Why Computer Voices Are Mostly Female 276
PolygamousRanchKid writes with an article exploring the question posed in the headline, which says that "One answer may lie in biology. Scientific studies have shown that people generally find women's voices more pleasing than men's. 'It's much easier to find a female voice that everyone likes than a male voice that everyone likes,' said Stanford University Professor Clifford Nass, author of 'The Man Who Lied to His Laptop: What Machines Teach Us About Human Relationships. 'It's a well-established phenomenon that the human brain is developed to like female voices.' One notable exception has been Germany, where BMW was forced to recall a female-voiced navigation system on its 5 Series cars in the late 1990s after being flooded with calls from German men saying they refused to take directions from a woman. An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment on why the company gave Siri a female voice in the U.S. Nor would she say why Siri speaks like a man in the UK, where iPhone 4S owners have swarmed online forums to request a female voice instead."
Hmmm, nope. (Score:2)
The library around here had an autodialer that would remind folks about late materials and when books were available, they used a pleasant voice from a black gentleman. It had a James Earl Jones quality to it and was quite pleasant despite being relatively unsophistication in use. Meaning that the words were taken from samples so they wouldn't quite match up even if the grammar was correct.
Re:Hmmm, nope. (Score:4, Informative)
From TFA:
'"It's much easier to find a female voice that everyone likes than a male voice that everyone likes..."'
It's not that there are no people who find male voices pleasant or prefer them in some circumstances. Just that _generally_ people prefer female voices. I certainly do.
Re: (Score:2)
Because it's not that hard to find somebody with a voice that most folks would like to hear. Which is a pretty serious problem with the hypothesis that it's hard to find male voices that everybody likes.
Re:Read better (Score:5, Interesting)
Academic studies always show that we prefer female voices, but in reality, those who count on computer generated voices all day prefer male voices. Note all the readers mentioning James Earl Jones. The reason studies like this get it wrong is simple. They get random groups of people who never use computer voices to take part in their experiments, and such people initially prefer female voices. If the experiments were to run long enough for participants to become expert listeners, they would find they trend towards male voices. I do a lot of looking at speech signals, and my unsupported theory as to why we switch to male voices is that male voices cover a broader portion of the sweet spot in our hearing, where we perceive sound most sensitively. This makes male voices easier to listen to if you have to listen for long periods of time. They are also easier to understand in noisy environments, thus thus the classic low male ham radio voice.
To understand what people like when they have to listen a lot to computer generated voices, just ask the blind. I was the tech lead for Vinux 3.0, which is Linux for the Vision Impaired. That doesn't make me an expert, but here are my observations. The most popular voices for blind programmers are male, probably eloquence first (it can play very fast), followed by espeak (because it's free and everywhere), followed by various low-speed commercial male voices. The most popular Mac voice for the blind is Adam, a mechanical guy with a decent voice that can play at decent speed. The female voices are often discussed, usually with adjectives like sexy, emotional, sultry, and so on, but in the end the blind go back to their male TTS engines to get work done.
I did a lot of testing to try and speed up voices to the speeds the blind like to listen. The result is the sonic library, which powers speech speed-up in various programs like the Astro Nova player at up to 6X playback speed. At least one blind lister can listen with high comprehension to a male voice (eloquence) at about 1,500 words per minute, or 7X the default speed of this high speed voice. At this speed, the original vowels are typically compressed to one or two pitch periods. It's incredible that a blind listener can still perceive these as whole phonemes. To achieve higher speed, I've told him he needs to consider listening to a female voice, where I could get perhaps twice as many pitch periods into the same 10-ish milliseconds where he currently perceives one phoneme. The problem is that at higher fundamental pitch, this voice will register on a smaller portion of his hearing bandwidth, making it harder to get as much information out of it high speed. We've not yet had any luck with high speed female voices.
As a person losing central vision, I experienced all this myself. When I first started using computer generated voices, I tried to find a female voice I could live with. I tried a couple of smooth female Cepstral voices, but before long they sounded grating and frustratingly slow. My blind friend told me to avoid the "natural" voices and go with something that I could listen to at high speed, but I just couldn't stand the mechanical voice he was pushing - eloquence. Well, he was right. I eventually migrated to eloquence just like him and many blind people. James Earl Jones has the perfect voice for computers. It's low enough to take advantage of every bit of bandwidth we easily perceive. It's broad spectrum, taking advantage of the high frequencies as well, and very consistent, making his voice addictive. Your ear likes consistency.
Re: (Score:3)
Your question is answered, and your theory doesn't quite fit:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/health/HealthRepublish_1428081.htm [abc.net.au]
Re:Read better (Score:5, Funny)
For my computer generated voices, I prefer a raspy, sensual voice, with a hint of lasciviousness. Compliant, or even coy at times, yet surprisingly assertive when you least expect it.
