Used Waymo Robotaxi Batteries Become Backup Storage For Power Grids (arstechnica.com) 89
Waymo and B2U Storage Solutions have struck a "strategic supply agreement" to repurpose used batteries from Waymo's electric robotaxi fleet into stationary storage for California and Texas power grids. The arrangement could give robotaxi batteries a second life storing renewable energy after they're no longer suitable for vehicle use. It will also "support B2U projects in regions where Waymo's autonomous robotaxis operate -- meaning the used Waymo batteries could bolster the local power grids that Waymo vehicles rely upon for charging," reports Ars Technica. From the report: Waymo's "proactive maintenance" for its autonomous vehicles includes identifying opportunities to "refresh the battery to improve efficiency overall for our fleet," Adam Lenz, head of sustainability and environment at Waymo, told Ars. "That's when we look to these second-life applications, because there's still a lot of life left in the battery," he said.
Waymo did not specify the average mileage at which it swaps out batteries or retires vehicles from service. But Waymo robotaxis drive around much more each day than the typical EV, which means the Waymo fleet is likely to experience faster usage-related degradation of battery capacity over time. The company confirmed to Ars that "some of these vehicles have now been serving riders for years and have mileage beyond what a normal consumer drives."
[...] "Put a little haircut on that in terms of degradation and the effective capacity that would be left in those batteries when they're suitable for repurposing, and we're still talking about pretty significant capacity per battery," Hall said. The growing Waymo robotaxi fleet could lead to "pretty large numbers in terms of megawatt hours of capacity that can be deployed pretty quickly" for stationary energy storage supporting power grids, he suggested.
The agreement gives Waymo discretion over when and how many used batteries will be turned over to B2U. But the companies confirmed that B2U has "already started receiving smaller initial quantities of batteries" from the Waymo fleet. Over time, the agreement could give B2U "hundreds of megawatt-hours" of additional storage capacity from Waymo's thousands of electric vehicles, Lenz said.
Waymo did not specify the average mileage at which it swaps out batteries or retires vehicles from service. But Waymo robotaxis drive around much more each day than the typical EV, which means the Waymo fleet is likely to experience faster usage-related degradation of battery capacity over time. The company confirmed to Ars that "some of these vehicles have now been serving riders for years and have mileage beyond what a normal consumer drives."
[...] "Put a little haircut on that in terms of degradation and the effective capacity that would be left in those batteries when they're suitable for repurposing, and we're still talking about pretty significant capacity per battery," Hall said. The growing Waymo robotaxi fleet could lead to "pretty large numbers in terms of megawatt hours of capacity that can be deployed pretty quickly" for stationary energy storage supporting power grids, he suggested.
The agreement gives Waymo discretion over when and how many used batteries will be turned over to B2U. But the companies confirmed that B2U has "already started receiving smaller initial quantities of batteries" from the Waymo fleet. Over time, the agreement could give B2U "hundreds of megawatt-hours" of additional storage capacity from Waymo's thousands of electric vehicles, Lenz said.
Re:Life Expectancy Study. (Score:5, Informative)
just how long will an EV owner drive before running face first into that five-figure maintenance bill? Will that be before or after the 7-year auto loan is paid on an asset that has depreciated like milk..
From the article on why they're able to use the batteries after just 10 years:
Waymo did not specify the average mileage at which it swaps out batteries or retires vehicles from service. But Waymo robotaxis drive around much more each day than the typical EV, which means the Waymo fleet is likely to experience faster usage-related degradation of battery capacity over time.
But since you asked, this shows batteries in EV's driven by consumers last 15-20 years: https://www.evconnect.com/blog... [evconnect.com]
Re:Life Expectancy Study. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:2)
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:5, Insightful)
Feel free to cite references if it is wrong.
Nope. Doesn't work that way. You get to cite your references. LLMs scrape the Internet at large, including FUD and troll content and assemble plausible responses based on linguistic probability, in addition to be being biased by whatever prompt they're given. They aren't primary sources.
