Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology (Apple) Businesses Technology Apple

Video iPod Oct 12? 471

Petey_Alchemist writes "Apple Insider is reporting that Apple will release a video iPod on October 12th, possibly in conjunction with the announcement of Apple's fourth quarter results. From the article 'Although details are scarce, sources who claim to have seen the new iPod describe it as being similar to Apple's 60GB iPod photo player, but several millimeters thinner. The device reportedly sports a smaller click-wheel akin to that of the iPod nano's, making way for a larger, higher-resolution color display that extends further down the face of the device.' "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Video iPod Oct 12?

Comments Filter:
  • The screen! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by glamslam ( 535995 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:08PM (#13722812)
    Let's just hope this screen resists scratches much better than the nano. At least you do not have to look at the nano to enjoy listening to it...
  • by dada21 ( 163177 ) * <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:09PM (#13722817) Homepage Journal
    Video is not portable in any successful manner. Cell phone providers can't get people interested; portable mini-LCD DVD players spend more time on family room shelves than in-use.

    Music videos? Does MTV even play them anymore? Who watches videos?

    My impression is that Apple is trying to make the market viable, yet the iPod's popularity rode on years of MP3 success from Napster-on. Who trades videos over P2P or buys video DVDs from Borders, Wal-Mart or Amazon?

    Is it a workaround from the RIAA? Doubtful. Is it attempting to fill up the hole in a dwindling music video market? Unlikely. Is it a feature that will get a huge initial "ooh toy" interest that will never get used after the first few weeks?

    I can't see why this is needed unless Apple foresees video Podcasts from independent video "bloggers" or DIY TV show sites, but even that is a stretch.

    The iPod coasted on the coattails of a huge market without a user friendly portable player. Video iPod is trying to invent a market boom.
  • by Morgalyn ( 605015 ) <slashmorg@gmail.com> on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:15PM (#13722874) Journal
    I think the market is in homebrew video. A large number of people use the photo iPods as their virtual expanding wallet of family photos. Just imagine being able to show Grandma a short video of that cute thing Junior did, without going to another room, setting up the tv and the VCR or the DVD player and then remembering the stuff and... well, you see?

    The latest version of iTunes to come out added support for video podcasting, and with storage and bandwidth becoming less of a factor, I think we are going to see more and more people taking their blogs to the next step.. from text, to podcasts, to video podcasts.

    Just because its an iPod doesn't mean it has to be music related.
  • by mblase ( 200735 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:15PM (#13722877)
    Would a larger screen on an iPod-sized device really make it any easier to watch video on it? No matter how you design things, it's a tiny tiny display.

    Say you make it taller than it is wide and rotate it ninety degrees to view video. Then you're 2" tall, but still only about 2.7" wide, giving you a whopping 3.3" diagonal, up from 2.5" on the current iPod.

    Video out support is good, but you're pushing that tiny hard drive pretty hard whether you're driving the iPod's screen or not. Apple would have to do some very impressive tricks with the battery life to make a video iPod practical.

    From everything I've been reading, video support on the current iPod is just a firmware upgrade away. But I'm not convinced it's something users are going to be able to use well, even if it is just restricted to music videos.

    Hopefully AppleInsider's barking up the wrong tree.
  • by Khyron ( 8855 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:16PM (#13722886)
    All I can say is if this is true, it better play more video container and codec combinations then Quicktime Player does otherwise it will be terribly limited. Unlike a Mac running OS X, users would not be able to trivially add codecs or install programs like VLC or MPlayer on an iPod as they are forced to do on a Mac in order to watch most "modern" commonly used codecs and container formats.
  • Bound to happen. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by blackmonday ( 607916 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:17PM (#13722898) Homepage
    I watched 2 movies on my iPaq on a flight from LA to Paris. It was actually very nice. I have only 1 GB of storage, but that fits 2 divx movies perfectly.

    I doubt that Apple will support divx, using H.264 instead. My question, who has compared these formats in a 500 MB size limit? Will Apple give you a utility to convert your DVDs? (probably not). Also, the question of battery life is important. An SD card doesn't spin inside. That hard drive on the iPod is going to burn a lot of battery power, and get hot to the touch.

    The video iPod is inevitable. My questions are mainly to how we will fill them without an Apple Movie Store. I would expect the release of this iPod to coincide with the release of a movie store.

  • by 4what4 ( 196829 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:19PM (#13722912)
    if this doesn't have video out, I don't see the point. I don't want to watch any show or clip of a show on my ipod. I am sure there are a lot of other people who are the same.

    but,

    if it did have vdeo out of some sort, it would be really attractive. I would buy a show through apple (h264 would be awsome), load it onto an ipod and play it on a tv at my convience, hd output of some sort would be a plus.
  • by Darius Jedburgh ( 920018 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:20PM (#13722919)
    Video is not portable in any successful manner.
    Then why are people buying PSPs? I don't think it's for the games.
  • by Oculus Habent ( 562837 ) * <oculus DOT habent AT gmail DOT com> on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:21PM (#13722928) Journal
    The invitation picture piques my interest, though. I don't think it'll be a video iPod, but I think movies are involved bdsed on the red curtain.

