Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology Apple Hardware

Apple's AirPower, Unveiled in September 2017, Officially Misses 2018 Shipping Deadline (9to5mac.com) 137

From a 9to5Mac report: As the new year begins in Pacific Time, where Apple's Cupertino headquarters are based, the AirPower charging mat has officially missed its 2018 release window. The charging mat promised to charge iPhone, Apple Watch and AirPods on a single compact mat with flexibility on where devices can be placed. However, the product has been rumored to have faced internal development challenges as late as this past summer, which prevented Apple from bringing the product to market as smoothly as it expected.

[...] Unusually, Apple has not provided a statement to press with an update on AirPower's status. Apple refused to acknowledge the product at its September and October events, and has not responded to press requests for comment at the end of December. The product therefore enters 2019 still in limbo.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple's AirPower, Unveiled in September 2017, Officially Misses 2018 Shipping Deadline

Comments Filter:
  • Nikola Tesla is rolling in his grave...

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Just don't give us constant updates on this sh**. Seriously, why is it journalists feel we need updates on all of Apple's stock movements constantly. Does anyone care about this, and is anyone surprised N

  • Feckless hiptards (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Hognoxious ( 631665 )

    Charging mat - for people who are too lazy & feckless to plug in a cable.

    • Or just for people who can afford to waste power by running a tiny radio station that spews EM in all directions, some of it reaching the devices they want to charge.

      • I'm pretty sure these charging mats use some kind of induction, which doesn't spew EM radiation all over. Still more wasteful than plugging in, though.

        I don't really understand the benefit of these, since it won't reduce cable clutter around your desk. I guess one might make sense if one charger replaces lots of small ones in a workplace etc. Otherwise, it sounds about as useful as a Wifi AP that only works within touching distance.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          They save wear on the charge port, and I bet Apple is moving towards a phone with no ports at all eventually.

          Also very useful for cars because you don't need cables trailing all over the place. Some cars have the charging mat built in now so you literally just put your phone in the provided holder and that's it. All they need to do now is get Android Auto working wirelessly too, although for now you can do stuff like have the Bluetooth auto-enable and disable.

        • Induction means to induce current with generated EM emissions. It's generally pretty efficient, but it's not an inaccurate description.

          • by dfghjk ( 711126 )

            "spews EM in all directions" is inaccurate not because it's not EM but because it's not "in all directions" and it doesn't "spew". Furthermore, a charging mat is not accurately described as a "tiny radio station" nor is is it "just for people who can afford to waste power" by operating such a relatively useless "radio station". In summary, the entire description is inaccurate except for EM being involved, the one thing you zeroed in on.

            Also, your definition of "induction" is inaccurate.

          • I have a master's degree in physics so I could probably explain a thing or two about the differences between EM waves (radiation) and inductive charging. Or maybe you could look it up somewhere like Wikipedia, instead of spewing around any inaccurate emissions.
            • And what exactly do you think induction is, then?

              • Oh, and feel free to cite the Wikipedia article on EM induction.

              • EM waves do induce currents, that's how radio reception works. But EM waves are not used for inductive charging, because of the obvious waste of energy.

                Inductive chargers involve what's basically a transformer in two parts: one coil (the charger) is used to generate an oscillating magnetic field, which induces current in another coil (the phone).

                EM waves/radiation are a rather special case where electric and magnetic fields oscillate together, basically inducing each other to make the wave go on. But y

                • Near field EM is still an EM wave. And it's still coupled with the fluctuating electric field in the coil. It's just that since the near field radiation is what's important, there is not enough power to generate significant amounts of far field.

        • by JBMcB ( 73720 )

          I don't really understand the benefit of these, since it won't reduce cable clutter around your desk.

          They want to get rid of every port and make the case completely sealed. Much easier to make them waterproof / dustproof / etc...

        • I'm pretty sure these charging mats use some kind of induction, which doesn't spew EM radiation all over.

          Yes it does, whatever gave you the idea that induction doesn't leak EMF? Hint: induction = EMF.

      • That's not how these things work. The losses are small, about 10-15%.
        My new car will have one, which is nice. Sure beats fiddling with a cable.
      • It's a very short distance, and possibly the reason it's taking so long is that they plan to use some sort of beamforming from the multiple antennae. It seems very logical to try this, but completely crazy to announce what turned out to be an unfinished product that hasn't made it out of R&D yet.

    • I use wireless charging mostly doe to the fact that I don’t damage my cable and connector.
      Over the past 22 years of cell phones.
      The first one I replaced because of a cracked screen.
      The second one was because the charging connector on the phone got corroded.
      The third one the charging cord broke and couldn’t get a compatible charging cord anymore.
      The forth one went threw the wash
      The fifth one (the original iphone) actually still works but just outdated.
      The sixth one charging connector was loose an

  • is starting to have a negative impact on delivery dates. /s

    • by markdavis ( 642305 ) on Tuesday January 01, 2019 @08:55AM (#57888118)

      Yep.

      And that last article about people not willing to pay Apple's insane prices anymore is amusing. And the article before about them eying 3D cameras, although phones have already done that. And Apple users laughing at phones with fingerprint sensors, then Apple "inventing" it. And laughing at large-screen phones, then "inventing" it. And laughing at the capacitive Samsung S Pen, then "inventing" the concept with the Apple Pencil. Other companies were first with OLED displays, wireless charging, optical stabilization, touch screens, smart watches, keyboard covers, zoom pinching, face ID, removal of home button, slim bezels, dual rear cameras, RFID payments, water resistance... but the distortion field says that either Apple invented them or somehow only Apple could make it work right.

      But let's give them credit- they were among the first with no headphone jack, non-user-replaceable batteries, and strange cut-out areas on the display.

      • But let's give them credit- they were among the first with [...] strange cut-out areas on the display.

        They weren't the first with that.

  • Development Issues (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 01, 2019 @07:50AM (#57888014)

    Apple delayed because they couldn't find a way to make it incompatible with any other wireless charging system.

  • Scanning the options sheet for Mercedes...a charging mat is an option.....
  • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Tuesday January 01, 2019 @01:27PM (#57888870)

    I think it's absurd to beat up Apple over the inability to ship a charging mat that they mentioned just once!! Come on, was it really a huge problem for Apple they could not ship something that you can buy a score of near equivalent products for?

    If you really wanted a story about Apple missing deadlines, it seems like, oh, I don't know, maybe the Mac Pro would be a better target for that? Since there is no word about that yet and at one point we were all expecting it to arrive at the end of 2018. Mac users would really be chomping at the bit if they hadn't been placated to some degree by the iMac Pro and updated Mac mini, but there are indeed some users that really need a Mac Pro, it would be great to have word from Apple about that... now it seems like maybe we'll not hear about it until June.

    • Apple not being able to ship a charging mat is just plain comical. While your indignation is totally understandable, that doesn't make it not pathetic.

  • by Tough Love ( 215404 ) on Tuesday January 01, 2019 @08:34PM (#57890242)

    Apple vs physics: physics wins. Maybe consider letting engineers design products instead of powerpoint managers.

    • "letting engineers design products instead of powerpoint managers."

      Joke's on you: engineering is 50% powerpoint.

  • by Shotgun ( 30919 )

    I don't get it. Apple is having trouble designing a Qi charger? I've been using a wireless charger for a couple years now. My current phone, a Kyocera, came with it built in, but I had to add a $5 coil into the back of my Samsung S6 for it to work. The Samsung charging pad cost about $15. I don't understand why Apple is having issues.

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...