Chernobyl Is Being Run By 'Exhausted' Staff Held Hostage for 10 Days (ksby.com) 164
When Russia's invasion of Ukraine first began, Russian forces seized control of the Chernobyl nuclear plant — and then took its staff hostage.
A week later the Associated Press filed this update: The United Nations' atomic watchdog says Ukraine has informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that staff who have been kept at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant since Russian troops took control of the site a week ago are facing "psychological pressure and moral exhaustion." IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said Thursday that the staff must be allowed to rest and rotate so their crucial work can be carried out safely and securely.
Grossi received "a joint appeal from the Ukraine Government, regulatory authority and the national operator which added that personnel at the Chornobyl site 'have limited opportunities to communicate, move and carry out full-fledged maintenance and repair work,'" the IAEA said in a statement...
Ukraine has lost regulatory control over all the facilities in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone to the Russians and asked the IAEA to undertake measures "in order to reestablish legal regulation of safety of nuclear facilities and installations" within the site, the statement added.
Their article quotes the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency as saying that "Any accident caused as a result of the military conflict could have extremely serious consequences for people and the environment, in Ukraine and beyond."
This morning CNN shared this update: The growing exhaustion of staffers confined for "10 days" at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant is not only "difficult," but could pose "a danger to the world," Yuriy Fomichev, the mayor of Slavutych, told CNN in a telephone interview on Saturday. "People are tired; they are exhausted, both mentally and emotionally, but mainly physically," Fomichev said, adding that more than 100 people in the plant are shift personnel who should have been handed over after 12 hours. "A nuclear facility run by the same shift of 100 people without a break for 10 days in a row means their concentration levels are too low ... the main thing we want to convey is that it is very dangerous," Fomichev said.
Staffers in the plant only eat one meal per day and have limited amount of time to contact their families, Fomichev said.
A week later the Associated Press filed this update: The United Nations' atomic watchdog says Ukraine has informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that staff who have been kept at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant since Russian troops took control of the site a week ago are facing "psychological pressure and moral exhaustion." IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said Thursday that the staff must be allowed to rest and rotate so their crucial work can be carried out safely and securely.
Grossi received "a joint appeal from the Ukraine Government, regulatory authority and the national operator which added that personnel at the Chornobyl site 'have limited opportunities to communicate, move and carry out full-fledged maintenance and repair work,'" the IAEA said in a statement...
Ukraine has lost regulatory control over all the facilities in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone to the Russians and asked the IAEA to undertake measures "in order to reestablish legal regulation of safety of nuclear facilities and installations" within the site, the statement added.
Their article quotes the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency as saying that "Any accident caused as a result of the military conflict could have extremely serious consequences for people and the environment, in Ukraine and beyond."
This morning CNN shared this update: The growing exhaustion of staffers confined for "10 days" at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant is not only "difficult," but could pose "a danger to the world," Yuriy Fomichev, the mayor of Slavutych, told CNN in a telephone interview on Saturday. "People are tired; they are exhausted, both mentally and emotionally, but mainly physically," Fomichev said, adding that more than 100 people in the plant are shift personnel who should have been handed over after 12 hours. "A nuclear facility run by the same shift of 100 people without a break for 10 days in a row means their concentration levels are too low ... the main thing we want to convey is that it is very dangerous," Fomichev said.
Staffers in the plant only eat one meal per day and have limited amount of time to contact their families, Fomichev said.
Putin is czar, you are serf (Score:2)
No complaining [pbs.org].
"I started saying that I’m not happy with all finances going for this palace. And I was told that Putin is the czar and you are his serf."
Re: (Score:2)
"What could possibly go wrong?" That's the joke I was looking for. But kind of an interesting FP.
Hopefully the answer to my rhetorical joke is not much, since Chernobyl is hopefully not doing much these days. Is the staff doing anything much besides monitoring the mess?
