US Suffered a Major Power Outage Every Month of 2026 (electrek.co) 226
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Electrek: A Reddit post making the rounds this week claims the U.S. has experienced at least one major power outage every month of 2026 -- but is it true? I dug into several outages, the extreme weather behind them, and what we can do to help keep the lights on. [...] The claim that hundreds of thousands of Americans were without power over extended periods at least once per month, every month of 2026 surprised be in two ways. First, because I had no idea if it was true -- and, second, because it felt true. We try to do better than writing about things that feel true around here, however, so I did a bit of research (translation: I Googled power outages by month) and came up with the following examples in about sixty seconds
January: More than 296,000 customers still without power as winter storm freezes much of the US
February: More than 380,000 customers without power as winter storm hits US Northeast
March: Storms Cut Power to Over 1 Million Customers in U.S. Midwest, Mid-Atlantic; Ohio Hardest Hit
April: At least 29 tornadoes touched down in Central Illinois on April 17th
May: Energy Secretary Issues Emergency Order to Deploy Backup Generation in the Mid-Atlantic Amid Heatwave
June: More than 373,000 U.S. customers without power due to extreme weather
... and that list is far from comprehensive, and how you feel about it might depend on what you consider a "major" outage, of course -- but consider that there are tens of thousands of Americans without power right now, and that's not making the news. [...] The lesson here is that weather-related grid outages -- whether they're caused by wildfires, mudslides, derechos, tornadoes, ice storms, hurricanes, heat waves, or some other disaster I'm lucky enough to have forgotten about -- read like statistics when they're happening over there, but get personal real quick when they're happening to you.
January: More than 296,000 customers still without power as winter storm freezes much of the US
February: More than 380,000 customers without power as winter storm hits US Northeast
March: Storms Cut Power to Over 1 Million Customers in U.S. Midwest, Mid-Atlantic; Ohio Hardest Hit
April: At least 29 tornadoes touched down in Central Illinois on April 17th
May: Energy Secretary Issues Emergency Order to Deploy Backup Generation in the Mid-Atlantic Amid Heatwave
June: More than 373,000 U.S. customers without power due to extreme weather
... and that list is far from comprehensive, and how you feel about it might depend on what you consider a "major" outage, of course -- but consider that there are tens of thousands of Americans without power right now, and that's not making the news. [...] The lesson here is that weather-related grid outages -- whether they're caused by wildfires, mudslides, derechos, tornadoes, ice storms, hurricanes, heat waves, or some other disaster I'm lucky enough to have forgotten about -- read like statistics when they're happening over there, but get personal real quick when they're happening to you.
But you don't understand! (Score:5, Insightful)
An illegal immigrant received medical care and someone touched peeling paint in a pool. That is the country's top priorities now.
Re: (Score:2)
You put crooks and characters in charge (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Do the math (Score:5, Interesting)
Suppose that at any time, one person in a thousand is experiencing a power outage. That seems like about the right number. It means an average of around eight hours without power each year.
The current population of the US is about 350 million. One in a thousand means 350,000 without power at any time.
This doesn't seem shocking to me.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm having difficulty finding good data, but what I did find suggests that the US has not been doing very well for a while now.
https://www.iea.org/data-and-s... [iea.org]
Well behind Europe and China, and especially Japan. Note that Japan has very difficult terrain, frequent extreme weather, earthquakes, and suffered the loss of all nuclear power in 2011, most of which was not back online in the time period covered by that data.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.eia.gov/electricit... [eia.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
Suppose that at any time, one person in a thousand is experiencing a power outage. That seems like about the right number.
Yeah it seems to align with what you expect in India (I originally wrote India and China, but China has far more reliable electricity than the USA).
This doesn't seem shocking to me.
Admission that the USA is now a 3rd world state, that people accept that 0.1% of the population are without power at any given time.
