Should Huawei Just Abandon Android? (androidauthority.com) 91
Due to a U.S. government ban on sales to Huawei, Google revoked its license for popular apps last spring (including Gmail and the Play Store). But this week Huawei executive Fred Wangfei suggested that even if that ban is lifted, Huawei would continue developing its own app ecosystem instead to avoid the possibility of future political complications.
The vice president of risk management and partner relations at Huawei later called those remarks "incorrect," while elsewhere Huawei issued a slightly different statement -- that "An open Android ecosystem is still our first choice, but if we are not able to continue to use it, we have the ability to develop our own." But BGR was already noting that Huawei "is ready to invest $3 billion this year to incentivize more than 4,000 developers to improve its Huawei Mobile Services system. Another billion is reserved for marketing purposes."
And Android Authority suggests Huawei should stick to its original statement. "Maybe it's time for Huawei to go all-in on Harmony OS and do what it can to bring a viable alternative to Android and iOS..."
If there's any company today that has the financial resources and raw talent necessary to bring in a viable third choice for smartphone operating systems, it's Huawei... Sure, it would be a long-term investment and there would inevitably be short-term losses as the company tries to find its footing and develop Harmony OS to have its own identity. But it would prevent something like the Huawei ban from happening to the company again as well as further the company's ambitions as not only a smartphone manufacturer but as a technology creator....
Huawei would have major difficulties in encouraging wide adoption of Harmony OS for one major reason: it's Huawei. The Huawei ban exists because the United States government doesn't trust Huawei and there are numerous (as yet unproven) accusations against the company related to espionage, IP theft, fraud, and even violations of international treaties... Huawei is already in a bad situation. It's going to need to dig itself out of the hole it's in regardless, so why not use this opportunity to turn lemons into lemonade and develop Harmony OS as a viable third option on the way?
Maybe the industry needs a shake-up... Maybe a new operating system is just the kind of fire OEMs need to turn the market around. Maybe a real, potent threat that the billions of people who use Android and iOS just might jump ship to something else would scare companies into taking some real risks.
As I said earlier, there aren't too many companies out there right now that could do this, but Huawei could.
The vice president of risk management and partner relations at Huawei later called those remarks "incorrect," while elsewhere Huawei issued a slightly different statement -- that "An open Android ecosystem is still our first choice, but if we are not able to continue to use it, we have the ability to develop our own." But BGR was already noting that Huawei "is ready to invest $3 billion this year to incentivize more than 4,000 developers to improve its Huawei Mobile Services system. Another billion is reserved for marketing purposes."
And Android Authority suggests Huawei should stick to its original statement. "Maybe it's time for Huawei to go all-in on Harmony OS and do what it can to bring a viable alternative to Android and iOS..."
If there's any company today that has the financial resources and raw talent necessary to bring in a viable third choice for smartphone operating systems, it's Huawei... Sure, it would be a long-term investment and there would inevitably be short-term losses as the company tries to find its footing and develop Harmony OS to have its own identity. But it would prevent something like the Huawei ban from happening to the company again as well as further the company's ambitions as not only a smartphone manufacturer but as a technology creator....
Huawei would have major difficulties in encouraging wide adoption of Harmony OS for one major reason: it's Huawei. The Huawei ban exists because the United States government doesn't trust Huawei and there are numerous (as yet unproven) accusations against the company related to espionage, IP theft, fraud, and even violations of international treaties... Huawei is already in a bad situation. It's going to need to dig itself out of the hole it's in regardless, so why not use this opportunity to turn lemons into lemonade and develop Harmony OS as a viable third option on the way?
Maybe the industry needs a shake-up... Maybe a new operating system is just the kind of fire OEMs need to turn the market around. Maybe a real, potent threat that the billions of people who use Android and iOS just might jump ship to something else would scare companies into taking some real risks.
As I said earlier, there aren't too many companies out there right now that could do this, but Huawei could.
Totalitarian government OS? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Works great for anyone outside China though.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I doubt that they will use this for their phones, though. I suspect that it will rather be Linux with their GUI on top.
We known that the US is illegally spying on us and illegally spying on their own people. It doesn't get anymore totalitarian than the US. Everybody has understood that by now.
Re:Totalitarian government OS? (Score:5, Insightful)
Go to the Washington Mall and declare the U.S. a totalitarian country and the pol deserve prison time. No, would really give a flying rat's ass.