However the situation in Zaporizhzhia is much more serious. Obvious Putin ordered them to capture that nuclear plant so they can shut it down and make the Ukrainians freeze in the dark. But shutting down an active nuclear plant is a tricky op
Re: (Score:2)
No, they are a logical explanations of the events there - and the "darker one" matches the Russian narrative. An alternative explanation would be stupidity on behalf of the attacking forces.
Re: (Score:2)
Putin himself - or his serfs - cites Dubya's invasion of Iraq as "prior art". He's not wrong there, although there is no comparison between Saddam Hussein's Iraq and the democratic-if-corrupt Ukraine.
Re: (Score:2)
Except that at least Bush went to the United Nations Security Council and received a unanimous vote [wikipedia.org] to tell Iraq to open sites to inspectors to prove they didn't have WMD, and they didn't.
Yes, the whole "WMD" thing was bullshit, and the US went to war on that bullshit. However, they at least went through the UN, which is what nations are supposed to do. Russia just decided to invade, because their leader is a warmonger imperialist cunt.
Re: (Score:2)
I would suggest using form of Tsar, personally I call him Tsar Novichok.
Cz is commonly used to designate, for example, Czech Republic, so is bound to the expression of different sound.
There may be local or other heritage to your usage, I'm not aware of.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I just quoted it directly from the article. I'm used to weird spellings when cyrillic can't be used.
After what he did in St Petersburg and Moscow, he should be called Tsar Impaler. It wasn't good.
Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:3)
Re: Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If it is any indication the official French nuclear doctrine is "you attack our nuclear plants, we nuke you".
War isn't a problem for nuclear (Score:2)
The problem for nuclear isn't War it's corrupt businessmen who are skilled to convincing people that they're magical geniuses. Sooner or later people are going to privatize
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
None of the reactors at Chernobyl are operating, according to what I have read. The work work the staff there is engaged in is the important work of decommissioning the reactors. Putin captured it not because Chernobyl is on the main route to Kyiv from Belarus. The fact that his soldiers seem completely ignorant of what's going on there, and also of the effect the radioactive dust will have on their own lives is rather frightening.
Re: (Score:2)
Oops left the word not in there by accident.
Putin captured Chernobyl solely because it is on the main highway leading to Kyiv from Belarus. He plans to move a lot of military equipment and soliders through this cooridor.
Re: (Score:2)
That's definitely a side benefit. Almost every power plant has a rail head for fuel and equipment shipments.
Re:Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:4, Insightful)
And what if it doesn't so choose. Putin is fucking scary right now, scary because he doesn't seem to be in his right mind. He just said that the economic sanctions are akin to a declaration of war by the west. Putin just basically said we are at war with him even when we held back from stepping in in Ukraine.
So, Putin just said we declared war. This is not a man I want in charge of nuclear weapons or nuclear power stations in war zones.
Do I need to remind anyone that this man can incinerate Europe and North America if he so chooses?
Re: (Score:2)
The scary thing is his staff seem to believe Russia can win a nuclear war. There have been in the Russian press expressions like "In case of nuclear war Russians would be more divided but Europe would be incinerated" and "We are not interested in a world without Russia" Meaning without a Russia with the influence of the Soviet Union.
They live in a mental bubble of their own making.
In case of accident in the Zaporizhzhia plant the westerly winds would bring fallout towards Russia.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I work in central London so if there is a nuclear war at least I'll die instantly rather than a slow painful death from radiation poisoning or the starvation that will follow when the whole system falls apart. The idea that anyone can win a nuclear war is completely bat-shit insane. I'm still hoping that Putin gets assassinated, he is said to surround himself with sycophants, but sycophants aren't religiously loyal, they're in it for their own gain.
I'm kind of surprised that defcon level isn't 2 right
Re: Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, certainly not sure, I had misunderstood, thinking the number was public, Google search pretends to know what defcon is as does one or two sites out there.
