New chips on the horizon 37
Rewbob writes
"Rise Technology officially released
its roadmap for chips in the sub-$600 PC market and confirmed it
will release a chip faster and compatible with Intel's Celeron. Check out the whole story over at news.com. "
What I think should happen.... (Score:1)
"Windows 98 Second Edition works and players better than ever." -Microsoft's Home page on Win98SE.
Re: On Prices.. (Score:1)
Drop Prices? Are you kidding?
You want these people to make less than 400$ profit from each chip sold?
How will they feed their families??
I really hope they Do drop prices. Everything is overpriced these days.
People "Getting Away" with raising their prices, set the example for other companies to do the same, Therefor creating the same effect as a Monopoly- and they're not allowed for a good reason.
sniff sniff (Score:2)
Re:Rise (Score:1)
Intel's Future Competitor (Score:1)
Compatible (Score:2)
I'm guessing probably not...
Re:Intel's Future Competitor (Score:1)
If the Cyrix 6x86 is anything to go by... (Score:2)
under warranty, and I got it refunded and bought
a pentium).
When the 6x86 was brought out, Cyrix published
benchmarks of 'floating-point applications'. They
claimed that raw benchmarks were not truly
representative, and so used non-fp-intensive,
integer-intensive applications instead (so that
the Cyrix P166+ came to about 1% ahead of an
iP150). Running quake was a joke (most of the
speed increase over my old 486/66 was due to
the PCI graphics card (PCI Grafixstar 600 as
opposed to an ISA Cirrus 5422). An iP90
happily outpaced it at FP intensive applications.
A frient bought a MII-300 (@233Mhz), and a
similar story resulted (it getting slaughtered
by a K6-233 with a slower graphics card).
In short, NEVER buy a Cyrix.
motherboard (Score:1)
did i read it right that they are going to attach some directly to the bourd with no socket or slot making it impossible to upgrade?????????
Re:Another Cyrix (Score:1)
Re:But are they overclockable? (Score:1)
Re:motherboard (Score:2)
Optimized for Low System Cost
By specifically designing the mP6 microprocessors with low-power consumption and superior architectural features, Rise is able to reduce the overall cost to OEM's and systems integrators by allowing for the reduction of hardware components in a system. The triple MMX(TM) allows the mP6 processor to reduce the cost of the system by eliminating expensive hardware components like DVD decoders and modem chipsets and implementing those functions in software. In addition, the BGA packaging allows OEM's to mount the mP6 processor directly on a motherboard reducing system costs even further. The BGA packaging is possible due to extremely low power consumption of the mP6 processor.
Re:Intel's Future Competitor (Score:1)
Why is Amazon.com still in business, then?
Re:Intel's Future Competitor (Score:1)
Rise (Score:2)
Re:Rise (Score:1)
Re:If the Cyrix 6x86 is anything to go by... (Score:3)
Basically, if you're concerned about maximum possible performance, get an Intel (or get an Alpha or something if you don't care about x86 compatibility). If you want the best price/performance ratio, there's AMD. And if you want acceptable performance at absolute dirt cheap prices, get a Cyrix.
Re:Intel's Future Competitor (Score:1)
Rise MP6 and FreeBSD (Score:1)
FreeBSD Test Labs have a couple of units kindly supplied by Rise; support is expected shortly.
Re:If the Cyrix 6x86 is anything to go by... (Score:1)
>similar story resulted (it getting slaughtered
>by a K6-233 with a slower graphics card).
and the K6 is a terrible FPU performer at that.
Another Cyrix (Score:2)
But are they overclockable? (Score:1)
Re:Rise (Score:1)
Hope to hear from you!
Jon Acheson
Re:Intel's Future Competitor (Score:1)
Foreign markets being more lucrative ? (Score:3)
It would (somewhat loosely) parallel how readily Linux has been adopted by countries like Mexico and China as a good product for less.