Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
EU Power

Europe Told To Cool Its Datacenter Boom Before Water, Power Run Short (theregister.com) 60

A new Grundfos report warns that Europe's datacenter boom could strain water supplies and power grids unless regulators bake water and energy efficiency into planning, reporting, and incentives for new facilities. The Register reports: According to the report, the EU-wide server farm IT load is about 10 GW today, and is expected to rise to 35 GW by 2030 -- just four years away. These facilities account for about 3 percent of all electricity consumption now, but this is projected to hit 7-9 percent by the end of the decade. Water and energy are intertwined in cooling systems. Grundfos claims that cooling infrastructure accounts for a substantial share of a datacenter's resource use, representing about 38 percent of total electricity consumption in an average facility, while water demand in large hyperscale facilities can reach 11,356 to 18,927 cubic meters per day -- enough for up to 155,000 EU households.

Rapid growth in bit barns is placing increased pressure on energy systems, water resources and local infrastructure, the report notes. Without careful coordination, inefficient or poorly sited facilities risk exacerbating these problems and triggering public opposition. [...] Grundfos advises regulators to integrate water efficiency and cooling design requirements directly into planning approvals for new facilities and any large-scale expansions to encourage adoption of efficient cooling technologies. It also advocates investment incentives from governments such as tax credits, green financing mechanisms, and grant programs for technologies that demonstrably reduce energy and water consumption. Integration between server halls and district heating networks is another aspect worth consideration, the report adds.

Europe Told To Cool Its Datacenter Boom Before Water, Power Run Short

Comments Filter:
  • Grundfos? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by UsuallyReasonable ( 2715457 ) on Thursday May 28, 2026 @07:07PM (#66165014)

    Who in fuck is Grundfos?

    "Grundfos is a global leader in advanced pump and water solutions, renowned for its highly efficient, reliable, and sustainable pumping systems."

    Ah.

    • They make consumer products too. I have one of their recirculating pumps on my water heater.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by dgatwood ( 11270 )

      Who in fuck is Grundfos?

      "Grundfos is a global leader in advanced pump and water solutions, renowned for its highly efficient, reliable, and sustainable pumping systems."

      Ah.

      Translation: A company that has the potential to benefit from regulation by squeezing out competitors wants more regulation.

      I'm not saying they're not right, just that it seems awfully convenient for a company specializing in pumps that recirculate data center water to want efficiency regulations that would push customers towards their most efficient (and thus presumably most high-margin) pumps.

    • Re:Grundfos? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Thursday May 28, 2026 @07:54PM (#66165058)

      Having a product to sell doesn't make them wrong. There are multiple energy grids across Europe that are completely overloaded. There are multiple water supplies including ground water that are massively under strain.

      And when I say overloaded I mean in some places there are even proposals to use the mobile phone emergency alert message to ask consumers to shed loads (e.g. unplug cars, stop their washing machines, etc). https://www.rtvutrecht.nl/nieu... [rtvutrecht.nl] (in Dutch). In Germany the HV grid is under such strain that at some time the price of electricity dips negative in one province only for it to spike in another. Only 12 hours ago Truin was in a complete blackout as Italy's power system was unable to cope with the load of everyone's AC units. There are massive anticipated water supply shortages looming in Spain, France, and even the god damn Netherlands where it rains 364.5 days a year (bit of a joke but not far off).

      While it's always healthy to have a bit of scepticism whenever someone has a solution to sell you, one shouldn't turn off their brain entirely and dismiss the claim outright. .

      • In Germany the HV grid is under such strain that at some time the price of electricity dips negative in one province only for it to spike in another. Only 12 hours ago Truin was in a complete blackout as Italy's power system was unable to cope with the load of everyone's AC units. There are massive anticipated water supply shortages looming in Spain, France, and even the god damn Netherlands where it rains 364.5 days a year (bit of a joke but not far off).

        While it's always healthy to have a bit of scepticism whenever someone has a solution to sell you, one shouldn't turn off their brain entirely and dismiss the claim outright. .

        A couple things of note here: OP's talk about High efficiency/High margin and presumably high price is missing the point. Cheap seldom saves money over the long term.

        My place has extra insulation I had put in, and I took out the old high efficiency oil furnace and replaced it with a maximum efficiency gas furnace, the exhaust is mostly water, and via PVC pipe. The lights are all LED, Even our spa tub is super insulated. Hard to calculate the "payback" is on that - but our electrical bill is pretty cheap c

        • Second - doesn't the EU have an interconnected power grid?

          It does. But that doesn't mean you can infinitely send power where you want. Major HV connections are starting to be a limiting factor and governments are spending a small fortune to expand them. It's not like Schleswig-Holstein (one of the main landing points for North Sea wind can send power to Frankfurt via Limburg if the Dutch interconnector is also already overloaded. Regional constraints do very much still exist.

