Wal-Mart Sells Home Spy Gear 144
Anonymous Coward writes "Always wanted to play with the toys James Bond, the CIA and Dateline get to use every day? Now you can surf over to your friendly neighborhood Wal-Mart Online and pick up a spy-cam (complete with audio) disguised as a Smoke Detector at everyday low prices. Or pick from a variety of pinhole and infrared CCD cameras. Walton, Sam Walton... "
Amazing! Wal-Mart seems to have a wide selection of video security gear. I think I'll get one of these for my limousine. Hmmm...
Re:If they had this in Porky's (Score:1)
...now I need to get one of these for my own *ahem* recreational use...
Re:"I found my thrill. . ." (Score:1)
Cool, but. . . (Score:1)
Fat is the cure. (Score:1)
Hair recession roundabouts the top of my head distorts and scatters light rays, further confounding any video devices.
Keep your newfangled electro-magneto whiz-bang gizmo's -- give me Cookies & Cream ice cream.
Pardon me, I must go comb my ears.
Re:The erotic possibilities are endless! (Score:1)
Re:Infrared Cameras? (Score:1)
Re:Disclaimers? (Score:2)
Re: It's true (Score:1)
--Your former friendly neighborhood Wal-Mart employee, now your friendly neighborhood MIS Manager.
-------------------------------------------------
50 carraiges at 40 pounds each up a 5 degree grade. F sub N equals that of a compact car. Push, boy!
Real geek toys. (Score:1)
Re:Disclaimers? (Score:2)
I do know that video survellance is inadmissable as evidence in any federal court unless the subject knew of it beforehand.
--
Re:some thoughs about the camera (Score:1)
--
Dave Brooks (db@amorphous.org)
http://www.amorphous.org
X10 Cameras (Score:1)
New theme song (Score:1)
*ad music*
...Spying on you everyday
That's the WalMart way!
Re:some thoughs about the camera (Score:2)
Perhaps he has been looking at himself through a pinhole camera all this time?
The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in stores (Score:3)
that the most of the ceiling cameras in the
store are fake (complete with blinking LED and
occaional movement) and occasionally floor
personal will call for a security gaurd over the
PA system "Security: code orange, section 3"
for no reason other than to keep potential
shoplifters paranoid.
All-in-wonder-cam (Score:2)
You'd have a self-contained webcam. With a little ingenuity, and some more power, maybe a wireless solution could be cooked up? Like a car-top webcam. Wouldn't that be nice. (My car is parked at 42nd and Vine. My car keys are on the roof in plain view of the camera)
Disclaimers? (Score:2)
--
How do they attach the video ball camera? (Score:1)
And do you have to carry around a 12v power supply?
Oh well, at least the video output's female.
George
Hmmmmmmmm!!! (Score:1)
saw these a year ago... (Score:2)
Re:How do they attach the video ball camera? (Score:1)
nifty (Score:1)
I can see it now. Neighbors dog in trash - fire the water cannon.
I've never used any CCD stuff before. I wonder if this stuff is straight forward? I guess I'll go a searching....
Webserver (Score:1)
LOL (Score:1)
Amen, brother! (Score:1)
I can't stand those damn ads with the happy smiling face knocking down numbers. I always envision that happy smiling face shutting down local stores and cracking the whip in a sweatshop.
Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store (Score:1)
So yeah, i guess if yer gunna shoplift, do it at a walmart, just obey the eternal law of capitalistic justice, "Don't get caught!".
Re:Hmmmmmmmm!!! (Score:1)
Re:Audio Illegal? (Score:1)
A better idea ... (Score:2)
Timur Tabi
Remove "nospam_" from email address
Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store (Score:2)
I put a few of the cameras in the store.
The problem areas usually have them installed. Also, almost every cash register overhead is real. But for the most part, many are fake.
The store tended to play it safe rather than risk being sued.
Re:Hm. For parental snooping? (Score:1)
Re:My Birdhouse Cam (Score:1)
Infrared Cameras? (Score:1)
Still pretty neat gadgets though.
Possible counter reactions (Score:1)
As defence against this intrusion into privacy is at least very expensive, if not impossible, I am quite sure that we all will develop a kind of exhibitionistic don't-care-if-you-tape attitude. That's the cheapes solution for some aspects.
And I wouldn't be surprised if rooms with granted privacy become the exception instead of the normal in the future.
A great occasion for companies or unused temples by the way. Who knows what crazy offerings will result. Take the oxygene bar as a response to air pollution. Maybe one has to shell out some bucks in the future to have a nice private talk.
Re:Is the record Slashdot lowest score below -21? (Score:1)
Could the creator of this SlashBot please step forward?