    The "AirPort Express" device is probably not for the iPod, but rather like the Express, a video-out system for Macs, allowing you to play your movies to your TV without having them near each other... Hasn't this constantly been the intention of Apple - the "digital hub" without all the wires?

    I wonder if/hope it will support a remote control, so you can control your on-computer content in the other room from the TV.
  • by CameraChimera ( 835399 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:21PM (#13722930)
    Not portable? I'm inclined to agree, but then why are PSP movie sales through [mp3newswire.net] the [geek.com] roof [usatoday.com]? It seems that a market already exists.

    If Apple can match the PSP's screen quality and beat its ease of use (by making movies downloadable, perhaps) they might have something.
  • by nine-times ( 778537 ) <nine.times@gmail.com> on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:23PM (#13722951) Homepage
    Video is not portable in any successful manner. Cell phone providers can't get people interested;

    Oh, so... since cell phone providers can't get people interested in their crappy, poorly designed, expensive portable video, no one else should attempt such a thing, even if it becomes technologically trivial?

    Why not allow video playback on the iPod? They already have a color screen, and enough hard drive space to store several movies. It's not like it'd take much to allow video playback.

    Of course, if they add a good video decoding chip, a bigger screen, and a longer lasting battery, it'd make it more practical to play video, but it isn't as though playing a movie requires Apple to design a completely new device.

  • by GekkePrutser ( 548776 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:28PM (#13722998)
    That's strange, on the 5th of September Thinksecret claimed that we wouldn't see new powerbooks this year. http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0509g5.html [thinksecret.com]

    Quote:
    No PowerBook revision?

    Sources are also reporting that the pending Power Mac revision will be the last Mac upgrade of the calendar year. Contrary to other reports, Apple's PowerBook line, last revised in February with only incremental upgrades, will likely not see an upgrade before Macworld Expo San Francisco in January 2006, at the earliest.

  • by jabella ( 91754 ) * on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:28PM (#13723000) Journal

    personally, i think it's going to be the rebranding of the itms from 'itunes music store' to the new media store.

    they'll sell movies, etc. no new device for watching on tv yet. no new video ipod yet. you need a base of people who use the service that really WANT a remote way to move their media around first. how many people (outside the slashdot community) would even HAVE movies to put on an vipod now?

  • by bheer ( 633842 ) <rbheer@gmail.AUDENcom minus poet> on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:34PM (#13723058)
    > Who trades videos over P2P or buys video DVDs from Borders, Wal-Mart or Amazon?

    dada21, you luddite, go check out torrentspy.com. The video trading scene mostly uses BitTorrent and eMule, and it is VERY vibrant. The only thing holding it back is that you need obscure codecs to play the files (not a problem on PCs but a real problem on devices). The situation with video today is EXACTLY like the situation after Napster went under.

    As for who buys DVDs from Amazon etc -- lots of people do. And boxset sales have made sure that the portable DVD player has become a serious vacation accessory.

    As for TV: 2006 is going to be the year of digital on-demand tv (streamed or streamed+cached). ADSL2 is getting more common, even in bandwidth backwaters like the UK (see previous BBC/digital TV story). Yahoo, Microsoft and Google are all getting into the game and more and more TV studios are seeing the writing on the wall -- their libraries of old programs can be endlessly monetized by streaming them over the internet. In a world where customers connect at 10Mbps+, it'd be stupid not to do it.

    Video blogs and DIY video is probably the least important of the applications of a portable video player.

    > Video iPod is trying to invent a market boom.

    There was no 'boom' for MP3 players before the iPod either, unless you count geeks. iPod+iTMS made the MP3 player chic enough for Joe Public to want one. If Apple doesn't do the same for video, someone else will.

    The only valid problem about portable video is that watching video takes up your full attention. But lots of people who play games on their cellphones on the subway -- I'm sure they wouldn't mind watching video.

  • by jargoone ( 166102 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:35PM (#13723071)
    These groups of people would probably go bananas over a video iPod, if it was done right.

    It was, [archos.com], but it doesn't say Apple on it. Hence, no bananas.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:39PM (#13723104)
    The red curtain is meaningless. Read the fine print: The event is being hosted at a theater.
  • by wvitXpert ( 769356 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:41PM (#13723130)
    What, with no native programs to run on it?
  • by shotfeel ( 235240 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:52PM (#13723237)
    It's not like it'd take much to allow video playback.

