Windows 8 Early Build Hints At Apple, WebOS Competitor - EWeek 375
Microsoft's next Windows could be a cross-platform OS in the style of Apple's iOS or Hewlett-Packard's webOS, if supposed early builds are to be believed... "Bloggers Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott, in a series of April postings on Rivera’s Within Windows blog, have described the various features of what they claim is an early build of Windows 8: an Office-style ribbon integrated into Windows Explorer, complete with tools for viewing libraries, manipulating images and managing drive assets; an unlock screen that harkens to the 'Metro' design style already present in Windows Phone 7; an 'immersive' user interface and a built-in PDF reader they call 'Modern Reader.'"
App X, Ribbons, and hogwash (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
pan-FUDatio is what first come to mind on a MS thread.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps:
pan- : across
fundatio : fundamentalists?
So, 'across multiple fundamentalist things' (presumably referring to the various fanatical proponents of their respective platforms)
Flaming (Score:4, Interesting)
Microsoft should just keep pushing good stability features for their crappy OS. Every single OS release is an "oh we got this new x and that new y (both available in other decent OS for ages, except for the occasional innovation)" moment, instead of a "We have increased security and enabled you to fully control your computer. If you are not a computer expert, this OS is great, as it always has been, but if you are a computer expert, then now we have given you the ability to fully manipulate your computer" kind of thing. That's what Windows should do -- add powerusers to their marketshare (I mean real powerusers). Also, it isn't FLOSS (I just had to troll
Re:Flaming (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft is usually damned if they do, damned if they don't. Let's say they added multiple desktop support, a la every other worthwhile OS. Everyone would laugh at MS for being late to the party. If they don't add it, then people will mock them for its omission.
I use a Mac and Win 7. There are some damn nice features that 7 has I wish my Mac would copy. Namely: snap to sides. Unfortunately, I doubt that Apple will ever add this, because they seem to refuse to admit to anyone else ever having a good idea. (We did get Spaces eventually, though, so perhaps there is hope.) I also really enjoy how the new start menu works. It's sort of an enhanced dock with the ability to preview and close windows without having to open them. Apple already does have similar functionality (sans the closing windows bit, and it's a little more cumbersome), but there are aspects of the Windows implementation that I prefer.
You could look at how Apple handled Snow Leopard. For the most part, it was an "under the hood" update, which is basically what you're asking for. And yet, even though it technically did bring a lot of new features, there were a lot of people who were mad at Apple for producing a "weak" update, even though it only cost $30.
You just can't please everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This feature is in BetterTouchTool [boastr.net], which I recommend if you use a Magic Mouse or a mutlitouch trackpad on a Mac (even without the snap to side feature).
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft has too many "partners" to sneak in a new version 18 months after the previous version (like Apple did with Snow Leopard). As a result, they'll probably be tied into their recent 3-4 year schedule.
I think the sadness over Snow Leopard being weak was due to the fact that Apple had been shipping major new releases every 12-18 months for four straight upgrades. And then along comes Snow Leopard on the same schedule, but mostly under the hood. So yeah it was disappointing, but necessary (so no comp
Re: (Score:2)
They already did, a decade or so ago - see Virtual Desktop Manager.... Except it's an optional (free) powertoys download,and not bundled by default.
Re: (Score:2)
The Windows 7 graphics stack is still more capable than anything in Linux when it comes to features like switching between GPUs and replacing GPU drivers without closing programs, logging out, or rebooting. This feature greatly reduces the impact of graphics driver crashes
wtf summary...? (Score:2)
if supposed early builds are to be believed... "Bloggers Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott, in a series of April postings on Rivera’s Within Windows blog, have described the various features of what they claim is an early build of Windows 8: an Office-style ribbon integrated into Windows Explorer, complete with tools for viewing libraries, manipulating images and managing drive assets; an unlock screen that harkens to the 'Metro' design style already present in Windows Phone 7; an 'immersive' user interface and a built-in PDF reader they call 'Modern Reader.'"
Northing here is about why it should be a cross-platform OS.
I may be kind of drunk right now, but I sure know when I read a bad summary!
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like the goal is to provide the ability to write a game once and it'll run on WIndows desktops and laptops, the XBox console, and their phone OS.
