Cool Personal Robots 146
300e24 writes "I have always wanted a robot around the house, not the useless but fun Sony Aibo, but something which can actually do things for me. I always thought it was a pipe dream, until I found this review of a very interesting (and surprisingly cheap) robot. " The software unfortunately looks to be windows based, but its interesting: it maps out its space, and can automatically dock/recharge itself.
This was already available (Score:3)
You drink isopropyl? (Score:2)
Great for cleaning your metal contacts, I wouldn't want to clean reality out of my system with it.
Jamaican rum cleans reality out for me just fine... Mmmmm...
Sounds like a good idea to me. (Score:1)
Vacuuming, mail delivery & stuff - industrial apps (Score:1)
The mail delivery bit could be used to deliver parts from a stock room to production lines etc.
Just think, companies wouldn't need cleaners or mail delivery people any more.
Robots in the 21st (Score:1)
"Ye--wn, yeah James, please, btw please change the music mood from "work" back to "lounging" please?"
I put aside my real-doll (thanks hun
"James, please clean the house vigouresly today, mums comming for dinner tonight."
"Should that be the usual week-end clensing, or the full-swing sprink break sopping?" James asks. I call my house James, call me conservative. My neighbours named it HAL. Personally I think this is asking for trouble, specially if they havent installed the House2k buffer overflow patch. It would be a real nuisance to find your real-doll with the cyber flue.
Of course, they bought WinHouse, whilst Im running my favourite RedRoof Linux.
Thankfully the freebeer patch for my Intellifridge worked, now I hacked free beer on my daily deliveries!
Now where did I leave the hornyashell, mood mod? Oh well, have to work late anyway.
Luckely my bath is heated, thanks James, and my CarBot is humming to wait for my daily commuter.
I rub my back and watch the BabyJames' crawl under the laudry basket, in search of that week-end dirt to suck.
Greetz Dread
Re:Sounds like a good idea to me. (Score:1)
Re:Lame personal vaccuum device (Score:1)
Re:a practical use (Score:1)
Cye 'sucks', according to c't Magazine (Score:1)
Re:Since MAY? (Score:2)
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:1)
Anyway, I've thought of doing something similar myself, but I've never really had the hardware to do it. I think it would be fairly simple to fit a small mower with servos (I think thats what their called) to control the wheels. It might be more practical to have a computer control the wheels by radio signal. That would prevent you from having to put an actual computer on the mower. You would'nt want a comuter exposed to all that dust, vibration, and grass.
What are your thoughts on a design?
Re:You drink isopropyl? (Score:2)
Philistine.
cashola (Score:4)
We're still quite a ways off from a decent robot for home use. To be more than a novel conversation piece it needs to do a lot of things that depend on AI that just haven't been devolped yet (or at least at an affordable cost). High resolution sensors and powerful servos are just too expensive for the consumer marketplace. It would be really helpful for it to be bipedal as well. I've seen a few bipedal bots developed by scientists but it hasn't got very far beyond the research stage.
Re:Vacuuming is the Killer App of robots? (Score:2)
Re:Giant Battle Robots! (Score:2)
It could be swivel mounted on three of these 'bots, and with the addition of a 'Rabbit' type video transmitter could almost be a cost-effective means of World Domination!
Thanks Leonardo! (Score:2)
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:2)
But, I'm not giving up hope. No, for there is a company once mighty in just matters of the chainsaw... now they too have the mower for nerds.. is now we turn to Husqvarna! [husqvarna.com]
Now if they'd only make a robotic chainsaw too...
smaller, cheaper, faster (Score:1)
More interested in AIBO type stuff. (Score:1)
a practical use (Score:3)
You could use one of these robots (or a wheelchair-size version) to map out the un/accessibility of a building...
Why so expensive? (Score:1)
Why the $1000 price tag?
Josh
Cheap robots (Score:1)
I know the vision running through many people's heads is one of robots doing every simple task required. Cooking food, cleaning, etc.... But how versatile are they in terms of different tasks they can perform?
Obviously, programming a robot vaccuum cleaner is easy, given the layout and obstacles in the room. But when will a robot be cooking my breakfast?
Sweet, now I need one that can wash dishes.... (Score:1)
This little thing would get drowned in the sea of soda cans on my floor.
Kintanon
Robot maid, anyone? (Score:1)
It was fashioned as a roughly human shaped object, although with blocky metallic contours (for instance, the "head" was a mostly featureless sphere).