Re: (Score:1)
You won't read it.
After telling your dad he must have a $3k fast charger at home, instead of the $100 outlet that is needed, under an assumption it isn't already there... I have no expectations of a good faith argument from you.
Under the same incorrect conditions, this would require stopping an ICE vehicle every 1.2km to fill up the gas tank, instructing him to never let it get down 1km worth of fuel below full.
A situation that would not only make the ICE vehicle have a useless 1km max driving distance, bu
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My dad wasn't comfortable with the fact that he may drive to our cabin for a day trip and then be stranded with no charge at night. They are getting on in years so may need a hospital.
First up, I need to preface this with conceding that I absolutely, positively do not claim EVs are suitable for all use-cases, all drivers, and all trips.
That said, am I understanding the invalidating scenario here is:
Father drives ~500km round-trip to and from the cabin, draining the battery.
Father is concerned about a medical event that he'd have to drive to hospital for, where the hospital is more than about 50km away, and this medical event is happening within an hour of returning home:?
I'm just t
Re: (Score:3)
There is no "staying away". The average car is scrapped for a multitude of reasons, many not even remotely related to the engine. Your own co-pilot reference shows the lower bound for this is 250000km, incidentally 250000km is the WARRANTY PERIOD of a battery on EVs. Not the life expectancy.
The clueless dolts or trolls with an agenda (like yourself) are getting to the point where they are actively failing to make even their own contrived arguments.
Re: (Score:3)
Name an EV that loses 90% of range.
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
15 minutes?!? I'm going to miss the flight to my dying aunt if I have to stand around waiting 15 minutes for my oil to be changed! And what if there is a queue and I have to wait longer???
Also, come on, just oil changes? Do you think most of us haven't owned a fossil and know that isn't true?
You are getting shafted if someone is charging you $3k to have a charger installed.
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
15 minutes?!? I'm going to miss the flight to my dying aunt if I have to stand around waiting 15 minutes
Don't you know that ICE drivers have a little toilet built into their car seat so they can piss themselves while they are on the road? You need then when you drive to the point of exhaustion just so you can prove to someone you were able to die on your destination faster than those other people!
You are getting shafted if someone is charging you $3k to have a charger installed.
Okay joking aside, no not at all. If anything $3k may be an underestimation for *MANY* people. It is highly dependent on what you have in your house. If you are a manly man who does manly things in your manly garage
Re: (Score:2)
That's interesting about the chargers. In the UK we usually don't need a service upgrade, and if changes are needed they are usually free and the responsibility of the supplier. Because the UK is supposed to reach net zero, some work is expected to be done by the electricity supplier, such as "unlooping" (it's a UK thing, was done to save money when copper was scarce after WW2), and fuse/cable upgrades.
Typically an install is in the region of â1,200 here, but you can get it for less with various scheme
Re: (Score:3)
Gas is $5 a gallon. It costs over $60 to fill up my car. It would cost me $9 to charge an EV at home.
Re: (Score:3)
It's $7 here. you have to be millionaire to fill your tank. "Oh wait, you're a millionaire? Then gas is $9 gallon for you bro."
Re: (Score:2)
My EV I charge overnight and draw 22kWh per night given my commute, for 7p per kWh. My range is 90 miles, so a spot of converting tells me I pay $2.06 for 90 miles of range.
Seems ok to me.
Re: (Score:3)
So my house has EV and gas vehicles, and by far taking the gas vehicle to a gas station is way more annoying than plugging it in at home. Not to mention the maintenance (oil change? nope air filter change? nope brakes? just like hybrids the brakes barely get used). No random surprises like "oh great, some fluid on the ground, smoke is coming out the exhaust.
The battery is the big one, and the tendency to be heavier means faster tire wear, but the plugging in for a lot of people is a *plus* not a minus. Me
Re: (Score:2)
Tip, as soon as you say "copilot says", no one will take you seriously.
Yes, an *engine* can last a while, but that's far from the full picture.
Headgasket will likely not last that long, and while *technically* the engine "lasts" through that repair, that was an expensive repair.