Which is almost doable right now, but I guess they hope to broaden the class of apps with which this is possible, and lessen the differences between these various platforms.
Re: (Score:3)
Sounds like the goal is to provide the ability to write a game once and it'll run on WIndows desktops and laptops, the XBox console, and their phone OS.
Wait ... you're saying their new OS will allow you to write code once for both desktops AND laptops if both run Windows? No way! That would be so cool .....
[/snark]
So... (Score:2, Insightful)
... basically, according to Thurrott and Rivera, Microsoft's "vision of the future of Windows" is - OS X?
Re: (Score:3)
What a strange troll...
Re: (Score:3)
"Does OS X have a tablet mode similar to Windows Phone 7's UI"
Yes, they call it iOS.
"or a ribbon interface"
I still don't really see how a "ribbon" is different than a toolbar. OS X has lots of those.
i hate ribbon (Score:5, Insightful)
It is the most terrible difficult and unintuitive development in ui I have ever seen. Give me my damn menu's back, he'll I would prefer vi over ribbons.
Indeed (Score:4, Insightful)
But this is the company that has made Wordpad an unusably over-complex piece of garbage - and I say that even though Windows 7 is a vast improvement over XP; installed on my laptop because XP was giving up with too many programs open, and now all those programs run nicely together.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You may think the Mac has the best of both worlds. I think they've merely combined crap and trash. Both approaches are UI disasters, and having mixed paradigms in the same software for that sort of thing just doesn't work well, which is why I stuck with my old copy of Office 2004 for Mac while trying to make the transition to using iWork. I'll take one broken paradigm over two any day, and iWork is great, though I've been so used to doing things the MS Office way for so long that it's taking a lot of habit
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I still hate the ribbon interface and feel like I am slightly less productive than before. More than half the ti
Ribbon... but why? (Score:2)
I think the ribbon is O-K. It's not fantastic (not the amazing revolution MS seems to think it is) but it's usable. I think it works OK in Office 07 at least. But... why in explorer? Explorer isn't complex enough to justify it. Office warranted it because it has oodles of menus and features. Explorer is comparatively simple though, which makes me think this is just overkill.
I can't wait for Windows 8! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
integrated software functionality (Score:2)
the list of functionality sounds like a perfect recipe for absolutely every major software company under the sun to begin anti-trust lawsuits, to me. oh, and patent infringement cases, too...
ribbon = rubbish (Score:2)
Interesting to see that they're fine with catch-up (Score:3)
Both iOS and webOS have made a lot of strides over the past few years. A big part of how they do things is user experience...Microsoft gets too geekily technical about some details, and the fact is, those details aren't as popular with the wider population than they'd like to admit. It's been the same story since Microsoft first ventured into the mobile space years ago.
Personally, I really, really like how fast and accurate the built in search is on webOS. I know a lot of other guys who left the platform and came back because once you get the bug, it's hard to give up. Especially if you figure out how to really use the platform well. Instead of swiping and scrolling through silly little screenspace consuming icons, you pull out the keyboard, type a couple letters, and it'll give you contacts, apps, you can mod it to do a wikipedia lookup, imdb, whatever. It's pretty sweet. It's like taking all the best things about a CLI and all the best things of the standard GUI and putting them all together. That's something, to me, I can deal with using 2 year old hardware on a day to day basis when I know there's better hardware out there...and I could even get it for free. And unless my provider would let me install webOS on that other phone and all my apps work, I'm not going to switch hardware. I'll duct tape my first gen Pre together if it comes down to it, and if that doesn't work, I'd be spending plenty of time trying to make it work on other hardware.
The reason I say all that is that if you're releasing a new mobile OS, you aren't going to "get me" to give up my apps, my preferred workflow, my cash, just to switch if you're playing catch-up. Just because you're Microsoft or Apple or Google doesn't impress me. Its whether or not your stuff does what I want, and if your software can't do it like I want, then either you pay me to use your stuff, or give me some features I can't live without. And no, I'm not going to switch just to "get" with a paid third party app something I already have well-integrated and free on my current platform of choice. Plus, it's all got to work well with what I currently have, or it's not happening. Not only that, but I stopped writing software for Windows Mobile about 3 years ago. You know what I really liked about it? It was a fairly powerful (if not a little quirky) platform to code for. I like
Midori/Singularity (Score:2)
They should just make that work and release it :)
Microsoft software always looks best... (Score:3)
The Ribbon Sucks (Score:2)
The Office Ribbon GUI is one of the worst GUI changes ever forced on a significant number of people.
could be?? (Score:3)
Microsoft's next Windows could be...
