laptops but they're built cheap as hell and they both feel like they are, look like they are, the keyboards definitely feel like they are, the screen is terrible and they barely manage to last a couple of years before the battery craps out and things like the screen hinges start to give up the ghost.
        • I can walk over to Microcenter with $600 and walk out with a spiffy laptop with an 8 core snapdragon CPU, 16 gig of RAM and 1TB of storage - running Win 11, the same OS most companies & schools run. (Acer Aspire 14 and 16 laptops in specific)

          The people excited about a $600 iPad are looking for a laptop to take the place of an iPad, and they have to be casual users that don't have specific software requirements/needs - nothing beyond a browser or office suite.

          There are a lot of them, but not enough to sc

          • I can walk over to Microcenter with $600 and walk out with a spiffy laptop with an 8 core snapdragon CPU, 16 gig of RAM and 1TB of storage - running Win 11, the same OS most companies & schools run. (Acer Aspire 14 and 16 laptops in specific)

            Then go ahead if that is what you want. At this point, you will never buy a Mac and cannot see why someone would buy one.

  • Just offer all the Neo buyers the option to purchase a refurbished base model M4 Air for the same price. Might cut the backlog a bit.

  • Why? Because it might upset the purchasers of the more expensive 6-core models? So, ship them with a few dead pixels and you can still call it the budget model.

    • Why? Because it might upset the purchasers of the more expensive 6-core models? So, ship them with a few dead pixels and you can still call it the budget model.

      No, offer an upgrade with 6 GPU cores. 5 core remains as the low end at the current price, so marketing is happy.

      The only problem is that the nerfing between the Neo and Air is that much less.

      Also, either there is a lot of new low end demand that Apple did not expect, or there is a lot more cannibalization of Air sales than Apple expected. Investors should look closely at any data on Air sales.

  • When you have a product made from leftover rejected parts the supply is guaranteed to be limited.

    So you hype it as "for a limited time" and people go hog wild with FOMO.

    coming soon: "The Neo is Back."

    • Apple's initial plan was to have suppliers build around five to six million MacBook Neo units before ceasing production of the model with the A18 Pro chip

      5-6 million pieces is a far cry from 'limited edition' in my opinion...

      • By definition, that is a limited edition. It is not a "rare" or "collectible" edition. The NES Classic was also a limited edition that sold several million copies.
    • When you have a product made from leftover rejected parts

      That's the urban legend around the McRib anyway, but judging by my local Walmart's meat department, extremely low quality pork is available year-round. I think the real reason it's only seasonal at McDonalds is because if they kept it around all the time, the novelty of eating an extremely fatty slab of processed pork slathered in excessively sweet barbecue sauce, would wear off.

      • At Walmart, extremely low quality everything is available year-round.

        • At Walmart, extremely low quality everything is available year-round.

          It's been ages since I was last in a Walmart.....when I looked at the extreme poor quality of meat and even most veggies/fruit I could not believe how bad it was, and not significantly cheaper than one of the "real" grocery stores around the area.

          I just can't believe people regularly shop at Walmart....at least for food....???

  • A lot of people want a Mac because they have a nice form factor and they work in the Apple ecosystem. Macbooks were a bit expensive. It's obvious that an iPad masquerading as a Macbook was going to work, because a lot of people like a proper keyboard and don't need touchscreen. Macbook Neo fits a perfect niche. I'm not surprised by its success, I'm just surprised that Apple are. I'm stunned their business case didn't imagine bigger volume. Why buy a more expensive Macbook for basic admin, web browsing, and
    • I'm not surprised by its success, I'm just surprised that Apple are. I'm stunned their business case didn't imagine bigger volume.

      The problem is that is writer's description of the issue. Apple may not consider it a "dilemma". Apple is selling off their binned A18 Pro chips that they could not sell before. Yes, Apple would like to sell as many Neos as they can but given the current state of computer manufacturing, adjusting to supply chain constraints is not easy. However, I suspect the alternative for Apple would have been to release a new Apple TV with A18 Pro. After all, the current model uses the A15 which was probably binned c

  • Apple can build a much better model, with A19 instead of A18 for the same money. Customers will love it. And. no extra cost.
    • More than likely next year's Neo would be using the A19. Hopefully they use the A19 Pro which has 12GB RAM. We will have to see.
  • also the iPad OS is a confusing mess now, at least to me.
  • TIL they are using crippled A8 Pro chips with one GPU core disabled.

    What a way to recover from binned chips.

Everybody needs a little love sometime; stop hacking and fall in love!

Working...