I can't imagine they were very capable given the state of robotics back then (or even today).
Anybody know what happened to these things and the people/company manufacturing them?
Wow, another vacuum! [sic] (Score:1)
Re:You drink isopropyl? (Score:2)
[OT]Any other homebrewers on
I got 3 cases of Honey black spruce lager aging in the garage and a batch of Porter I just racked to secondary last week... mmmmmmm.... HomeBrew.....
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:1)
Ugh. (Score:1)
Hey, this has been done! (Score:2)
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:1)
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:3)
The most popular design uses X-Acto type blades spring-loaded around the edge of a spinning disk. Cuts grass but spring back against the disk if it hits something more substantial...like shoe leather. Some designs try to detect the edge of uncut grass while others just bop around randomly.
Re:Why so expensive? (Score:1)
the ZEN of robotics (Score:2)
This is an intriguing bit of technology, but more importantly (at least to myself), is that it's nice to see such a clean approach to design. They're builing a practical robot from the ground up, in a staged/layered manner, instead of lumping a whole bunch of features into the product at once, and then trying to unravel the knots at a later date. The only problem I have is that the robot might have been released prematurely as there are hardly any real uses for it yet.
What I mean by all that is, cye is apparently a good stepping stone for future robotic products because it's starting as a simple device to which revisions can be easily applied. The future growth of something designed in this manner is greater than something like the sony AIBO, which would be something quite difficult to change due to it's greater base level of complexity.
I'm thinking of cye as the kernel around which a real robotic appliance can one day be built. All the sensory features, and manipulators and fancy things can be gradually introduced as they become useable as well as feasible.
I also like that it's brains are your PC. This provides an easy upgrade path that isn't based on any one particular hardware platform. Try upgrading an AIBO to do something other than what it was initially built for and the differences will be apparent.
As it stands, I can't afford one anyways. :-(
For the true gadgeteer.... (Score:1)
Pricing Info: (Score:2)
Here's the run-down for the price-ticket impared:
Cye-sr special, robot=bbn, Wagon=bn, ac=120VAC, shirt=Black-L (wbd) 1
$995.00
+ $48.50 shipping
=$1043.50
Re:Wow, another vacuum! [sic] (Score:1)
Limitations on simple robots (Score:1)
Well, aside from the OCR and such, I wouldn't recomend this if you homebrew. Afterall, most homebrewers use a variety of sizes of bottles, depending on what's avalible. If you just trained the robot to "pick up a bottle" it would drop the little ones and smash the big ones.
This is also relevant to doing dishes or picking up anything in your room but clothes and papers. How much programming and sensory attachements would it take for a robot to be able to consistently pick up a novel object? You have to know the shape and where you can safe-ly lift it, how slippery and/or heavy it is (so you don't apply to little pressure and drop it), how fragile it is (so you don't apply too much and smash it), and if it is a container which must be kept in one orientation.
And thats just to pick up an object. I don't even want to try enumerating all the issues that would come up with cooking!
It seems like it will be a long time before we have a real household robot - that is, one that can acomplish regular household tasks without the price or time investment outweighing any energy saved.
But, hey - I could be wrong. ;)
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:1)
unless you're drunk, stoned, an on acid, you're not gonna run over your kid brother with a lawn mower (at least if your parents are around...
Re:Why so expensive? (Score:1)
One correction... (Score:1)
(I believe Cye is the first robot capable of docking with a charging unit)
This is far from the truth. The Johns Hopkins "Beast," one of the first mobile robots ever, was able to do this back in the 1960's. Read the end of the first paragraph at this link [cmu.edu].
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:1)
missing an attachment (Score:2)
No, wait.
I mean Vanessa comes with it, but she doesn't show up at the door with it when you buy one.
Sorry for the potential confusion. We now return to our regularly scheduled program.
Pope
Re:Why so expensive? (Score:1)
Classic AI problem, but no AI (Score:2)
The technique was fairly simple: give the robot a certain number of points for changing a grid square from dirty to clean, and subtract a certain number of points for every unit of energy expended. After each run, the robot changes its algorithm and tries again. Eventually, you end up with a robot that will clean up the maximum amount of dirt with the minimum amount of energy.
(Forgive me if the details are fuzzy--too much LDS in the '60s...)
