Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Power AI

NextEra, Brookfield to Build $100 Billion Kentucky Data Campus (bloomberg.com) 27

NextEra and Brookfield plan to invest more than $100 billion to transform a former uranium-enrichment site in Kentucky into a data center campus with a generating plant. "The privately funded effort will include construction of 2 gigawatts of natural gas-fired power at or near the site in Paducah in western Kentucky, and as much as 2.6 gigawatts of battery storage capacity," reports Bloomberg. " For context, a single gigawatt of capacity is roughly the output of a traditional nuclear power plant and can power about 750,000 homes at any given moment." From the report: Brookfield will develop and operate the 1.8 GW data center campus, which will occupy portions of the sprawling 3,556-acre Energy Department site once used to produce weapons-grade uranium and fuel for nuclear reactors. Operations using the now obsolete enrichment technology known as gaseous diffusion stopped in 2013 and the site is now subject to cleanup efforts. Construction is expected to be completed in 2031, the Energy Department said. "The U.S. government is leveraging its assets -- like our federal lands -- to add power generation, create jobs, and ensure the United States wins the AI race," Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in a statement. The project is expected to create 8,000 construction jobs and 600 permanent positions, the department said.

NextEra, Brookfield to Build $100 Billion Kentucky Data Campus

Comments Filter:
  • Always the talk of a race. And the whole world are the enemies. Seems like the US is treating everything like a zero sum game where winning at all costs is necessary. Is this a cold war relic? Will this actually benefit American citizens?

    • by lxnt ( 98232 )

      I'm also curious. Who are they racing with?

    • Always the talk of a race. And the whole world are the enemies.

      Just regimes like Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran. And one of them is a credible AI researcher, one who would likely weaponize AI. Seems like the US is treating everything like a zero sum game where winning at all costs is necessary.

      Nope. Its maintaining parity as a deterrence to attack.

      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        Of those nations you list, only China is anywhere credible as a threat in the AI race. But even if China won, they are perfectly happy to sell us the models along with the hardware to run them on. China seems quite content to dominate economically, but has zero interest in any kind of military conquest and direct rule of those they consider non-Chinese, at least of the same kind the US has regularly demonstrated in the past.

        Putin may talk big, but Russia is in no position to develop any kind of home-grown

        • by drnb ( 2434720 )

          Of those nations you list, ...

          You asked who might be enemies of the USA.

          .... only China is anywhere credible as a threat in the AI race.

          Did "one of them is a credible AI researcher" confuse you?

          But even if China won, they are perfectly happy to sell us the models along with the hardware to run them on.

          You realize models can have military applications?

          China seems quite content to dominate economically, but has zero interest in any kind of military conquest ....

          and direct rule of those they consider non-Chinese,

          Actually they work to destroy non-Chinese religions and cultures within their territory. Forcing Han culture and language.

          at least of the same kind the US has regularly demonstrated in the past.

          And no longer does, having become more civilized. Unlike the CCP.

  • by Anne Thwacks ( 531696 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @04:28PM (#66263282)
    "Include construction of 2 gigawatts of natural gas-fired power"

    At last ... Kentucky Fried Data!

    • Noting also that 2 GW is around the combined capacity of the two reactor units at California's Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant.
  • All the hunters and fisherman who voted for this are going to blame Hillary/Obama/Binden.

    • All the hunters and fisherman who voted for this are going to blame Hillary/Obama/Binden.

      And B.Clinton, Carter, Johnson, J.F.Kennedy, Truman, Roosevelt...

  • by rossdee ( 243626 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @04:59PM (#66263340)

    You don't measure battery storage capacity in watts.

    You measure it in watt hours.

    • Both measures are relevant: watts for safe discharge rate, and watt hours for energy storage capacity. Given that this was from Bloomberg, the only units of measure that they grasp are dollars and time.
    • Instantaneous power is the most important metric when you are designing an system for instantaneous power support. The use case is when there is a failure in the local power plant and you need to keep everything in the data center up for 10 minutes to get the hot standby running and synchronized. It doesn't matter how long you can run only half the data center.

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @05:19PM (#66263376)
    That's kind of clever, change the name so people who have already figured out the data centers are bad news now thinks of them as something else. Muddy the conversation long enough for you to ram it through after some bribes to do local politicians.

    The data center build out really is letting people know, especially people in rural communities, just how much of their own autonomy they have given up over the last... When was Ronald Reagan elected?
  • >"and as much as 2.6 gigawatts of battery storage capacity"

    Watts are not a singular unit for the storage of energy. There must be a time component. Why do so many articles seem to make this same ridiculous mistake. Are we talking about 2.6 gigawatt hours?

  • The closest house is about half a mile away; very few within 2 miles. The Shawnee coal power plant 2 miles away on the Ohio river is slated to close in 2035. It has only half the power the data center needs.
  • "The project is expected to create 8,000 construction jobs and 600 permanent positions" on "a former uranium-enrichment site". Anybody see any possible flaws in that plan? Nope? All righty then, full speed ahead! No doubt all the employees will get the best possible medical care. Onward and upward to Hanford [wikipedia.org]!

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein

Working...