Now go to Tiananmen Square and tell the CCP that they are corrupt and deserve prison time. Enjoy your new jail cell.
See the difference?
Re: (Score:3)
Replace Russia with Taiwan or Tibet and copyright with enforcing globally recognized Patents... Overall, it still tips in the favor of the US. Comparing the US & China on a totalitarian level is like comparing grapes to oranges. Yeah, they are round & fruits & edible but thats pretty much where it ends.
Re: Totalitarian government OS? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Replace Tibet and Taiwan with Hawaii, California, Texas, Oregon, Arizona, New Mexico, Indiana, and most other States. Then there is all the IP theft that America did until the 20th century.
It is true that in America, you have the choice of Coke or Pepsi when you vote.
Re: (Score:3)
Puhlease, getting a pipeline has practically NOTHING to do with freedom of speech, versus the example given.
Grow up!
Re: (Score:2)
China will still jail you for advocating for those, if the state doesn't want them. The US will still simply ignore you, unless you gather sufficient popular or political support.
In the former case, you're arguing that the US shouldn't try to pull its allies back from a resource that Russia routinely exploits for political leverage [russiabusinesstoday.com]. In the lat
Re: (Score:3)
According to whom.
Re: (Score:2)
Me.
Re: (Score:1)
Well, sometimes the magic works, sometimes it doesn't. [reuters.com] Suddenly, everybody gets sick...
Re: (Score:2)
Standing on a soap box shouting "I'm free, I'm free" doesn't make it so.
Re:Totalitarian government OS? (Score:4, Informative)
It doesn't get anymore totalitarian than the US.
That's a really ignorant comment.
Re:Totalitarian government OS? (Score:4, Funny)
It doesn't get anymore totalitarian than the US.
That's a really ignorant comment.
But he was paid for it, or else they were going to sell off his organs.
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't get anymore totalitarian than the US.
That's a really ignorant comment.
Indeed. China and America are very different.
In China, the government spies on the citizens.
In America, the corporations spy on the citizens.
In China, the government lies to the people.
In America, the media lies to the people.
In China, the government controls a vast network of police and prisons.
In America, a vast network of police and prisons controls the government.
Inverted Totalitarianism [wikipedia.org]
Prison-Industrial Complex [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Totalitarian government [priorities]? (Score:2)
Very witty and I wish I had a positive mod point for you [ShanghaiBill]. However I think you should have worked the military into both sides of your last pair.
How about something like this:
In China, the militarized government controls a vast network of police and prisons.
In militarized America, a vast network of police and prisons controls the government.
My favorite version of the same sentiments would be "Government of the corporations, by the lawyers, for the richest 0.1%." I'm increasingly convinced that
Re:[Which] Totalitarian government OS? (Score:2)
We known that the US is illegally spying on us and illegally spying on their own people. It doesn't get anymore totalitarian than the US. Everybody has understood that by now.
I see you [xxxLCxxx] are already attracting the censorious trolls, so I'm quoting the part that is most likely to offend them in order to make it more visible. I wish I had a positive mod point to give you, though I never have one to give. (Some triggering combination of my excellent karma and critical and analytic attitude?) However, I don't think your comment justifies the "Insightful" that it is currently showing. (I also think the display of the Score for each comment should be logarithmic...)
On this st
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you're approaching a different aspect of the problem. Underlying your aspect of the problem is the focus on maximizing profit ahead of all other considerations. If all of the downstream profit ignores other factors such as choice and competition, then manufacturing will almost automatically become over-concentrated. That's where the Chinese government intervention has been dangerously effective, but I think it's breaking down now simply because it wasn't sustainable. Actually, making lots of noise a
Re: (Score:2)
This summary is pretty good.
I've pulled apart a number of Huawei firmware images (Switches, routers, WACs, etc) and their biggest problem isn't spyware, but that the coding is just so appallingly BAD - reminiscent of "paid by the yard" contract indian programmers of a few decades ago.
This is a particular issue with patches, which are frequently atrociously written, badly documented and half the time introduce more new bugs than they fix.
As for their APIs or the SNMP MIB abuse.... *sigh* (but they took lesso
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting comment. I'll focus on two primary responses.