Is the record Slashdot lowest score below -21?
Visit http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=preview&bid=bottom 10comments [slashdot.org] for a recent listing of state-of-the-low comments.
Re:Redneck Spy Supplies (Score:3)
Beat you to it. The Redneck Bugzappercam [attaway.org], so grab a six pack, sit back, and watch bugs die a spectacular death in a shocking display. Should I provide a streaming mp3 of them getting nuked?
I need a switch from my parallel port and a perl script so the pinhole cam [attaway.org] I was showing off earlier in the day can be seen.
Cancer? (Score:1)
And since we're not dealing with reality: you should try making yourself invisible. Then you don't have to worry about any one spying on you and you can spy on all the girls lockerrooms that you want.
-----
Do not confuse 'legal' with 'admissible in court' (Score:1)
This has no bearing on wheather or not recording is permitted at all. Remember the Pamela whatever sex video. She tried to prevent its dissemmination and failed. Nor could Laura Schleischenger(sp? aka Dr. Laura) block the dissemination of nude pictures over the web.
So if you tape an insurance company telling you lies and illegal stuff, don't threaten to go to court... threaten to release it to the web! Bad word of mouth is far more harmful than bad court decisions to big companies.
Re:A better idea ... (Score:1)
Where to get a b&w pinhole cam for $50? (Score:1)
Re:some thoughs about the camera (Score:1)
Re:Disclaimers? (Score:1)
Also known as "the sleazy politician law"!
Pres: I did not have sex with that woman!
Starr: But we have your encounter on video tape!
Pres: Nope, doesn't count
Starr: What?!?!
Pres: Yup. Thanks to my fellow sleazy politicians, your tapes are inadmissable, because i didn't know you were taping me!
Star: But thats ludicris! if you had known you were being taped, you wouldn't have done it, or at least not where the camera could see it!
Pres: I know, thats the point.
Stupid law, if they can make that law,, they should also let you know when you are close to a police speed trap, so you can slow down, otherwise the radar reading should be inadmissable in court...
Re:infrared camera (Score:1)
Redneck Spy Supplies (Score:2)
One to monitor the bug zapper, and the other to watch for any varmits tryin' to steal the wheels off my house.
Sounds like you've been reading Cryptonomicon (Score:2)
This would work if you have a kind of image encoding where the magnitude of the difference (from subtraction) accurately reflects the magnitude of the difference we would percieve by looking at the two shots. For instance, if each image is encoded as a big long number, and the two numbers subtracted, you would get a very big result if the only pixel changed is the one in the upper left. This is an example of a scheme that wouldn't work.
With a good encoding scheme, this would work very well.
Re:Infrared Cameras? (Score:1)
Re:Disclaimers? (Score:1)
I was researching this a little and, so far, the clearest thing I have found is at Fairfield and Woods, P.C. [fwlaw.com] where they say that video surveillance is probably legal without notifying the observed so long as the "contents" of any communication are not recorded. This is talked about in a section called Video surveillance about half way down the page.
This is quite an interesting subject. I suspect that in the near future (20 minutes from now?) people will have to assume that they are being recorded most of the time.
Re:X10 Cameras =>I bought one (Score:2)
Color cameras do not seem to benefit from infrared. I have a ccd b/w and it responds in a most excellent way from infrared led's. The b/w also does a pretty good job under moon light. The color does not see this spectrum and is miserable for night viewing.
I also have a image multiplier (got this one at walmart in the hunting department!) that multiplies light 15,000 times. Its great for scoping wildlife out in the woods and other telephoto lenses will fit it. Just don't use it to try finding your way out of the woods in the dark. I tried and discovered the field of vision was narrow and I tripped over every damn thing in the way!
Re:All-in-wonder-cam (Score:1)
Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store (Score:1)
having spent all my pre-tech job years in retail i saw the lengths that establishments went to to halt what some think of as a victimless crime, and at least some of them were just as concerned with internal theft as theft from "customers"
just my piece of life-experience
Note to Self (Score:3)
Re:X10 Cameras =>I bought one (Score:1)
Do it cheaper this way... (Score:1)
Re:Audio Illegal? (Score:1)
New motto (Score:1)
---
Put Hemos through English 101!
Re:some thoughs about the camera (Score:1)
Re:Audio Illegal? (Score:1)
Taping phone conversations (Score:1)
---
Put Hemos through English 101!
Re:The erotic possibilities are endless! (Score:1)
Only six? (Score:1)
Re:Counter Measures (Score:1)
Anyways, if the signal is going through a good quality cable, and not being broadcast through the air, you probably don't have much chance.