Re: (Score:3)
So you're like the others here, and prefer James Earl Jones...
Re:Hmmm, nope. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Because Geoge Takei also has a really wonderful voice, not to mention that Leonard Nimoy isn't too bad either.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Following directions of the Sith may not be acceptable to those of the religious Jedi order.
Re:Hmmm, nope. (Score:4, Insightful)
And for emergency alerts, Brian Blessed.
Re: (Score:3)
DYIIIIIVE!!!!!
How about this... (Score:5, Funny)
I would pay good money (as opposed to Bitcoins) to listen to James Earl Jones and Morgan Freeman have a conversation about types of cheese.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who is JEJ? I Googled it and got a zillion hits, but nothing obvious.
Re:Hmmm, nope. (Score:5, Funny)
Meaning that the words were taken from samples so they wouldn't quite match up even if the grammar was correct.
The trick there. Is to hire Shatner for. The voice. acting. ThenNoOneWillKnowTheDifference.
Re: (Score:3)
Although I like Leonard Nimoy much better, I - have - noticed - a - similar - style - in - his - delivery.
NYC Subway (Score:5, Interesting)
One day I had the interesting observation on the New York Subway that the recorded voices with informational statements were female, and the statements asking the passenger to do something ("Please stand clear of the door") were all male.
Re:NYC Subway (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:NYC Subway (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:NYC Subway (Score:5, Funny)
Re:NYC Subway (Score:5, Funny)
He was probably the only person they could find who spoke Welsh.
Actually, it's Dylan Thomas. If anyone actually spoke Welsh, they'd realise that he's saying, 'I sing to you now of the pretty milk town down the dingle where a milk maid coos to her swain. By the time we arrive her heart will have lofted like a swan, leaving the lost little lad consumed and forgotten as the lilac by the goat. Mind the gap.'
Re: (Score:3)
In Boston, they just use one male voice for everything. Although I guess it makes sense, due to things like the following being common:
(leaving Porter Square): Next stop, Harvard Square.
(arriving at Harvard Square): Now arriving at Harvard Square.
(leaving Harvard Square): Next stop, Harvard Square.
(arriving at Central Square): Now arriving at Harvard Square.
(leaving Central Square): Next stop, Harvard Square.
(And so on)
I've also heard it do the stations backwards, giving the next stop as the stop in the oth
Re: (Score:3)
Must be hard to know when to get off when they announce all stops as Harvard Square.
Or maybe that's why Charlie never returned [mit.edu].
Re: (Score:2)
I believe the MBTA matter-of-fact male voice is also synthetic.
Re: (Score:3)
One day I had the interesting observation on the New York Subway that the recorded voices with informational statements were female, and the statements asking the passenger to do something ("Please stand clear of the door") were all male.
In Barcelona they did this 20 years ago already. A female voice said: "Proxima estacion", and a male one said: "Catalunya". I found it very entertaining then.
Re: (Score:3)
In Barcelona they did this 20 years ago already. A female voice said: "Proxima estacion", and a male one said: "Catalunya". I found it very entertaining then.
This is actually an excellent feature--I noticed it when I was in Barcelona a few years ago, and I would be thrilled to see more cities adopt it. Making the name of the station audibly distinct is an excellent cue for listeners in the often-loud subway with its muffled, broken, or distorted public address systems. As an added bonus, subway riders who don't speak Catalan or Spanish get the important information - the station name - clearly set off from the surrounding announcement.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My experience in NYC was that the "stand clear of the doors" message was live audio, getting progressively angrier as people failed to get out of the doors? That may have been a Metro North train though; I took a lot of trains that trip.
It's the Majel Barrett effect (Score:5, Insightful)
Female computer voice: Star Trek
Male computer voice = HAL 9000
Nothing good ever came from a male computer.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That was a fembot, not a femputer!
Re: (Score:3)
On the one hand, the female computer voice could at any moment turn into Lwaxana Troi.
On the other hand, it turns out Babylon 5's computer [youtube.com] seems to have the same problem.
Re: (Score:2)
On the one hand, the female computer voice could at any moment turn into Lwaxana Troi.
But you could always think about Nurse Chapel if you prefere more pleasant thoughts...
Re: (Score:3)
Re:It's the Majel Barrett effect (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
GLaDOS.
Re: (Score:2)
Red Dwarf had both male and female computers and both were just as hilarious
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Andromeda TV series? Why can't Siri look like that?
Re: (Score:2)
And after you've owned the futuristic iPhone for two seasons, it inexplicably turns into two tin-cans and a string??? No thanks....
Re: (Score:2)
Siri (Score:5, Interesting)
So US Siri is a secretary and UK Siri is a gentleman's gentleman ?
Clearly! (Score:2)
Solution to BMW and Apple's issues: (Score:2)
A toggle switch.