1. Nothing morally wrong with reinventing the wheel. I don't even buy the wasteful argument, because I think the learning is usually worth it. However, it's still a good idea to collect the feedback, and I have to agree with you that little from outside seems to penetrate their bubble. However, I think that may be largely a linguistic issue. I prefer to talk with English speakers and have much higher bandwidth when doing so, and I'm sure it's the same
Re:Totalitarian government OS? (Score:4)
You should stop with the unnecessary exaggeration. Your post was fine up until this point. The US surveillance state is bad enough, you don't need to call it totalitarian (let alone the most totalitarian) when it's not. There are enough obvious counter-examples of that (e.g. North Korea) that it just makes you look alarmist despite the completely valid point that US spying is a bad thing. Just stick to the facts and let them speak for themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
More or less the same could be said about Google, though...
Re: (Score:2)
Ooh...sick burn...
It's even worse when you realize China has to be this way, to keep its power. Google is being the same way entirely of their own free will.
Re: Totalitarian government OS? (Score:2)
As Trump has shown us. Anything you do to stay in power is by definition good for the country, as long as you simply believe you are a good leader. Xi is just following democratic best practice.
Google on the other hand is just evil for the money. Totally different situation.
Re: (Score:1)
At the end of the day, Huawei operates in a totalitarian country. No one, and I mean NO ONE with a brain in their head is going to trust their OS. While I applaud their efforts to bring a third player to the mobile operating system market, as long as China is governed non-democratically this is probably a fool's errand.
Yes, yes, yes, China is an authoritarian regime, this is not news. However, since when is the US a democracy? ... the US is a plutocracy which basically boils down to the same thing as an autocracy. The US Congress is filled to the rafters with toerags that do the bidding of a small community of ultra wealthy donors in exchange for some morsels from the latter's table. Why should we distrust the Chinese but merrily hand over all our data to American corporations without giving it a second thought? The answe
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, yes, yes, China is an authoritarian regime, this is not news. However, since when is the US a democracy? ... the US is a plutocracy which basically boils down to the same thing as an autocracy. The US Congress is filled to the rafters with toerags that do the bidding of a small community of ultra wealthy donors in exchange for some morsels from the latter's table. Why should we distrust the Chinese but merrily hand over all our data to American corporations without giving it a second thought? The answer is that we shouldn't. Personally, I distrust US and Chinese corporations equally.
I wish I had a positive mod point for you [Freischutz], though I largely disagree on your terminology. I'll go ahead and quote you as a hedge against censorious trolls. (You've already attracted one.) I think America has become a kleptrocracy transitioning to a hereditary idiocracy. If #PresidentTweety survives this year, the future "history" of "America" may be reduced to this: King Donald I until 2024, followed by Queen Ivanka to 2032, then King Donald II to 2040, followed by Ding Eric [sic] up to 2048, s
Re: (Score:2)
The question the headline forgot to ask is:
If they abandon Android for a proprietary OS, would you trust the proprietary OS more or less than Android?
I suspect it'll be "less", so why bother?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a regular critic of the Chinese regime, but it's probably an exaggeration to call it a totalitarian regime. In some ways what it is is actually worse, because it works a hell of a lot better. It's more like what a totalitarian regime would be if it were designed by somebody really smart. Less energy is spent on regulating people's private lives and more on getting them to regulate themselves.
The Cultural Revolution was Authoritarianism Release 1. It was a POS. What we're looking at is more like Rele
Re: (Score:2)
Mao's time was totalitarian. They wanted you to be political all of the time, every day. Today, no. Nobody cares what you do, as long as you don't organize people to overthrow the government.
Strangely enough today's Maoists (SJWs) are the same way. All politics, all the time, no breaks. The journal Cultural Anthropology recently spoke out:
Academics who are not politically engaged through their work are tacitly endorsing the status quo.
- Cultural Anthropology (@culanth) May 3, 2018
They also said:
Re: Totalitarian government OS? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
It's the "all politics all the time, you must never have a rest" that distinguishes totalitarianism from authoritarianism. China isn't totalitarian, it's authoritarian. The journal Cultural Anthropology is trying to be totalitarian, but has nowhere the power needed. BUT those statements are definitely building it. If you're not political, and in the right way, i.e. SJW, they won't publish you.
This would be fine if they were a political magazine. But they're not. They're a legitimate science journal
Re:Totalitarian government OS? (Score:5, Interesting)
At the end of the day, Huawei operates in a totalitarian country. No one, and I mean NO ONE with a brain in their head is going to trust their OS. While I applaud their efforts to bring a third player to the mobile operating system market, as long as China is governed non-democratically this is probably a fool's errand.
