Google Will Start Retiring Hangouts For G Suite Users In October

In a blog post, Google clarified the timeline of the transition from classic Hangouts to Chat and Meet for its paying G Suite customers. "For them, the Hangouts retirement party will start in October of this year," reports TechCrunch. From the report: For consumers, the situation remains unclear, but Google says there will be free versions of Chat and Meet that will become available "following the transition of G Suite customers." As of now, there is no timeline, so for all we know, Hangouts will remain up and running into 2020. As for G Suite users, Google says it will start bringing more features from classic Hangouts to Chat between April and September. Those include integration with Gmail, the ability to talk to external users, improved video calling and making calls with Google Voice.

Hangouts, Chat, Meets, confusing mess

[blahbooboo]

Amazing how Google could so mess up messaging. It's a confusing mess now. I can't tell what product does what anymore.. Hangouts is mostly dead anyway as most folks seem to have moved on to other platforms.

The original Google Chat was such a success, Google just completely dropped the ball!

Re:

[AmiMoJo]

Hangouts has over a billion installs on Android. It's extremely popular, by far Google's most popular messaging app and the default for handling SMS on Android. A lot of people use it.

Hangouts video chat is the best free video chat system available, especially for more than two people. The way it handles conference calls is unparalleled. They keep talking about replacements for text chat, but it's the video chat I'm worried about.

Re:

[shortscruffydave]

Plenty of applications which get bundled with Android could claim millions of installs. That doesn't mean they actually get used though, so really stretches the meaning of the word "popular"

Re:

[blahbooboo]

Granted this is a skewed sample, but I've found most android folks I try to use hangouts with have to "find the hangouts app" to message them on it as they never use it.

Re:

[swillden]

Hangouts has over a billion installs on Android. It's extremely popular, by far Google's most popular messaging app and the default for handling SMS on Android.

Hangouts does not handle SMS on Android any more, unless you're using Google Voice or Google Fi. SMS on non-Google carriers must use the Messages app or a third party app. Even before they removed the ability for Hangouts to handle (non-Google) SMS, Messages was the default.

Re:

[AmiMoJo]

Huh, thanks, I didn't know that. I switched to Signal ages ago but I was thinking to ditching it because I can't get anyone else on board and it kinda sucks.

Re:Hangouts, Chat, Meets, confusing mess

[TeknoHog]

Sun: We're the "dot" in the "dot com".
Google: We're the "mess" in "messaging".

Nobody cares for the "eco-system"

[Dorianny]

Google's obsession with tying all their products together has been the death-kneel of many of their projects. For the most part people are just not interested in the all-encompassing approach. Facebook has been much smarter in letting multiple products appear to be seperate even when they offer some of the same functionality, facebook messanger, whatsapp, instagram and run on the same underlying platform

Re:Nobody cares for the "eco-system"

[Solandri]

These apps worked better together. In Hangouts, I could be texting someone, decide I'd rather talk to them and call them via my Google Voice account by tapping a single button. Later if I decided to switch that call from a voice call to a video call, I could do that with another video tap. If I then decided to add someone else to the video call, I just had to add the extra person. All from withing Hangouts. The only thing it didn't support was seamlessly transferring cellular calls to VoIP and vice versa.

Now if you want to do the above, it's a confusing hodgepodge of different apps. You have to text someone with Messages or Allo (I'm still not sure what the difference between the two is). If you decide you'd rather talk with them, you have to switch to the Google Voice app, look them up in your contacts, and initiate the call. If you then decide you want to change it to a video call, you have to hang up and call them again on the Duo app. And if you decide you want to add a third person to your video call, you have to end the Duo call, start the Meet app, and call everyone all over again.

I still don't understand why they're killing off Hangouts. The replacements are an app that does only messaging, an app that does only VoIP, an app that does only video calls, and an app that does only video conferencing. Hangouts was a communications app. Its closest analogue was Skype, where you could video conference between multiple people, or a single person, or disable the camera to get just a voice call, or just type messages to each other. It made sense to tie all of these into a single app, so all you had to do was pick what mode of communication you wanted at that moment - text, voice, video, or conference video.