In the BMW it could be a real physical toggle somewhere, but an OS setting would work as well. In Apple's case they need to relax a little, pull the stick out, and let the people toggle which voice they want, even MS allows that on their voice related functions.
Garmin already does this (Score:3)
Garmin allows you to pick from a number of different voices, with different regional accents and languages as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You forgot about Tom-Tom fool! [navtones.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The trouble is that Navigation systems have two very distinct narration types. One is a set of prerecorded sentences and words. Those are relatively inexpensive to make, and most celebrity navigation systems use this. For example all NavTones voices use this style.
The other is true Text-to-speech. This system is a lot harder since it requires adjusting the incredible number of parameters to get a voice that sounds a close as possible. For things like celebrities it would also work best if any canned text we
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I want a female voice with a french accent. Like the french chick on the highlander series who was McCloud's friend. Damn that's a sexy voice.
Re: (Score:2)
That's an EXCELLENT reference, and I agree!
Re: (Score:2)
Are you sure that you didn't mean to write MacLeod [wikipedia.org]?
Re: (Score:2)
Nah.
When they really want to pretend some actual intelligence/personality, they should make the voice (and perhaps avatar) randomized, seeded with the phones serial number.
(remember where you read that first!)
Re: (Score:2)
But then, it is Apple "Selli
Re: (Score:2)
"Viki" is a logical default as it's a more advanced version of the old "Victoria", and arguably the most natural sounding Apple Talk voice.
Even though Vicki sounds a bit more natural, Victoria is still easier to understand; but Alex beats all other voices in clarity, by far!
Re: (Score:2)
Female voices are easier to understand (?) (Score:3, Interesting)
In the army there is a known fact/myth that female voices are easier to understand on noisy radio links.
Something to do white the a different/better frequency spread than a male voice.
In my not very scientific experience, it seems to be true.
Not a myth (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for that interesting tidbit. Times have changed quite a lot. Many remnants of the old ways are still permeating our culture, though.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I've also heard that both birds and human babies learn better from a voice more like a womans that that of a mans. Men can of course make their voice be more like that when talking to those, so it's not such a big deal.
Re:Female voices are easier to understand (?) (Score:4)
Obligatory comment: I was in signals in the army for 4 years.
Female voices *are* easier to understand than male voices over the radio. And some males sound female on the radio.
*BUT*, female voices and male voices aren't significantly different from each other in pitch. Women are sometimes higher pitched, but on the whole, they're about the same pitch as male voices. The difference between the two is resonance... males tend to have larger lung capacity, and with that more space to resonate the lower frequencies in their voice, which is why their voice sounds lower pitched. This is why female voices sound higher pitched than males, and it's why some male-to-female transgenders are able to sound completely female by learning how to resonate their voice (hint: the ones who don't sound naturally female are the ones who adjust the pitch of their voice).
It's that lack of resonance that I think explains why females are easier to understand on the radio, and also why some males sound female on the radio. The radio isn't a very good medium for transferring something like resonance, because it's a single point of sound at the output, and usually not a particularly high end speaker at that... as a result, female voices sound more natural over the radio, and males sound distorted. It's not that they're *actually* distorted, just that they don't sound quite like we expect them to sound, and it causes a cognitive dissonance.
I always thought the reasons were technical (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I always thought the reasons were technical (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Your nerd "technical reasons" leave us no room for endless inflammatory arguments and trite gender sterotyping! How will we fill the empty silence now?
We could have general discussions about the treatment and oppression or lack thereof of men women and hermaphrodites in different settings, like for example among geeks, the free software community or in general.
The piece linked in my sig could be a conversation starter. ( http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/misc/22786_To_My_Someday_Daughter.html [starcitygames.com] )
It's about p
Re: (Score:2)
sry... forgot to put quotes the quote, which was the first paragraph. Did not mean to plagiarize.
Re: (Score:2)
Bull. I can't stand hearing some dude's voice on my devices. It pisses me off and I wouldn't even buy it. I think on this I'm not alone by any means.
Re: (Score:3)
Female voices span a greater range of the audio frequency spectrum than male voices.
Citation, please? I think the opposite would be true. First of all, consonants have generally high frequencies and wide spectra, so the low male vowels will make the whole spectrum wider. Secondly, harmonic frequencies are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency, so a male voice has more of these harmonics within the audible range. This is why deep male voices are good test material for audio systems. For example, lossy compression schemes will remove some of the harmonics, so female voices would be
citation needed (Score:2)
Even assuming the 1990s were the middle ages, this is hard to believe. Firstly, nearly all navigational systems I've encountered here in Germany in the past ten years have female voices (if they have any), and the public transport system's automated announcements have been made by a female voice since forever.
Higher pitch? (Score:2)
There may be cultural reasons too, of course, but this theory of a physical reason makes sense to me.