Re: (Score:2)
European Command is at Defcon 2. Overall status is Defcon 3.
Source: https://www.defconlevel.com/ [defconlevel.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Problem is, leader of Russia, who is living the good live, and has said that "he is not interested in a world without Russia", has the trigger to the nuclear weapons that Russia has, may decide to "end it all" if he is backed into a corner where he doesnt have / forsee having good live anymore.
I can't have it, neither can you. Am old anyway, dieing soon, so the world can die with me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The whole “Russia under threat” thing is a fig leaf. And if he’s in cognit
Re: Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:2)
So like 10,000 of his hypersonic missiles would be considered enough to go nuclear or will tightening the sanctions be fine ??
Da, asking for a friend.
Re: (Score:2)
Like it or not, sanctions like these, in 2022, are a declaration of war - in the same way that US economic actions and embargos against Japan were acts of war before Pearl Harbour.
It's ludicrous to cling to some anachronistic ideal that just because nobody has fired a shell it means there isn't a war on.
Re: (Score:3)
Nope still not war, war is when you take your military into a country and kill people, destroy buildings etc, not the same thing basically.
Sanctions are when you say, hey, you're naughty, we're not buying your stuff any more, we're cutting you off until you behave, sort it out.
See, different things.
Re: (Score:2)
Thinking like that, extended only slightly, let the US government pretend they haven't declared war since 1942.
It's dishonest pedantry,.
Re: (Score:3)
Or you could look up the US's military incursions and conclude that they did actually go to war a lot of times.
Like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
When we imposed sanctions on South Africa, no-one called it a declaration of war because it isn't war, nice try twisting words about but sanctions are not war, they are sanctions and countries are perfectly free to decide who they trade with, that's not war, it's trade.
If I don't buy something from you, that's not the same as if I punch you in the face, these
Re: Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:2)
War is whatever triggers the crazy guy. Not what we debate and deduce here !
The sole reason for war is failure of logic in convincing one of the parties. Both sides usually have equally impeccable reasons.
As a random example, its between 2 countries why is the whole world jumping in ? How would US look at someone who might have started fighting because of Iraq?
Or, his demands are basically just - dont induct Ukraine into NATO. So why refuse unless you have some ulterior plan ? Not that different from Cuba.
I
Re: (Score:2)
Except that had already been agreed to and a treaty signed, Ukraine was not joining NATO but Putin invaded anyway.
And AFAIK Ukraine was it's own country before it was swallowed up by the USSR. And 'during its history, there were 15 Soviet Socialist Republi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So choosing as a nation to not to financially interact with a bad actor, which funnels money into that bad actor's war machine, is an act of war now?
Are you fucking stupid?
Re: Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:2)
If you think sanctions are war, you don't know what they are. How do you think you would remediate a sanction via war? Force me and my trading partners to buy your stuff?
If you go into a store and the owner says "I don't sell to guys in leather coats." What exactly are you going to do? If every shop in the mall says the same, are you going to cry foul and say it's ok to rob them?
Sanctions are NOT anywhere close to war. It's people not playing soccer with you because they don't like your dirty game.
Embarg
Re: (Score:2)
This debacle has proven, beyond any doubt, that Russia is not only not a world power, it's barely even a regional power. This would be like the USA invading Mexico and our supply lines breaking down ten miles into Sonora because our truck tires had all turned to dust. Ukraine is a nation of size and population comparable to Iraq, which another superpower rather famously invaded in 200
Re: (Score:2)
Has the invasion been more difficult and taken longer than he expected? Yes, absolutely.
But make no mistake, the words "stunning failure" are too strong. Ukraine will fall. Kherson has been captured, as has Berdyansk and Melitopol. Odessa is next - Children there are filling sandbags.
What exactly the scum in Moscow plan to DO once they've captured the place is unclear even to them, but they will win.
