Reddit Communities With Millions of Followers Plan To Extend the Blackout Indefinitely (theverge.com) 236
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Moderators of many Reddit communities are pledging to keep their subreddits private or restricted indefinitely. For the vast majority of subreddits, the blackout to protest Reddit's expensive API pricing changes was expected to last from Monday until Wednesday. But in response to a Tuesday post on the r/ModCoord subreddit, users are chiming in to say that their subreddits will remain dark past that 48-hour window. "Reddit has budged microscopically," u/SpicyThunder335, a moderator for r/ModCoord, wrote in the post. They say that despite an announcement that access to a popular data-archiving tool for moderators would be restored, "our core concerns still aren't satisfied, and these concessions came prior to the blackout start date; Reddit has been silent since it began." SpicyThunder335 also bolded a line from a Monday memo from CEO Steve Huffman obtained by The Verge -- "like all blowups on Reddit, this one will pass as well" -- and said that "more is needed for Reddit to act."
Ahead of the Tuesday post, more than 300 subreddits had committed to staying dark indefinitely, SpicyThunder335 said. The list included some hugely popular subreddits, like r/aww (more than 34 million subscribers), r/music (more than 32 million subscribers), and r/videos (more than 26 million subscribers). Even r/nba committed to an indefinite timeframe at arguably the most important time of the NBA season. But SpicyThunder335 invited moderators to share pledges to keep the protests going, and the commitments are rolling in. SpicyThunder335 notes that not everyone will be able to go dark indefinitely for valid reasons. "For example, r/stopDrinking represents a valuable resource for a communities in need, and the urgency of getting the news of the ongoing war out to r/Ukraine obviously outweighs any of these concerns," SpicyThunder335 wrote. As an alternative, SpicyThunder335 recommended implementing a "weekly gesture of support on 'Touch-Grass-Tuesdays,'" which would be left up to the discretion of individual communities. SpicyThunder335 also acknowledged that some subreddits would need to poll their users to make sure they're on board. As of this writing, more than 8,400 subreddits have gone private or into a restricted mode. The blackouts caused Reddit to briefly crash on Monday.
Ahead of the Tuesday post, more than 300 subreddits had committed to staying dark indefinitely, SpicyThunder335 said. The list included some hugely popular subreddits, like r/aww (more than 34 million subscribers), r/music (more than 32 million subscribers), and r/videos (more than 26 million subscribers). Even r/nba committed to an indefinite timeframe at arguably the most important time of the NBA season. But SpicyThunder335 invited moderators to share pledges to keep the protests going, and the commitments are rolling in. SpicyThunder335 notes that not everyone will be able to go dark indefinitely for valid reasons. "For example, r/stopDrinking represents a valuable resource for a communities in need, and the urgency of getting the news of the ongoing war out to r/Ukraine obviously outweighs any of these concerns," SpicyThunder335 wrote. As an alternative, SpicyThunder335 recommended implementing a "weekly gesture of support on 'Touch-Grass-Tuesdays,'" which would be left up to the discretion of individual communities. SpicyThunder335 also acknowledged that some subreddits would need to poll their users to make sure they're on board. As of this writing, more than 8,400 subreddits have gone private or into a restricted mode. The blackouts caused Reddit to briefly crash on Monday.
Open mouth, insert foot. (Score:5, Insightful)
His attitude and quotes practically guarantee an escalation. Writing "more is needed for Reddit to act" is an open invitation.
Re:Open mouth, insert foot. (Score:5, Funny)
Adding a new chapter to the "how to not handle a PR crisis" book.
Re: (Score:3)
It's not in the memo [theverge.com]
Here the phrase does appear [reddit.com], in a post by somebody on r/Save3rdPartyApps who I presume is not the CEO of anything.
Re:Open mouth, insert foot. (Score:5, Informative)
But let's go ahead and generate 12 pages of upvoted responses about how stupid the CEO is for saying it anyways. It's just like being back on reddit!!!
Re: (Score:2)
The one thing going for Spez is that there really doesn't seem to be a real competitor for Reddit for people to switch to. Digg (as a social forum) is dead, Facebook doesn't really work for posting content semi-anonymously, and sites like Twitter and DIscord don't really work for long-form content.
