Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy The Almighty Buck United Kingdom Technology

Tesco, One of the World's Largest Supermarket Operators, Is Testing Cashierless Stores Solely Dependent On Cameras (moneymaven.io) 89

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Wall Street Journal: Tesco, one of the world's largest supermarket operators, is one of several grocers testing cashierless stores with cameras that track what shoppers pick (Warning: source paywalled; alternative source), so they pay by simply walking out the door. The retailers hope the technology -- similar to that pioneered by Amazon.com Inc. in its Amazon Go stores in the U.S. -- will allow them to cut costs and alleviate lines as they face an evolving threat from the e-commerce giant.

Tesco plans to open its self-styled "pick and go" or "frictionless shopping" store to the public next year after testing with employees. Eventually it wants to use the technology, developed by Israeli startup Trigo Vision, in more of its smaller grocery stores. Tesco's 4,000-square-foot test store uses 150 ceiling-mounted cameras to generate a three-dimensional view of products as they are taken off shelves. In its recent demo, Tesco's system detected shoppers as they walked around the store. It also identified a group of products when a person holding them stood in front of a screen, tallying up their total price. Tesco is considering identifying shoppers through an app or loyalty card when they enter the store and then charging their app when they leave. Tesco told investors its method costs one-tenth of systems used by its competitors, partly because it only uses cameras. Amazon Go uses cameras and sensors to track what shoppers pick. Amazon customers scan a QR code at a gate when they enter a store, then walk out when finished.
While Tesco will track the movements of their customers, the company says the system used in its trial doesn't recognize faces.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tesco, One of the World's Largest Supermarket Operators, Is Testing Cashierless Stores Solely Dependent On Cameras

Comments Filter:
  • What do we want? (Score:5, Informative)

    by markdavis ( 642305 ) on Monday July 08, 2019 @07:26PM (#58893636)

    Just what we want. To be identified when entering a store and watched every millisecond. And then maybe, hopefully, it will figure out what we ACTUALLY put in our carts/baskets. Did it notice I put it back on the shelf? Did it notice that guy who put it on the wrong shelf? But we will have to stop and check our receipt just to make sure. Oh, probably can't pay with cash, either. Creepy, invasive, and punitive (to those who value at least SOME degree of privacy or anonymity).

    Meanwhile.... I find the self-checkouts at Walmart work just fantastically now. Fast, easy, done. That was NOT the case when they first went in- the first models were horrible and EVERYONE hated them. "Unexpected item in bagging area", "please wait for assistance", scanners that didn't work half the time. So they were ripped out and reintroduced a few years later. Now it is fast, can process the prices in my head as I scan and bag. Can pay with card or cash, can bag how I like, don't have to interact with a person, don't get my dozen eggs squashed, get an easy-to-read and reconcile paper receipt if I want. Oh, and no spy-cards... I mean "loyalty cards". Almost as good at Target, too.

    • Meanwhile.... I find the self-checkouts at Walmart work just fantastically now.

      I think of these monitor what you take systems as being very close to that, I mean after all you are going to be on camera checking out at a self checkout so I don't see a ton of difference.

      The only difference is not being able to pay with cash, but I mostly reserve cash for paying smaller places with instead of larger chains.

      P.S. I had exactly the same issues as you reported with Target self-checkout machines to the point I just

      • Not sure if Target ever fixed that

        Target's self-checkout system is much improved over even a year ago.

        You may want to give it another try.

      • >"I think of these monitor what you take systems as being very close to that, I mean after all you are going to be on camera checking out at a self checkout so I don't see a ton of difference."

        You don't think there is no difference being monitored, in detail, every second of an hour-long shopping trip compared to a minute during checkout? Someone or something examining every item you LOOK at or touch, not just selected?

    • the first models were horrible and EVERYONE hated them.

      Yeah, I never understood how they fucked that up. UPC bar code scanning has been a thing since 1974, how can they still be screwing that up 45 years later?

    • I hate to admit this, but you are correct about Wally World.

      In the affluent areas, on top of the staffed self-checkout area, they have regular lanes open for self-check out without a person around. I'm sure someone is watching via cameras, but that's OK. Having a hand scanner and not needing to put everything on a scale based meter is really nice (local grocery does the scale thing, pain in the a**).