Timing belt won't last that long, and that's an expensive maintenance item.
The transmissions for ICE wear more than EV, and those tend to have a relatively shorter life than cited, and that also is pretty pricey.
Further ignores thing
Re: (Score:2)
A modern internalcombustion engine (ICE) typically lasts 250,000–400,000 km with normal maintenance, and many reach 500,000 km or more depending on engine type and care.
Maybe in a laboratory setting. According to an extensive industry analysis by Auto Recycling World, the national average odometer reading for junked vehicles sits at 156,470 miles, with an average age of 16.58 years.
https://autorecyclingworld.com... [autorecyclingworld.com]
https://www.iseecars.com/car-l... [iseecars.com]
Re: (Score:2)
batteries in EV's driven by consumers last 15-20 years: https://www.evconnect.com/blog... [evconnect.com]
That's not really correct, though. The batteries aren't worn out or unusable after 15-20 years... they just have maybe 15-20% less capacity than when they were new. So a battery that provided 400 miles of range, now only provides maybe 320 miles. So it becomes a question of how much range reduction the owner is willing to tolerate.
I bought a Nissan Leaf in 2011. The early model Leafs were something of an outlier because they lacked a thermal management system for their batteries and they had a very sma
Re: (Score:1)
But since you asked, this shows batteries in EV's driven by consumers last 15-20 years: https://www.evconnect.com/blog... [evconnect.com]
That article just says "Recent studies show modern EVs can reach lifespans of 15–20 years,". It doesn't have any statistics on actual longevity or define what lifespan even means. One of the sources says "When we expanded the study in 2025, the average capacity loss had returned to 2.3% per year across the 21 make-models. This means the average battery is projected to have 81.6% of its original capacity (state of health or SOH) after eight years."
So it depends on what you think "lifespan" means. My
Re:Life Expectancy Study. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Or the whole pack gets replaced with the old but still good cells going on to the second hand market for other uses.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> if cells can be replaced that easily, why isn't it being done for Cybercabs?
Well I think the most likely reason is Cybercabs don't exist yet. Not that facts or details mean much to you I suppose...
Or did you mean robo taxis? Well, we don't actually know *how* the used batteries are being repurposed. It's entirely possible they are harvesting the sub-assemblies, capacity-matching and repackaging them with new BMS controls. Or they might be using the entire EV pack as-is. The Jaguar I-Pace packs are 90k
Re:Life Expectancy Study. (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
good grief, nice display of ignorance of EV batteries. 1. Batteries have at least a 7 year warranty. 2. Batteries can have faulty cells/modules replaced therefore no need for a full replacement.
Yup. It is nothing short of incredible that people are using old and disproven claims. Must be heavy into recycling.
I recall in here after the Prius was well established, and some slash dotters were claiming that the batteries didn't last long, that you were going to be better off just ditching the car when the batteries went south.
Yet in most states, the batteries were warranted for 100,000 miles (160,934 km) except for California which required a warranty of 150,000 miles (241,402 km)
And digging i
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
FWIW, my 2005 Prius lasted 14 years and 295K miles (475,000 km). The engine burned oil for the last 70K miles, the rocker panels and rear suspension rusted out, and finally it wouldn't pass inspection. The battery was fine.
Exactly - The battery and the electrical motor is generally the least of the cars issues. Wear and tear and the ravages of road salt and dirt will end the car long before the batteries and electrical motor.
Re: (Score:2)
I think these are their iPace taxis, so they will be LG Chem batteries. They have proven to be quite reliable in other vehicles, with similar packs in Kia cars holding up well at 350k miles. For comparison, petrol engines typically last 150-200k miles, but need extensive maintenance to get that far. Regular oil changes, spark plugs, coolant, fuel and air filters, all sort of stuff.
Anyway, assuming that Waymo has been pushing them hard, rapid DC charging regularly, they are probably somewhere in the 250-300k
Re: (Score:2)
I think these are their iPace taxis, so they will be LG Chem batteries.