Well you can hide a backdoor in your hardware/software while complying 100% with Google's API so it's more whether you should trust Huawei phones at all, not whether their phones run Android or some other OS. There's already alternatives to GMS because not everybody's happy with Google's position, all Huawei would have to do is enlist as many as possible and try to create a new smartphone standard that's not dependent on licensing anything from the US.
Maybe a desktop analogy is easier, let's say the state department blocked Microsoft from selling Windows licenses to China. They could create a proprietary ChinaOS, that'd probably work for China but not so much anywhere else. But they could also say fuck you, we're going to push Linux on the desktop and make that popular and it's not like the rest of the world would refuse their help. That way even if they don't gain control, they could make the US lose control.
Re: (Score:2)
> whether you should trust Huawei phones at all
Compared to what?
I have an LG/Google Fi phone, I've used Huawei phones. I don't 'trust' any of them for things that I don't want to share.
They all make phone calls. They all browse the web. They all run google maps. They all play games.
But I don't trust any of them with my bank password, or not to share my location or any related thing. Just behave as if they are untrustworthy and you will be fine. They are still useful devices.
Re: Totalitarian government OS? (Score:2)
They all make phone calls. They all browse the web.
Yes.
They all run google maps. They all play games.
Huawei phones won't run Google maps. They won't play games dependent on Google play services.
Re: (Score:2)
They all make phone calls. They all browse the web.
Yes.
They all run google maps. They all play games.
Huawei phones won't run Google maps. They won't play games dependent on Google play services.
New ones won't. The Huawei tablet we got just before Google cut them off (in Singapore on a trip) seems to keep running it fine.
Re: (Score:2)
"But they could also say fuck you, we're going to push Linux on the desktop and make that popular and it's not like the rest of the world would refuse their help. "
Unfortunately from what I've seen, most chinese programmers WOULD refuse the rest of the world's help on collaborative development.
They're very happy to cherrypick Linux, but everything running on top of it suffers badly from "not invented here" syndrome
And then there's the wholesale abuse of GPL, where chinese treat it as "public domain" and hav
Re: (Score:2)
By the same logic no one should trust an American OS. It's a country where mass surveillance is pervasive and apparently legal, and not just for the government. Every corporation wants in on it too, with everyone from cell service providers to handset manufactuers to app makers tracking citizens' every move.
Fortunately we don't have to use this faulty logic, we can simply use our brains to examine each OS and see what it is doing and how much we should trust it.
Re: (Score:2)
Does it mean that we cannot use the OSs from the US companies? Certainly, not.
Because it is clear to any sensible person that it takes time and a lot of effort to solve such problems. They cannot be solved by a decree or by a proclamation.
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely right, but an axe seems to shorten most arguments.
Re: Totalitarian government OS? (Score:2)
latent racism
In CNN's defense, it's currently fashionable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Cough, gag...
Keeping my mouth shut on this one.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Huawei has shown in the past that they're willing to open-source SOME OF their stuff if that's what it takes to be trusted.
There, FTFY
Glaring case in point: Xmeye-based DVR code running on HiSilicon (Huawei) SOCs - and the Huawei-sourced monolithic binary sitting on top of the linux OS in the things - which is full of enough debugging symbols to see it's actually effectively some kind of secondary VM stuffed full of stolen GPL (amongst other things)
That's ON TOP of the fact that there's no source release fo
Re: (Score:1)
What's that rule? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
The problem with Android is that it is only a quality platform as long as you have access to all the Google stuff. If you need to build up the infrastructure yourself then the OS isn't really of much consequence. Tracking AOSP will also leave you too far behind Google to really have any chance of competing with flagship devices.
Mobile is an all or nothing game right now. You either own the ship that you steer, or you ride along as a passenger.
You seriously underestimate the effort and cost involved in developing your own OS from scratch based on bare-bones Linux rather than just forking Android.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Sure, I mean I am a contributor to Bionic. But maybe I forgot how this all works.
Re: (Score:2)
You seriously underestimate the effort and cost involved in developing your own OS from scratch
This has been done so many times, it's demonstrably something that can be done. It's been done so many times that we can even collect statistics about how long it takes on average.
The difficulty isn't building an OS or GUI system, the difficulty is getting anyone to use it.
Re: (Score:2)
You seriously underestimate the effort and cost involved in developing your own OS from scratch
This has been done so many times, it's demonstrably something that can be done. It's been done so many times that we can even collect statistics about how long it takes on average. The difficulty isn't building an OS or GUI system, the difficulty is getting anyone to use it.