      I do only go there when I need a bunch of bulk items.

    • Did it notice I put it back on the shelf? Did it notice that guy who put it on the wrong shelf?

      Yeah I'm sure they didn't consider such incredible edge cases. Clearly they need an armchair warrior to help them with their project.

    • by mentil ( 1748130 )

      The Walmart self-checkout is much less whiny than it used to be, true -- so much less whiny that it didn't complain at all when I accidentally bagged something (heavy) I hadn't scanned, the other day. I scanned and rebagged it once I realized this and it still didn't complain. I guess they save more on cashiers than they lose in shrink.

      • It might have complained later when you finished tried to finish the transaction? I don't know. I just know I have been using them way over a year now (or is it two?) and I am constantly amazed that Walmart, of all places, could have something like this that works so well. About my only complaint is when there aren't enough open/free checkouts... but at least it is a fair, SINGLE QUEUE line to that area, which is also the correct way to handle such things.

        • by mentil ( 1748130 )

          Supposedly, customers dislike single queues, which is the reason they're not normally employed (although I have seen them employed at some places like Michael's and Best Buy.)

          • >"Supposedly, customers dislike single queues, which is the reason they're not normally employed"

            Fascinating. I have never heard of that before. It makes no sense to prefer multiple lines because it is far less fair, less predictable, harder to manage, harder to monitor, less efficient, and more frustrating and stressful. I guess most people are just irrational?

  • what are the age checking laws like in the UK?

    • No alcohol sales to customers under age 18. Usually one clerk assigned to watch over a group of 6-12 self checkouts to do the necessary age verifications and to correct when the system thinks there's an "unexpected item in the bagging area." It works reasonably well. I haven't gone to one of the staffed checkout lanes in months.
      • Hmm, that's not my experience. In my experience at my local UK supermarket (a Sainsburys), if the queue ahead of you for the human checkout is 2 or fewer and you have age restricted items (which includes energy drinks now!), the human queue is faster because they use people who are restocking shelves etc to double up on self checkout duty so often it ends up being the same human checkout operator who then has to come over to authorise your purchases because noone else is nearby. They fixed the 'unexpected
  • by Luthair ( 847766 ) on Monday July 08, 2019 @07:58PM (#58893764)
    Do you really want to trust the store to tally it up and send you a bill later? For me I'd still want a checkout so I could skim through the list ensuring it wasn't including extra items or incorrect pricing.
  • Uhm.. Identical twins not allowed I guess? I know twins and they report they haven't found a facial recognition that can tell them apart yet.
    • by mentil ( 1748130 )

      They'd probably have to specially code for it, but if two+ people enter with the same face, and if you're one of those people, then to check out you have to present your app again, as you did upon entering the store. Same thing if you're wearing a burqa/balaclava/mask/etc.

  • Guy Fawkes gonna be buying a whole lot of swanky yuppy beer.

  • If I wanted cashier-less I'd just get it from Amazon. Why would I want to bother with actually going to a store? OK. Harbor Freight is an exception. Fuck all their questions and asking me for my phone number.
    • You buy milk/eggs/bread at a brick & mortar store for the pleasure of interacting with the cashier?
  • by Alwin Barni ( 5107629 ) on Monday July 08, 2019 @10:52PM (#58894240)

    As in the topic. Didn't Amazon's cashier-less shops get into trouble because of this?
    Tesco is a UK company isn't it? Are they operating in the US? How is it in the UK regarding cash government guarantees?

    This technology might influence cryptocurrencies implementation.

    --
    Revelation 13:16-17

    • Legally,companies in the UK are well within their rights to refuse to sell to you for cash if they want (legal tender exists in England and Wales though not Scotland but only applies to debts which already exist - and its a valid contractual term to specify a method of payment so they can simply refuse the transaction). Not sure the supermarket would be ready for the publicity of doing this though as it's some of the most vulnerable in society who'd be excluded.
      • Thanks, indeed, cash is a guaranteed legal debt tender - quite interesting.
    • As in the topic. Didn't Amazon's cashier-less shops get into trouble because of this?