The new decentralized/federated sites all seem to be a disorganized mess, and "legacy" tech discussion forums like HardOCP and Slashdot are really only used by the 40+ crowd who refused to go to Reddit when it bec
Re: (Score:3)
So...what is this "Reddit" thing....?
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the federated sites are a lot less intuitive than Reddit. I feel like the kbin one is a lot more reddit-like in look and feel though, maybe it'll get there someday, but I don't know if it's good enough as a substitute today.
Can the federated social media system scale to handle something like Reddit's volume? Technologically, I'm guessing that it can, but does the model impose costs on instance owners in a way that'd be impractical for them to scale to that kind of volume?
Re: (Score:2)
His attitude and quotes practically guarantee an escalation. Writing "more is needed for Reddit to act" is an open invitation.
That was the reddit moderator saying we need to do more to get Reddit to act, it wasn't an invitation for escalation by the CEO.
Stop digging (Score:5, Insightful)
My grandfather used to say "First step in getting out of a hole is to stop digging" I'm guessing this guy does not understand that the people who post to Reddit are the ones creating content for free. I have just stopped going to Reddit, other should do the same. When the big wigs notice a drop in traffic maybe, just maybe, they will rethink their position.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing this guy does not understand that the people who post to Reddit are the ones creating content for free.
I'm not against the protest, far from it, but these kinds of comments are flawed. It's a two-way street. Reddit provides the service and the users, in exchange, provide the content. Both parties need to be appeased. While it's true the users don't technically need Reddit, there is a derth of comparable replacements at this time.
Re:Stop digging (Score:5, Insightful)
Digg thought much the same, and that didn't turn out well for them.
Reddit is far from a technological marvel, a competitor is mostly a matter of consensus.
Meanwhile, reddit could probably come up with a nuanced approach that gets reddit pretty much what it wants while also giving the community what it wants. A tiered API pricing structured, special consideration for select applications and users, in exchange for some validation that blessed applications are properly presenting Reddit advertising and not using their API to supply marketing research material.
Of course, there's every chance that if they wait a couple of weeks the moderators will get over it and largely come back. Though a company that's entire existence is based on the goodwill of a big internet community is taking a dubious risk to avoid thinking hard.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm glad you mention Digg because they did pretty much the same thing by crapping all over the users who made the place worth going to. I guess that website's still there, but is anyone but bots actually using it?
Sure, /r/pics, /r/funny, and /r/news will keep going but I know the mods and main contributors of a lot of specialty subreddits are likely done if this doesn't get resolved in a good way. At that point, what you have left is Digg, since for most people I know, it's the specialty subreddits (like
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
while also giving the community what it wants. A tiered API pricing structured
And see this is just a misunderstanding. The community doesn't want a tiered API pricing structure. They want a sensible functioning app to use reddit. The API is a symptom not a cure. The blackout here isn't about APIs or pricing, it's about the loss of functionality for an end user. If Reddit's app didn't suck balls in the first place Apollo likely wouldn't exist.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, there's also the bots, as far as I understand, which would also be tied to the API.
The least complex path to a functioning app while preserving reddit's perceived business opportunities would ultimately be API pricing structure that makes the popular applications feasible with strings attached so they can audit the user experience/branding/use of their APIs. Far easier to let the apps stand than *try* to compete with them. The try to compete with them is tricky enough under the best conditions, but r
Re: (Score:2)
Any site that successfully competes with Reddit will face the same problem as Reddit: the more popular you are, the more your hosting costs rise. If ads aren't enough or you want to protect your users from predatory monetization, you are going to be a victim of your own success. We still haven't solved how to fund a large content generating site in an ethical manner.
Re: (Score:3)
One possibility is that any sufficiently successful site attracts investors, and going to far in with investors causes untenable demands.
Here we have a case that is reddit trying to prep for a public offering. They probably have the screws on them from investors to do what investors *think* is the best path to have a successful IPO (that's likely their time to cash out). They've taken over a billion from various investors over the year. They may have a viable operational model for steady state operation
Re: (Score:3)
The value of Reddit is in the users and the content they provide. Because right now, Google's become absolutely useless. If you have any issues, the first few search results usually
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, the choices aren't black and white either reddit makes enough money or the users are happy. There likely exists a "fine" strategy that largely preserves whatever reddit's business opportunities may be while by and large accommodating their contributors.