Re: (Score:2)
You assume they aren't taking over nuclear power plants to increase their nuclear arsenal. (I know, kind of a doomsday scenario. The rest of the world needs to take this seriously.)
Re: (Score:2)
Then why was Putin so desperate to re-extend the START treaty after Trump cancelled it? It doesn't appear to me that Russia is interested in an arms race, or at least they weren't a year ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To put it into perspective, the value of $1 more in debt to the US (A treasury bond) is more than all $200B of russian debt combined.
Re: Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:2)
So $2 Trillion would be better you feel ?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Selensky stupidly thought out loud about getting nuclear weapons at the Munich Security Conference a couple weeks ago.
If anything, Russians are capturing nuclear power plants to prevent Ukraine from using the stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Zelensky was (and is) more and more desperate as he's been warned for months that Russia was going to invade and he's looking for solutions for his people... like all good leaders do
Agree on that 100%. And he's by far not the only person who warned that something like this could happen.
Nothing Zelensky did a few weeks ago (except not surrender) played into the decision at all.
Disagree on this. There's always the reason or context why things happen the way they - like the militaristic and antagonistic general climate in Europe before WW1 - and then there's the immediate cause - like the assassination of the Archduke.
There probably would have been a war in Europe anyway. But it could have happened later, it could have not escalated quite so badly, fewer countries could have bee
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think Ukraine could've done anything, actually. Ukraine is the pawn here.
US, NATO, Europe could've played their cards differently. When Russia asked for Ukraine to be a neutral country and guarantees that it won't join NATO - that's something we could've given them, especially since according to multiple western leaders, there anyway weren't thoughts of letting them join NATO.
With the immediate fears of Russian hardliners addressed, there would've been less pressure on Putin to be aggressive (he's n
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, so a bunch of other countries should have dictated to Ukraine who they are and are not allowed to ally themselves with, in order to avoid a shooting war with a nuclear power controlled by a dictator? How is that not appeasement of a dictator? How is that not nuclear ransom?
Neville Chamberlain called and wants his foreign policy back.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Oh, so a bunch of other countries should have dictated to Ukraine who they are and are not allowed to ally themselves with,
NATO is a club that allows others to join - or not. Yes, NATO could have comitted to not letting Ukraine join, that's entirely within their rights and it's not "dictating" anything to Ukraine.
I don't have to let you join my RPG group, you know? Same situation. If you are, say, my ex-wife and my new girlfriend is the jealous kind, I can very well make a promise to her to not let you join. You know, to avoid a shooting war with someone who could go nuclear on me. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Something was bound to happen. But maybe not a full scale invasion.
Putin was planning a full scale invasion. Preparing propaganda to "justify" it [nbcnews.com], including the videos where his ministers couldn't remember which video they were recording, the "recognize independence of Luhansk and Donetsk" or "welcome Luhansk and Donestsk and the rest of Ukraine back into the Russian Federation" video.
They were specifically preparing various "false flag" narratives in order to justify an invasion. And nothing Ukraine d
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot "appeasement" in your list of shitty things that this guy is advocating for. Example. [slashdot.org]
Why would any other nations get to tell Ukraine who to align with? That gets to be decided by Ukraine, and the citizenry of Ukraine. Not Russia, not NATO, not the US, and not anyone else - the entire list can fuck off, except for Ukrainians.
Saying that NATO nations are at fault for Russia invading a neighbor is an argument for appeasement of expansionist dictator cunts. All responsibility for this shit starts
Re: (Score:3)
Ok yeah, that tears it. You're a russian propagandist account
Totally. Spent over 20 years posting thousands of tech comments just as a cover.
Do you guys sometimes notice how deep you went into Cold War and propaganda thinking when anyone who disagrees with you is immediately labeled an enemy? Where did critical thinking and having different opinions go? Heck, we're not even at war (yet, thankfully) but the attitude already isn't much different from the new Russian censorship laws. Well, you don't get prison time, I mean just the attitude that other opinions aren't ac
Re: (Score:2)
>But he said "that agreement that says I can't have nukes? yeah, scrap that."