I'm not doubting it can be done. I'm doubting the costs will be trivial. As for getting anybody to use it, when you own the low end smartphone market people will use what you install and if they're used to Android then forking Android and install your own apps and services will be the better move anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Also by forking Android they make porting apps really easy. In fact it's so easy that you can run ASOP with gapps, an open source implementation of Google's non-free APIs that lets you run pretty much any Android app without any closed source code (except for drivers of course).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I hope you're right. Because right now I think mobile OS industry is tough to crack into without going all in. Incremental steps will let Google leave you behind or lock out your product, and potentially confuse users. Making a mobile platform and ecosystem from the ground up is hugely expensive and a big risk. Maemo, Tizen, Firefox OS, Mee Go, WebOS and many more. Some of these have some real technical merit, none of them are OSes that I'd consider to be on the rise. Maybe some good services and applicatio
So you're saying kinda yes (Score:2)
the answer is always 'No'?
We agree the best path is to fork Android and de-googlify it.
By doing so they could no longer use the Android brand/name or software distribution network - so it does count as abandoning Android.
This is kinda the same as how all the other Linux vendors abandoned the slackware or whatever thing they were using before Red Hat made .rpm and Debian made .deb.
Android is NOT open source! (Score:2)
AOSP is. Android contains the Google apps.
And, Android is shit.
You may not realize, because iOS is even worse, bit there are SO MANY things that could be made SO MUCH better.
Give me half a day of briefing with an OS dev team, and I'll gladly sign a guarantee that you got an Android killer there or I'll literally eat my hat, shorts shoes, and all the other clothes.
Re: (Score:1)
Maybe the buyers don't need and aren't threatening (Score:5, Insightful)
I look forward to Huawei investing all the resources of a the former Blackberry and Microsoft operations while having none of the early-mover advantage of the former Blackberry and (to a lesser extent) Microsoft operations, while suffering the same fate as the former Blackberry and Microsoft operations.
I see no evidence of viable market for a third consumer-facing OS, in personal computers, tablets, or smartphones, and no appetite from app developers for supporting one.
Have fun.
Re: (Score:1)
I look forward to Huawei investing all the resources of a the former Blackberry and Microsoft operations while having none of the early-mover advantage of the former Blackberry and (to a lesser extent) Microsoft operations, while suffering the same fate as the former Blackberry and Microsoft operations.
I see no evidence of viable market for a third consumer-facing OS, in personal computers, tablets, or smartphones, and no appetite from app developers for supporting one.
Have fun.
Huawei, Xiaomi and friends have the ability to underbid much of the remainder of the Android using smartphone manufacturing world. The only ones not affected are Apple and makers of high end Android smartphones in the same way BMW, Bentley and Mercedes Benz are relatively unaffected by stirrings in the bargain basement family car market because they don't compete there. If these Chinese manufacturers kill off or buy out most of the ROW's low and medium end Android device makers the standard low end OS in th
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bring back Palm OS (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Support alternative firmware (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
No Google maps no sale (Score:2)
With Google maps and money saved I just about buy a non iPhone, without Google maps I'll just spend the few extra bucks.
Especially now Apple is cornering the payment market it's increasingly uninteresting not to just choose them. Regulators really shouldn't be allowing them to do it, but that's irrelevant to my choice.
Re: (Score:3)
I suppose it depends on exactly what you get from Google Maps.
Keeping street files up to date is a gigantic undertaking, especially for places like Florida where developers keep spreading out the sprawling street network. But there must still be vendors out there selling reasonably up-to-date GIS data. Google doesn't sell data, it sells mapping services, an arrangement that suits many quick-and-dirty apps but doesn't meet the needs of every developer.
The thing about Maps is that it adds a lot of value (an
Google Maps is shit! Try OSMand. (Score:2)
You will never look back. The offline maps are worth it alone.
But you can (but don't have to!) add layers upon layer of information and online maps and whatnot, 'til your screen explodes.
In my city, literally ever trash can is marked out.
It feels like climbing from an airplane passenger seat to a airplane cockpit, in an empowering way.
But if you just leave things as is, it is still dead-easy.
(Mapillary provides street view, but is relatively new. Street view is more a gimmick to me anyway.)
I can't go back t
Why? (Score:2)
Why would they abandon an OS they get for free? I am talking about AOSP here.