To implement this in a real system, it seems like you could even dispense with the sensor, and just weigh the vacuum bag at the beginning and the end of each cycle. You just have to make sure the robot doesn't cheat by going outside to vacuum up all of the dirt in the garden...
Cheap fix (Score:1)
1 heavy wooden or metal stake
rope
First modify the front wheels slightly so that they're just barely pulling the mower to the right (this will make the mowers navigation system 'self correcting'). Drive the stake into the center of the largest patch of uncut grass and tie one end of the rope to it, and then measure out a length of rope to the closest edge of the yard. Affix the mower to this rope in such a way that when it goes, it pulls itself in a counter clockwise circle around the post. A thicker post will make for a quicker mow. If the grass is thick, a skinny pole is best.
Note: Before starting the mower, be sure remove any children, desireable animals and/or lawn-ornaments from the cutting area. Also be sure to cut down and remove any trees or decorative shrubs that might get in the way. A home made EMP device also makes for a great 'remote kill' switch should a difficult situation arise.
Re:Giant Battle Robots! (Score:1)
For preference I would like to use gamma ray lasers, mounted on stealth satilites that I control from my secret base on the far side of the moon.
Plan B would be to use a particle acelerator to make a black hole.
Re:Anyone remember ROBI????? (Score:2)
(It's also possible that I just heard those "Clap On! Clap Off" commercials *way* too often)
Dana
More info on Cye - from Probotics (Score:2)
Pity the poor Daleks... (Score:1)
What I want to see is a stair-climbing motorized wheelchair with on-road capability and a top speed of, say, 40 KPH. Robotic gadgets that cannot handle the terrain we humans take for granted are seriously handicapped.
But seriously, folks, distributed intelligence is THE way to go, IMHO. I myself am building a sort of distributed-intelligence Open Source robotics system inspired by the (somewhat-too-costly) Lego Mindstorms gadget, with a few obvious improvements (stepper motors, DC motors with position feedback, cheap sonar ranging, a generic expansion capability to allow for new sensor/actuator module types) based on low-cost PIC uCs.
If/when I get it up & running, I'll try to make it available somewhere...
Buy the cheaper, older cye! (Score:1)
Re:Giant Battle Robots! (Score:2)
type video transmitter could almost be a cost-effective means of World Domination!
It's been done already, and they are called Daleks. Created by a guy named Davros.
Automatic Charging Systems (Score:1)
Thanks
Re:the ZEN of robotics (Score:2)
From colored Palms, to colored intelligent vaccuum cleaners in less than a day. Neat.
Now hey, wait a second. Plug your color Palm into your colored intelligent vacuum cleaner and do away with the computer but retain the flexability! I'd like to see a program for the Palm that could control the cye with either its own serial remote or sitting on its back and plugged into the RJ45 (with some kind of splitter so you could plug something else in, too; I don't know the specifics of how this expansion adapter is wired up). Then you can crash your computer in all the different geek ways you can think of and you still get your vacuuming done for you :-). As an added bonus you get a local display (messages from bot and other Homo sapiens) and control ("Hey, get me a drink, then go vacuum up the mess the guys made in the living room."). Forget clapping, start tapping. The only thing I'd be worried about is the requirements of the little Palm processor.
As it stands, I can't afford one anyways. :-(
I think the same thing whenever one of these cool geek toys comes up. That's [one of the reasons] why I like Linux!
Kenneth
Not quite what I'm looking for in a robot (Score:1)
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:1)
Re:The Honda Human (Score:1)
http://animemania.net/~f.m artinertesta/robotica/hhri.htm [animemania.net]
It walks down stairs, alone or in pairs!
Probably outside your price range though... You may have known about this one, but any chance to link to it, I take. I want one!!!
Not much like a Dalek, but could be a Cyberman if they ever update the design...
linux support - Re:From the FAQ =) (Score:1)
My only concern is how many of the people who would love to code for this, would be willing and able to fork out the $1000 to buy one. Also I wonder how much fun or practical it would be writing code for this with out acutally having one.
A cute, but overpriced, gadget (Score:1)
A blind dead-reckoning robot seems lame for 1999. Most mobile robots use at least a Polaroid sonar system to prevent bumping into obstacles. You can do mapping with a broad-beam sonar without running into anything, using some classic algorithms by Hans Moravec. It should be possible to use that technology today at well below the $1000 price point.