Well, considering the agreement has already been abrogated by the West by not defending Ukraine from invasion after they gave up their nukes, I can see that.
I am of the opinion that they should never have given them up. It appears to be the only way to have a semi-independent country these days.
Re: (Score:2)
It's definitely not an argument in favor of non-proliferation, that's for sure.
Re: Nail in the coffin for nuclear? (Score:2)
:) Thanks for pointing that out!
These guys keep forgetting that unless we try to understand opposing views there's no utility in discussions with people. If every body here had the same view what would be the use of slashdot or reditt or twitter..
Fact is, we are as yet unable to understand what Putin gets out of all this shit. That means our mental moods or theories aren't correct. To fix that you have to try n understand how different other people's perspective could be. And Putin's would be probably more
Re: (Score:3)
Jumping around that everyone is a paid russian shrill is extremely stupid. When there's an actual war going on, why would anyone be doing propaganda on slashdot ??
Moryath especially is answering each and every of my comments multiple times. I think he's the actual troll, and I doubt he's even being paid for it. Silly boy. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Russia fucking ATTACKED them,
The Munich Security Conference was 18 February - 20 February. The invasion began on 24 February. His words in the speech cannot possibly refer to something that happened days afterwards.
Re: (Score:2)
They have the biggest nuclear arsenal in the world already. And, they have no shortage of capacity for making weapons-grade plutonium already, thus the biggest nuclear arsenal in the world. And they are treaty-limited by how many "pits" they can have, and how many operational warheads they can have. And this is inspected regularly.
Taking these reactors is about denying resources to Ukraine - namely electrical power. Russia could give a fuck about the nuclear material.
Wishing for an Easterly Wind (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wind is defined by the direction it's coming from. An easterly wind would mean the nations west of Ukraine would get all of the smoke.
What you want are winds out the west. Which, thankfully, is the prevailing flow in those northern latitudes anyhow.
Closed (Score:2)
Chernobyl has been shut down. What are the people there operating? The cooling pumps were shut down 9 years ago, meaning nothing is running.
Re: (Score:2)
Not all the reactors were shut down.
Closed II (Score:3)
The three other reactors were all shut down by 2000. The cooling pumps were shut down in 2013. No cooling pumps means they *definitely* aren't running the reactors.
Here's an archived video of them draining the cooling basin.
https://web.archive.org/web/20... [archive.org]
Re: (Score:2)
You need operating cooling pumps when you congregate spent nuclear fuel in a storage pool (i.e. Fukushima). If all the cooling pumps were actually shutdown in 2013, lets hope they made a concerted effort to disperse & bury the spent nuclear fuel that may have been on that site.
Re: (Score:2)
You do understand that spent nuclear fuel rods are roughly 75% of its original radioactive content, that they would need to be processed (by humans, not working for free) to have a much lower percentage of radioactive content, and then "dry casked"? This being done by a poverty stricken nation with a long tradition (stemming back to the Soviet Union) of bureaucracy that lies.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Which leaves for the storage of the radioactive remains/waste.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Closed (Score:2)
Spent Fuel Pools (Score:2)
Presumably there is still spent fuel storage pools, which IIRC operate about 20 years after transfer from the reactor, and then the fuel is transferred to dry cask storage.
100 people per shift to manage that seems like a lot though; I didn’t think there was much active management of a spent fuel pool.
Re: (Score:2)
Plenty of nuclear material and monitoring systems that need attention. Why else would you pay staff to be there?
Re: (Score:2)
Honest question: do you mean they're "running" a nuclear reactor to do practically nothing? Or is there some science experiment or other non-energy generation stuff being done at the site?
Confession: after having read some pop-science article on the disaster that mentioned the reactors having been entombed, I stopped paying attention to any Chernobyl article that I come across every once in a while.