I stopped reading right there. It could be a lot of things. I was expecting a more informative "going to be"
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember that early builds from MS mean nothing. In the end it will just be Windows 7 with no 32-bit backwards compatibility and a new skin.
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember that early builds from MS mean nothing.
Right; this is crucial to remember. The reason for any information release at this point is to block MS partners who are thinking of becoming HP partners. MS will now be feeding this into their friends in your company and whenever someone points out what WebOS can do that person will say "if we just wait six months MS will do the same thing and we won't need to migrate".
Oh; and there will be 32 bit backwards compatibility; even if it's just through an integrated transparent hypervisor. Trust me.
If you want to adopt WebOS, get your project going now. Make serious progress as a "demo", "test environment" etc. If asked about the new MS product just say that this will give your organization a chance to prepare. Get real customers doing real things. At the point where Microsoft backs out or fails to deliver what your customers need, that is the point to make it really official.
Re: (Score:2)
No chance Microsoft will ditch backwards compatibility. The absolute most they'd do is ditch it in the core OS and implement it in the form of an integrated virtual machine running in userland, which IIRC is broadly what they do in recent versions anyhow.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Why? (Score:4, Informative)
By that argument, all version of Linux are just the previous version of Linux with a new skin.
There was actually a lot of under the covers changes in Windows 7, and the kernel changed substantially. Those aren't things you can see though, so you look at it and say "It's just windows with a new skin" because the skin is all you can see.
Re: (Score:3)
If they are going to support ARM SOC they will be 32bit there so I doubt they will drop 32bit x86 since intel still produces ATom for Netbooks and some other devices.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why? (Score:4, Informative)
I'm sure I can find a lot of other stuff that's wrong with windows when thinking about it...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
efficient usage of system resources = How does 7/R2 fail to use systems resources in a efficient way?
stability - I can't seam to get my systems to have stability issues, how do I reproduce this?
file system - What is wrong with NTFS as implemented by 7/R2?
decouple GUI from core - Has already been done. Server Core
decouple apps from core - Which apps?
simple remote access - RDP and other methods are already built in.
get rid of the sick regist
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Server Core. Haha aha ha ha. Yeah, great. Now get a unix OS and see what a real headless/GUI-less system can do. It needs SSH, for secure remote login, remote file copying and remote command execution. Of course, somebody at Microsoft is right now programming a really shit set of updates for powershell to try and copy SSH, but they'll get it wrong, naturally.
Powershell is crap. The outrageously long commands they've created are a really bad joke, especially compared to the nice simple single-purpose command
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair to Microsoft, I'm pretty sure Powershell is partly hamstrung by the design of Windows.
IIRC (and ICBveryW), Windows is more-or-less entirely object-oriented in design. Seriously, you can't do a damn thing without messing around with all the overhead of instantiating objects, assigning attributes or calling methods. Which means that any sort of scripting language needs to do one of two things:
1. Be wholly object oriented. Pros: Relatively easy to develop the language. Cons: The syntax for th
Re: (Score:3)
IIRC (and ICBveryW), Windows is more-or-less entirely object-oriented in design. Seriously, you can't do a damn thing without messing around with all the overhead of instantiating objects, assigning attributes or calling methods.
Uh, what? The vast majority of Win32 API is plain C. You don't need to create any objects or assign any attributes to read a file, open a network socket, or display a window.
The reason why PowerShell is object-oriented has nothing to do with Windows design, and everything with being more flexible. In Unix, "ls" lists contents of a directory, printing it out as a series of strings. In PowerShell, "ls" lists child objects of the current active objects, producing the result as a collection (items of which can
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You took the time to generate a list of "issues" yet refuse to support a single one of them.
How about you just address one of them? Why isn't PowerShell a real shell?