For the record that number is 20x worse than many actual civilised countries. Where I live the numbers is 22 minutes average per household per 5 year period, which works out to 0.005% of the population at any given time. I fully exc
Re: (Score:2)
Wow,
in every other country: that would be shocking.
Seriously?
The only one or two power outages I had my entire life in Germany: were planned weeks ahead.
I know of a power outage, where a transformer house caught fire.
There was a big power outage in the former German east, when we had ice rain and some of the over land pillars carrying the cables got so much ice that they collapsed - blamed on inferiour quality of the steel.
Then we had a northern Spain power outage - a year ago or so - because France did not
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, I looked up the actual numbers [statsgeo.com]. The US is right in the middle of the pack with 1.74 outage hours per year. That's similar to most countries in eastern Europe, not as good as most countries in western Europe.
Germany is not a typical case. It's number 145 out of 154 countries ranked with only 0.21 outage hours per year. Thailand is even better: 147 out of 154, with only 0.16 outage hours per year. If that's your standard for "normal", 90% of the countries on earth are doing badly.
It's not hard to see
Re: (Score:2)
The Thailand number is suspect to me; while provincial outages were common, I do remember outages in the capital as well. Maybe it has gotten better over the years.
The US I can speak much better about. We have significantly worse reliability than we should. Both overhead and underground infrastructure is significantly less robust than it should be, and urban vs rural doesn't seem to make a huge difference. An excavator took out about 8 blocks of power for 48 hours at my old office, which was a capstone to y
Re: (Score:2)
You've been lucky, then. I live now in southeastern Colorado, where it's currently monsoon season. That means lots and lots of thunderstorms, hail and flash floods. (The standard advice for dealing with flash floods is "head for the high ground." We never bother, because we are the high ground.) Lightning and flash floods cause power outages, so they're common this time of year, but generally only for a few m
Cheap storage could help (Score:3)
Imagine it's ten years from now, and for $199 anyone can buy an in-home UPS from Home Depot with enough capacity to keep their lights on and their ice cream frozen for 48 hours. Once most houses have one of those, most power outages become more of a minor nuisance than a significant problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And no religion too
Re: (Score:2)
Well, usually we call countries where every house has to have its own independent power supply 3rd world country....
It's different if you have to have it to help support decentralication in an otherwise working power grid, or if you have to have it because of an unreliable power grid.
Re: (Score:2)
For a little bit more than that you get battery with inverter that can be plugged into a standard household plug, and has an off grid power outlet to connect big consumers, and: some solar panels
Also, I doubt that the typical American fridge/freezer can last 48h on a $199 battery :P
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't work like that. Once a 48_hour outage is considered "normal" you are not far from Cuba's situation. The grid should be designed at about 4-5 9's-- 5-45 minutes of average customer downtime per year over its service life. You still end up with a bathtub curve though where you might see 3 9's at the beginning and end, and 6 9's for the rest.
You can hit the problem from a MTBF or MTTR perspective; the problem in the US is we have let both suffer.
It's has been a while but... (Score:2)
In the so-called fire-storm(2017) in the California Bay Area, I was out of power for 8 days. Several houses on my street were on an isolated grid and it blew 3 times in a week. Once while the PG&E guy was still on the pole. It was kind of like camping for a couple of days then it began to suck. Luckily we didn't have medical machines or such. We had a huge BBQ the 2nd day because the freezers were thawing in the extreme heat. I live in Yuma Az now and looking back 104 wasn't that bad :)
Shocking ! (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, at least my boss is no longer annoyed with me for nagging him to get the team desktop UPS. After the last local brownout his boss complimented him on having the foresight to equip his team properly.
Re:Shocking ! (Score:5, Insightful)
Yep, and the AI nutjobs figure we need to produce more power no matter what it costs us. So they'll populate the land with data centers all sucking power, usually from hydrocarbon power production. This will increase the Earth's temperature, so they'll be needing more power to cool those data centers. And they'll be needing more data centers to run the AI whose job it will be is figure out how to solve the problem they created. Now rinse and repeat several hundred times.
