Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Almighty Buck

Walmart To Finally Start Accepting Apple Pay and Google Pay (techcrunch.com) 70

After years of refusing to adopt tap-to-pay technology in its stores, retail giant Walmart announced today that it is finally accepting payments via both Apple Pay and Google Pay. The rollout begins August 24 at select Walmart and Sam's Club locations and is expected to reach all stores by year-end. It will then expand to fuel stations by mid-2027. TechCrunch reports: The news is a surprise, as Walmart has long refused to adopt the ubiquitous payment technology to instead promote its own in-house solutions, like Walmart Pay and Scan-and-Go. In years past, Walmart even teamed up with other big retailers in an attempt to take down Apple Pay entirely with an alternative mobile payment system of their own, called CurrentC. The effort failed and was shut down back in 2016.

All the while, Walmart customers have begged the company to support modern tap-and-pay technology, like Apple Pay, which is now accepted at 85% of retailers across the U.S., including most larger stores.

For Walmart, the decision reads as a defeat. As one of the world's largest retailers, it believed it could push customers to its own payment solutions despite the growing adoption of Apple Pay and others of its kind. Ultimately, it had to admit that it was disadvantaging its own customers in the process.

Walmart To Finally Start Accepting Apple Pay and Google Pay

Comments Filter:
  • by sentiblue ( 3535839 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @12:21PM (#66300170)
    We've all seen this repeated countless times in history. Resisting the customer demand/preference ALWAYS lands in hot water. I've become so used to mobile payments and since it has become available virtually everywhere, I no longer bring my wallet with me. Once I went grocery at WMT and didn't bring my wallet like usual. I was dumbfounded when I realized the issue. If my wife didn't register a WMT account on her phone, I would have left the cart and gone home empty handed. I think WMT has realized countless cases like me and decided to do the right thing.
    • I'm not sure I like the idea of Google, never mind Apple (or even worse, Samsung) skimming off the top of every single purchase I make. And in this case, even if they don't, even the cash purchases inevitably take a hit, effectively subsidizing these companies where they're not even involved.

      We're literally adding yet another payment middle man in a place where we already have several. Anybody who has ever had a credit card merchant account will understand what I'm talking about.

      • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

        I'm not sure I like the idea of Google, never mind Apple (or even worse, Samsung) skimming off the top of every single purchase I make.

        On the other hand, the fraud losses are a lot lower, and as far as I know the transaction fee is the same, and the credit card company pays the 0.15% fee out of their cut. So while it theoretically *could* eventually drive up the rate in the future, I don't think that's happening currently.

        • I'm not sure I like the idea of Google, never mind Apple (or even worse, Samsung) skimming off the top of every single purchase I make.

          On the other hand, the fraud losses are a lot lower, and as far as I know the transaction fee is the same, and the credit card company pays the 0.15% fee out of their cut. So while it theoretically *could* eventually drive up the rate in the future, I don't think that's happening currently.

          Yeah the best thing about Google Pay is the merchants never see your real credit card number, they get one managed by Google. If someone wants to try and do sketchy things with that, have at it.

        • the credit card company pays the 0.15% fee out of their cut

          For now.

  • Aren't these redundant since you can pay with their app? You're only serving people who don't regularly shop at the store. I have never heard of a WalMart near public transportation, so you already need your driver's license in most states, so you probably. have to have your wallet. Also, I've never seen a convenient WalMart. It's not like CVS or 7-11 where you quickly drop in for 1 item you forgot. It's hard to get in and out of one in less than 10 minutes. I happen to be one of those guys who never
    • >"They SUCK in my area...mediocre prices and every store is a horror show of damaged shitty merchandise thrown all over the place, flicking lights, and poorly maintained everything."

