Tiger Early Start Kit 417
EccentricAnomaly writes "If you can't wait until next spring for the official release of next version of Mac OS X, Apple is offering a Tiger Early Start Kit to those willing to pay $500 for an Apple Developer Select Membership. And if you don't want to spend the money, they've also added a developer overview page describing some of the guts of Mac OS X v10.4."
cheers (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:cheers (Score:5, Funny)
Strange, I thought that was to see Jobs best Ballmer in a naked, sweaty cage match.
Re:cheers (Score:5, Funny)
Re:cheers (Score:5, Informative)
Sorry, but until they have some new lower-power and cooler G5 chip it will never be in a Powerbook. Even the new iMac has big fans in it.
Re:cheers (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:cheers (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:cheers (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:cheers (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:cheers (Score:3, Informative)
Re:cheers (Score:3, Insightful)
" Keep in mind, Apple likes their boxes QUIET. I'm thinking you could get away with two big ass heatsinks and fans on that 2.5GHz G5. Also, from what I've heard, the 12" AlBook has some heat problems, so Apple could release a hot laptop..."
You do realise that if your CPU is dissipating enough heat to put a small furnace to shame, it doesn't really matter how efficiently you move this heat out of the laptop because you will be wasting so much power that your battery life will be shot to hell anyway.
Don't forget about NDA (Score:5, Interesting)
You can't even talk to other devs about Tiger if you have it.
Re:Don't forget about NDA (Score:5, Funny)
Watch those pesky acronyms. They are entirely different things.
=tkk
$500 to Beta Test! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:$500 to Beta Test! (Score:5, Informative)
$500 gets you select ADC membership +
- Pre-release versions of Mac OS X v10.4 tiger and Xcode 2.0
- Exclusive access to the latest tiger documentation
- Direct, one-on-one access to tiger support engineers
- Special developer discount on the latest Apple hardware
- GM versions of Mac OS X v10.4 and Xcode 2.0 when available
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11632974~mOnly a few things missing (Score:5, Funny)
A Developer commentary track:
{booting OSX} "Ding! Welcome to the developers edition of OSX. I'm Joe Schmo, lead designer of Aqua, and with me I have Jim Bob of Core Graphics. We've got some great stories here for you! You'll see that it's starting up services, let me tell you about a time old Jim was writing one of those and the power went out after a fifteen hour coding session..."
And of course "Deleted comments - too hot for public release!"
Re:Only a few things missing (Score:5, Interesting)
They used to do this (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:$500 to Beta Test! (Score:5, Informative)
So, like the first guy said, $500 to beta test. No thank you. Why people fall for this I will never understand-if you want to invest in the company, buy stock.
You seem to be missing the point -- but then, so do most of the people posting here, so maybe it is the fault of the misleading, biased copy in the Slashdot writeup.
This program is for DEVELOPERS. You know, people who write software that will run on Apple's OSes. Getting early access to developer tools and upcoming OS releases is *easily worth* $500. I pay about three times more to Microsoft for MSDN for the same purpose -- to get a first look at the operating systems and tools. Not because I want to be first on my block for bragging rights, but because I may want to be first to market with an application that makes use of services in the new OS.
Re:$500 to Beta Test! (Score:5, Informative)
OS X current version full install
OS X Sever current version full install
Beta access
Free copies of OS X for every new release, on disc sent in the mail for a year. This includes a disc copy for the free point releases (i.e. 10.3.X)
Discounts for exhibit hardware
Discounts for hardware in general (roughly 15-20%)
Access to the compatability labs (go to apple to test your software on all their machines)
Developer tech support
and various other minor discounts and benefits.
Re:$500 to Beta Test! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:uh, no (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:$500 to Beta Test! (Score:4, Informative)
And that is how much? 5% off on some stuff that I don't need?
$600 off a dual 2.5 gig machine.
$500 off a dual 2.0 gig machine.
No. $500 for ADC membership that comes with extras (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No. $500 for ADC membership that comes with ext (Score:2, Informative)
Re:No. $500 for ADC membership that comes with ext (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:No. $500 for ADC membership that comes with ext (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's see... Tiger is probably going to be $129, and the hardware discount is $400+ on any 15" or larger Powerbook, any Xserve or any 2x2GHz Power Mac (maybe the dual 1.8, as well). So if you're in the market for a pro machine, and are planning to buy Tiger when it comes out, you can probably save money overall by being an ADC Select member -- even if you don't take advantage of *any* of the other benefits. (Like the free copy of OS X Server, which would cost $499 otherwise...)