In your BBS example, if your BBS became just a massively popular BBS, and you decided that you were going to disable QWK to force users to use the online interface only. All your users complain and say they are going to stop posting to your board
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, the choices aren't black and white either reddit makes enough money or the users are happy.
Some businesses do find a balance between customer satisfaction and profit, and others just say "screw it" and let things burn to the ground if they're not hitting their desired profit margins. Disney's Star Wars resort closure is a great example. They could've found some middle ground with pricing that customers would be willing to pay and then reduced their expenses accordingly, but they didn't.
Most for-profit businesses eventually do gravitate towards a desire for profit above all else, because that's
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you thinking that Reddit, as a business, is immune from criticism and ought to ignore their customers?
The majority of Reddit's "customers" are just confused as to why a sub they're attempting to visit has gone private. The fact that Reddit is actually allowing a handful of moderators to hold portions of the site hostage is rather silly.
The point you missed is that when you're running a community-contribution forum, showing the complainers and the troublemakers the door generally improves the signal-to-noise ratio on your site. Let them go off to 4chan or start their own forum at ImAPissedOffExRedditor.com
Re: (Score:3)
The fact that Reddit is actually allowing a handful of moderators to hold portions of the site hostage is rather silly.
Let them go off to 4chan or start their own forum at ImAPissedOffExRedditor.com
That's exactly what all of these moderators are eventually going to do if the blackout fails, particularly if Reddit admins decide to re-open all of these thousands of subreddits that are protesting. Moderators will stop moderating the content for free and go somewhere else and the crapflood will start rolling in. Reddit admins will have to figure out how to quickly implement the necessary moderation themselves, either by paying people to do it, or developing algorithms to enforce the rules. Either way
Re: (Score:2)
Mods are completely overrated and mostly not needed. Slashdot's moderation system is far better. Don't wanna see crap, then don't browse at -1, want to see the crap? You still can if you want, but only if you want.
Reddit and other mods are pathetic power hungry little fief-masters.
Re:Stop digging (Score:4, Insightful)
You think the task that the moderators do, to filter out low-quality posts, spam, and illegal content, is valueless to the owners of the "free" message board? You think the site will look and function the same after those people are disregarded, disrespected, and driven out? You think they will be easily replaced, without incurring additional costs? You think that users will be willing to give their money to the formerly "free" message board, after the leadership will have caused the content quality to decline sharply, and also removed access to their favorite third party apps with no acceptable replacements? You think this message board is somehow special and unique, and can't be replaced?
I know of at least one other "free" message board that acted with similar amounts of hubris and disdain toward its userbase. That site does still exist, but is no longer a message board, and no longer has a userbase, or any value to investors.
Both sides appear to be dugg in, so we are about to enter the "find out" phase.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
pretty close to it. its like expecting facebook to appreciate the fact you keep your profile up to date and tidy.
Facebook is a great example. At Facebook, Content Moderator is a paid position, with a salary of approximately $45k on ZipRecruiter. Facebook employs approximately 15,000 moderators.
https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Facebook-Moderator-Salary [ziprecruiter.com]
https://brandminds.com/digital-content-moderation-industry-expected-to-reach-13-60b-by-2027 [brandminds.com]
At reddit, moderation is done by unpaid volunteers.
Re: (Score:2)
anyone can make their own message board, but can you create one with tens of millions of daily visitors? go ahead.
Visitors agglomerate. If the ones that others stick to leave, then they all leave. What made Reddit in the first place was users and content. If users and content leave, what do you have? Only expenses.
Re: (Score:2)
you mean they wont have a free place in which to host their message board? reddit's doing user's the favour, not the other way around.
Reddit and users have been doing things for each other. Reddit doesn't exist without the content to monetize, and the users get a place to post their content. You're only half wrong, but it's the wrong half.
Reddit depends on unpaid moderators. If they continue to alienate them, they will stop moderating, and Reddit will become Rchan — and their value will go negative as advertisers flee en masse.
Re: (Score:2)
Not as silly as you think. Sure, they could change a flag in the database and return the subreddit to public, but then it might end up without it's volunteer moderators and become yet another r/4chan or worse.
Re: (Score:2)
They're simply too used to getting away with it. Either they get what they want or they cry for a bailout and get it that way.
EXCELLENT! (Score:5, Insightful)
Good.
