Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Businesses The Almighty Buck

TSMC To Invest Additional $100 Billion In Arizona (apnews.com) 45

TSMC said it will invest another $100 billion in Arizona after reporting a record 77.4% year-over-year jump in second-quarter profit. The expansion would bring its total U.S. investment to $265 billion and include new fabs for 2-nanometer production and advanced packaging to serve major U.S. customers. The Associated Press reports: As AI-related demand continues to jump and needs for computing power from data centers surge, TSMC has been expanding chip fabrication plants in the U.S., Japan and Taiwan. It said it is increasing its annual capital expenditure budget for this year to $60 billion-$64 billion, up from an earlier estimate of $52 billion-$56 billion.

TSMC, or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., is a key supplier to Nvidia and Apple. It had previously already committed $165 billion in the U.S. for building plants in Arizona, with six fabrication facilities planned. The extra $100 billion in investments are to "support the strong multiyear demand from our leading U.S. customers," C.C. Wei, chairman and CEO of TSMC, said during the company's quarterly earnings conference Thursday. An additional four fabrication plants in Arizona will likely be built with the new investments, TSMC said. They will focus on making some of the most advanced chips that are 2-nanometer and below.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TSMC To Invest Additional $100 Billion In Arizona

Comments Filter:
  • by jfdavis668 ( 1414919 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @06:51PM (#66242376)
    Enough of the nanometer business, lets get really small.
  • I'm tired of hearing about how close together they are putting transistors because the size of the transistors themselves is now several magnitudes greater than the gaps between them. When are they are going to start telling us they are making smaller transistors?

    • There is a physical limit to the size of the lithograpy used, the smaller the wavelength the smaller you can make things, that's why they're starting to use ultraviolet, which comes with its own problems.

      Making 3D chips is the obvious way to go and they're on track there.

      Physics is what it is

      • The 386 chip was a miracle of small transistor technology when it came out. Nothing compared to today's simplest CPUs. The miniaturization of technology is fascinating. I wonder how small they'll eventually go?

        • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

          Seems the radius of silicon "electron-shells"  would place an ultimate limit on transistor size. Unless you can build "logic" structure directly into the electron field of QED. Not sure that last sentence means anything.
    • Why do you want the transistors to be smaller, anyway?

      The historical reason for shrinking transistors was cost and yield (almost the same thing). By having higher transistor density, you get more chips per wafer geometrically, and you also get more yielding chips per wafer because every killer particle only kills 1 chip, so more chips per wafer translates into higher yield even with the same number of killer particles on the wafer.

      There are other benefits to advanced process technology, like lower power con
  • Just wondering if TSMC is doing this because they think it makes financial sense (capitalism) or because a certain republican made an offer they can't refuse? (dictatorship)

    • by Charlotte ( 16886 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @08:44PM (#66242512)

      Many of their customers are in the US anyway. It makes sense to build there if that's what your customers want. Of course politics plays a role too!

      • Many of their customers are in the US anyway. It makes sense to build there if that's what your customers want. Of course politics plays a role too!

        It's not just the chips but also the packaging and supply chain. Making chips in Arizona that have to be sent back to Taiwan for packaging is costly. What the customers want is a reliably, steady supply at a reasonable cost. Whether that comes from Taiwan or Arizona doesn't really matter.

        Trump is pushing for the US fabs, but TSMC might also be mitigating future risk in case of the theoretical Chinese invasion. There's another angle that Trump likely would hate. The Arizona plants allow TSMC to legitima

        • by drnb ( 2434720 )

          Many of their customers are in the US anyway. It makes sense to build there if that's what your customers want. Of course politics plays a role too!

          It's not just the chips but also the packaging and supply chain. Making chips in Arizona that have to be sent back to Taiwan for packaging is costly.

          The existing TSMC plant is at an early stage of a long term plan. That overseas packaging is likely temporary.

          There's another angle that Trump likely would hate. The Arizona plants allow TSMC to legitimately send a bunch of Taiwanese to the US on L visas.

          Really? He frequently comments on being in favor of legal immigration and legal guest workers, especially those of a highly skilled nature.

          • You'd think except how'd that work out for the guest workers at Hyundai in AL? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] No unless they are white, Trump really doesn't want you in the US. He particularly favors Eastern European women.
            • by drnb ( 2434720 )

              You'd think except how'd that work out for the guest workers at Hyundai in AL? No unless they are white, Trump really doesn't want you in the US.

              Nope. Your own citation shows you are mistaken. That those detained did not have work visas or they had short term work visas that had expired. Again, I referred to "legal immigration and legal guest workers”.

        • by BetterSense ( 1398915 ) on Friday July 17, 2026 @11:36AM (#66243338)
          They don't even make chips in Arizona actually.

          Arizona only performs middle-of-line wafer processing. It's a tiny slice of the value chain. Almost the entire semiconductor production chain is in Asia still, which is why the TSMC Arizona fabs have no technological or economic point to exist. Their only possible point is geopolitical or strategic.

          All the actual wafers (substrates) are made elsewhere and shipped into America. Along with most of the equipment, a lot of the labor, and many of the chemicals (sulfuric acid in particular is still being shipped to the US from Taiwan because there is no suitable US supply). Then, after shipping all that shit into the middle of the desert Southwest, they perform wafer processing in Arizona, and the complete wafers are shipped back overseas again and sawed up, tested, and packaged, potentially assembled onto PCBs, all overseas.
          • They don't even make chips in Arizona actually.

            Arizona only performs middle-of-line wafer processing. It's a tiny slice of the value chain. Almost the entire semiconductor production chain is in Asia still, which is why the TSMC Arizona fabs have no technological or economic point to exist. Their only possible point is geopolitical or strategic.