Re:No. $500 for ADC membership that comes with ext (Score:3, Insightful)
Quartz/JavaScript support? (Score:5, Informative)
This has got to be the coolest new feature, considering how weak DHTML currently is. I could be wrong, but adding support for other APIs doesn't seem like it would be too hard. I'd love to finally be able to ditch Win32.
Re:Quartz/JavaScript support? (Score:3, Informative)
doesn't this look like XUL [mozilla.org]?
I bet there will be a website like Mozilla update [mozilla.org]'s extension portion, and provide free downloading of millions, ah... sorry, maybe thousands, ah... maybe hundreds, never mind, of open source small applications! Brillian days of Apple are coming via these small applications! Maybe.
Doesn't MS is also doing something alike named XAML?
I'd like to buy some stock of Macromedia, dreamweaver may become a major developing tool in next ten years.
Re:Quartz/JavaScript support? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Quartz/JavaScript support? (Score:3, Informative)
This is likely a reference to Safari's new canvas [mozillazine.org] tag, mainly intended for dashboard [apple.com]. A version of it is being specified in the graphics [whatwg.org] part of the WAHT WG [whatwg.org] Web Applications 1.0 spec, so you're likely to see it in Mozilla sooner or later
But there is no ... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:But there is no ... (Score:2)
Re:But there is no ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:But there is no ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:But there is no ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Mouse gestures for Dashboard? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Mouse gestures for Dashboard? (Score:5, Funny)
Though it may be possible with the iSight (Score:3, Funny)
Sounds like a fun hack
Re:Mouse gestures for Dashboard? (Score:3, Informative)
Oh how I wish (Score:3, Interesting)
Apple has made Unix a dream desktop OS. I just hope that they support 64bit Java on this thing. I will buy it and switch from Linux (Fedora 64bit) if they come out with a 64bit powebook in a heartbeat.
Re:Oh how I wish (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oh how I wish (Score:4, Funny)
The first rule of developer releases... (Score:5, Insightful)
That said...
Select membership gets you access to pre-release software, one incident of support from developer tech services, one hardware discount, and issues of the operating systems when they're finally released at no additional charge.
The way I look at it, $500 gets you the OS release that's bound to take place during your year's membership, and you can easily save far more than the difference when you buy a Macintosh system through the developer discount program. Being able to get assistance directly from Apple when you have a coding issue is a boon. The rest is icing on the cake.
Re:What kind of discount? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The first rule of developer releases... (Score:3, Informative)
Core Data = good idea, weak storage (Score:3, Interesting)
Core Data sounds like so many other great 3rd party tools out there, except now part of the OS (so to speak). A standardized object-relational persistence mechanism and design studio - Awesome. But why only:
Why not an odbc/ado/adsi type of interface that will allow the use of any persistence mechanism? Using LDAP or any sql-92 compliant existing database would be useful. Hey apple, you listening?
Keeping it simple (Score:5, Interesting)
To me, the idea of provided a core OS service that essentially acts as a really nice standard embedded DB you can use quickly, is awesome. I'll continue to write apps using more standard databases, but there are smaller apps I have in mind that can really make use of this feature. I was already looking over small DB's and debating about the best way to move forward with an embedded DB in an app.
Fundamentially the configuration and administration needs of an embedded DB vs. an external DB are different, and I don't mind treating them differently.
Re:Core Data = good idea, weak storage (Score:3, Insightful)
Why not an odbc/ado/adsi type of interface that will allow the use of any persistence mechanism?
It's called setting a reasonable goal for version 1.0. SQLite is an excellent, public domain database that works on a local file and requires no server. It directly fits in as a persistence mechanism with Apple's document-based architecture. Hell, even I saw the potential years ago when I started development of STEnterprise [subsume.com]. If Apple picks up the ball, then I say "Great". If they go on to extend it to m
Quicksilver (Score:2)
I'm waiting for 10.6... (Score:4, Funny)
All these new features... (Score:4, Interesting)
I like to watch AntiTrust (Shhh... Don't tell anybody) while I'm coding.