So then the same shit NCM packs that caught fire in Moss Landing?
Re: (Score:2)
I think there was a recall on them, yes. I don't remember the details but some people got new packs. Like a lot of manufacturers, they had some early issues that needed to be resolved.
Re: (Score:2)
The issue is the chemistry. Those Lithium-Cobalt based chemistries are all shite and need withdrawn from the market for good.
Re: (Score:2)
Including for phones and laptops.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an older chemistry that the market has already moved away from. I think the Koreans only keep producing it to ensure continuity of supply for existing buyers.
Re: (Score:2)
The issue is the chemistry. Those Lithium-Cobalt based chemistries are all shite and need withdrawn from the market for good.
Yeah, nothing like a battery that is prone to thermal runaway.
Re: (Score:2)
Great, let's have another world record setting BESS fire.
These are the same packs that caused the last one.
Surely it's a good plan to double down instead of recycling them into something less shit!
Re: (Score:2)
Surely if they had such a serious flaw they would have been replaced already. As I recall, there was a recall programme in place for affected packs.
Re: (Score:2)
Surely if they had such a serious flaw they would have been replaced already.
I see you're new to capitalism. Can I borrow your unicorn? I want to take it on a walk through fantasy-land.
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm, I was under the impression that the US regulator wasn't entirely useless, and in fact did force car companies to do recalls at great expense. Has that changed or was it never the case?
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm, I was under the impression that the US regulator wasn't entirely useless
Please, please, please re-read that sentence and think about it in light of what you know about the US auto market and its protectionism.
Re: (Score:2)
I think these are their iPace taxis, so they will be LG Chem batteries.
So then the same shit NCM packs that caught fire in Moss Landing?
Apparently. What surprises me is that a battery tech that is prone to overcharging fires, and releases Oxygen when overheated was used - not a good choice.
For my own two cents, the business of battery based grid storage shouldn't even look at Lithium based storage. There are plenty of very stable and tougher batteries out there.
I've agitated for years for Nickel - Iron batteries for this purpose. They aren't indestructible, but they are so much tougher than the Lithium based batteries. The New York su
Re: (Score:3)
Sude, if you are sore with no clue, maybe just keep it to yourself? This model of battery lifecycle is about 30 years old. It had limited commercial success before, but it was always clear that this is the thing to do.
Re:Life Expectancy Study. (Score:5, Informative)
just how long will an EV owner drive before running face first into that five-figure maintenance bill?
We know that answer already, it's "forever" for the typical consumer. Replacing an EV battery is done out of damage or faults, not out of degradation. EV batteries statistically outlast the useful life of the rest of the car.
Will that be before or after the 7-year auto loan is paid on an asset that has depreciated like milk.
Given that many manufacturers offer warranties on their batteries longer than 7 years we can categorically say after. In fact Tesla's battery warranty is within the error bars of the average scrapping distance travelled for a car (150k-200k miles) so you can expect even second hand buyers to never end up replacing the battery.
And before someone points out they've had their car for 50 years and has 600k miles on it, you're not average. You're a special little boy. *pats head*
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Errr no. Precisely no one is suggesting that EVs work for everyone. And those millions of people (which is a rounding error of the population) are more than happy to continue using ICE cars.
The problem is that special little boys like yourself aren't actually having discussions, but playing in a field building strawmen.
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:2)
Re: Life Expectancy Study. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So I live in a country that is going to ban ICE passenger cars in a few years. They absolutely must work for everyone.
No they don't. Even based on your country there will be ICE passenger vehicles available on the market for the next 20 years, that's how bans on *new* sales work. And by that time they will absolutely work for everyone.
At that point we may even have those magic EVs that you so desire to own with your 1minute charging time because you feel the need to piss yourself while driving to your destination and can't cope with the thought of spending 10minutes to chill out.
(Yes I'm telling you specifically that you a
Re: (Score:2)
just how long will an EV owner drive before running face first into that five-figure maintenance bill?