    Not to mention that they already have a video out too. Talk about Tivo-To-Go.
  • by Been on TV ( 886187 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @12:58PM (#13723289) Homepage

    I wrote yesterday that processor upgrades [andwest.com] are also very likely for this event for two reasons:

    • IBM will launch new hardware on October 14 with the multi-core Power5+ processor. Such announcements tend to have a connection - particularly since it would be "new" processors for both IBM and Apple in their products
    • The PowerMac, iMac, Xserve and Powerbooks are long overdue for a processor upgrade, and needs more performace to live through to the Intel 64-bit products in 2nd half of 2006.
  • by big daddy kane ( 731748 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:03PM (#13723317)
    Most people who buy the nano/mini/shuffle etc are people who place fashion over utility, the amount of songs the device can hold is nearly inconsequential, or at most second place. If they're content with at most 2gb of storage, they wont put on a fit over a new device with more space, if they're slow to adopt new trends (eg digital music, assuming they have small libraries to match their small player) then they wouldn't have video to put on a video ipod anyway. Apple is opening up a new market, not pissing on its existing one.
  • by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:05PM (#13723343) Journal
    Close, but no banana. Why limit it to G5 owners? An H.264 decoder chip costs under $10. They could quite easily build the decoder logic into the Airport Express Base Station, and allow even G3-class machine to stream the video with almost no CPU load. Combine this with a remote control and an iTunes-like interface so you don't have to go to your computer to press pause, and you might well have a winner.
  • by damiam ( 409504 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:05PM (#13723345)
    Maybe it would be more popular if it weren't twice the size of the iPod (12.1 vs. 6.2 cubic inches for the 20GB models) and significantly heavier (9.9 vs. 5.9 ounces).
  • by ifwm ( 687373 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:19PM (#13723452) Journal
    "I'm inclined to agree, but then why are PSP movie sales through the roof?"

    They're not. You swallowed a marketing pitch disguised as news.

    Go stand in the corner until you get your "silly corporate hype" detector working.
  • by Pierce ( 154 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:24PM (#13723494)
    Not to mention damn near every last grunt in Iraq. There's a lot of "down-time" involved in occupation efforts, and folks like us mailing DVD's out to them is one of their main sources of entertainment out there.

    As a soldier who will be mobilized in less than a month (according to the current "best guess"), I wouldn't take an iPod with me to watch video for a few reasons:
    1. I have a limited capacity to carry anything, if I want to take a personal device for watching movies I'm going to take a laptop. This way I can potentially check email when Internet access is available, read eBooks and listen to music.
    2. A device the size of an iPod could get broken or lost a lot easier than a laptop.
    3. If I had an iPod that played video, how would I update the videos? I'd need a computer, which means I should just have the computer.
    4. When I watch a movie I would want the option to allow other soldiers that don't have a laptop or video iPod to watch as well. On a video iPod, if the sizes are approximately the same, only one person could realisticly watch the video.
    5. If necessary it would be easier to find a replacement laptop charger or battery than a video iPod (unless the charger was identical to existing iPod chargers). The last thing I'd want is a video iPod that has no juice because my charger broke or was lost.

    ...with that said, an iPod-sized device that allowed me to plug into a video display to play the saved content would be nice. But I'd still have to get around the issue of uploading new content and deal with times when I don't have a display to plug into.

  • by Basehart ( 633304 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:26PM (#13723513)
    "....and possibly we'll see a new high-end Nano (6 or 8G?), with some price adjustments across the board."

    No way. Apple would not release a higher capacity Nano only weeks after releasing the existing versions. It would piss everyone with a 2 or 4 gig version off so bad they'd be ripping the metal off the front of their local Apple Stores demanding free upgrades!
  • pocket video (Score:3, Insightful)

    by frankmu ( 68782 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:38PM (#13723609) Homepage
    the posters who complain about the usefulness of such devices don't have children. i recently traveled with children to SF. i had ripped some kids videos (They Might Be Giant's "Here come the giants") to my treo 650. now you can argue about how illegal that is, but it kept my kids occupied. now, would you like a screaming 2 year old sitting behind your plane seat, or one watching video? there is definitely a place for this device.
  • Re:Obviously.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by eclectic4 ( 665330 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:40PM (#13723620)
    "...you don't know Apple too well. They will always come out with an update of your product less than a month after you purchased it"

    Isn't invention great. And you fail to mention the real reason it makes so many people feeling a little jealous... it's the fact that Apple has been doing this for many years. They will upgrade their line when they feel it's right, while keeping the price of the relative product the same. They've been doing this on the computer side for a very long time.