They can just add their own store to their custom AOSP build and developers will be able to offer their apps in the Huawei store if they want to.
Re: Why? (Score:2)
Why would you abandon that ass-rape you get for free? /s
Thers's more to the world than money, dear Ferrengi-American. ;)
And AFAIK, AOSP is free; Android is not.
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly is in Android (and not AOSP) that Huawei can't replace? They can write their own store and make it trivial for app developers to upload to their store. They can use one of the alternative replacements that exist for the proprietary Google Play Services blob. What else would they need?
Re: (Score:2)
And if you're an app developer, why wouldn't you upload you android app to a China specific app store, given that that's a pretty big market.
They are already doing that... (Score:2)
"Maybe it's time for Huawei to go all-in on Harmony OS and do what it can to bring a viable alternative to Android and iOS..."
Huawei is already doing that. Problem is, HarmonyOS is nowhere near ready to be a SmartPhone OS. Since the chinese in general (and Huawei in particular) are very good at playing the long game, they are onboarding the ecosystem (carriers, developers, cloud service providers and users) to their AOSP port before taking the leap to their own OS.
And I would not be surprised if they try to time the change to Google jumping from Android to Fuschia
Huawei seems to be more than ready (Score:1)
At the current stage they wouldn't even benefit from a third-party OS like Sailfish (which they had experience already using a Sailfish fork called AuroraOS on laptops for a Russian census) : https://www.techrepublic.com/a... [techrepublic.com]
Huawei says Harmony/Hongmeng is ready for smartphones but still want to use Android
https://www.huaweicentral.com/... [huaweicentral.com]
HarmonyOS/Hongmeng OS: Here’s everything you need to know about this new Operating System
https://www.huaweicentral.com/... [huaweicentral.com]
Harmony OS: Here’s the roadmap for de
Yes, it absolutely should. (Score:2)
We desperately need a new OS that is independent from Google but a first class OS. And I don't mean just AOSP-based. They could innovate too, improving the world a bit.
It depends on if you see it as a chance.
And of course, until the whole retarded USA VS China dick slapping contest is over, OMGREALMURICA* will avoid Huawei, no matter what. (Is any hardware banned in China by the way? I bet they could ban ALL foreign manufacturers, and barely anyone would even notice. ;)
_ _ _ _
* Don't get me wrong. I don't t
Re: (Score:2)
"We desperately need a new OS that is independent from Google but a first class OS."
The problem is as always driver support. Manufacturers don't want to support drivers for Android as it is. Getting them to support even more niche operating systems is probably impossible. There's no room for third place.
Re: (Score:3)
"We desperately need a new OS that is independent from Google but a first class OS."
The problem is as always driver support. Manufacturers don't want to support drivers for Android as it is. Getting them to support even more niche operating systems is probably impossible. There's no room for third place.
Just like apple, huawei makes their own processors, and have the scale, so it is a non-issue for them.
Different submission of the some topic (Score:2)
This is NOT intended as a disagreement with the submission, but just an in-comments copy of my different starting point on the topic. I submitted it a while back, and I don't see any elements of it in the official version. However my thoughts have already evolved, though I will be looking at the discussion (already over 50 comments) with these old aspects in mind, along with the new thoughts.
Kind of a complicated topic, but several aspects seem worthy of discussion. Does Slashdot still do those? But let me throw in a few points for consideration:
(1) Standards are good, but international standards depend on international cooperation. If the world is devolving into every country for itself, then the collateral damage is obvious.
(2) If Huawei wants to survive in a stable way, then it can't rely on American companies anymore. Best case is to profit from the sales opportunities in America, but it has to be downstream in sales, not upstream on the suppliers' side.
(3) Huawei actually has more leverage to protect its hardware from government intrusions than most American companies. Basically Huawei can honestly say to the Chinese government "If we put any kind of spying stuff into our hardware, then it is eventually going to be discovered, and that discovery would kill us in the international markets." (That could break down if they really believe they are so far ahead of other countries that their hardware can never be reverse engineered, but I think that would be a crazy belief.)
(4) Maybe international support is just too messy and unprofitable now?
(5) Then there's the wild card factor. This week's wild card is the Wukovi. (That's supposed to be a joke name for the new epidemic: WUhan COronoVIrus. It definitely needs a catchier name if it's going to catch on, eh?)
I loved Huawei phones (Score:2)