This thing reminds me of the PenMan plotter of the early 1980s, a little mobile robot with a pen intended for producing large plots. Several times a minute, it went back to its docking station to reestablish its position. Cute, but not a useful plotter, it faded from the scene long ago.
what a waste of resources... (Score:1)
I just read Brave New World for the first time, and all sorts of things I read remind me now how prescient Aldous Huxley was. Its been almost seventy years since he wrote the novel, and we are ahead of his pace.
-Brian
Have I missed someting? (Score:1)
How did the robot get the drink into the tray?
My guess is, you go to your fridge and put it in there yourself as the bot couldn't do that in its current config.
I want a robot that will get the drink/food etc for me while I sit on my fat lazy arse in front of the PC/TV, not one that requires me to do all the hard work!
Re:Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:2)
--GnrcMan--
Re:Wow, another vacuum! but more (Score:1)
So he can sleep, then come in to your room at 7am and sing a certain song then leave and go wait for you or wheel around. Like a mobil alarm clock that gets out of your way when you are all pissed and sleepy after being woken up.
The Zap stuff is where the robot gets fun. It has sleep and if statments so he can do a lot more then vacuum.
Re:cashola (Score:2)
It looks like they picked a cool way to solve a lot of the problems. The mapping feature looks good too. I saw this is a magazine just the other day, but didn't really look at it. It doesn't look like robots are "supposed" to. hehe.
Re:How would you like (Score:1)
Re:overestimating the buying public (Score:2)
..speaking of hopelessly naive..
Linux support (Score:2)
Vermin control device.... (Score:1)
There already is a vermin control device on the market very similar to what you describe. While it doesn't vacuum, it does a fair job washing dishes and cleaning up certain types of kitchen spills, and an excellent job of keeping the home vermin free. It's called a cat.
Additional attributes:
The aforementioned device does have a few drawbacks, though:
On the whole, I'd say the benefits outweigh the detriments -- I know have four of my own.
-- WhiskeyJack
Re:You drink isopropyl? (Score:2)
Budweiser???
Um, I'm Canadian.
As for beer, I can't actually drink the mass produced crap they make even here.
I tend to go for imports and some of those microbrewery beers (Mmmm, Black Pearl, cream ale made from coffee...).
Though I drink more rum than anything else.
Voice of dissent (Score:1)
And please, nobody say 'Because it would be cool!'. An actual reason please... What would it do?
Re:More info on Cye - from Probotics (Score:1)
Regarding complaints that the robot isn't smart enough... this is a software issue, and since Probotics are making the API available, I don't see any reason why you couldn't write a driver that updates the map as it encounters obsticals.. Remember, the Cye does provide feedback to the base when it encounters an obstical; it just doesn't have a ranged sensor. The Cye can be as intelligent as you want it to be.
I'm enthusaistic about this. This is basically a real-life robot-wars situation, where you can program your own behavior. If there were a USB port on the Cye mobile unit that could communicate with the base via the radio, then the Cye would have limitless possibility for expansion; robot-arm attachments, light and audio sensers... I can't believe Probotics doesn't have these improvements planned.
--- SER
From the FAQ =) (Score:3)
Linux Linux Linux.. Need I say more? Open up
your libraries to the Linux community and you
will find your product improving daily at no cost
to you from the efforts of the Linux development community.
I couldn't agree more. Our libraries are open any time. We have yet to refuse anyone who wanted a copy of our source code. Please, take the bull by the horns and start writing the Linux rev for us. We are swamped with new features and bug fixes just sticking with one operating system (let alone 2, 3, or 4 (Linux,Mac, Unix)).
I know what I want for Christmas, or my birthday next month =)
Giant Battle Robots! (Score:3)
Just up scale one of those babys about 50 or 60 times, and stick on some laser cannon...
Although, when I start thinking about it, mapping out a whole city for it might take a while... and don't even *think* about trying to take over the world.
Hmm. I'd probably be better of welding an M16 to the back of an AIBO.
but.... (Score:1)
This is a tiny robot, it needs to be black, to convey power(and a strong sexual drive).
Hmm.. I really haven't (Score:2)
I don't know that I would actually want something like this. It would be cool to play with and all, and maybe if you could get one that vacumed I'd think it was cool - except I'm such a slob letting any machine clean my room would lead to either something I really wanted being thrown out, or some sort of bizzare damage to the robot.