Re: (Score:2)
man? As long as it is up to date and they developers have bothered to write it.
ext3 can get fragmented.
sudo? In Explorer shift right click. In the CLI use runas
You link to an article about Vista pre SP1 to show hardware requirements? See modern GNOME / KDE.
Re: (Score:2)
Performance is highly subjective, and depends on the chosen task. If we take anything with heavy 3D, for example, and a decent graphics card, Linux will lag behind real bad.
Documentation - man sometimes wins on details, but only when you have a man page for something. Is there a man page for, say, apache? For Samba? For KDE? On the other hand, if you take PowerShell, it does have a very man-like system...
File system - ext3 is subject to fragmentation, it just deals with it as it goes, same as any other sane
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or a slow HD.
Seriously. I have a 128 GB SSD installed on my home machine, running Windows 7, and it's instantaneous on resume.
On the other hand, the IBM Thinkpad with the 4200 rpm HD is so slow I want to place it in a brown paper bag, and leave it in someone's shopping cart.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are definitely doing it wrong. My MacBook Pro (running Mac OS X or Windows 7) resumes from sleep in about two seconds.
Re: (Score:2)
Stability
Security
Interoperability
Add a *real* command shell ...
Re: (Score:2)
What do you recommend to make it more secure?
Interoperability? So broad a term as to be meaningless.
"real" command shell? You mean like PowerShell?
Re:Why? (Score:4, Informative)
Security: read this [wikipedia.org] and check out what Exec Shield and PaX do
Windows has full NX bit support. It also has ASLR, and a far better implementation of it than either Linux or OS X (as evidenced by pwn2own results).
What desktop linux distros ship with PaX?
Interoperability: more effort into native POSIX support. Mingw32, Cygwin, SFU, [...] shouldn't have to exist; this is a consequence of too much difference, most of it deliberately engineered for vendor lock-in purposes.
The reason why Win32 is not POSIX-compatible is not due to anything "deliberately engineered" - it's a consequence of backwards compatibility applied to the extreme.
That said, SUA (the new name for SFU) is native POSIX support. It does that by completely ditching Win32 subsystem, and using a POSIX subsystem implemented directly on top of NT kernel (unlike Cygwin, which tries to implement POSIX on top of Win32 - which is very hard due to many mismatches).
Mingw has nothing to do with POSIX at all, it is simply a port of gcc to Win32.
"Real" command shell: if you think PowerShell is not a joke, then perhaps you're acquainted with its super-compact syntax [stevex.net]?
Do you realize that all common commands have short aliases out of the box, most of them in fact taken from Unix shell? Sure, you can write "get-childitem", but you can also write "ls" - and all sane people do. Long names exist because PowerShell has a strict naming guide for all commands to improve discoverability (you can often guess the name of command you need by looking at the names of other commands that you know), and this is applied to common commands such as "cp" for the sake of consistency.
Oh yes, "write-output" is aliased as "echo", and "write-host" is aliased to "write". And "write-host" is a very different thing - it writes directly to the host (PowerShell can be used as a scripting language; host is the program that does so). Normal shell scripts should use "write-output" (i.e. "echo"), which writes to stdout as God intended.
A much bigger WTF is the decision to use a back-tick as a line continuation indicator. e.g., if you want to insert a linebreak into an echo statement (oh wait, it's fucking called write-host . So elegant!) you do so like this ... No \n.
What does "\n" have to do with it? In Unix shell, line continuation would be \ followed by end-of-line. "\n" is when you want to insert a newline in the output. In PowerShell, you write "`n" for the same.
The obvious reason why PowerShell does not use "\" as escape character is because it is used as the path separator by OS. They had to use something else simply because otherwise writing out paths would be very painful (and they can't just use "/" for that because that would be inconsistent with other applications - you couldn't copy/paste a path from, say, Explorer into PS then). Even so, other than the different escape character, all escape sequences are the same as in Unix shell.
Some more absurdities are move-item instead of cmd's move, copy-item instead of cmd's copy, and rename-item instead of cmd's rename. A command-line scripting language should be file-oriented from top to bottom, yet these -item suffixes are in some of the most commonly-used commands!