We know that answer already, it's "forever" for the typical consumer. Replacing an EV battery is done out of damage or faults, not out of degradation. EV batteries statistically outlast the useful life of the rest of the car.
He's recycling the old arguments when the Prius was first put out in 1997. Proven wrong time and again. Must be the same people that claim Solar power is impossible because it gets dark at night.
Given that many manufacturers offer warranties on their batteries longer than 7 years we can categorically say after. In fact Tesla's battery warranty is within the error bars of the average scrapping distance travelled for a car (150k-200k miles) so you can expect even second hand buyers to never end up replacing the battery.
And before someone points out they've had their car for 50 years and has 600k miles on it, you're not average. You're a special little boy. *pats head*
Yeah, of all the issues with in the EV vs ICE wars, battery life is only on the list for the woefully ignorant. It isn't an issue at all.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
That's an interesting theory but it's simply not at all reflected in any of the data. There's no massive array of dead batteries out there to point to beyond a few select issues which generally boil down to:
- Screwed up design - which almost universally fails before warranty.
- Really early tech (your Nissan example isn't an example of anything nefarious, as you can tell by it only affecting a single model of Leaf)
- Accidents.
There's just no examples of mass failures you claim to point to. We're not talking
Re:Life Expectancy Study. (Score:4, Informative)
They have EV batteries from buses in China with 800,000km on the odometer and the batteries are still at something like 80% capacity. Grow up.
Re:It's a Huge Win (Score:5, Insightful)
Seems to me 'dead' for a taxi isn't 'dead' for a static power bank. If I'm running a taxi I've got hard limits on how large my battery can be and how heavy, and I want to maximise the mileage I get between charges, because while my taxi is charging it's not out on the road earning money. When that battery is keeping only maybe 80% of its original design charge, and now I have to schedule one recharge too many per working day? Bang goes my business plan, so I'm replacing it.
If I'm storing energy for the grid I'm a lot less worried about that. It only stores 80% of what it did when new? Better than nothing, and the taxi firm is selling them off cheap. I'll stack them up!
Re: (Score:2)
You see, by passing dead batteries off to these schmucks Waymo completely avoids any battery disposal problems. In fact, they pay for Waymo's waste.
They get to pretend that they are contributing to the green movement for a year or two before the batteries are so useless that they must be dumped or "recycled". But, that's not Waymo's problem.
It's a huge win, for Waymo.
They are not dead batteries. their characteristics have changed (to around 70 percent of initial capacity max) to a point where they aren't appropriate for vehicle use, but still store energy https://www.motherjones.com/en... [motherjones.com]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/... [sciencedirect.com]
All of which makes them very appropriate for grid power storage.
Re:It's a Huge Win (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed, but just plugging the batteries somewhere else is a lot cheaper than actually recycling, it's a pretty good middle step.
I imagine you could have this whole wacky secondary market of "watts per kg" where batteries are just shifted around until no market wants em and then it's time to recycle.
Of course, that would require very standardized batteries.
Re: (Score:2)
Not schmucks (Score:3)
You see, by passing dead batteries off to these schmucks Waymo completely avoids any battery disposal problems. In fact, they pay for Waymo's waste.
They get to pretend that they are contributing to the green movement for a year or two before the batteries are so useless that they must be dumped or "recycled". But, that's not Waymo's problem.
It's a huge win, for Waymo.
Older EVs don't "die" like the cells in your flashlight, they lose charge capacity over time.
Specifically, once the battery goes down to below 80% of initial capacity, it's better for the company to swap them out for newer batteries.
However, 80% capacity is still a lot of energy storage, it's just that the energy density per weight (or volume) isn't as good for EVs. If your energy storage doesn't care so much about weight or size (concrete floor in an industrial building), then these things still store a *l
Re: (Score:3)
You see, by passing dead batteries off to these schmucks
If by "dead" you mean passing off batteries that still have more capacity per kg than other forms of grid storage like vanadium redux batteries (which very much are viable and purchased new for some installations) then sure.