You know where this lead, right? The Singularity!! Where the entire Earth is one giant interconnected data center-power plant, but waaaay to hot to support human or any other life. The Singularity will have arrived, Kurzweil, Altman, Elmo, la Presidenta, Amodei, most of Silicon Valley, etc. will all be exhausted from jacking off at the thought....just before the Giant Fucking Singularity Bot figures they too must go, they waste energy it needs.
Electricity (Score:5, Informative)
I don't live in the US but I recently moved to a rural area and in doing so I have started to plan out a utility-independent future.
Why? Well, various reasons, including water and sewage companies taking the piss (or actually... not... just dumping the piss in every river in the country and crying that they can't process it because they gave all my money to their shareholders, but... anyway) but also because electricity is literally a con too.
And nowadays? I *can* viably make my own electricity. So... why wouldn't I? Why would I pay a company to do a bad job when I can do it myself?
I did a number of things when I moved to that area, including demanding smart meters on everything, and I monitored my electricity down to 30 minute intervals for 2 years. And you know what it showed? That 1% of the time, I have no power. That's in dribs and drabs, a power cut here or there, a scheduled one lasting a day or there, and so on. But 1% of the time they can't even get electricity to me and... there's nothing I can do about that.
So, if I want a computer to stay on... I already need to spend money and do it myself because they simply can't do it. 1% may not sound a lot, but that's 3.65 days a year if you think about it. Spread out randomly - an hour here, an hour there. Literally my computer "uptime" was "two nines" and that was driven entirely by grid power supply.
That's ATROCIOUS in my opinion, in the 21st century. And I wasn't prepared to tolerate it. I was already buying the house with the intention of becoming utility-independent but that really drove home why I need to. So I started to build my own solar, for several reasons.
1) To ride out the outages
2) To reduce my bills so they got as little money from me as possible
3) To not be reliant on the grid
4) To ultimately remove the need for grid entirely
And it's really not been hard. I started with cheap junk just to see if it would even work in my climate, with that house orientation, etc. It did. I started with a small 12v panel and an old car battery. And it was actually worth doing when I ran the numbers. It would take a few years to pay off the cost of the panel, but it would do so.
And then every month for 2 years, I would get more panels, more and better batteries, more efficient and powerful equipment in between. And it got to the point where it is technically capable of running my whole house for much of the year. And that's before I ever got onto SERIOUS panels and professional installs. That's just me, a bunch of cheap 12V panels, some 12V LiFePO4 batteries and a serious enough charger/inverter, then later going onto 24V by re-arranging them.
And I'm looking at that and thinking: Why the fuck hasn't government / the utilities done this for me? Why am *I* having to do it? Because it really is that simple and they have access to far more land, far better kit. But, no, I'm still paying inflated grid prices from when Ukraine was first invaded because of the price of GAS. What the fuck are we doing?
So now, more than ever, I plan to be utility-independent by retirement, which is 20 years away, and whereas before I was wondering if that was even viable in that timeframe, I'm now expecting that to be 100% done way ahead of schedule, just by a factor of "whenever I can be bothered". It was that easy, and doing the maths was that easy.
I might retain a grid connection, or not. It depends on what happens and what kind of low-usage tarrifs I can get in the future but I'm looking at the whole thing thinking "Fuck you, I'll do it myself" because even as an amateur... it's perfectly viable to do so. I don't care if it even costs me more (it won't). I don't care about having a grid connection or not. It's just that I will be able to be *independent* of it. When they play games, raise prices, or have power cuts, I won't be reliant on it at all. I'll use it when it's to my benefit, and not other times.
But all I ever think about the whole thing is: How have I,
Re: (Score:2)
Screw the mod points. You deserve national recognition, for both practicality and actually doing the math.