See above regarding consistent naming. As well, PowerShell is not file-oriented - it's object-oriented and object-tree oriented. Files are objects, directories are lists of objects, and filesystems are trees of objects. This lets it deal with any hierarchical data structure in the same way.
As well, "copy-item" is aliased to "cp", "rename-item" is aliased to "ren", and "move-item" is aliased to "mv"
Re: (Score:3)
It also has ASLR, and a far better implementation of it than either Linux or OS X (as evidenced by pwn2own results).
This is a complete and utter lie. In 2008 the only system left standing was Ubuntu, and since then no GNU/Linux has been in the contest. So you need to remove Linux from your list there, cowboy. As for your other points, I wouldn't trust a liar like you about anything.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This is a complete and utter lie. In 2008 the only system left standing was Ubuntu
The quality of ASLR implementation is not the sole factor that decides who wins the contest, so looking at winners is not giving you any information. But if you read the interviews with participants, they did explain some aspects of making attacks easier, and ASLR was specifically covered. For example, here [tomshardware.com] is one from 2009, and I quote:
"ASLR is also very tough to defeat. This is the way the process randomizes the location of code in a process. Between these two hurdles, no one knows how to execute arbitrar
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Stability
I can't honestly complain any more. They have even go so far as a video driver crash being less fatal for them than Linux. Linux may be able to survive a video driver crash, but anything on the UI dies, and that's not the case for MS. They have made a lot of improvements here.
Security
They have managed to make most people stop running as administrator, with a 'sudo-like' implementation. Now I've heard mumblings about that being trivial to bypass (though I haven't seen it), which would be a critical flaw. They don't open a lot of services by default anymore. Largely any insecure behavior is non-default and the fault of users (either enabling features or misusing them). Their NTLM hashes they store on disk are pitifully weak, which could be improved, but only relevant if that is attacked. NTLM was/is a horribly insecure network authentication, but AD is a valid Kerberos approach and NTLM *shouldn't* be used if MS is used as intended. Overall, their security isn't bad.
command shell
I will say PowerShell is an improvement. I do think it borders on counterproductive pride as to why they don't have anything quite as simple as plain-ol-bash. Also, why they don't implement SSH for a nice common protocol instead of their WMI crap for remote command execution.
Re: (Score:2)
I think NT-passwords are not hashed, but encrypted, because the cleartext password is needed to implement the NTLM-authentication.
Re: (Score:2)
The SAM database does indeed store poorly salted hashes. If you need to do NTLMv1 and v2, you need two hashes (if the server had access to the cleartext, it wouldn't need both hashes to do the two). All that said, NTLM is just a horrible horrible protocol that should have been retired approximately 5 seconds after the release of Win2k, when they finally caught up to the *nix world in capability.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
So I'm a linux person through and through, but it's about the flexibility the platform offers, and I no longer feel justified in criticizing MS over the 'basics' with their improvements.
scalability
If you refer to the OS running on enough cores, I haven't heard of a technical limitation. I think they do have various arbitrary limits on their licensing, but the software developers have done the required work. Maybe someone can point out scheduling deficiencies or poor placement decisions in a NUMA architecture, but I've not heard that. Keep in mind this discussion is on the desktop, which probably will be non-numa and no more than 6 or 8 cores.
Modularity
They used to be more modular in their install, but the sad reality is 99% of people couldn't be arsed to think about it, so the default experience is less customizable. Even linux installers have trended toward skipping package selection. Other than that guess, it would need some specifics to understand exactly what you want.
Platform support
If you mean supporting other architectures (e.g. ARM), that was precisely one goal they already announced. I personally think this is a pointless endeavor for them unless they give some magical ability to run x86 binaries everywhere without horrible performance degredation. MS has tried repeatedly to support other architectures, but the reality is x86 is where the applications are and MS doesn't have a particularly special offering that people intrinsically want if not for the x86 applications.
Window management features
Ok, I'll give you that one of the big reasons I stay away from Windows is the relatively incapable window management stuff, but at the same time, I have to presume they think the features 'we' would want would confuse their main target market.
Speed
In my experience, I haven't seen anything particularly slow about Windows. This is probably one area I've never been able to complain except for disk IO due to Vista defaults that got toned down.
