Google Helped Cause the Mysterious Increase In 911 Calls SF Asked It To Solve (bbc.com) 166
theodp writes: Android users have long complained publicly that it's way too easy to accidentally dial 911. So it's pretty astonishing that it took a team of Google Researchers and San Francisco Department of Emergency Management government employees to figure out that butt-dialing was increasing the number of 911 calls. The Google 9-1-1 Team presented its results in How Googlers helped San Francisco Use Data Science to Understand a Surge in 911 Calls, a Google-sponsored presentation at the Code for America Summit, and in San Francisco's 9-1-1 Call Volume Increase, an accompanying 26-page paper.
Simple (Score:5, Informative)
Many Android phones when you press the power button the screen activates with the "Emergency Call" touchable which means it easily enters calling mode. Since emergency services is the only valid call you can make from that screen those are the "butt dials" getting through.
More annoying is the fact that holding the power button, something that seems to happen often in my pocket, brings up the "silent/airplane mode/power off" options without having to enter the pass key. I've missed so many calls because of this damn "feature". It's a combination of bad phone design and bad software design.
Simpler (Score:2)
Re:Simpler (Score:5, Insightful)
Sorry, not going to start carrying a murse.
Re:Simpler (Score:5, Funny)
What about a belt clip? It worked for Batman.
Re: (Score:2)
These don't work well for the flat pda style of smart phones. Unless you make the thing extra bulky.
Re: (Score:2)
What about a belt clip? It worked for Batman.
Why do you think I wear one?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Those phone are so big these days, why can't they just put wheels on them? It's almost at the point where it's easier to carry my friends than my phone.
Re:Simpler (Score:4, Interesting)
If you can't put your phone in your front pocket where you won't ever butt dial and instead put it in your back pocket, news flash, you're already wearing a "murse." Its just in the form of ball-crushing tight pants with no space.
Free the dangly appendages, wear more comfortable pants!
Re: (Score:2)
Except that I do keep it in my front pocket and it still "butt dials".
Re: (Score:3)
Except that I do keep it in my front pocket and it still "butt dials".
Wow, you must have a really big butt, if it reaches all the way to the front pockets ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
If a belt clip is dorky, then an arm sheath is douchey. And shirt pockets don't work if you have tee shirts (ie, 75% of silicon valley). Plus it falls out of shirt pockets when you bend down to tie your shoes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Put it in the pants pocket, it makes sense. However the phone makers, who are all shouting "you're holding it wrong!", probably disagree.
And everyone is different too. I keep my keys in my pockets all the time. All day, all night, then I swap them to new pants. However my father would always remove all his change and keys from pockets when he got home and put them in a tray in the dining room, and retrieved in the morning. Other people put the phone on the nightstand. Some never put the phone down bec
Re: (Score:2)
Where the hell else can I carry it? I've got jeans and a t-shirt. The phone fits in my jeans pocket so that's the only logical place to put it. I guess I could get a belt clip and have it catch on everything but I think not. How about they could just make it where I have to actually unlock the screen to make a call? Problem solved!
Re: (Score:3)
"Where the hell else can I carry it? I've got jeans and a t-shirt."
That's exactly why I use a fisher-style vest in summer.
Re: (Score:3)
Where the hell else can I carry it? I've got jeans and a t-shirt. The phone fits in my jeans pocket so that's the only logical place to put it. I guess I could get a belt clip and have it catch on everything but I think not. How about they could just make it where I have to actually unlock the screen to make a call? Problem solved!
fucking simple... I buy trousers (or pants to you yanks :P ) with my stuff in min... cargo trousers, the map pocket is great for yer phone when paired with bluetooth headset.