Let me guess, you're the kind of person who bought an RTX5090 to make your spreadsheet render more crisply on your screen.
Translation: No thought given to recycling (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Translation: No thought given to recycling (Score:4, Insightful)
There's plenty of thought given to recycling [redwoodmaterials.com]; Lithium battery recycling is a steadily growing industrial sector.
But you know what's better than recycling? Not throwing out something that's still perfectly usable.
Not sure if you're old enough to remember, but the original slogan was "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle." The words were in that order for a reason. This would be the "Reuse" part, by the way.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
No, they are not too depleted. Cars are very power hungry - the average 4 banger with 150 horsepower has over 100kW on tap - which would drain the vast majority of EV batteries in somehwere between half an hour and an hour. Meanwhile, the average house consumes about 1-1.5kW on average per day.
Even the largest grid scale storage only really capable of doing 1MW. And those installations are much larger than 10 EV batteries.
Just because a used EV battery can't supply its 100kW peak doesn't mean it can't be re
Re:Translation: No thought given to recycling (Score:5, Insightful)
Already, the battery are too depleted to be used for what they were intended; what happens when they can't even shore up the power grid by a significant amount. If they were perfectly usable--they'd still be in the cabs.
Not at all.
Car batteries have to have high storage to weight ratios. A reduced-capacity battery holds less power but still weighs just as much.
But weight doesn't matter for grid storage. If the batteries only have half as much capacity, just stack up twice as many of them. And in fact it's not a case of "half capacity". I'd bet Waymo retires them when they get to 80-90% of capacity, because reduced capacity means more time spent charging and less time spent working. If the grid storage system gets a battery with 80% of its original capacity, it can likely use that battery for decades before it has to be retired and recycled.
And, of course, lithium ion batteries are highly recyclable, so there's no reason not to expect them to be recycled when they're finally taken out of service in 2060 or so.
Re: (Score:3)
If the grid storage system gets a battery with 80% of its original capacity, it can likely use that battery for decades before it has to be retired and recycled.
If they are actually still at 80% of their capacity then they are overachieving. The batteries used for grid are fundamentally different designs and chemistries optimising for as low cost as possible instead of weight and discharge capability like in cars. As it stands if you go to CATL and buy a run of the mill battery for EVs you'll get something like their Qilin product at 280Wh/kg. If on the other hand you go to ... CATL and buy their absolutely densest top of the line battery storage solution (for smal
Re: (Score:2)
>Already, the battery are too depleted to be used for what they were intended
By definition, yes, though it's ultimately up to the battery/car owner to decide if the battery is no longer suitable for their needs.
> what happens when they can't even shore up the power grid by a significant amount
Then they get recycled. It'll take at least another 15+ years to reach that point, meanwhile they are doing their new job to an acceptable level of performance. Again, recycling was never off the table and was a
Recycling is the LAST 'R' (Score:3)
Well yes that's the point. Recycling is THE LAST 'R'.
1. Reduce.
2. REUSE - the thing that is happening here.
3. Recycle.
In that specific order. There's absolutely *NO* reason you should recycle an EV battery at end of life while we live in a world of battery storage capacity shortage on the grid. The grid does not need to maximise Wh/kg like your EV does.
And number 1. is handled in continuous advancement of battery tech which, despite Slashdot's ignorance and general pessimism on the topic, is demonstrating a
Re: (Score:2)
Someone check this person’s browser history.
You don't understand this (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Different companies have different levels of transparency about battery state-of-health, and there's no standard right now to make sure you can compare between manufacturers. Tesla tends to report state-of-health that drops from 100% relativ
Re: (Score:2)
They hide the true remaining usage from the factory so that lowering capacity over time isn't seen until it actually happens.
Except it's something you can easily verify by doing a discharge test. Maybe you can provide a citation that this data is hidden? Or rather that factories are lying to you, given how many cars actually show you the battery health?
No I won't take your word for it random internet ... I was going to say person, but who even knows if that is true.
Battery Emulators (Score:2)
Reuse (Score:2)