      My nearest Walmart, which I frequent, has on-part or lower prices on most goods than anywhere else, and it really not dirty or overly disorganized. And no problems with lighting. My problems are:

      1) They are *ALWAYS* out of SOMETHING I need. Often it is several items on my list. And often it is something basic like eggs, d

      • by anoncoward69 ( 6496862 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @02:26PM (#66300456)
        WTF is OP smoking? Walmarts won't go near major cities? Theres literally probably a dozen full on walmarts and several walmart neighborhood markets in my city. And thank god they started limiting item counts at self checkout. They should have always been limited to 10-15 items. No more than you can carry in a hand basket. It's infuriating when you have 1 or a couple items and you're stuck waiting behind someone who's purchasing a heaping cart full prepping for the apocalypse. And watching them figure out how to juggle the items they've already rang up vs what's left in the cart when they run out of space on the bag platform.
        • >"They should have always been limited to 10-15 items. No more than you can carry in a hand basket. It's infuriating when you have 1 or a couple items and you're stuck waiting behind someone who's purchasing a heaping cart full prepping for the apocalypse"

          [My Walmart is 15 items] And it is also infuriating when you have 16 to 30 items and are stuck in a GLACIAL line with people who have 50 to 100 items. AND then muck around with their stupid phones AND multiple payment methods at the end AND with reade

        • I've lived in 4 major cities and of them, only Chicago has precisely 1...and it's in a shitty neighborhood and I don't think it was there when I lived there, but doesn't matter because I'd never go into that neighborhood on purpose anyway. There are none anywhere near Boston or Los Angeles or NYC. I went down the list and see a tiny few in Houston and Phoenix, but I don't know those cities to know if they're in a place people actually live or the far out city limits.

          It's well-known. WalMart won't tou
      • Target is 15 item self check now too. Neither enforce it.
      • by ack154 ( 591432 )

        3) They never have enough checkout lanes open, so are always INCREDIBLY slow.

        Between our local stores, I have checkout issues are Target FAR MORE than I do at Walmart. My biggest issue at one of our Walmarts is that I always prefer self-checkout but they sometimes only open one set of 4 kiosks, which generates a line of 4-5 people at a time. I'm sure there are registers open somewhere, but I'll take a minute or two of pain over wandering to find an open staffed register most days.

        Our Target is a complete clusterfuck for checkout (and it's not even a big city or anything). There are

        • I prefer self-checkout, if the self-checkout is done correctly, but often have "too many items" to use it. Ultimately, I don't care if it is self-checkout or not. I just want to get the F out of the store without waiting forever.

          My Target is always TREMENDOUSLY faster than my Walmart. Always. Target has many more open checkouts and with fewer people in each, and moves much faster. They have fewer self-checkouts than Walmart, but at Walmart, there is often a queue 10+ deep just to get into the self-chec

      • 1) They are *ALWAYS* out of SOMETHING I need.

        I'm convinced this is just because of bad logistics. I've got three Walmarts in relatively close proximity and often two will be completely out of something, while the third will have an absolute shitload of it. My guess would be that the stock intended to be split between the other nearby stores just gets all dumped at one location by their freight unloaders, and they call it a night.

    • ", so you already need your driver's license in most states, so you probably. have to have your wallet. "

      Uhm my drivers license is also on my phone.
    • by Junta ( 36770 )

      Yes, you can use their app to pay. It sucks though.

      For one, my watch can tap to pay, but not with walmart app.

      For walmart, I have to open the app, wait for it to load, sometimes it randomly decides I need to "prove I'm a human", then as I'm trying to go to pay, it pops up a "you want walmart+ now!" and the "yes" button is close to where I would have tapped so I can imagine they get accidental accepts. Then finally I click and it opens the camera app to scan the qr code, which is an annoying approach in ge

    • 1) Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you should. Not everybody wants to install the Walmart app on their phone. 2) If you think only people who drive to Walmart shop there, and there are no Walmart's anywhere near public transport I have no idea what planet you are on, but it isn't planet Earth.
    • by Reeses ( 5069 )

      Aren't these redundant since you can pay with their app?

      Why would I want to give them even more data? Apps are known for slurping up as much as they can get from you as possible. I don't want them to have that.

      All I wanted was them to support Tap to Pay for regular credit cards. Let go of the swiping already. They're one of the last holdouts that doesn't support it and it's crazy.

  • I believe apple pay has been available in Walmart Canadian stores for a long time. Tap to pay is pretty much everywhere.

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      Tap-to-pay (aka Interac Flash) has been available in Canadian Wal-Mart stores for over a decade. Whether that's done via a debit/credit card, Google Wallet, Samsung Wallet, or Apple Wallet is irrelevant as they all use the same tech.