I also buy shirts/tops at times with phone in mind.It's not rocket science
But no... it always boils down to.. " WAAAAH... moan moan moan"
So just for you..... have a gander at this [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Heh-heh. Nice one. Bloody first world problems, eh? I've been using belt clips since my first mobile phone and never had the issues mentioned by people. Maybe I'm just not treating my costly hardware like cheap disposable rubbish. If using a belt clip makes me such a horrible person as noted by someone else earlier, well - fuck! It's not like they're the kind of person I'd want to meet, is it?
Re: (Score:2)
What I've been thinking all this time. I actually use a case with belt loops--that way it can't accidentally pop off my belt.
No accidental dialing. No cracked or scratched screens. No lost phones. I've got very little sympathy for these people when a simple solution exists.
Re: (Score:2)
Nice. I don't wear a belt otherwise I might have gone that route myself. My current one is a very slim but solid 2-part plastic job with a ribbed surface for grip. (Ooer!) One part is good enough to stay on the back of the phone (Galaxy Note II) with cutouts for speaker & camera on the back, volume & power either side & plenty of space for 'phones, USB & S-Pen top & bottom and also has slightly raised edges to keep the screen from hitting ground if dropped on a flat surface. The oth
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It is solely for my phone... it's the pressure when I kneel down against the outside of the pant leg. With my phone the power button is on the top corner so it seems very easy to trigger in this way. There should be a two button option for problem phones (software) and/or a button that has guards at either end to prevent evenly distributed pressure from pressing the button (hardware).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Would a tight warranty be better than a loose one? If it is loose, it might fall off the phone randomly.
Re: (Score:2)
It happens most often in khakis - ie: standard business wear. Also in relaxed fit jeans.
Re: (Score:2)
You probably have metal pocket buttons that are sabotaging you. A capacitive touch screen should have minimum opportunity for this problem if alone in the pocket, so I'm assuming there is some metal getting in there. Maybe you just have too much pocket fluff buildup, and it is holding a charge.
Re: Simple (Score:5, Insightful)
I find it works better to revert to an 80s wardrobe. With cargo pants I always can choose a decent pocket for each device.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry kiddo, but I was there. Maybe your neighborhood was just behind the times? MC Hammer had his parachute pants, and people wanted to copy him but they didn't want the weird pants that nobody sold so they compromised with baggy cargo pants. I still have mine. I could fit a pack of 10 5.25" floppies in the big pocket.
Re: (Score:2)
This happens to me when I'm wearing loose grandpa jeans. I suspect it doesn't happen with khakis or suit pants, but it definitely does not have to be tight pants for this to happen. It doesn't take much pressure at all to push the power buttons, if it did take pressure someone would complain and then the next model of phone would be back to a hair trigger.
Re: (Score:2)
They're called "grandma jeans." There is no such thing as "grandpa jeans." Grandpas wear normal jeans. Don't let homophobia destroy your communication ability. It is OK to wear grandma jeans.
Re: (Score:2)
Grandpa wore jeans, grandma wore overalls, and crazy uncle Joe wore his boots backwards.
Re: (Score:2)
This does not work. You already designate a pocket only for your phone if you don't want it to be horribly scratched up by your pocket change and keys. This power on accidentally happens in the front pocket, especialy on my phone where the "home" key also doubles as an extra power button. I've slowly gotten a habit of taking the phone out of my pocket when I tie my shoes in the morning, but a couple of times that has led me to forget and leave the phone behind.
This is without having a bulky case to wrap
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The case is what makes the difference for me ; without the case, I've had an occasion where the phone factory-reset itself ; not so hard on Android, only requires pushing the power and volume buttons in a particular order.
With one of those flexible plastic shell cases, pushing the buttons requires more effort than a pants crease can manage.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand why people prefer their back pockets to put things into
They try to look like 18 years old chicks, that's why
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand it either. I keep my phone in either my shirt pocket or my front pants pocket. I don't want to sit on the damn thing.