Re:All these new features... (Score:3, Insightful)
Already stays fullscreen when inactive (Score:4, Informative)
The latest DVD Player.app does this. Go into preferences and click on the Full Screen widget then look for the "Remain in full screen when DVD Player is inactive".
Now only if they would add this feature to iChat for video conferencing. :-)
Spotlight and Backup (Score:5, Interesting)
I wonder if Spotlight calculates (or could be made to calculate) an MD5 for the file. This would be useful for backup. If the backup program looks up a file's MD5 in its catalog and finds it already there, no need to back up again. This would survive arbitrary renaming or moving (the metadata would still need to be backed up for each file), and would make for major efficiencies when backing up multiple machines on a network (only one copy of Hei.dfont, Osaka.dfont, xxx.App, etc. in the backup set).
Re:Spotlight and Backup (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Retrospect has done this for years (Score:3, Interesting)
Between Linux and OS X... (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone else notice.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Just thought that was interesting..
Re:64bit OS (Score:3, Funny)
Huh, Microsoft has had 20 years and still isn't there.
Apple has gone to it in more like 5 or 6 years.
The hard work was done at NeXT (Score:3, Informative)
My point is that NeXT technology provided the boost that gave Apple such a headstart over Microsoft. The past few years have been mainly useability and performance improvements as they have iterated through releases. So thank NeXT for doing all the heavy lifting.
(p
Re:64bit OS (Score:2)
Re:64bit OS (Score:5, Insightful)
+4 insightful to the guy who's never run AIX :-) (Score:5, Interesting)
All the "high end virtualisation, monitoring and enterprise volume management" that AIX includes does not make up for basic, fundamental problems with things like shared library handling. Everything is fscking hard coded to
Also, the fact that IBM doesn't update their Open Source repository is inexcusable. Try compiling apache on AIX sometime. It isn't fun. Actually try compiling any open source software on AIX.
Now, if you are an IBM drone, you will say, "you should buy their integrated Websphere." But, the problem with this is vendor lock-in. AIX is worse than fscking Windows for vendor lock-in.
Some of IBM's consultants are really bright, unfortunately you need that. Extensive experience with Linux/*BSD/Solaris/Irix is NOT enough to adequately anticipate/fix problems that crop up with AIX.
At a small shop, AIX is just a pain in the ass. At a big shop with ~1,200 AIX servers supporting >35,000 desktops in a whole bunch of locations (don't ask) it's a nightmare.
Ironically, there is nothing that we do with AIX that we couldn't do better/cheaper with Linux. Hell, we could probably get better support for it too. I suggest that the era of Big Iron in the enterprise is over. Cluster cheap linux blades.
I'm sick of the Slashdot IBM fanboy syndrome. There are plenty of companies to be excited about (like Apple!). There are plenty of operating systems to evangelize (like Linux or *BSD!). AIX/IBM are not the horse to bet on. They suck worse than almost any other vendor.
Oh yeah, Lotus/Domino sucks just as much as MS Exchange.
Re:+4 insightful to the guy who's never run AIX :- (Score:3, Insightful)
I was following you, and nodding a bit, until you hit this point at the end.
Notes can do some sweet things, and back before everything was a web app, it was even more useful. The whole "everything is a database" paradigm makes for an extremely useful, extensible, and powerful system - if you design and administer the system correctly. Which, I'm afraid, most people don't seem to do. E-Mail is only a small subset of the power of Notes and Domino
Good points. (Score:3, Interesting)
However, it does have some new technologies that might have more direct impact for more people and deliver on some age-old promises of computers making life easier; workgroup management , server task [apple.com] automation [apple.com] & client management [apple.com], and volume management [apple.com] of its own. Not to mention everything they're doing in regard to clustering with Xgrid, and authoring software (Xcode).
Granted, the Apple stuff is new,
Multi-processing (Score:3, Informative)
Mac OS X, however, is heavily multi-threaded. Before Mac OS X was commercially released there were development Macs in Apple's labs running many parallel PowerPC 604 processors (I believe it was 32); the OS coped just fine and gave fantastic performance. They never shipped, however, primarily because they would have been very expensive.