Re: (Score:3)
They were also doing lots of fuel handling work, getting it in a form suitable for long term dry storage (ISF-1 and ISF-2).
I've taken the workers train from Slavutych into the Chernobyl exclusion zone a few times; three trains depart each morning, each with about 500 people on board. There's a reasonable amount of
Re: (Score:2)
That was my question too - I thought Chernobyl was simply a disaster area now. Did Ukraine restart the reactor on the sly?
Re: (Score:2)
They're decommissioning units 1-3, transferring fuel to a new long term waste storage site. They were also demolishing the original, jerry-built sarcophagus, which was supposed to be complete two years ago but is still ongoing. Monitoring *that* is pretty complex. The nuclear stuff happening in the ruins of unit 4 keeps changing; it's kind of like having a smoldering fire.
Putin wants the disaster pretext (Score:2)
Putin wants a nuclear disaster, he will claim it was sabotage or weapons research gone wrong and will use it as a pretext to say Ukraine must not exist.
It could kill 1,000,000 russians and he would not care.
Re: (Score:2)
Why did we let Russia and the US rule the world? (Score:2)
There are communists and socialists in Russia such as CPRF, but they were side-lined long ago when Putin rigged the elections. Putin is no friend of Soviets and he doesn't behave or think like one. Whatever he is trying to rebuild isn't at all like the USSR.
It would be more accurate to describe what we are seeing as Russian imperialism, and the claiming of Russia's place as in the world as a superpower. The funny thing about nuclear superpowers is they can invade other countries and there isn't shit anyone
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Superstition has no predictive power and no place in rational discourse. Keep your religious mumblings within the walls of your church if you don't want to appear foolish.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Would you discard Plato because of its idealism?
That entirely depends on the dogmatism of the reader and not of Plato.
Re: (Score:2)
> Putin is no friend of Soviets and he doesn't
> behave or think like one. Whatever he is trying to
> rebuild isn't at all like the USSR.
Where on earth did you get that idea? Putin is on-record as pining for his good-old-days of the KGB and Soviet Union; having called their dissolution âoethe greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century.â That is not speculation or interpretation. Those are his very own, publicly spoken, words.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It wouldn't be the first time Putin killed his own people for propaganda purposes [hudson.org]. Pathetic. He also stole money that was intended for food [thebureaui...igates.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. A George W. Bush ordered the 9/11 terror attacks.
Honestly. Do people believe these sorts of conspiracy theories?
Was it also Putin who invaded Dagestan?
Re: (Score:2)
There is no question the FSB did apartment bombings. Did Putin know about it? He was the head of the FSB. What do you think?
Another great reason for nuclear power (Score:2)
The plants make excellent targets for invaders or terrorists who want to hold whole countries hostage.
Re: Another great reason for nuclear power (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The tactic only works for nations that can't be held accountable for war crimes or invaded. So Russia, the US, and to a lesser degree China. As well as terrorist organizations that have no country to invade or leaders to prosecute.
If Japan or Brazil or Germany were to invade another country or blow up nuclear power plants. They'd have American Marines in their capital faster than you can say "regime change". I'm not saying out of some patriotic pride, I'm trying to explain that the rules don't apply equally
Re: Another great reason for nuclear power (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not a risk because North Korea would be invaded if it committed an overt attack like that, regardless of its nuclear arsenal.
China too but it would be complicated by its more robust military defense. They would probably suffer blockades and destruction of ports. Things that are not possible to impose on Russia or the US.
Putin is loony toons (Score:2)
Giving crazy Presidents, I mean leaders control over nuclear shit is fucking scary.
Ukraine coverage, worth checking (Score:2)
For those with capability to dig Russian, quality coverage link below, acceptable sound starts about 30 min into.
Hats off to the analyst from Bellingcat and the host. High grade material.
https://fb.watch/bzz_2h42zX/ [fb.watch]