Re: (Score:2)
My new phone has this problem. The "home" button also acts as an extra power button. There's no need for an extra power button, but apparently they thought it was convenient. But in Lollipop the option to disable that extra power button is removed; you are stuck with it unless you root the phone. So this means the phone can easily power itself on even when it's in your pocket. I have often found myself walking around and hearing a blipping sound coming from my pocket, only to notice that it was trying
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's Samsung, and the home doubling as power button is a Samsung feature. But you used to be able to remap it, until the Lollipop release. So not really Google's fault per se, but a continuing part of the trend to remove control and customization from users.
However, once a phone does get powered on and it's still in your pocket, then all sorts of problems will happen. There must be a way by law to dial an emergency number if if you can't unlock it (ie, you don't know the PIN or can't type it, say you pul
Re: (Score:2)
I've had a Nexus 5. It doesn't have a hardware home button.
Re: (Score:2)
With my old non-smartphone 133113313122 was a valid emergency number! It would ignore all the wrong digits and see: 133113313122, and 112 is the international emergency number. And this was even with a keypad lock engaged. A good design would reset the dial string on an invalid entry. Instead, it could take hours to finish dialing the emergency number, but it would get dialed in my pocket.
Re: (Score:2)
What if your hands are shaking because you're dying because the terrorist who's trying to nuke New York just shot you, and you need to warn Bruce Willis before you do? Getting right 3 in a row might be quite hard in those circumstances. So it's not really a good design, unless you want the nuclear terrorists to win.
Re: (Score:2)
You tell my local dispatcher to be more forgiving of butt-dialers, then. They're the ones letting the terrorists win. Instead, they literally told me to buy a new phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Well then, if there's a possibility of a real emergency then those phones should be constantly connected to the hotline, 24/7. They just keep listening until someone says "help, I can't touch my phone or interact with it but tell someone that the aliens are landing!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're just holding it wrong.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/m... [cnn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You're just holding it wrong.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/m... [cnn.com]
http://dontholditwrong.tumblr.... [tumblr.com]
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Simple (Score:5, Insightful)
They just need to change the button from a press to a slide or something like that... simple to access but not simple to accidentally press.
Re: Simple (Score:2)
While that is a very good idea, why can't I simply choose not to have the emergency dialer displayed on my lock screen?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The reason I ask is because I tested some copper phone jacks that once-upon-a-time had landline service to them but no longer have service, and there is no dialtone (but there is still power to make the lights on the phone light up). Thinking that perhaps one could still call 911 without a dialtone, but not wanting to waste EMS time handling a bogus call I contacted Verizon support (1-800-VERIZON) to ask.
The representative I spoke with s
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2009/05/update-about-911-and-disconnected-landlines/index.htm [consumerreports.org]
At which time it appeared that NY State (where I tested this) was one of the states that had some sort of "soft-tone" requirement. Apparently that is no longer the case.
Re: (Score:2)
Because the phone must be able to dial 911 even if it's locked. That's the law.
Re: (Score:2)
Seems to be what they've done in 5.1.x... at least, nothing on the lock screen appears to respond to just a press or a press-and-hold. It's all slides or double-tap.
It was a short presentation (Score:2)
Full transcript of Google's remarks follow:
Uhh... We're sorry. We're really, really sorry.
It's your ass calling (Score:5, Funny)
"Help! My owner has me trapped in these tight jeans!"
Butt dialing is easy... (Score:3, Funny)
Butt texting... now THAT"S a challenge.
Re: (Score:2)
But, is it that much harder than talking out your ass?
Why have emergency call at all? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't there some US law that all phones have to be able to make 911 calls?
Re: (Score:1)
IIRC it's because all cellphones are mandated by law to be able to make 911 calls even if they're locked, out of service or even SIMless.
My Android phone can make emergency calls even before the phone's main storage area is decrypted at bootup.
blackberry... (Score:3)
I accidentally emergency called 911 on a blackberry a few years back. I have no idea how long the call was going before I realized it was on, but there was nobody on the other end.