Some time next year Apple will start putting in dual-core G5 chips into their top-end machines, giving y
Re:64bit OS (Score:4, Insightful)
MacOS tries to be a desktop OS, and it succeeds brilliantly. However, MacOS does not try to be a mainframe OS. It doesn't run on mainframes, and would't do a very good job if it could. This is what Solaris and AIX do, and they do do a good job.
The two things aren't even remotely comparable.
Re:64bit OS (Score:3, Insightful)
However, those things have nothing to do with the mainframe type stuff. The whole point of clusters is to have relatively inexpensive interchangable machines. The whole point of a mainframe is to have one bulletproof system. The CPUs are hotpluggable, the filesystems can move from disk to disk without being taken offline, etc. MacOS
Re:64bit OS (Score:5, Informative)
Re:64bit OS (Score:5, Insightful)
So, Captain Kurk and Spock get into a fight...
Re:Indemnification. (Score:5, Insightful)
Does Apple really need to? They have a cross-licensing agreement with Microsoft [microsoft.com], they distribute GPL'd software [apple.com] with source, and they've shown a willingness to license even questionable patents [findlaw.com].
My guess would be that if Apple were found to have infringed on someone's (legitimate) patent, they would just pay-up.
Of course I'm sure someone will point out a counter example ;)
Re:Marketing (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Marketing (Score:5, Insightful)
If you're mad because they're charging for two operating systems that both start with 10, you might as well be mad at MS for charging for 95, 98 and ME separately.
Win 95
Win 98 = Win 95.1
Win ME = Win 95.2
Win NT
Win 2000 = Win NT.1
Win XP = Win NT.2
Win 2003 = Win NT.3
Mac OS 10
Mac OS 10.1
Mac OS 10.2
Mac OS 10.3
Get the picture?
Re:Marketing (Score:3, Funny)
Do you mean Apple? As an inanimate object, wouldn't it be kind of hard for "Mac" to charge for anything?
Re:Marketing (Score:5, Informative)
95 = Windows 4.0
98 = Windows 4.1
ME = Windows 4.9
NT = Windows NT 3.1 - 4.0
2k = Windows NT 5.0
XP = Windows NT 5.1
2003 = Windows NT 5.2
Wasn't 98SE extra? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Marketing (Score:5, Funny)
Now then, if you were actually an Mac user, rather than a Windows apologist looking for a asshat line of attack, you'd realise that you don't need to buy every version of software that comes your way. It sounds like you skipped Windows Me. Similarly many Mac users skip some OS releases if the particular features in that release aren't that important to them.
Re:Marketing (Score:4, Funny)
This situation combined with MS's propensity to re-invent themselves technologically while remaining compatible with billions of existing pieces of software creates a logical nightmare! I do not envy MS that task.
This, however, does not excuse their many lapses in on-tiem feature delivery or their generally buggy and somtimes poorly designed software. I'm just trying to look at it from a computing monopoly's viewpoint. Poor babies. :)
Taft
Re:Marketing (Score:3, Insightful)
Apple offers as many free patches as Microsoft does. And I wouldn't call new features like a complete file database system, 64-bit support,and new programs like automater patch material. It's not as if Windows has been drastically changed since Windows 95 (I'm typing this on an winXP computer). Every new version of OS-X has added significant features. For example Panther had a completely redesigned file manager, expose, and fast user switching. The only difference I can find between Windows 20
Re:Marketing (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Marketing (Score:4, Insightful)
Moving from X to 10.1 to 10.2 to 10.3 added over 100 new features to the OS with each revision and 10.4 is supposed to do the same. Microsoft can't say anything remotely close to that so don't try and make pitiful comparisons like that.
Each one of these OS updates have been vastly more than mere patches, which come out from Apple on a regular basis between OS revisions, 10.3.6 is right around the corner in just over a years time and each of the six minor updates has included security patches and new features as well.
The list of features that MS has had to pull out of Longhorn to get it to market, in possibly under five years, is long. Most of the features that were going to set it ahead of XP have already been stripped out just so they can bring it to market. [com.com] The biggest, most important change to Longhorn, WinFS, has been taken out too now [com.com]. Meanwhile Gates smiles and the company blames the customers, the developers and the retailers for their short-failings with "SHORTHORN". [com.com] On top of all of that, you still won't see it released to the general public, in a non-server format, until 2008.