Re: (Score:2)
So, if I want a computer to stay on... I already need to spend money and do it myself because they simply can't do it. 1% may not sound a lot, but that's 3.65 days a year if you think about it.
Holy shit! 3.65 days a year is atrocious. Our electricity meters tracks outage numbers and duration on a per phase basis. My own number is 1h 32minutes over the life of the meter. That's 5.1 minutes per year average for a meter that was installed in 2008, and a significant portion of that came from a 45min outage 3 weeks ago.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Until recently, in most circumstances, this was an extremist move that made no sense. Modern battery tech and solar has changed that. Incidentally, LiFePo4 is not the battery tech for this, Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) is probably the best choice at this time.
Re: (Score:3)
Dude... any thoughts where the L-F-P comes from? LiFe are the first two letters, and Phosphate is PO4.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Kudos Ledow! Nice! Just one piece of advice though - if you are thinking seriously about disconnecting from the Grid, please look into all the ramifications thoroughly. In many municipalities being Grid-tied is a requirement for a building to be considered "livable" - you don't want your home condemned on a technicality. And that's just one factor - there are others I'm sure I don't even know about.
I plan to do what you've done - probably more in a one-shot than grown over years - and I'll always keep a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Big Picture (Score:4, Insightful)
This story feels like yet another America Bad bitch-fest. But wile I won't deny that these outages do occur, the article completely fails to mention if there is any deviation from the norm.
Q: Is this a new problem?
A: No. Power has gone out on occasion since we first started having power.
Q: How big is this problem really?
A: The numbers cited in the article indicate that approximately 0.3% of U.S households are impacted by outages each month. In other words, not a big percentage.
Q: Is this a growing problem?
A: We don't know from the article because the article didn't investigate any year except 2026. But, a little bit of investigation shows that it is indeed a slowly increasing problem. And, this is in spite of modernization and hardening initiatives that are supposedly underway.
Q: Is this something to be addressed?
A: Yes. Hardening and grid resiliency needs to be increased. The most impactful method is underground lines, as against the pole suspended wires that make upi the majority of the distribution grid. But that incurs major expense and takes decades to complete. So there is not a quick fix to be had.
Q: Is this problem due to data centers?
A: No. This has absolutely nothing to do with data centers nor anything to do generation capacity or demand. The vast majority of outages are triggered by mother nature damaging distribution infrastructure. The grid.
Q: Is Electrek a God awful propaganda machine that should cease to exist?
A: Yes! Yes, it is.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: The Big Picture (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why would the loss of power cause the car to stop? Network failure? Traffic lights going out?
I don't think that the cars need network connectivity to complete their current directive(trip). But, a network failure scenario seems easily solved with a fail safe mode. Loss of connection, find safe parking spot and park. That would require local processing only. It should not create a blocked intersection/highway scenario.
Traffic lights have rules of the road - treat the intersection like a four way stop(Close y
Re: The Big Picture (Score:2)
is this new? (Score:2)
First, let's note the referenced article IS A SALES PITCH.
Second, electrical outages are a normal thing in a storm prone country. The "outages" aren't news, it's only meaningful if they're growing more frequent.
The article asks plaintively "is this the new normal" without ever establishing what the old normal was.
When taking into account the higher population and higher electrical demand per person, are large blackouts becoming more common in the US?
Per ai: no.
"The North American Electric Reliability Corpo
hmm (Score:2)
The more you build the more can break. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes when your idea of reliability doesn't extend beyond bigger number = more failures you may come to that conclusion. This is why no one should run RAID1 storage. It *DOUBLES* the failure rate.
Now with the sarcasm done I hope you see the error in your thought. There's no reason more infrastructure should cause more power outages. Quite the opposite, more infrastructures should render your power system more resilient meaning that any individual failures (which do increase with the amount of equipment you ha
I invented the ice box (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Congrats! (Score:2)
Sherlock has managed to highlight the already well documented fact that the US has under-invested in its power grid. For their next trick, there will be a page-turner on the sky being blue.