It's the Toyota debacle all over again (Score:2)
"Peoples butts are too fat"
"butt dial" or pocket dial ? (Score:2)
I thought the generic term is pocket dial.
I'm guessing that "butt dialing" is more for girls or others who wear skinny jeans or those who enjoy sitting on the phone.
I am also guessing that skinny jeans and "butt"-dialing does not usually apply to slashdot users.
Re: (Score:2)
In my case it's definitely "pocket-dial". I have it in the wrong pocket to "butt-dial" anything.
Re: (Score:2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question [wikipedia.org]
Android's Achilles Heel (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Android's Achilles Heel (Score:4, Informative)
People have been filing bugs to the Android team over this issue since 2011 and it has never been addressed, and the newer bugs keep getting pushed to lower and lower priority.
I'm really starting to get pissed at this tendency. They let bugs that lots of people care about persist forever. For instance, there are actually two active bugs for pinless bluetooth pairing. This is a problem that actually predates gingerbread.
The obvious solution! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Or, what about an intelligent screening system that only routes the call to an operator if voice is detected. What could go wrong with that?
Re: (Score:2)
Might make it hard to call for assistance after that home invader ties you up and gags you.
Confirmation that no one at Google Android dev (Score:2)
Bothers reading bug reports or they would have fixed this issue 7 years ago when users first started reporting how shitty the lock screen configuration is
Never dialed 911 (Score:2)
But I did 3 pocket-dials in a short time. I have no idea how that happened, since my iPhone was locked. Those calls were to my GF and my mom, so it appeared to be accessing my Favorites, but how it did that is a mystery.
Flawed design (Score:3)
I've had this problem myself and at first scratched my head at the odds of random brushes across the digitizer dialing only 911 then pushing call was even remotely possible. Then I realized there is practically no "debounce" and the random brushes are allowed to be registered at uselessly inhuman rates.
Secondly a proximity sensor is present in all but about 15% of android devices. If the emergency dialer checked this sensor before pocket calling emergency services this problem would be significantly reduced. You could at the very least include an extra on-screen hoop such as long pressing keys that would only be activated if the sensor detected it was in a pocket so that emergency services could still be contacted even if the sensor malfunctioned.
Another thing is the design just sucks.. if the goal is quickly and easily contact emergency services dialing 911 on a touch screen display can't be even remotely optimal. If your going to mandate anything it should be a single physical button intentionally engineered to be maximally both easy to use and resistant to unintentional use. Drop your phone, fall, get hit by something, get into an accident.. cracked displays and broken digitizers are by far the most vulnerable and failure prone components.. good luck making a call without them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You could, maybe, stop wearing those ridiculously uncomfortable skinny jeans and actually leave "room" for your phone, in a FRONT pocket?
I've never worn skinny jeans in my life and always put it in my front pocket and unintentional calls/commands happen a LOT.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You could, maybe, stop wearing those ridiculously uncomfortable skinny jeans and actually leave "room" for your phone, in a FRONT pocket?
Impractical. How are you supposed to play "pocket pool" if you start putting stuff in your front pockets?
Re: (Score:2)
The HTC One M7 don't have a user accessible battery. It's hardwired to reboot the phone because otherwise a software glitch that crashes the phone could brick it until it ran out of power.
I used to have a Morphie power case for mine, but the power button on it was even more sensitive. My wife with the same setup didn't have issues with her purse. But even the loose extra side pockets of cargo shorts would allow it to get pressed.
My solution was figuring out that I didn't need the extra power from the cas
Re:It took a team? (Score:4, Insightful)
Read the document instead of relying on a poor, click-baiting summary. There's an actual problem with ass callers.