Decoupling of the GUI from the os
The only thing they would gain here is the ability to run an systems without any video chip, which they have no hope in hell of winning. If you refer to the ability to manage them via serial console *in addition* to video, they do have serial console support to do some basic things including starting CMD/PowerShell. Sure, we love our VTs on occasion, but a very small minority of people use them except when they *have* to. Perhaps inherent capability to ssh in and get cmd/powershell would be nice, but getting rid of the GUI on VGA console won't really win them anything in the market.
Re: (Score:2)
Decoupling of the GUI from the os
The only thing they would gain here is the ability to run an systems without any video chip, which they have no hope in hell of winning. If you refer to the ability to manage them via serial console *in addition* to video, they do have serial console support to do some basic things including starting CMD/PowerShell. Sure, we love our VTs on occasion, but a very small minority of people use them except when they *have* to. Perhaps inherent capability to ssh in and get cmd/powershell would be nice, but getting rid of the GUI on VGA console won't really win them anything in the market.
Really? Microsoft think they've already got a version of Windows that doesn't depend on the GUI [microsoft.com].
Granted, it opens a command window complete with all the window decorations you'd expect, but I can't imagine it'd be that difficult to turn it into nothing but a serial console.
Re: (Score:2)
I knew of core, and it doesn't count as decoupled IMO, but instead GUI with one terminal, but the EMS console is indeed a true serial console. You can still start notepad in a core edition. If the core edition did not have a GUI, it couldn't do some third-party software, which really is the heart of Microsoft's hold on the market.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft has made a lot of scalability improvements in Windows 7, particularly in the areas of multi-core support. But, because this is under the cover, most people don't see these changes.
Microsoft has also been improving modularity. IIS7 and IIS7.5 for instance have gone completely modular compared to IIS6. They've decoupled the UI from the browser. They've made a lot of changes that improve things.
Window management has improved greatly with the DWM.
I don't find the Gnome menu or the K menu any bette
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They should rather concentrate on improving the core OS in my opinion. Why would I want to manipulate images or read PDFs with crap software from MS...
What you want doesn't matter. Microsoft makes deals with places like Best Buy to make sure Geek Squad sets up ignorant computer users with a Windows Live e-mail address, bing as the default search engine, etc.
This move is probably to prepare them to compete in the tablet market if it proves to be more than just a fad and to consolidate as much as possible between their different operating systems.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's certifiably false, regardless of your experiences. I'd wager you have some dodgy hardware (memory going bad?) or a really awful 3rd party driver.
Because Win7 is as rock solid an OS as I've seen out of MS, and it's many times more stable and solid than XP ever was or could be.
Your experience is an abberation, and clearly the OS is not at fault here, something else is. You're blaming the wrong thing.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Because customers call all the time to tell you that their 5 year old system is still working fine, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is that what the summary means by "cross platform"? That it's unix based with a Windows front-end?
Is that how iOS is considered "cross platform"?
I'm not sure I understand everything that the summary is hinting at.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why? (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, Wine just needs to add a couple more crashing bugs, and maybe a few exploits and they could get to 100% compatibility!
Re: (Score:3)
What would be the point? The kernel for Windows is perfectly stable, barring shitty drivers.
The UI may occasionally do odd things, but that's true of any OS. As far as the average enduser is concerned, it doesn't really matter two hoots if the underlying OS is still functioning if you can't interact with it.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
What would be the point? The kernel for Windows is perfectly stable, barring shitty drivers.
That would be the point, IIRC over 95% of linux is device drivers. There was one computer that windows xp was crashing on every hour or so, Out of curiosity I installed linux on the machine. I had never seen linux spew so many warnings about out of spec hardware and features being disabled. Linux was stable, but really, windows could have been just as stable, if they would have been willing to say, these features disabled because the hardware is lying about having them. But, if Microsoft had done that, it would have been Microsoft vs Foxcom (or who ever made the crapware) and it would have turned into a pr war. With Linux the hardware was tested, and people reported that it did R when it said it would do A, ergo, mark it bad, until someone comes up with a workaround.
Microsoft has a lot of baggage that makes people willing to take the crapware manufacturer seriously, the Linux developers are viewed as impartial reporters about the state of hardware.