            Much of the value chain is in Asia, particularly Taiwan. However, the Arizona fabs will do EUV photolithography and wafer production and testing. That's not a "tiny slice" of the value chain. Characterizing it as middle-of-the-line processing is a gross understatement. It's a huge deal. It's the part that the US is trying furiously to prevent the Chinese from doing. Furthermore, CoWoS/etc. packaging is planned to be online in Arizona by 2028/2029 by both TSMC and Amkor.

    • Just wondering if TSMC is doing this because they think it makes financial sense (capitalism) or because a certain republican made an offer they can't refuse? (dictatorship)

      Domestic manufacture can be required for use in Department of Defense related projects, national security, secure supply chain in the event of war, etc. Its like having a foreign company open a factory in the US to be eligible for a contract. Happens under all administrations.

      During covid this idea was extended to medical stuff too, like the protective equipment that was no longer made domestically at the time. I guess public health stuff could fall under national security too.

    • It's not just capitalism at play. There's also nationalism.

      China may invade Taiwan eventually. TSMC would be irresponsible not to hedge against that.

      • I don't expect an invasion. I forget who, maybe the Blackstone hedge fund guy, who was saying after a recent visit to China he expects an HK style reunification with Taiwan by 2028. Given the world today, Xi may be planning to take advantage of the turmoil of Trump to do it soon. I mean really what could the US say after attacking Iran for no reason, saying we are going to take over Greenland, and how can we forget, kidnapping the VZ pres, just off the top of my head. And Trump recently has talked about bas
      • China won't invade Taiwan because even if Taiwan can't win in a direct confederation if they possess or could possess the capability to take out the Three Gorges Dam, it would devastate China due to the flooding. The U.S. has had a lot of chip manufacturing historically and with Intel becoming less prominent, there's room for TSMC to step in. Since the chips get sent to other countries after being made in the U.S. or Taiwan for further packaging I'm not sure to what extent if any tariffs come into play, but
    • That's answered several times in the summary.

      The extra $100 billion in investments are to "support the strong multiyear demand from our leading U.S. customers,"
      TSMC has been expanding chip fabrication plants in the U.S., Japan and Taiwan

  • Until then, this is just another press release promise to get the tax breaks and scuttle.
    • by drnb ( 2434720 ) on Friday July 17, 2026 @01:12AM (#66242674)
      TSMC is already making chips in the USA. From Google:

      "TSMC’s massive $65 billion Phoenix, Arizona, project is rapidly expanding into a "gigafab" cluster. The first fab has been in production since late 2024 using 4nm process technology. Construction on the second fab is complete, with equipment installation underway ahead of an accelerated 2027 production target for 3nm chips.

      Fab 1: High-volume production of 4-nanometer (N4) chips is actively supplying major U.S. customers like Apple and NVIDIA.

      Fab 2: The physical building structure is complete. Equipment installation is slated for 2026, with high-volume production of 3-nanometer (N3) chips targeted for the second half of 2027.

      Fab 3: Groundbreaking and structural topping ceremonies are complete, with this facility slated to utilize even more advanced 2nm and A16 process technologies.

      Future Expansion: TSMC has acquired additional land and laid the groundwork for up to six fabs plus research and development facilities"
  • On the topic, this is worth reading:

    TSMC's $265B US fab pledge is the outline of a concept of a plan
    Beware of fab makers bearing press releases
    https://www.theregister.com/sy... [theregister.com]

    "Considering it takes four to five years to build and ramp production at a new fab site, that $200 billion in promises could take decades, assuming a global economic recession — triggered by a certain bubble bursting, perhaps — doesn’t derail those plans."

    • TSMC's $265B US fab pledge is the outline of a concept of a plan

      According to Google they are already "actively supplying major U.S. customers like Apple and NVIDIA" from the Arizona plant.

    • by gtall ( 79522 )

      Yep, that article was right on point. This is just hot air because el Bunko runs on hot air. He's even now handicapping a projected loss in the midterms by blaming China for past "influence" conveniently forgetting (1) Russia and his favorite squeeze, Putin, was much more blatant, and (2) doing everything he can to weaken voting protections, and (3) doing everything he can to prevent people in blue states from voting and depressing blue voting in red states. He's gotten plenty of help from the Nazis on the

      • Feel any better after venting all that emotion? Reason going to be able to kick back in anytime soon?
        • Was anything he said factually inaccurate?

          • Here we are talking about building chip fabs, and he chimed in from left field to vent his feelings about Trump. Want to tell me how that was appropriate or even remotely associated with the topic at hand? Note that "I share his rage" doesn't make it appropriate.

            And also, yes, the entire scrawl was just the venting of hyper-emotional partisan rage. All opinion, zero fact.

          • Every bit of it was irrelevant, offtopic, and full of htberbole / flat out lies.

  • But I guess they need it to keep their chips cool.

  • Native Zonie, I lived there for four decades. THERE IS NO FUCKING WATER. The Colorado River is drying up. Fabs need a lot of water, and these are huge fucking facilities! And they're going to build SIX of them?!

    But hey! Arizona is a growing state! Look at all the semiconductor manufacturing we have going on! Yay us! Let's build some more golf courses and resorts while we're at it.
  • The only things they will do is: Clear some land, put up some signs, have some architects (or just AI) do up some plans, do a ribbon cutting/first shovel ceremony, and then wait out the trump admin.

There are worse things in life than death. Have you ever spent an evening with an insurance salesman? -- Woody Allen

Working...