So, if something like this was cheap, how many people could honestly see themselves getting it for a practical use, and how many are just entranced by the neatness of the idea?
oh yeah, and it would scare the hell out of my cat, and if I get a dog it would chew on the robot (or play shake games... how sturdy is this thing?)
Vacuuming is the Killer App of robots? (Score:2)
This happened to PCs, it will happen to PRs as well.
Re:Why so expensive? (Score:2)
R&D
Usually, as a product becomes more widely used, the cost goes down. The quality also goes up :) Anyways, I think that in a reasonable time we'll see these things being used for practical purposes and being sold inexpensively in Walmart.
Whee!!
-BrentPrimative Dont Ya Think? (Score:1)
Oh well, guess is it cant be all that bad though at least it's not one that flashes some lights and beeps and does absolutely nothing besides that. But that's just me
Re:Vacuuming is the Killer App of robots? (Score:1)
Enterprising geeks know when two technologies should be integrated.
Re:Mindstorms is cooler (Score:1)
Amazingly enough, there are now robots that wash dishes [maytag.com] and do the laundry [sears.com]. Science marches on!
Re:a practical use (Score:1)
This would also be helpful in creating existing condition surveys of buildings, with the ability to export the data in a vector format (DWG/DXF). This task takes a lot of time, especially in buildings built in the pre CADD days that need rennovation/expansion. I can imagine letting this thing loose after buisness hours in a building, or at someone's house, and it could map all of the walls, etc and then one could add neccessary details.
I just wish someone would come up with a object oriented (CADD, not programming) file format. If you are curious as to what I mean, check out how to draft in 3D.
Re:Lame personal vaccuum device (Score:1)
In all seriousness, does anyone know how well this robot moves on hardwood floors?
Re:Why so expensive? (Score:1)
Re:Cheap fix (Score:1)
If you turn the wheels right you should have it go clockwise, if you turn them left you should have it go counterclockwise...
Re:Voice of dissent (Score:1)
Vacuuming... (Score:1)
Re:The Honda Human (Score:1)
Re:Automatic Charging Systems (Score:1)
Re:Cheap fix (Score:1)
1 Goat (stake and rope optional)
That should do it.
Bluetooth's killer app? (Score:1)
Nah, it's probably just me...
Re:Wow, another vacuum! [sic] (Score:2)
It has a wagon. Therefore I'm guessing that it can carry stuff for you.
-BrentMindstorms is cooler (Score:1)
Lame personal vaccuum device (Score:1)
I want a robot that can pick up my dirty laundry, do my dishes, clean the cat box, water my plants, make me meals, get the mail, wash my clothes, run errands (grocery store, post office, dry cleaners, bank), dust the furniture, do a GOOD job at vaccuuming, and hell, give the cats baths, set the time on the VCR, shovel the snow while we're in "dream" mode.
Linux Support (Score:3)
Jazilla.org - the Java Mozilla [sourceforge.net]
Re:but.... (Score:2)
Hey, you're in luck. Check out the store (page). It comes in dozens of different color combinations. Yes, even black.
-Brentoverestimating the buying public (Score:3)
I realize that the robot-buying public may be a wee bit savvier than the general buying public, but isn't the above sentiment hopelessly naive? Does anyone believe that everything that sells in great numbers "must be effective"? Ever heard of Windows?
I understand that Cye's navigation probably is remarkably effective, but offering big sales as evidence is poor logic.
Re:Since MAY? (Score:1)
Re:Why so expensive? (Score:2)
Simple: economies of scale.
once you have come up with the design and written the software
This costs lots of money; R&D usually does.
shouldn't it be fairly inexpensive to produce a robot like this?
Sure. Mass production is a wonderful thing.
When you combine the previous two with an expected market of 50 million, you can amortize R&D costs over many units - the manufacturing costs winout. However, if you expect to sell a relatively small number your R&D costs dominate.
time ? (Score:1)
Re:More interested in AIBO type stuff. (Score:1)
I got the impression from the article that the robot certainly could do it that. However, that's a long process, and it'll have to bumb at every possible place of a wall to know for certain he can't go through it. And since there isn't much fun in a robot bumbing into things, the fast drawing of a map is an option.
-- Abigail
Forget vaccuming.. how about mowing the lawn? (Score:2)
I've wanted to build something to mow the lawn. It's not like I have a big yard in Arizona. It takes all of about 5 minutes to mow. But that requires the following sequence of events:
So, science fiction aside, anyone want to work on building a robot lawn mower? :)