I'm not sure about this, but I think the only thing a magnet is going to do is ruin any TVs nearby (I don't think they affect CCDs. After all, AFAIK they are just LED/LDR combos...).
Re:why wal-mart is the devil (Score:1)
Bottom of the /. pool (Score:1)
Moderation Totals:Offtopic=2, Flamebait=7, Troll=12, Total=21.
Are you for real or a failed attempt to create an AI?
Re:Infrared Cameras? (Score:2)
Re:some thoughs about the camera (Score:1)
Radio Shack (Score:1)
Small cameras start at $79.
Re:A better idea ... (Score:1)
Story time.
About 8 years ago I was doing some lab work with a frame grapper. We used it to find if, at a given voltage, the sample had undergone a phase change or not. As you approach the critical voltage, the time to phase change takes longer and longer.
So we automated it by comparing frames over time with the intial frame. Problem was, the grabber would get one of the two interleaves, so we had to take three snapshots and use the smallest of the differences |2-1|, |3-1| and |3-2|.
In other words, even if the scene doesn't change you could still get some differences between the images.
Re:Infrared Cameras? (Score:1)
Re:Where to get a b&w pinhole cam for $50? (Score:1)
Re:why wal-mart is the devil (Score:1)
Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store (Score:1)
Wal-Mart has been selling these for quite some (Score:1)
Re:How do they attach the video ball camera? (Score:1)
It's most commonly produced by detonating nuclear weapons in the atmosphere... I'm sure there are other ways to do so but I don't know of any.
Kintanon
"I found my thrill. . ." (Score:1)
Re:nifty (Score:1)
Smarthome's catalog is full of neat stuff like this. I've never actually bought any of it, but it makes for nifty browsing.
You get to pay $200 for a smoke alarm case. (Score:3)
Of course, this is Walmart we're talking about. This is a CONSUMER product, and of course, there is a high consumer demand for surveillence equipment in the home. After all, this is about the extent that it could be used legally. Nobody will likely use these in a commercial environment when there are better choices available and its illegal to use them in almost any other circumstance. So if you're going to break the law anyways, why rely on a consumer product that would probably be easy to identify.
-Restil
If they had this in Porky's (Score:1)
It would have made the movie less funny. There are certain things you can do with a hole in the girls' shower wall that just don't work with cameras.
Re:Taping phone conversations (Score:1)
This became an issue recently as Linda Tripp was taping those phone conversations with a certain white house intern while she (Tripp) was in Maryland, which is one of those states that requires both parties to be aware of the recording. Maryland prosecuters went after her for that, but in Maryland it is a valid defense (for this law) to claim ignorance of the fact that both people have to know. Of course, they had the Radio Shack salesperson who had sold Tripp the recording device testify that he had read her the standard "these are the laws in Maryland..." disclaimer that they're required to read to each customer who buys one of these, and I don't know what happened after that.
Re:saw these a year ago... (Score:2)
Re:The erotic possibilities are endless! (Score:1)
- - -
Re:How do they attach the video ball camera? (Score:2)
In short, just ionize the shit out of an area, and then zap it with about 50mA and a few thousand volts, and you'll kill anything with an IC on it.
Try microwaving your walkman to get a good idea of how this works.
--
Re:Paranoid? (Score:1)
I wouldn't let any Andover sales person *ever* plant a story in Slashdot. In fact, part of my job is here to keep them from even thinking about it. I'll play around, sure, but when it comes to maintaining editorial integrity, I do not joke. Ever.
Re:Disclaimers? (Score:1)
You catch them on video, but they get off, cuz they didn't know they were being taped?
Wide Load Web Cam (Score:1)
Re:A better idea ... (Score:1)
My friend used this setup to make an auto-cat-squirter for his garden. It was cool... anything tried to go in the garden and the sprinkler turned on...
Re:Do not confuse 'legal' with 'admissible in cour (Score:1)
Re:All-in-wonder-cam (Score:1)
Re:Audio Illegal? (Score:1)
interstate telephone recordings?
Or was that Nixon?
Re:If they had this in Porky's (Score:1)
Re:Audio Illegal? (Score:1)
Tripp nearly ran afoul of the law because it was telephone conversations that she taped.
I think that it would have been legal if they had been in Tripp's house or car.
Also it is one of the FEW cases where ignorance of the law is a VALID excuse.
Wierd stuff anyway.
LK
Re:Hmmmmmmmm!!! (Score:1)
You gotta love Austin Powers.
Re:Disclaimers? (Score:1)
I wonder how such laws apply to "conventional" security monitoring? Very often those cameras are positioned so as to not be obtrusive and as a result, the observed might claim to be unaware.