Facebook Dislike Hype Exploited In Phishing Campaign

An anonymous reader writes: A new Facebook scam is quickly spreading across the social network which plays on the announcement of the highly-anticipated 'Dislike' button. A new scamming campaign is now exploiting impatient Facebook users anxiously awaiting the dislike button addition, by tricking them into believing that they can click on a link to gain early access to the feature. Once the unsuspecting victim selects a link, they are led to a malicious website, which enables access to their private Facebook accounts and allows the hackers to share further scam links on their behalf.

Moderation system

[MrKaos]

Do any other sites have the same sort of moderation system that /. has?

Moderated 'dislike' or 'like' seems kind of lame in comparison.

Re:Moderation system

[rmdingler]

It's an interesting comparison. While the slashdot system obviously allows us a more fine-grained expression of opinion, it's widely abused, e.g. people modding down posts as redundant or overrated because they disagree with the content of the post. And the maximum +5 score means you can't tell if just a handfull of people found a post interesting, or thousands of people. You also can't really tell how controversial a post is from the score on slashdot...

Right, you'd still have to actually read the post to form an opinion. Life is crazy hard.

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

If anything more than clicking the dislike button is too much effort for you then you've probably not put much thought into the matter in the first place.

It has nothing to do with effort.
If someone makes a good post, I upvote it. We don't need 1,000 additional posts all saying the same exact thing or quoting the original with "I Agree!" tacked on the end. All it does is clutter a comment section.
If there are 100 posts all saying basically the same thing, and I don't agree or I want to add my own comment on it, I will do so ONCE, and then downvote all the other redundant posts. I'm not going to spam the section with an individual reply to every single one.
The

Re:

[ioErr]

That's nice and all, but nothing of what you said explains why it's a problem that Slashdot doesn't give you a numeric score describing how controversial a post is.

Re:

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

It's an interesting comparison. While the slashdot system obviously allows us a more fine-grained expression of opinion, it's widely abused, e.g. people modding down posts as redundant or overrated because they disagree with the content of the post. And the maximum +5 score means you can't tell if just a handfull of people found a post interesting, or thousands of people.

^^^ THIS, times about a billion.

Was it a few people that disagreed with you, or 10,000? With slashdot's moderation system you'll never know.

Slashdot could show the full tally (i.e. "437 up votes and 192 down votes") but for some reason they want to use a lobotomized post rating system.

Re:Moderation system

[torqer]

Slashdot moderation isn't Youtube moderation. Slashdot grants users who have earned amount of Karma, and who visit the site regularly, 5 moderation points.

Youtube, et al, let every Tom Dick and Harry (and bot) vote.

The more scarce moderation points should be carrying significantly more meaning than one like, thumbs up, or +1. For me at least, /. isn't about finding the most popular statement. It's about finding the salient arguements around a subject. I'd much rather read 20 +3 comments, than 5 comments with 432154315438 likes. All a like proves is popularity.

Save the whales [[phone]]

Re:

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

Slashdot moderation isn't Youtube moderation. Slashdot grants users who have earned amount of Karma, and who visit the site regularly, 5 moderation points.

I understand that. Although I visit the site regularly and post stories (some of which are accepted and published) I've never seen or gotten karma. To me it feels as though an elite group is blessed with being able to "rule" on what's liked or not, which isn't necessarily representative of the community's actual take on any given story or comment.

So yes, I understand how it works, I just don't think it's a very good way to go about it. I also think that not being able to edit a post during a grace period to

Re:

[maeka]

I surely can't be in the minority in getting 15 mod points at a time. I have a rather unremarkable account history.

Re:

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

I surely can't be in the minority in getting 15 mod points at a time. I have a rather unremarkable account history.

It may just be that I'm an idiot, lol. If I had mod points to give out, where would I see them or how would I know I had them?

I see no indication on the posts or names or anything that would indicate I had mod points. Hell, for all I know I have some and don't know it. Like I said, it may just be that I'm an idiot (that's the usual explanation, according to my wife).

Re:

[maeka]

you should meta-moderate if you've never been given mod points.

Re:

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

you should meta-moderate if you've never been given mod points.

Okay, help me out here..."meta-moderate"...? How?

What should I see (and where) in the interface if I do have those magical mod points to give out?

Re:

[maeka]

What should I see (and where) in the interface if I do have those magical mod points to give out?

You'll have a notification on every page's sidebar that you have points, and a drop-down under ever comment (in threads you haven't posted in) if you have points. There is no mystery. If you are uncertain then you don't.

Re:

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

You'll have a notification on every page's sidebar that you have points, and a drop-down under ever comment (in threads you haven't posted in) if you have points. There is no mystery. If you are uncertain then you don't.

Thank you for the explanation...I must not have mod points since I see nothing like that in my sidebar or anywhere else.

(I looked through all the slashdot FAQs and stuff earlier but saw no real explanation of what I would see if I had 'em.)