      Once again, the backwater known as the US banking industry is decades behind the rest of the world.

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        This is not a baking industry issue, it's a Walmart issue.
      • Tap-to-pay (aka Interac Flash) has been available in Canadian Wal-Mart stores for over a decade.

        NFC payments, like Apple Pay and Google Pay, have been available in many US stores for well over a decade as well. The reported issue was indeed due to a specific decision made by Walmart.

    • Your subject line, "American issue, not Walmart specific", is completely wrong.

      I've been able to use Apple Pay / NFC payments here in America for a long time at a lot of stores - my local hardware store, my pharmacy, both of my local grocery stores. But some specific stores - Walmart and Home Depot come to mind - made a deliberate choice (in the U.S. at least) to try and push their own payment "app" rather than adopt the standard NFC payment system. The main driver for this appears to have been they did not

  • lets not forget (Score:5, Interesting)

    by k3v0 ( 592611 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @12:30PM (#66300192) Journal
    apple pay is also more secure so they were actively reducing customer financial security
  • by lusid1 ( 759898 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @12:49PM (#66300248)

    You could use ApplePay everywhere but Walmart, or you could use "WalmartPay" at walmart and only walmart. There was zero incentive to set that up when you could just dig out the physical card if you happened to find yourself in a walmart.

  • by markdavis ( 642305 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @01:08PM (#66300284)

    >"After years of refusing to adopt tap-to-pay technology in its stores, retail giant Walmart announced today that it is finally accepting payments via both Apple Pay and Google Pay. "

    The definition of "tap to pay" is not Google Pay and Apple Pay (or Samsung Pay or whatever). It is touching the reader with ANY device, including a physical credit card, and have it contactlessly and quickly completing the transaction.

    All the Walmarts around here don't allow you to "tap to pay" with anything; INCLUDING real physical credit cards. You have to insert the card and stand there, waiting, and waiting, and waiting. And in my case, 25% of the time, it fails and I have to try again. Every other merchant I can think of uses tap to pay with cards, except Walmart. And I don't believe that ability would cost more than inserting the same exact card into a reader.

    https://www.savingadvice.com/a... [savingadvice.com]

    The consensus seems to be that Walmart just wants to make using credit cards as inconvenient as realistically possible, in the hopes customers will just use their app or whatever.

  • by nmb3000 ( 741169 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @01:08PM (#66300286) Journal

    Does this mean they will finally enable contactless credit cards on their POS terminals? They've refused to do it for years, requiring people to insert the chip into the reader, as an attempt to push people into using the Walmart app for payments.

    Drives me fucking insane. Half the terminals have screwed up chip contacts in them requiring gymnastics to get it to read the chip and it's so much slower than contactless processing. I've started intentionally failing the chip read twice so I can just swipe my card instead. Pretty sure it costs Walmart extra processing fees and is actually faster.

    • by hwstar ( 35834 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @02:20PM (#66300444)

      The backstory. Walmart refuses to accept contactless payments because contactless payments are more secure, and your name and credit card info does not show up to be harvested when you use a contactless payment. They want your name an credit card info for their mountain of data they harvest.

      If any group tried to lobby congress to phase out contact payments and instead require contactless payments, Walmart's lobbyists would be on members of Congress riding them hard to kill such a bill.

      If they eventually did lose access to your name and card number, they'd probably raise prices to cover the savings they saw by harvesting the data.

      • by hwstar ( 35834 )

        Oh and one more thing. Walmart could pull a "Winco Foods" and not accept Credit Card payments at all. In my area there's a Winco Foods about 30 miles from where I live. They only take debit cards, not credit cards. They do beat Walmart's prices so whenever I'm nearby, I take advantage of that.

        • Our local Winco - where we buy the majority of our groceries - recently (finally!) installed new POS terminals that allow tap to pay, Apple Pay, etc. It's still debit-only, but that's fine.

        • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

          Oh and one more thing. Walmart could pull a "Winco Foods" and not accept Credit Card payments at all. In my area there's a Winco Foods about 30 miles from where I live. They only take debit cards, not credit cards. They do beat Walmart's prices so whenever I'm nearby, I take advantage of that.

