In America, Only Three States Use Google-Apple Contact Tracing App (nbcnews.com) 42
NBC News reports that in various parts of America, "States that had committed to using contact tracing apps or expressed interest are now backing away from those claims."
The few states that have rolled them out have seen only tepid responses. And there are no indications of any momentum for the apps at a national level... A survey of state health officials from Business Insider this week showed that only three states — Alabama, North Dakota and South Carolina — said they were going to use the software provided by Apple and Google. The number hasn't grown since the same three states reported interest last month, and none has launched an app with the Google-Apple software...
Even the World Health Organization has piled on. "Digital tools do not replace the human capacity needed to do contact tracing," WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a briefing this week, adding that more evidence was needed and that the WHO would convene experts to share information...
A handful of states — North Dakota, South Dakota and Utah — launched apps without the support of Apple and Google, but none saw widespread adoption. More states, including Washington, have considered doing so or have launched test versions, and it's possible that apps will gain momentum closer to the fall, when they might be taken up by more employers, schools and universities and at related football games.
Two months ago Google and Apple announced a joint project to build a contact-tracing app -- which was supported by the governor of America's most populous state, California. But now a spokesperson for California's public health department tells NBC News that the state isn't currently using any apps or cellphone tracking technology.
"Most of the contact tracing work (notifying people who have been in close contact with an infected person to prevent the disease from spreading to others) can be done by phone, text, email and chat."
Even the World Health Organization has piled on. "Digital tools do not replace the human capacity needed to do contact tracing," WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a briefing this week, adding that more evidence was needed and that the WHO would convene experts to share information...
A handful of states — North Dakota, South Dakota and Utah — launched apps without the support of Apple and Google, but none saw widespread adoption. More states, including Washington, have considered doing so or have launched test versions, and it's possible that apps will gain momentum closer to the fall, when they might be taken up by more employers, schools and universities and at related football games.
Two months ago Google and Apple announced a joint project to build a contact-tracing app -- which was supported by the governor of America's most populous state, California. But now a spokesperson for California's public health department tells NBC News that the state isn't currently using any apps or cellphone tracking technology.
"Most of the contact tracing work (notifying people who have been in close contact with an infected person to prevent the disease from spreading to others) can be done by phone, text, email and chat."
It doesn't work (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It doesn't work (Score:4, Insightful)
People are finally clueing in that it doesn't work.
And your opinion is based on all those states that gave it a go and showed it didn't work?
Re:It doesn't work (Score:4, Interesting)
Well, Iceland - a small country with a small population and the world's highest usage of contract tracing apps - says they have been almost useless [technologyreview.com], especially when compared to interviews.
This really isn't surprising - these apps are voluntary, which means a lot of non-participants. Since the data modelers estimate that 80% of the populace [forbes.com] would need to be running these apps to be effective, Iceland's 38% shows that it is very unlikely for any of this data to ever be useful. Singapore mandated use of the app, and still has only managed 30% or so (reports vary).
There's also the problem that in the US, only 80% of people even own a smartphone - and many of those are too old to run the apps. When you look at the high-risk groups like the poor or the elderly, the rate drops significantly: Smartphone ownership among the poor is less than 70%, and the elderly barely break 50%.
Finally, these apps fail to take into account any factors [brookings.edu] other than "crow flies" distance. Factors like masks - or even airproof walls - are not taken into consideration. This leads to all sorts of false positives, that need to be manually weeded out by humans, wasting time and money... not to mention the massive privacy concerns.
All in all, these "contact tracing apps" have not shown any significant benefit, and are known to have significant problems.
Normally you'd do a large gov't push (Score:1)
I mean, I haven't had Cable TV in over a decade but I still know what Dancing with the Stars is. That's market penetration. Only reason I know these apps exist is because I read
One more thing before I forget (Score:1)
What happened?
Re: (Score:1)
Without your consent.
Go to Settings > Google Settings and see if it says "COVID-19 Exposure Notifications" at the top.
To turn it off, hit the 3-dot menu button, then "Usage & diagnostics" and turn it off.
Apparently the app you download is only used to give you information about it. They collect the data regardless.
If that's wrong, someone by all means correct me. But don't just tell me what Google says. They
Re: (Score:2)
BS. First, also Apple devices have this. Second, you need an app on top of this (like you stated). But if you don't get the app, what data are they collecting? Your location data? They already have that, there is no need for extra software. And since it was developed together with Apple (which has shown to be a lot more concerned with privacy) I feel like I can trust this.
The app is needed for sharing your random anonymous ID with other phones that use the software, not with Google/Apple.
Re: (Score:2)
2) No, you do not need an app on top of this. I addressed that already. The app is to give YOU information. Not to collect it.
3) No, they don't already have my location data. At least, I haven't given them my consent to have it, it's not in their TOS that they can collect it without my consent, and I have all location settings turned off.
4) You can feel like you can trust anything you like. If you want to ignore Google's history in regard to thing
Re: (Score:2)
2) You DO need a app. You can address anything you want, but do you even know how it works?
3) How about cell tower information. Might not go to Google, but...
4) So you feel different, big deal. I don't ignore Google's history, but sometimes things are more important (for the greater good).
I suggest you inform yourself better on how this works, and stop shouting in the mean time.
Re: (Score:2)
2) Repeat for the third time: YOU need an app. THEY don't. I get that this was awkwardly worded, but read the whole thing.