          To be clear we're not out of total power capacity. We're out of the ability to move power

          • Second - doesn't the EU have an interconnected power grid?

            It does. But that doesn't mean you can infinitely send power where you want. Major HV connections are starting to be a limiting factor and governments are spending a small fortune to expand them. It's not like Schleswig-Holstein (one of the main landing points for North Sea wind can send power to Frankfurt via Limburg if the Dutch interconnector is also already overloaded. Regional constraints do very much still exist.

            To be clear we're not out of total power capacity. We're out of the ability to move power around where its needed. Yesterday the spot price for energy hit 80c/kWh as soon as the sun set in the Netherlands because the wind wasn't blowing in Germany and their sudden loss of solar caused the power network to swing the complete opposite direction from import across one of the main 480kV links to export.

            Likewise to my Italian example, Italy has enough power plants to keep the lights on, but the 220kV transmission lines from Mezze to Turin weren't able to carry that power resulting in the power outage.

            No one is fully reliant on themselves but interconnection has limitations.

            Probably should do a whole grid/generation redesign, and it is going to cost a lot.going to cost a lot, but power use isn't going to decrease, and temps are only going to go up. If they are going offline now, it will only get a lot worse if they have energy gobbling data centers.

            In PA, there is a whole revolt against data centers going on, and going off grid is looking better all the time.

            • There's no possibility to do that. Grids evolve naturally and are fundamentally designed to move power around where needed. What is needed is simple expansion.

              And that's precisely what is happening, the problem is electrification is exceeding the speed of grid capacity upgrades. Germany is currently $35bn / year on grid infrastructure upgrades. Tennet alone spent 1/3rd of that last year. The Netherlands is investing $20bn / year in grid upgrades.

              Literally countries are currently fighting for capacity on ava

    • I'm pretty sure they are the manufacturer of the pump in the well at my off-grid cabin.

      They make stuff ranging from consumer to massive industrial products. Regarded as a manufacturer of high quality reliable equipment.

    • "Grundfos is a global leader in advanced pump and water solutions, renowned for its highly efficient, reliable, and sustainable pumping systems."

      Yeah, what that means is that they are going to be the de facto choice for pumps for european DCs, and yet they are asking the EU to build fewer of them, which will mean less business for them. This doesn't mean what you think it means. Unlike in the USA, a lot of major European corporations are still run with sustainability in mind. They would like there to be a tomorrow for them to profit in.

  • now only if there were a company who could make highly efficient reliable and sustainable pumping systems.

  • by PPH ( 736903 ) on Thursday May 28, 2026 @08:25PM (#66165098)

    11,356 to 18,927 cubic meters per day

    Is that make-up water for cooling towers? Or pumped out of a river, passed through an exchanger and then returned with some specified maximum temperature rise?

    • Open loop river to river datacentres don't use any water in any normal sense. That 11-20k m^3 figure sounds like evaporative cooling for a ~150MW facility.

      • Not sure who moded this down, presumably someone who doesn't understand what that white stuff is that comes out of cooling towers. But don't trust me, look it up yourself.

  • If they're using 38% of their power to cool another 38% of heat losses then compute can be using (at most) 24%.
  • Black Rock has been building data centers [yahoo.com] as an investment vehicle. It's not clear whether they are all being used or not.

    That is to say, they are definitely not all being used. Whether or not a meaningful percentage of them are being left unused is still an open question.
    • Black Rock has been building data centers [yahoo.com] as an investment vehicle. It's not clear whether they are all being used or not. That is to say, they are definitely not all being used. Whether or not a meaningful percentage of them are being left unused is still an open question.

      I might be wrong, but the rush to have data centers that consume incredible amounts of energy, and their waste heat, and restoring old Nuclear reactors for data centers is super premature. A bad paradigm, and not sustainable.

  • The problem is most parts of Europe is not water supply but drainage. So let's have some data centers and aqua culture farms, and heat some households with it.

  • by SmaryJerry ( 2759091 ) on Friday May 29, 2026 @12:20PM (#66165904)
    The utility companies need to be the ones managing water and electricity production and distribution, not tech companies. It's far more efficient for competition in the industry to cause additional production of water and electricity when high demand (and a profit motive) exists. Instead it is likely that Europe will go communist or socialist with it and require datacenters to plan to produce or reduce their own electricity and water, as many left leaning cities and states in the US are doing. The problem is you are going to get the least efficient producers of water and electricity in the world because people entirely outside of the industry will have to produce their own - causing it to cost more and be more wasteful to produce the same amount. Additionally you will see standards set by people who don't even know how a server works placing restrictions based on energy efficiency targets instead of effectiveness targets - again actually causing the exact issue they want to prevent.

Optimization hinders evolution.

Working...