The one "new" feature that is supposedly going to remain in Longhorn is the MS duplication of the Aqua interface that Apple included with X since day one. No comparison at all, unless you just have no clue. Sorry fireangel, it seems you are clueless.
Quartz Extreme, Core Data, Spotlight, Automator (Score:4, Interesting)
I think the problem is that you're reading the watered-down description of the OS intended for casual consumers.
Quartz Extreme, Bindings (both Jaguar), Core Data, Spotlight and Automator (all Tiger) are certainly not "patches".
- Scott
Re:Awesome! (Score:2)
Re:Awesome! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Awesome! (Score:5, Insightful)
Land Rover CKD (Score:3, Interesting)
Land Rover offers an option in some countries of "CKD" - "Complete Knock Down" that comes to you in boxes, you get to put it together. Unfortunately you can't get these in the US (tho they tease people with them at auto shows: http://www.rockcrawler.com/trailreports/SEMA2003/
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Informative)
Apple gives away their development tools with the OS. The $500 gets you a one-year membership in the developer program, which gets you advance access to OS releases. This is similar to Microsoft's MSDN subscriptions. As compared to an MSDN subscription, I think it's a bargain. Microsoft's MSDN Operating Systems subscription (access just to Microsoft's OSs) is $699 the first year, and $499 thereafter. Want Visual Studio with that? $1,199 for the first year, $899 thereafter. (And, of course, the even higher-level subscriptions with all of Microsoft's server & desktop apps...)
Oh, and Apple lets you buy one system per year at discount when you're in the developer program. If you're looking for the high-end PowerMac G5 and a Cinema Display, you can save several hundred dollars when you buy the system.
Marginal or Marginful (Score:3, Interesting)
However, I would question that bit about lower margin than Linux. There may be more Linux boxes around, but if you count the users willing to pay for things which base do you think is larger?
And I think in some ways you might even be better off than you would be developing with Windows, because while there are a LOT of Windows users, there are also a LOT of programs competing in
Re:DRM'ed? (Score:5, Informative)
Apple doesn't care if you pirate it. They want you to buy it, they make multi-licenses and such a sweet deal and make it worth the money for single licenses. However, Apple makes money on the hardware, and the more users on the latest version of their OS, the less they have to support the old version and the more they can move forward.
Re:DRM'ed? (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure they do. They make money off of OSX, and they deserve to. They don't have activation keys and other piracy prevention measures because Apple users are less likely to pirate their OS (most are too loyal too Apple, the rest have too much money for it to matter or they just didn't know it was even possible), and 3rd world countries can't even afford the hardware so they don't have to worry as much about nock offs being sold for $3.
Re:DRM'ed? (Score:3, Informative)
Without the serial number, OS X Server doesn't install. Now, if you buy the $500 ADC membership, you get a (limited) OS X Server serial number, and access to OS X Server software for testing purposes.
If you want
Re:GCC 4? (Score:3, Informative)
It's currently in "stage 3" which is basically the GCC equivalent of 'feature freeze', where only documentation and bugfixes can be added, but not features.
The actual release is expected to be in early next year.
Re:Yeah yeah (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Yeah yeah (Score:3, Informative)
"Right-clicking' wasn't added to OS X, it has always been there. A two-button mouse on a Mac will map its right button to Ctrl-Click out of the box, and Ctrl-Click functionality has been in Mac OS for some time now.
In most cases, it opens a context-sensitive menu, just like it does in Windows. The only difference is that with Macin
Re:Yeah yeah (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.ragingmenace.com/software/sidetrack/
Lets you set the trackpad to one button and the button to another. Also supports scrolling areas and hot corners on the pad. I haven't had any problems with it.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
The price also acts as a filter. Joe Schmo will not get this. Only ISVs and hard core techies will get this. This filters a lot of support calls, and probably makes them hugher quality as well, since any bugs in the DP may affect the ISV's ability to make money, so it's in his financial interest to make the bug process as clean as possible.
Re:DANGER Will Robinson!!! (Score:3, Informative)
The difference (Score:5, Informative)
Instead, it is an application that makes use of a very widley used and understodd programming language to let you create these little Widgets. So it really is nothing like ActiveX at all, in that it is contained.