Rants like the one here http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/pci/if_rl.c [watson.org] are unlike to make it into the windows kernel, no matter how true.
Re: (Score:3)
Yea, Why would any OS maker do that? Apple doesn't include PDF Reader or iPhoto for editing images. Microsoft is breaking completely new ground here. /sarcasm
They are coupled with OS because people want them to be. PDFs have become so common that people expect their Operating system to read them and same thing with digital cameras. I would note that Microsoft already builds Photo editor called Windows Live Photo Gallery which does reasonable well for majority of people using digital cameras. People who need
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
remember how they said that we'll all be using Netbooks??
Yep. This post it being written from one, and it's really rather nice. That said, I'm running Xubuntu, as Windows 7 crawled when I had it on here. MS really does need to remember how to make a lean, fast, and usable OS. Right now they've got market share, but the only way to keep that is to stay ahead of the game. As they say, complacency kills.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Different from mine (Score:5, Informative)
It is even more annoying than WinXP in so far as something small as the file manager in Win7. You can select the files, it tells you how many you selected, but it no longer says how many MB / GB of files you selected.
Odd - mine shows the size of the selected files at the bottom. I'm running Win 7-64bit Ultimate.
Re: (Score:2)
On mine (Win7 64 Ultimate) it shows different stuff at the bottom depending on how much, and how diverse what I selected its.
A few mp3s for example show a bunch of information related to ID3 tags.
The entirety of my WoW folder however shows "30 items selected. Click for more details" If I click it, it shows just that 30 items were selected, and the range of dates they were modified.
If I select the entirety of the folder, excluding the sub folders it shows "20 items selected. Click for more
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Clearly you are experiencing the notorious PEBKAC bug.
Win7/64 Home Premium:
6 items selected Size: 369KB
Date created: 1/7/2011 7:25 PM - 2/26/2011 2:04 PM
Re:Change for change sake (Score:5, Informative)
If you select more than 20 items, size does no longer appear.
Its apperantly for performance reasons. The same reason why it does no longer show the size of the curren directly in the status bar.
That is for me the only thing i hate on W7. And its so useless a restriction, too.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
If you select more than 20 items, size does no longer appear.
Technically correct, except you forgot to mention that a link then appears, which you can click to "Show Details". The total size then appears.
Its apperantly for performance reasons.
Lemme guess...if MS had allowed you select 20+ objects, requiring a few seconds each time to calculate the total size each time you did that, you would be the one screaming how slow and laggy W7 is. Some people you just can't please...especially the ones who have decided to hate you no matter what you do.
Re: (Score:2)
It fails if one of the items you select is a "shortcut" or "internet shortcut".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Read what this popular blogger [google.com] has repeatedly pointed out about Paul Thurott's talents and track record.
What a tool.
What I read (the top result in the Goggle search string you provided) was nothing more than an extended ad hominem rant against Thurott by an unabashed Apple fanboy. It's entirely opinion-based, utterly biased, and highly inflammatory - and includes absolutely NOTHING in the way of actual evidence that Thurott is anything other than a Microsoft fanboy.
So, in sum, "Boo for the other team's cheerleaders."
Mind you, I am in no way, shape, or form defending or promoting Thurott here. Instead, I am merely and exc
Re: (Score:2)
Protip: Have everyone drink lots of water a few hours before the contest. It clears out the bad stuff (smelly) and provides plenty of fuel for the festivities. Joy all around.
Re: (Score:2)
Except for those people who like Mac, and don't mind paying to get a better product, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And what is so different about a modern Unixlike kernel compared to the Windows NT kernel?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are. You said:
You backpedaled quickly when I called you on something you must have known was wrong. There's nothing Microsoft could implement on a Unix kernel they couldn't implement on a Windows kernel.
You are dishonest, arrogant, and deluded.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think the general complaint is that the "ribbon" really isn't new. There have been "tabs" for a long, long time, including in Microsoft software. And some toolkits (not sure about MFC) consider the "menubar" to be a normal widget and therefore can be put inside a "tab". Furthermore many toolkits have considered a "menubar" to not only contain "submenus" but also "buttons" (often as a submenu title with no children). I certainly did this in a toolkit that is now almost 20 years old (see fltk).
Like a lot of