    Seeing an upgrade to your product (upgrades are good, trust me, my original 5 GB iPod wouldn't cut it today, sorry) that is exactly the same price as the one you just bought a month ago is what get's ya. But, Apple knows the balance tips towards keeping the prices constantly in certain ranges while not being afraid of investigating upgrades due to new technology. We as consumers tend to like that much more than don't like the jealousy thing... you picked the time to buy, and the purchase should have been an accepted agreement. Meaning, it was worth it to you to pay what you did for that device at that time, so go with that, or you will never own an xxxxxx.
  • Why??? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by CrazyTalk ( 662055 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:40PM (#13723621)
    Seriously, why would someone buy one of these? Its not like you are going to be watching video while working out at the gym, jogging, or walking down the street. Thats why the old portable TV Watchman was a failure, and the portable cassette Walkman was a success. You can multitask while listening to your iPod - not while watching a little video screen.
  • by Tibor the Hun ( 143056 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:43PM (#13723646)
    No offense, but it's not the fact that it doesn't say Apple on it.
    It's but uggly, and doesn't support h.264

    Sony PSP doesn't say Apple, yet is a fine portable video player.
    I think you're flaming a bit.

  • by The Lynxpro ( 657990 ) <<lynxpro> <at> <gmail.com>> on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @01:48PM (#13723687)
    "and think secret is saying the exact opposite: no vIpod, it's powermac and powerbook updates."

    And ThinkSecret seems to think there's a large margin on the iPod Nano, which there is not.

    ThinkSecret seems to think that an iPod Video model would rob sales of the iPod Nano despite the fact that the Video model would be at the high price range ($500+) of all iPods, whereas the Nano is not.

    This event is a media special event. It makes no sense to invite the media if it is merely an annoucement and last hurrah of the PowerBooks and PowerMacs before the Intel switch.

    Most likely, the event will start with a speed bump/dual core announcement for the PowerBooks and PowerMacs. The "one last thing" - and the main event of the presentation - would be the iPod Video, along with the iMovie/iVideo/iWhatever Video store debut. You gotta think about it like the last presentation; the rather mundane Motorola ROKR shown off (well, actually, iTunes 5.0 first), and then the major announcement of the iPod Nano saved for last.

    We must all remember that we are in the final stretches before the holiday season. Apple needs to remind consumers that Apple is still hot this holiday season, and thus an iPod Video would serve this well.

    Then again, same goes for a G5 powered and HD capable Mac Mini, while they are at it. But I doubt that is meant to be for now.

  • by C0rinthian ( 770164 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @02:03PM (#13723777)
    At the moment I can get music from iTMS, or rip my own CDs. It wouldn't surprise me that if Apple plan for video distribution, it will include a nice two-step DVD rip as well.
    I doubt that, given that breaking DVD encryption is a 'no-no'. They would need an online distribution method for this.
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @02:43PM (#13724039)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by macffooky ( 593691 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @03:04PM (#13724185)
    How about the ridiculously long time it takes to encode to H.264, even on mid-range hardware ?
  • by Rude Turnip ( 49495 ) <.valuation. .at. .gmail.com.> on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @03:04PM (#13724188)
    I thought about that...a good Christmas season for Apple would translate into good *first* quarter results for them, so the Company will look good coming in and going out of their fiscal year. Basically they can say..."hey, it's only the first quarter of our fiscal year and look how good we're doing already!"
  • by Guspaz ( 556486 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @03:07PM (#13724213)
    Don't they host most such events in theaters? I mean, they need someplace big with lots of seats and a stage for such announcements. Isn't a theater (and not the movie kind) the obvious place to host such a thing?

    I think a previous post I've made still applies to this situation, and I'll reiterate the key points: Every time Apple hints they are about to make an announcement, the media always tells the public that it is undoubtedly going to be a video iPod.. And every single time they have been wrong. Does this mean that this announcement is not a video iPod? No. I merely point out that screaming "OMG TEH VIDEO IPOD IS HERE!" every time apple prepares for an announcement is stupid.
  • by fupeg ( 653970 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @09:02PM (#13726558)
    If your only measure of utility is data storage capacity, then you might be correct. I'm guessing there are some other measures though.

    Personally, I bought a Nano for jogging. It's very light and much less likely to have vibration related issues than a hard drive based mp3 player. I had almost bought a shuffle for the same reason instead, but luckily waited until the Nano came out. I generally jog in sweat pants, with an old t-shirt and a heavily worn cap on, so fashion is not exactly high on my list.
  • Time for thinking (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Circlotron ( 764156 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2005 @11:14PM (#13727181)
    I can imagine a time in the not-to-distant future when I will be walking down the street without any kind of entertainment or communication devices in tow and these kids will be pointing and staring at me for not having a "rich multimedia experience" or whatever. The idea of not having multiple electronic devices attached to my every orifice and appendage will be inconceivable to them. One of them might just concur that I was using my time thinking of stuff like people did in the "old days". Yeah, I can do long division with a pencil and paper too! Just what *is* this perceived need for entertainment and communication every moment of your waking life? Whatever happened to solitude and reflection and pondering over things? No time for that now!

All the simple programs have been written.

Working...