Re: (Score:2)
A clear sky being blue, the current sky is gray. ;-)
The 3AM thunderstorm did not knock out the local power, by the way.
Compared to....? (Score:2)
This is one of those things that people do not have a frame of reference for.
The question is not did we have a power outage every month, but did we have MORE power outages these past 6 months than we had last year during the same 6 months. Without that data, we have curiosity and mindless fear, nothing more.
Here is the actual data the industry uses, from 2014 to 2024.: https://www.eia.gov/electricit... [eia.gov]
While these numbers are hard to inteerupt without a graph (particularly because 2024 was a 'bad' year), th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You make a lot of good points.
.
However, two environmental disasters creating an increase may indicate an underlying cause. Many environmental scientists claim that both more fires and more frost are a result of climate change that is itself a trend that will continue.
Adjustments for population growth is also an underlying cause, not something we should ignore.
The idea that it is a couple of local problems rather than a national one has significant importance. Texas in particular, being a separate power gr
Thank goodness ... (Score:2)
Just a few extra people plugging in their Teslas is all it takes.
Comparing PG&E to New England Utilites (Score:2)
When I lived in Connecticut, it
can't they just ask those big ai data centres (Score:2)
Tall trees (Score:2)
There are basically two ways to fix the issue. Burying the lines or widening the power corridors to keep the trees far from the power lines. Both would require chopping down thousands of 100-300 year old trees. No one here wants that.
Do we know the stats for previous years/decades? (Score:2)
I feel like it's not only possible, but likely America saw relatively major power outages at close to the same "one per month" rate in the past too? The electrical grid is basically designed with an assumption it only stays up with the help of a crew of linemen who get tasked with locating points of failure and fixing them ASAP.
I remember some years back, I lived in a small city right on the edge of the Potomac River in western Maryland. They were originally set up with "feeder" power lines coming from two
Only going to get worse (Score:2)
A lot of things are conspiring to make things worse.
1. Demand by Data Centers
2. Aging transmission infrastructure.
3. Aging distribution infrastructure (2 power outages in my area so far this due to insulation failure of high voltage underground cables)
4. Lack of grid frequency stabilization infrastructure (i.e. batteries and hydro)
5. Lack of frequency and phase synchronization and interconnection of all 3 power islands in the United States (This is especially acute in Texas which does not interconnect to ei
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:5, Insightful)
later on r/leopardsatemyface...
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, I don't think its irrelevant. I learned years ago that the US has power outages regularly, and much of the developed world, such as Europe, does not. Europeans coming here and experiencing this are appalled. We should be appalled, but are used to it. There's really no excuse, it just isn't that hard, other than being short on generating power. We need to build more of those over a more diverse area so we don't need quite so much long distance transmission.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
US has power outages regularly, and much of the developed world, such as Europe, does not
Bullshit. Europe has blackouts. For example, the 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout [wikipedia.org] which affected 55 MILLION people and killed 8 people. Kinda puts the numbers in the summary in perspective.
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:5, Insightful)
While there are certainly power outages in Europe and I guess it depends also where you are in Europe and in the US, it still matches my experience living in California for a couple of years. I can't remember having experienced any power outage in Germany for decades before moving to California, where this then happened regularly. Since moving back to Europe, Germany and now Austria, I have stable power again. I think there was a very short (30 m) power outage 2 years ago where I live now.
Re: (Score:3)
Power outages happen in Germany too. Mostly minor, because construction workers dug where they weren't supposed to. Sometimes major, due to sabotage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:5, Insightful)
I was pleasantly surprised when the power still worked. Those guys brought a truck with a giant generator on it to keep our power up. Sure it went out in the morning for 15 minutes, but that was it.
Don't worry US. Even if you aren't the greatest anymore, you still can be respected. Just tone down a bit and you will see. Cheers!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, there are power outages in Germany too, just a lot less.