Thanks, maeka! (Obligatory "If I had mod points, they'd be yours", heh)

Re:

[XxtraLarGe]

I usually meta-moderate after each comment I post, and seldom get mod points anymore. Not sure if it's that great of a remedy.

Re:

[maeka]

What you're describing is the opposite end (from OP) of the bell curve (meta-moderating to an extreme level) and it is well known that the closer one is to an "average" user the more mod points one gets.

Re:

[zennyboy]

"14 moderator points expire 2015-09-24."

my current status. Used one, of course...

Re:

[fisted]

5 moderation points

Aw, such a low ID and you never got 15 at once?

Re:

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

Save the whales [[phone]]

Save the whales...collect the entire set!

Re:

[antdude]

But for hardcore /.ers who come too much don't get moderation points. Yes, I'm one/1 of them! :(

Stealing candy from a kid

[rodrigoandrade]

Seriously? These idiots are boasting that they scam... Facebook users, which are mostly non-tech people, like soccer moms, pre-teens, and the elderly?

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

At least they caught these guys. One got sloppy and included his personal email address [cnetdaily.com] on another page on the same website.

I'm not quite sure

[Psychotria]

I dislike this story. Where's the big red button that tricks me into pressing it? I'll press it willingly.

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

Yes, blocking facebook is a good idea.

It is not the first time

[ruir]

As the comment says. Fake dislike scams have existed for ages. Those people are dumb. I actually even doubt this is newsworthy.

Re:

[LaurenCates]

I remember at some point in the last two years or so someone put up a poll whose question was "Do you want me not to de-friend you?" or something to that effect. And then I started seeing it pop up everywhere on my feed. So, I looked into it. An angry post from me followed to the effect of: "okay, people, cool it. You know that this is a poll, and it really isn't directed at you, and was probably started by someone you didn't know? Okay, so stop responding to it!"

Another was more recent: over a recent

Re:

[torqer]

Wow. The trusted source of truth for a township is a Facebook page. I don't mean it as a slight to the commenter, it's probably very accurate, it just is amazing to me what the world has become.

I feel old.

Re:

[ruir]

I get so fed up with shit post as images, I just block images in facebook in my Mac. Pity in the iPhone, it does not do that, maybe I will suggest it to the authors.

"Hey, I'm related to an African Monarch!"

[rmdingler]

Stupid [deviantart.com] internet explorers are not in the minority.

Re:

[drinkypoo]

As the comment says. Fake dislike scams have existed for ages. Those people are dumb. I actually even doubt this is newsworthy.

Well, you've seen the "news", right? This is newsworthy because it's happening to some people on facebook. It's probably worth a reminder that people are idiots. What kind of person thinks they need to download a website feature from a third party? I get why someone would think they would need to download an installer for an add-on that gave some site functionality, that's not outside the realm of possibility even to an educated user. But to think that they should get it from randomsiteinthecloud.com instea

Re:

[ruir]

People can be very daft. I remember a friend complaining about their computers being SLOW. Somewhat they sent me a link to a font to install with funny symbols...I installed in a VM and IMMEDIATELY the computer almost went to a halt. How hard would be to figure out it was that file had a malware payload I wonder...

Facebook Users

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

Once again, Facebook users provide a never-ending source of gullible suckers who will click on ANYTHING given the slightest encouragement.

Reason #32,461,273 why Facebook is a bad idea for the unwary, the unwise, and people with a propensity to click on everything they see.

Maybe someday I'll get a Facebook account so I can be exploited by advertisers and malware authors. I almost feel like I'm cheating them by not having an account.

Not me

[Buchenskjoll]

My Facebook dislike has not been exploited

What?

[U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M]

Never mind the usual Facebook hate and how Facebook users are stupid. We may not use it but we all know people who do. So the real question is:

Once the unsuspecting victim selects a link, they are led to a malicious website, which enables access to their private Facebook accounts and allows the hackers to share further scam links on their behalf.

How the hell does clicking on a fucking link enable access to a private Facebook account?

EXTRA EXTRA - STUPID PEOPLE FALL FOR STUPID TRICK

[wardrich86]

What's the point even... FB is a cesspool of stupidity. We've got people borrowing phones and writing statuses saying they've "hacked" their friend's account. We've got people that think sharing and liking will save a life or make them rich. We've got people that will click any and every link they see.

How is this news at all? It's just the same old story of stupid people falling for incredibly obvious (and stupid) tricks.

Meh

[deviated_prevert]

I suggest that faceplant institutes a third button for commenting on posts and call it MEH. A more considerate naming choice than a WGAS button. (who gives a shit) which is what most posts on faceplant usually deserve. After all, who really cares if your grandmothers cat hoiked up a giant hair ball that looked like a cooked Johnsonville Brat sausage this morning, replete with pictures!

Re:

[toonces33]

It sounds like a good idea, but I would have to sign up for faceplant in order to use it.

But, but, but,

[NetNed]

"The button is big, red, and blinking "push me!!". Seems totally legit to me" says that guy in my office.