3) That's right, it doesn't go to Google. But Google was the whole point of what I wrote. So: another straw man. Further, courts have increasingly been ruling that even police need a warrant for that.
4) Apparently you are ignoring Google's history, because you wrote "I feel like I can trust this."
I know quite well how it works, as I have already establis
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Iceland - a small country with a small population and the world's highest usage of contract tracing apps - says they have been almost useless [technologyreview.com], especially when compared to interviews.
I guess either there is only one app in the world, all apps are the same, or you know some hidden secret information that the Google/Apple app was secretly distributed by the Iceland government under another name.
We can by extension say Linux servers suck because Windows servers suck and therefore the entire concept of a server is useless by your logic right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It doesn't work... and here's why (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Covid spreads a minimum of 1 to 3. IOW, for 1 person infected, 3 more will get this. However, if we have contract tracing the second that somebody shows positive (via symptoms/testing), the ability to notify everybody that has had contact via direct/indirect allows the chain to be either broken OR slowed way down.
Shy of keeping ppl at home, contact tracing is the best form of stopping/slowing this.
Bruce Schneier also says It doesn't work (Score:2)
And here is a Brookings Institution essay that says pretty much the same thing [brookings.edu].
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re-read Schneier's comments. He identifies techniques that *are* effective (testing & tracing), but notes that the apps aren't one of those techniques, and spells out exactly *why* proximity apps aren't effective. His reasoning is sound.
Thank God (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
And yeah, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THESE APPS ARE DOING. They are not open source,... Apple and Google are just tracking MAC addresses and not transmitting until...".
It's amazing how much wrongness you can fit into such a small space. If you are going to make things up, why even post?
You'd be do better going to Wikipedia to learn things.
Re: (Score:3)
I know quite a few people whose only response to Washington's talk about a contact tracing app is "I'm not gonna let the government track me". They don't want to think about the need for it, or how the apps work - it's just "dad-blamed guv'mint ain't gonna keep track of me".
I'm sure when the state ends up hiring a small army of humans to do the same thing - which is how historically this has been managed for diseases - they'll be complaining about the cost to the taxpayer.
Re: (Score:2)
I know quite a few people whose only response to Washington's talk about a contact tracing app is "I'm not gonna let the government track me". They don't want to think about the need for it, or how the apps work - it's just "dad-blamed guv'mint ain't gonna keep track of me".
Given how forthcoming our government is about spying on us, I don't blame them.
Apple and Google should each release an App (Score:3, Interesting)
Instead of just building an API, each company should release an App for their respective platform.
I'd trust one of their apps over a random state developed App.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. For as much invasion of privacy that Apple and Google already commit, I'd still trust them to build a halfway decent national or even global scale app far more than any of the "developers" from the state or federal government.
Re: (Score:2)
I totally agree. In fact, I have been looking for a google app (who already has shit loads of info on us) tracing app. If they put it out, I will down load it.
Re: (Score:3)
Google already has a tracking/tracing app. It's called maps. If you don't turn off collection of your activity it will keep track of places you visit whether or not you used navigation to get there.
If you notice, though, it's garbage. It's forever insisting that I visited places to which I've never been, because I parked or even just stopped near them. Sometimes it tells me that I visited some place down the street from where I actually went, not even next door but several addresses down. If I were particul
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Apple and Google should each release an App (Score:4, Informative)
I don't trust either of them that far. More importantly, I don't trust the government not to swoop in and grab all the data, and prohibit them from telling us. I don't trust either of them to anonymize the data, either, before someone chimes in with that argument. Anonymization turns out to be really hard, and not in either of their interests, especially Google's.
Remember how the USPS told us that they just throw away the data after they scan mail for routing automation? And then it turned out that the data was being handed over to the feds? Just like that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anonymization turns out to be really hard, and not in either of their interests, especially Google's.
Anonymization isn't necessary when the data is just a collection of random numbers to begin with. Literally random numbers, from a random number generator, and not linked or associated with anything.
As for Google... even if it weren't just random numbers, what do you think Google would get from this that Google can't already get?
Re: (Score:2)
Anonymization isn't necessary when the data is just a collection of random numbers to begin with.
Hey guys, we found the idiot that still believes in security through obscurity.
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
Re: (Score:2)
"Trust no one."
HOW TRACK AND TRACE WORKS ONCE LOCKDOWN ENDS (Score:5, Funny)
HOW TRACK AND TRACE WORKS ONCE LOCKDOWN ENDS — IN FULL as seen on Facebook
We don't need MORE SURVEILLANCE (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What we need is to get people to STOP BEING SELFISH
(fixed that for you)
People need to stop acting like wearing a mask while out in public is a horrible affront to their human rights, start washing their damn filthy hands, and perhaps demonstrate a little empathy for the uninsured and high-risk members of society. The most callous thing I've seen frequently repeated is that those who are "afraid" of getting the virus should just stay at home, as if there were actually some safety net in place to keep your bills paid and food in your fridge while you try to
Re: (Score:2)
More BS! (Score:1)
Re: More BS! (Score:2)
Except that social distancing definitely does reduce the spread of covid19. The TSA, on the other hand, do fuck-all, except make me start using Amtrak and finding out how much more pleasant rail travel is than using an airport.
Anecdotes aside, we should also note that the social distancing measures are temporary, whereas there in no end in sight for the invasive TSA.