      No they didn't get "in trouble" there's no legal basis for them to be required to accept cash. Legal tender is for debts and debts alone, though a few states are trying to pass additional laws to hamper cashless businesses.

      What they did is capitulate when they received some backlash by some verbal backlash in New York.
      What they did is follow the law passed in Philadelphia due to lobbying specifically about the Amazon Go store.

      Every other store is still cash / cashier -less.

      • ** received some backlash by some verbal minority protestors in New York

        Slashdot really needs a way of previewing posts.

    • by mjwx ( 966435 )

      As in the topic. Didn't Amazon's cashier-less shops get into trouble because of this?
      Tesco is a UK company isn't it? Are they operating in the US? How is it in the UK regarding cash government guarantees?

      In the UK, stores are under no obligation to accept cash. Sure, any store that doesn't is simply cutting themselves off from customers but all stores are obliged to provide is a means of payment that is free to use.

      Nowhere is any UK vendor obliged to accept any, let alone every form of payment. If you start buying things in tens of thousands of Pounds (as in Sterling), vendors start to insist on bank transfers, no one even thinks of using credit cards because a vendor will flat out refuse it due to the m

  • If I wanted cashier-less shopping I will go to Amazon. I go to the "store" to have someone to scan the items, fix mistakes, look up the vegetable code for the vegetables I am buying, and give me cash back, etc. I am not there to do the work myself!!!
    • Most people seem to be. The ShopRite here put in a bunch of self checkouts this year, and now I always use a cashier lane because there's lines for self lanes and none or shorter for them. Walmart here it's about equal, only CVS is opposite.
    • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

      Exactly. If they want me to use the self checkout so they can reduce staff then give me a discount for doing so.

  • "While Tesco will track the movements of their customers, the company says the system used in its trial doesn't recognize faces."

    Nice, so I just switch off my phone and get the hell out without paying?

    • Nice, so I just switch off my phone and get the hell out without paying?

      The system supposedly still tracks people by their movement (of their general body shape). So you only need the phone on entry.

      But I wonder what happens if people get close together (hug), will it still know who is who after that?

  • I hope this is ready in time for the Brexit Famine of 2020.

  • This system is just an improved version of self-checkout. Self-check works great until you plunk down a bunch of escarole on the scale. All of these systems have a different, annoyingly clunky interface for identifying uncoded produce. Sometimes there is a multiple-choice selector for bananas, onions, potatoes and other common items, but otherwise you’re looking up SKUs in a giant scrolling index. You would have gone through faster with a cashier.

  • Another reason to avoid Tesco. I've given up with automated tills as it always takes longer than a human controlled till as it always glitches on at least one item and I have to wait for a supervisor to sort it. Said supervisor is usually busy sorting out somebody else's problem anyway. That's not even taking into account being ordered by a moronic robot voice to 'place items ...'
  • by mentil ( 1748130 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @11:13AM (#58896080)

    Even in stores with cashiers, there will soon be (more) cameras combined with software to run analytics on what all the customers are looking at/touching/picking up, because that's VERY valuable information to retailers. It's valuable to themselves, for determining what merchandising/signage is working, and quantifying that, and that can also be sold to manufacturers who want to know how well their advertising campaigns are working. You know all the 'free toy inside!', tie-ins, and similar promotions on packaging? They want to know if that leads to more people looking at/picking up their product. Soon it'll be possible to get a figure for "X% of shoppers who walked past our product on the shelf looked at it, and Y% of those picked it up for Z seconds on average." Shopper recognition (facial or otherwise) will be employed in order to profile 'types' of shoppers, in order to feed "if you like this item then you'll like THIS" recommendation engines, particularly in places that don't have loyalty cards. Loyalty card programs only know what you buy, currently, not what you look at or pick up. Knowing what things people are picking up and choosing not to buy is incredibly useful, as it may mean prices are too high or the packaging has inadequate information. Imagine the Walmart app's digital assistant piping up "what did you dislike about that product?" and a shopper responding why they put it back.

    Right now loyalty cards get no more granularity than sales figures, which some executives will say is all that matters. However, manufacturers will pay for more granular data in a real-world environment, that a focus group staring at their promotional materials can't tell them.

The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable. -- John Kenneth Galbraith

Working...