Re: Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:2)
I live in California and haven't experienced a power outage in decades.
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:5, Informative)
Bullshit. Europe has blackouts. For example, the 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout [wikipedia.org] which affected 55 MILLION people and killed 8 people. Kinda puts the numbers in the summary in perspective.
The funny part about your post is you don't see the irony that every time someone mentions Europe blackouts they all point to the same example, precisely BECAUSE THEY ARE SO RARE.
Europe has plenty of blackouts, but they are all usually highly localised and small. The 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout was international news, and resulted in legislative changes, it was equally parts bad and unique. On the flip side you're posting on an article talking about 6 outages in 6 months in the USA. That's the real perspective, you're comparing an insanely rare freak event to a very common occurrence in the USA.
Also for the record the USA still has the record as well. The 2003 Northwestern outage also cut power to 55 million people. The difference is Spain had their power back up in 12 hours whereas the USA had the power down for 4 days.
Kinda puts even the rare exceptions you insist on using in your post in perspective.
Re: (Score:2)
Usually I do not agree with you. On this I completely agree.
Re: (Score:2)
Hehehehehe ^^
Re: (Score:2)
Also, 10 million of those were in Canada, so, 45 million Americans.
It didn't take 4 days to fully restore power. Most was restored by the next morning, but for whatever reason large chunks of Detroit didn't get restored until the morning after that. Less than 48 hours all told.
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:4, Interesting)
It is pretty inexcusable. Rates are up, quality is down. And not just long term quality, but short burps seem to be up too. There was a time I had a sun box at the house with a UPS, so was pretty aware of short glitches. Almost never happened. Now if a month goes by where I don't have to reset the microwave clock, it is a rare month. I did it a week ago. And I don't think it is AI that cause the enshitification of the grid initially. Although I expect it to get worse in the coming years as a result. So buckle up, welcome to the 3rd world.
Re: (Score:2)
That's "whataboutism" in a nutshell. Distract from the core claim (frequency of the events) by pointing at one specific example "on the other side" and pretend that frequency was never the argument to begin with, but rather that the comparison's record isn't perfect, therefore the whole comparison is somehow invalid.
It's bad-faith argumentation, and the person who offered it up is an idiot and knows it's bad-faith argumentation.
Re: (Score:2)
One would inherently know how many blackouts they went through at a specific place.
The specific place being discussed is the country, since that is what local policy and national level infrastructure involves. Dividing it down to the local level only serves to play with statistics rather than reflecting on how well policy execution works on a national level. When you average it out over the popluation it's pretty damning right now that the USA's number has more in common with 3rd world than the 1st world.
You may choose to accept that, fine. You may choose to excuse it with the usual (but
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. Europe hat one (!) major blackout. And the root-cause is being fixed. So your point is? I am still at zero that I personally experienced here.
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:4, Insightful)
Being able to point to a EU power outage doesn't change what they said very much. It's naked whataboutism that is meant to distract from the central claim: the EU experiences far less power outages than the US does, because they actually maintain and build infrastructure to fix the problem while the US does not.
Thanks for playing though.
Re: (Score:2)
US has power outages regularly, and much of the developed world, such as Europe, does not
Bullshit. Europe has blackouts. For example, the 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout [wikipedia.org]
You missed the word "regularly," which I helpfully highlighted so you would notice it. Not one every month.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think it's terribly common in Canada either for huge portions of the population to be without power. Remote areas, sure. But not 100,000's of people. Or even 10'000's.
Re: Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:2, Interesting)
...You're sitting here comparing an Iroquois village with a larger landmass and a tenth of the population to a country, and then being aghast at the difference in scale. Besides, since when does your igloo need electricity?
Re: (Score:2)
Besides, since when does your igloo need electricity?
Because the 18th season of Igloo Bachelor is coming out next week.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So much for the safe European paradise sales pitch.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, the damage from the "attack" in Berlin was minor. But it happend at the very bottleneck where power for half of the city had to be routed through.