Re:

[SoapBoxRants]

This. It's not so much whether it is one app or several. It's about how none of these apps work together like the single app did. You cannot move a conversation from chat to a call or video seamlessly. Hangouts does this. The fruit company makes this easier as well. Nobody wants to open up one app to text, then close that app and open up the phone or contacts app so they can find that person's entry to call them. It's just frustrating that they are going from a great user experience to a terrible one.

And th

Re:

[An Ominous Coward]

Re: Change to video call

And if you or the other party are on a PC (Linux, Mac, Windows, anything with a browser) then you're SOL, because as far as I can tell there's no web client for Duo and no expectation to get one.

Re:

[rtb61]

Google clearly prefer it, because it locks out competitors that do elements of it much batter and it provides one 'RING' of services, "One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them". https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com].

It should be way more funnier than it is but everyone should know exactly their intent by creating a central local to control 'ALL' human social interactions on their services or is you your service and fealty to them. The big shit a

What replaces Hangouts?

[ctilsie242]

Hangouts had a nice niche. For personal use, Discord comes to mind. However, for a company, perhaps Slack might be the answer. Or perhaps moving from G-Suite to O365 and using Teams.

Wish Discord had an enterprise tier.

Re:

[Psion]

Draw. I used it a lot in conferences. I could generate a new picture from within Hangouts, then post it to one or more participants. If there was a need for updates, any one of the participants could draw on the same picture and re-post it. That went away without any explanation last fall.

Re:

[skinfaxi]

Maybe Draw is being replaced with Jamboard? https://jamboard.google.com/ [google.com]

Google Voice

[crow]

For me, Google Voice is the big issue. I can install Hangouts and the Hangouts Dialer, sign up for a Google Voice number, and then my phone works as a phone anywhere I have WiFi, and it's totally free. This is wonderful for overseas travel. It's also great for setting up an old phone for occasional special uses, or for a kid to have a phone to call from school.

I don't really care about Hangouts, and the summary suggests that it won't be retired until the Voice integration with Chat is completed, so presu

Re:

[Aighearach]

I just wish they'd give us a roadmap so we can plan ahead to use their service.

Their service will probably continue, but probably isn't good enough; it causes me to want to switch. Their lack of planning all by itself makes paid VOIP competitive with their free service. That screams "lost opportunity" IMO.

And then in addition to using Voice, I also subscribe to a paid Skype account for international calling. I'd have rather been paying google for those services as part of Voice, but they're not price compet

Re:

[barra.ponto]

I'm in the same boat, though it seems, according to this site [makeuseof.com], that one can use the GVoice app for VOIP without using one's cell phone plan.

Re:

[crow]

You may not have anything better to spend your money on, but I certainly don't want to waste money. I don't want to pay for international roaming when I only want to call from my hotel with included free WiFi. I don't want to pay for any service for an old phone that I send with my kid to the library to call me when he wants to be picked up. This isn't about using VoIP instead of limited cellular minutes, it's about using VoIP instead of paying for any service whatsoever.

I like Hangouts

[foxalopex]

I believe the message is more for paying commercial customers that use Gsuite. As for myself I'm actually a fan of Hangouts using it as an alternative texting service and a way to send pictures and files. Hangouts dialer still does free phone calls over WiFi for North American numbers.

So confusing

[itamblyn]

When I use gmail, I click on contacts' names and I can chat with them. I can also do video and voice. Whatever that service is called (I've lost track of all of their changes) is useful and should not be removed.

Never rely on Google for anything

[Anonymous Coward]

You WILL regret it.

Messages for Web doesn't seem that great

[Bruce Perens]

The replacement for Hangouts SMS/MMS on the desktop browser is Messages for Web, at messages.android.com [android.com] . You use this by installing the Messages app on your Android device, and then choosing Messages for Web in the app menu and scanning the QR code presented by the desktop browser.

It sounds to me like this requires that you leave your phone on with Messages running in background, as SMS and MMS are sent through your phone in response to a network connection. Project Fi and Hangouts can currently handle SM

Why would anyone use google tools?

[ilsaloving]

Google has a serious issue with service stability. They create and drop services like a toddler with their coat. So it makes me wonder why anyone would trust anything made by Google at this point.

And it's not just services. Literally anything Google produces is at risk of being dropped or significantly refactored to the point of breaking existing stuff. Just look at AngularJS. They didn't like it and completely rewrote it, completely breaking all existing code.

At this point I try to avoid anything by Go