          Yes they could, but they'd lose out on a lot of money. Winco foods likely saw their average receipt size and realized most of their patrons could either do debit or cash. Being a grocery store, cash is likely a viable

        • by nmb3000 ( 741169 )

          They want your name an credit card info for their mountain of data they harvest.

          I hadn't even thought about this but now their resistance to enabling contactless or allowing other payment apps makes a lot more sense. Scumbags.

          Walmart could pull a "Winco Foods" and not accept Credit Card payments at all.

          I like WinCo and shop there when I can (also far enough away to be a special trip). The stores sometimes have a K-Mart feel to them (poor upkeep, minimal customer support, that kind of thing) but they are very often cheaper and carry less popular products, and their deli and bulk foods offer a lot of unique stuff. Produce is usually better than Walmart but less

        • Oh and one more thing. Walmart could pull a "Winco Foods" and not accept Credit Card payments at all. In my area there's a Winco Foods about 30 miles from where I live. They only take debit cards, not credit cards. They do beat Walmart's prices so whenever I'm nearby, I take advantage of that.

          This is what I love about Winco not putting up with bullshit. Any store that still accepts credit should at least charge transaction fees for using it. Credit has gotten a free ride on all of our backs for long enough.

      • >"The backstory. Walmart refuses to accept contactless payments because [...] your name and credit card info does not show up to be harvested when you use a contactless payment. They want your name an credit card info for their mountain of data they harvest."

        https://www.rfidcard.com/nfc-p... [rfidcard.com]

        That supports the idea if you use the tap instead of insert on a credit card, the merchant can't know who you are. Is that really true? If so, that is fantastic for privacy. And it would explain resistance to the t

      • This would be horrifying if you werenâ(TM)t pulling it right out your ass. Walmart doesnâ(TM)t want or need your name, itâ(TM)s useless. More work is needed to anonymize your PII, so itâ(TM)s simply easier to not collect it. Thereâ(TM)s a recent feature in the app that will link your in-store purchases when paid with card to your Walmart account. But this relies on your card pre-existing on the Walmart account first. Use a different card and it doesnâ(TM)t work. Remove your car

  • We have a Walmart just 1.2 miles from our house.
    It is adjacent to the large local liquor store we frequent.
    Used to shop at Walmart for certain items that are much cheaper than Safeway.
    Stopped going to Walmart about a year ago as the "we don't tale ApplePay" became just too annoying. While I can save about $10 on a typical visit at Walmart vs Safeway, I was too frustrated.

  • Verifone, Ingenico or another payment terminal provider because I highly doubt Walmart has NFC enabled terminals already and they just have to turn them on. New terminals for every US store, RFQs were flying earlier this year I bet.

  • by Koreantoast ( 527520 ) on Friday August 21, 2026 @03:50PM (#66300606)
    This is a neverending fight over money, and Walmart, and the retailer side in general, having lost the fight and throwing in the towel. Ever since contactless payments emerged, credit card companies, tech firms, banks, and retailers have been in a massive battle over the hundreds of billions in transaction fees charged each year. Retailers learned the hard way how credit card companies have forced their way in, essentially harvesting up to 1.5%-3.5% per transaction. When they saw tech firms like Apple and Google also working their way in, essentially adding another 1-2% into those transaction fees, they tried everything they could to push consumers in a different direction. Unfortunately, retailers just couldn't put together a decent alternative, and Walmart giving up on their sad app signals their surrender.
  • I was at Walmart yesterday, the 21st of August 2026, and I used Google Wallet to tap my debit card. Maybe this is a US thing, I've been taping my phone to pay at Walmart for at least a year, if not longer.
  • Personally, Walmart finally caved for two reasons:

    1) They were starting to lose customers who want to use contactless payments, especially now with new and renewed credit cards or debits cards with the Visa or Mastercard labeling now all offering the ability to pay by "tapping" on a terminal. Walmart's recent earnings report supports this view.

    2) Walmart was watching with interest how other contactless payment holdouts like WinCo Foods (western USA supermarket chain), H-E-B Grocery Company (mostly Texas sup

BYTE editors are people who separate the wheat from the chaff, and then carefully print the chaff.

Working...