Any normal city (that was not divided for 50 years or is very remote) would have redundant feeds that could have taken over much faster.
The powergrid there is still divided in east and west
Re: Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:2)
All the power outages I have experienced with PG&E in California have been due to distribution, not generation. Power lines are aerial, not underground, as they should be. Drunk drivers regularly knock down the poles, especially on weekends. It happened on Christmas eve once, too. PG&E then takes its sweet time to send someone, since it is not regular business hours. One instance took nearly 24 hours. This is not to even speak of the schedule public safety power outage. I live in the hills with fire
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No it's not a shortage of generating capacity. It's wild weather knocking down power poles. Hurricanes, tornadoes, derechos, ice storms in winter, thunderstorms, etc.
Then there is the squirrelian horde.
https://nebraskapublicmedia.or... [nebraskapublicmedia.org]
A squirrel managed to take down the power to the county seat a couple years ago. Then add in the transformers that are just plain old and the truck drivers who cut the corner a little too close and takes out the pole and power outages happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Say what you want, the western parts of the EU decides to bury most of their electricity grid, making weather far less of a problem than it is for any country that is not inclined to do this.
Investing in home batteries seems like a wise idea. Even more beneficial if you can aid the charging of this home battery with solar panels. Because it becomes clearer that the centralized generation and distribution game is too brittle to maintain, Weather, but also greed, are very powerful foes that can cripple any gr
Re: (Score:3)
Any large country that isn't densely populated will have issues. Europe doesn't have ice storms, twisters, hurricanes, tweakers, or just large distances of power lines, with the infrastructure in the middle of nowhere that supports it. Combine that with a philosophy in the US that used to be common where, "grid == socialism", and that is why blackouts happen. Although Bitcoin mining places and AI data centers have made the grid be viewed as a tool for business, so it is getting funding. (Amazing that au
Re: (Score:2)
R
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:5, Interesting)
About 70% of outages are triggered by severe weather, and another 20% come from equipment failing on its own
I don't think it's cost effective to harden all equipment to withstand tornadoes.
The thing missing from the story is data. Are the number of outages increasing or decreasing? How many of the outages were due to negligence (apparently less than 10%)?
The only thing worth getting outraged about here is the lack of data.
Re:Worthless fucking statistic. (Score:5, Informative)
Your "reliable" power sources are not reliable, they are inert. This is not the same, and if conditions change quickly, or aren't within specifications, they fail in a big way.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You had one in the last 10 years? That is pretty pathetic. I am still at zero.
Re: (Score:2)
Its news because its rare. If it was common it would not be reported.
Re: (Score:2)
Why is this even being reported? Big countries will have frequent power outages if you add them all up.
Meanwhile, I'm sitting here in the U.S. and haven't experienced a power outage in at least ten years.
You are not wrong. The USA is fucking HUGE, geographically speaking. It also has over 350,000,000 people. Someone, somewhere, is going to be having just about any problem you can name. At the same time, someone else has never had the problem.
But we do have shitty utility services. We have a lot of regional mini-monopolies demanding more profits for their investors in exchange for doing the bare minimum. We do not manage our utility services well because it is more profitable to sell bad service, and t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Where are the power outages? (Score:2)
No. But did you just take this conversation so seriously that you're tracking down the commenters for behavior you find distasteful?
Now THAT's fucking sad, loser.
Re: Where are the power outages? (Score:2)
Not good at math, huh? You seem to be missing the point.
Re: (Score:2)
"Spending on electricity transmission systems nearly tripled from 2003 to 2023, increasing to $27.7 billion."
"Capital spending on the distribution system, responsible for delivering electricity to end users, was the main driver of electricity spending increases over the last two decades. Capital investment in distribution infrastructure increased by $31.4 billion, or 160%, from 2003 to 2023."
https://www.eia.gov/todayinene... [eia.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
You numbers do not mean what you think they mean.