Although the source data (i.e., whether a call is coming from a landline, cellphone or business) can be passed from the telephone system to the CAD system, technical issues can require human intervention to capture this data in CAD. For example, in 2014, DEM discovered that telephone routers could take 2-8 seconds to transmit ANI/ALI information (which includes source data) to dispatcher phones. However, if ANI/ALI information is not present at the time the dispatcher begins typing in the CAD Incident Entry window, source data is not captured, and dispatchers would need to manually port source data into the CAD Incident Entry window. Given this, source data (particularly for wireless calls, labeled as “W911”) was lacking in the CAD dataset which impacted the ability to identify the number CAD incidents created from wireless calls. Correspondingly, the number of CAD incidents resulting from wireless calls is significantly underrepresented, given that ~60% of DEM’s call volume comes from wireless phones.
Re: (Score:3)
Read the document instead of relying on a poor, click-baiting summary. There's an actual problem with ass callers.
I believe the collective term for these callers is 'ass-clowns'.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It took a team? (Score:5, Insightful)
Your translation is wrong. The problem is not the 911 software. The problem is the delay in getting the caller id from the PSTN, and this is not something they can accelerate from the 911 data center.
Imagine that your boss tells you that he wants to receive emails within one second of any client or potential customer sending them. The problem is not his Thunderbird or Outlook settings, the problem is that email has to cross multiple boundaries, from one ISP to another, from one SMTP server to another, and nobody has control over the entire process.
In the case of 911, how can they fix it? Operators get thousands of hang up calls for which they don't get the caller id immediately when the form pops up on their screen. Instead of spending 20 seconds tidying up the call information they dismiss it with the "ass caller" flag. The call is logged but no details are entered in the database, and while technically they probably are able to reconcile calls using the switch logs or some other mean, it's just a huge pain in the ass that nobody has the budget to deal with. Typical big data problem.
Re: (Score:3)
I work for the sixth largest teleco in the US ... Phone number portion of caller-I'd comes during the call setup phase, the phone number has been sent before the call connects.
CNAM dipping turns that number into a name and address using a third party service ... And we send billions of CNAM dip requests a day to them and get the response before call setup completes or we move on without it ... A quick look shows we had a grand total of 8 requests that failed yesterday after 150ms, they were retried and all
Re: (Score:2)
What are you talking about? Read your own quote:
if ANI/ALI information is not present at the time the dispatcher begins typing in the CAD Incident Entry window, source data is not captured, and dispatchers would need to manually port source data into the CAD Incident Entry window
That's a SOFTWARE issue, not a butt-dialing issue. When the information finally comes in, it can be recorded on the record asynchronously if the software is designed correctly.
Re: (Score:2)
Are there really that many butt dials to 911? Enough to flood the system?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks! That's 3/4 down this thread and you're the first NOT to talk about looks or tight jeans, but about the actual problem!
Phones are designed to male emergency calls easy - for exactly the reasons you noted. You may have to do a silent call or have an arm and a leg torn off and still need to be able to dial 911. Anything that makes it harder for your butt to dial 911 makes it harder in those situations, too.
Re:Google phones cause death (Score:4, Interesting)
I was out in the woods one day and sitting on a hill for a while. I thought I heard some noise from my pocket, so I checked my phone. I had a voicemail from 911 saying something to the effect of "This is the third time you've called 911! Please check your damn phone!"
I checked my phone and it had two outgoing calls to 911 in the list. I was pretty horrified.
They obviously were familiar with butt dials. However, what if I was injured and unable to speak? Hopefully they could tell the difference. At least I didn't get a helicopter flying over me or something.
The ease at which the phones can dial 911 is absolutely stupid... it's absolutely Google's fault. I'm sure there are plenty of ways to make it harder to do accidentally, but still easy enough to do if you're injured/impaired.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You were dialing 9 to get an outside line you dummy. 1 is the long distance / US country code.
Re: (Score:2)
Way back in 2004 I worked in an office where you had to dial 9-1 before dialing an outside line. Try dialing a 1-800 number after that.
At my office they changed the "9" to "8" to get an outside line, and I heard that was the reason.
Re: (Score:2)