Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Technology Science

Liquid Mirror Telescopes Set For Magnetic Upgrade 64

KentuckyFC writes "Liquid mirror telescopes start life as a puddle of mercury in a bowl. Set the bowl spinning and the mercury spreads out in a thin film giving the surface an almost perfect mirror finish. But these telescopes have two important limitations. First, they can only point straight up since tilting the mirror spills the mercury. And second, they cannot be made adaptive to correct for any blurring introduced by the Earth's atmosphere. But liquid mirror telescopes look set for an upgrade thanks to the work of a group of Canadian researchers. Their technique is to change the shape of the liquid mirror using powerful electromagnets. They use a ferromagnetic fluid of iron nanoparticles in oil instead of mercury which is too dense to be easily manipulated in this way. The work is just proof of principle at this stage but the idea is to use magnets to correct for the usual range of optical aberrations that telescopes have to deal with (abstract). And also to allow a liquid telescope to be tilted by using oil that is much more viscous than mercury and correcting any periodic deformation in the fluid that tilting might cause."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Liquid Mirror Telescopes Set For Magnetic Upgrade

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Power outage (Score:3, Informative)

    by FooAtWFU ( 699187 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @04:44PM (#24233627) Homepage
    TFS says they're not using mercury in the tilting kind since it's too dense to work with effectively.
  • Re:Alternately (Score:3, Informative)

    by againjj ( 1132651 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @05:05PM (#24233953)
    Mercury is too dense. From TFA:

    Mercury cannot be used, however, because it is too dense and changing its shape requires impractically powerful fields.

  • Too dense? (Score:5, Informative)

    by imsabbel ( 611519 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @05:15PM (#24234075)

    "They use a ferromagnetic fluid of iron nanoparticles in oil instead of mercury which is too dense to be easily manipulated in this way."

    Well, that and the fact that a ferrofluid (== ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic, ir depends) is a little easier to influence with magnetic fields than an weak diamagnet like mercury...

  • by hubie ( 108345 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @05:39PM (#24234303)

    When you talk about space, everything changes. If the ferrofluid has a volatile base liquid, it will all evaporate/boil away in the vacuum (and make a heck of a mess of the rest of the telescope). I couldn't tell from the ferrofluid manufacturer web site, but the material doesn't make any claims about vacuum compatibility (the stuff is used to make seals but those look to be hermetic and not vacuum seals).

    The other problem with space applications and these thin deformable mirrors is whether there is any savings in making a mirror out of them over glass. If the weight of all the actuators, actuator support structures, electronics to run the actuators and the control system, etc. weigh more than a proper piece of glass of comparable diameter, then you're better off going with a nice stable piece of glass.

    As an aside, I'm not so sure it makes it easier to build larger interferometric arrays. Everything behind the primary telescope mirrors stays the same and you are only talking about how much gain you get building these mirrors over glass. For interferometric arrays what is important is the "filled" area vs the area of the effective diameter, and unless you're talking about these mirrors being an order of magnitude larger (and much cheaper than the glass ones), I'm not so sure it impacts your "filled" vs "unfilled" area ratio.

  • by hubie ( 108345 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @05:50PM (#24234467)
    From their abstract they say they corrected the residual wavefront error to 0.05-microns, which for the 659.9-nm light they tested works out to lamda/13, which is not bad for the imaging surface for a mirror. Then again, the mirror was only 37-mm in diameter, so it would be interesting to see how it scales (especially with actuator number).
  • by WalksOnDirt ( 704461 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @05:55PM (#24234501)

    That question immediately came to mind, since as wild guess I would expect something more like a catenary. At http://www.math.iupui.edu/m261vis/LMirror/mirrorproof.html [iupui.edu] they show that it really is a parabola.

  • by vigour ( 846429 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @06:21PM (#24234785)
    Ferrofluids are generally dispersed in water. They consist of coated magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. It doesn't take a particularly strong magnetic field to distort them. If you place a small, good quality permanent magnet (NdFeB), which has a surface field ~ 150 mT, under a dish of a ferrofluid, the ferrofluid grows peaks (it look slike a hedgehog) to minimise its surface area.

    With small electromagnets, it is possible to generate fields of this magnitude, on this scale. The magnetic field inside a solenoid is
    B = mu_0 * (N/L) * I
    where mu_0 permeability 4*PI e-7
    N - Number of turns
    L - Length of solenoid
    I - Current in solenoid

    Typical Values of N = 5000, L = 1 cm, I = 0.5 A, B = 314 mT at the center (so ~ 150 - 200 mT at the edge).
  • by mikael ( 484 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @06:37PM (#24234941)

    The ferromagnetic liquid will always try to achieve an equilibrium point between gravity, surface tension and the surrounding magnetic field. Gravity and surface tension will make it try and remain flat. As a magnetic field is continuous, it should be possible to have a large number of small but powerful magnets to make the liquid adopt whatever position is desired.

    There are a good few videos on youtube: Magnetic sculpture [youtube.com]

  • by againjj ( 1132651 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @06:45PM (#24235019)
    Yes it is. Wikipedia talks about catenary [wikipedia.org] and parabola [wikipedia.org]. Basically, when you have a cable-like object that has evenly distributed mass and support only at the ends, you get a catenary. When you get support over the entire object, you get the parabola. This is talked about in reference to a suspension bridge [wikipedia.org].
  • by kaiser423 ( 828989 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @09:03PM (#24236207)
    Well, optical-grade corrections are extremely small. The magnets would be nowhere near to making something look like a polyhedron. Max deflection from these suckers would probably be millimeters if that....
  • Re:I love ferrofluid (Score:3, Informative)

    by rcw-home ( 122017 ) on Friday July 18, 2008 @12:27AM (#24237717)

    I don't know why it stains so well, but you spill even a drop of it and it will never come off.

    Iron is very common in ink such as the classical iron gall [wikipedia.org] and black tattoo ink [about.com].

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 18, 2008 @08:33AM (#24240453)

    A big glass mirror can be put together from smaller hexagonal glass mirror pieces. Some of the larger surface bound telescopes are set up that way too. So the launch vehicle diameter is not a hard limit.

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...