Concealed Apple commercial? (Score:2)
The GPS software I have used have both male and female voices in different languages to choose from, I have primarily used TomTom and Navigon. I cannot recall that I preferred one gender ov
Re: (Score:2)
There are a few possible reasons. One is that I'm pretty darn sure the TTS occurs locally, which means they are limited to the processor on the phone. Even then, the voice is more artificial than the phone is capable of, so I doubt this was a major factor.
Possibility two is that while the TTS is definitely the one part of Siri that can be replaced without any impact on the rest, they may have stuck with whatever TTS engine was in use by SRI when they were developing SIRI just to get it out the door as quick
Let me choose (Score:2)
I'd prefer Woodie Allen's voice.
Listen to the republican debate (Score:3, Interesting)
Whoever wrote this story hasn't been listening to the republican debate. I want to poke out my eardrums whenever michelle bachman speaks, sorry, screams.
Re: (Score:3)
I'd rather listen to her than Romney, or Perry.
For IVRs it's usually for Intimidation (Score:3)
Least for IVRs, on average people find male voices more intimidating than female voices. We also find female voices more nurturing than male voices on average.
Other posters have already point this out. Suggestions ( facilitated by nurturing speaker ) then women are used. Commands ( facilitated by intimidation, i.e. subtle threat of punishment ) then males are more often used.
Systems where you may need to intimidate the listener a bit will tend to use male voices. I kid you not, but in the future pay attention to how many collections operators or conflict desks sound 'black'. Also think of how often you spoke to a collections/conflict department and got a deep voiced male. Now compare that to how often you called the general operator and got a deep voiced male.
What about audiobooks? (Score:2)
It seems to me though that most audiobooks are read by men, and of the ones I have read by women, I find the voice irritating. These are real people though, maybe its more to do with how male and female voices are synthed.
Re: (Score:3)
I've listened to a couple of librevoice recordings from gutenberg, and I think that the real reason is that women, generally, like to read books more than men, so they get the idea that they would like volunteer to read for an audio book as well.
But, they're volunteers, not professional voice actors, so everything comes out as some kind of sing-songy poem read for kids. It's not that women are worse at voice acting than men, it's just that in the amateur reading department there are more of them. The mal
As they say on Reddit... (Score:2)
There is only one (Score:2)
Sir David Frederick Attenborough.
Proof that BMW owners are jerks (Score:2)
Seriously? (Score:2)
after being flooded with calls from German men saying they refused to take directions from a woman.
For real? Not only were these men pissed off about taking direction from a computerized woman's voice, but they also felt it necessary to call BMW to bitch about it. And then, BMW took these tools seriously enough to recall the cars? This just has to be a urban legend.
[runs off to check snopes]
Why computer Voices are Mostly Female (Score:2)
Riddle me this, (Score:2)
Re:Opposite Sex (Score:4, Funny)
Surely most people prefer to listen to the opposite sex, provided they do not suffer from sexual identity disorder or a similar crippling condition ...
I assume then that being British counts as a similar crippling condition?
Re:Opposite Sex (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, no. Research has shown better response to female voices by both men and women.
Re:Opposite Sex (Score:5, Interesting)
Surely most people prefer to listen to the opposite sex, provided they do not suffer from sexual identity disorder or a similar crippling condition ...
I'm guessing it's the same phenomenon as with magazines. The manly magazines are full of highly attractive women. The womanly magazines are also full of highly attractive women. Men like talking to a woman. Women like talking to another woman. It probably goes all the way back to our cavemen days where women were chatting at camp or out gathering, while the men were more rivals and out hunting pray, which obviously leads to less talking. So most everyone feels better talking to a woman, except when taking directions on where to drive. Which some say can also be traced back to our cavemen days...
You're doing it wrong. (Score:3, Interesting)
That doesn't mean 'only hang out with dudes', it means 'don't screw over your friends to get laid'.
Re: (Score:2)
Surely? Is it possible that you don't understand that women experience a lot of ups and downs, due to hormonal changes? While women MIGHT prefer a male voice SOMETIMES, there are other times that she might prefer that men don't exist. And, no, pregnancy and menstrual cycles are NOT considered to be crippling conditions. Menopause might be considered as such, but don't let my wife know that I said that!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
um, i just googled "bmw recall female voice" and got this: http://www.pbs.org/speak/ahead/technology/voiceinterface/ [pbs.org]
It doesn't appear to be mythical.
Re: (Score:2)
You just linked to an article that cites the same guy that is also cited by TFA.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Apple's entire business model is founded on the operational assumption that they know better than the customer. Their present success is founded on the fact that they are quite often correct about this....
Re: (Score:2)
which one?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd Mod you +5 Sexist.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah but there is. It means a Woman that speaks. Spokeswoman. It's like a spokesperson but more specific.
Re: (Score:2)
I like his voice okay. I'd rather listen to a woman talk to me though. I'm just wired that way.