The 48-hour blackout was a warning, and since the Powers That Be at Reddit refuse to listen to their own users, it's time to show them that people aren't fucking around.
If that fails, time to burn the place to the ground.
After a week or two of a blackout, many users just won't come back, ever. Some will, of course, but many won't. And that'll be the beginning of the end for Reddit.
Re: (Score:2)
since the Powers That Be at Reddit refuse to listen to their own users
The users aren't making decisions. A few noisy moderators are. That's the thing here. Reddit hasn't noticed a loss of users. Most of them would log in and not even realise that r/favouritething isn't showing up their feed.
No one is burning anything to the ground. In fact that the servers were struggling under the load of errors generated by users making requests for private groups show that users were still in fact trying to use reddit. The loss of r/aww isn't the loss of 34 million redditors. It's simply 3
Re: (Score:2)
That's the thing here. Reddit hasn't noticed a loss of users.
I'm pretty sure they have.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nah. Most of those communities will just be replaced. And it's not as if Reddit can't simply remove all mods of the most popular subs and replace them with their own mods.
Re: (Score:3)
The commoners with no horse in this race won't work for free. Most of them don't even have the technical skill to do so, and the job will be even HARDER without the proper tools. It will be a total shit show spam fest IMO...
Re:EXCELLENT! (Score:5, Interesting)
Likely, but that won't solve the problem.
Running a board with many 1000 users is far from trivial. Hell, it wasn't even trivial back in the days when I did something like that and the average IQ to get on the internet was above room temperature levels. Back then you didn't have to deal with two very destructive elements: Professional, that is, paid, trolls that try to use your platform to deliver their spin to the dumb masses and people who have this pressing urge to inform everyone about their latest delusion that they MUST warn humanity of, and of course your board is the perfect way to do that.
They didn't really exist 20 years ago.
So it hardly got easier. Quite the opposite, the signal-to-noise ratio got way, way worse in the meantime. So moderation is almost impossible to forgo anymore. And I'm not talking about occasionally taking a look at your board and removing that one or two offtopic posts, i.e. what I did in the early 2000s. Today this has more of weed-whacking in the jungle.
This isn't something you do alone, or something you can sensibly do by yourself with a buddy. This requires staff. And unless you already happen to have a worldwide (remember, you have to do this 24/7 or your professional spammers will very quickly find out when your mods are asleep and bombard your board then) team of people to do this, this won't work for long.
People who want to use your board sensibly will not stand for it. And these are the ones that you MUST retain. Because they are what makes your board alive and what keeps the others in. These are about 10% of your total population, but these are the crucial 10%. They are the ones that give you meaningful, and free, content, and they are the ones that the other 50% come for (the rest are spammers. I'm not kidding). If they are gone, so is your board.
Protocols not Platforms (Score:5, Insightful)
If it's not this bad decision it'll be the next.
Use distributed forums instead of Reddit.
Re: (Score:3)
Use distributed forums instead of Reddit.
You mean like USENET?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
USENET server operators were attacked for hosting child pornography. Then more child pornography appeared on other newsgroups that were not banned, including popular ones. At that point, many usenet providers decided to stop providing. Google implemented filters and that really marked the end of usenet. USENET will never come back due to this specific moderation problem
Re: Protocols not Platforms (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Hush! You know what happens every time we let the masses take a peek into the garden that is covered by the camo net.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> Use distributed forums instead of Reddit.
This seems to be where everyone is headed, namely Lemmy and federated space...
Re: (Score:2)
Use distributed forums instead of Reddit.
Logging into hundreds of different websites to read targeted special purpose information is not a substitute for reddit. Reddit isn't a collection of forums, it's a social media page, a rainbow unicorn vomit of posts from a complete mishmash of sources filling up a feed.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm dubious that's the case as the majority of users don't even know there's a protest, don't use alternative apps, and the protest process is to hide, so the main feed serves folk's usual content, with ironically fewer distractions--the signal to noise ratio has improved.
Many of the questions have been, "there are other apps!?" "What protest?" "Why?" "I've been kicked from X dark sub, so am sharing here instead" (the last not a question but reaction obviously).
Come tomorrow it'll be biz as normal. Folk
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Seems like this is a problem that will solve itself as users create new subs to replace the ones with stubborn moderators. If you ask me, purging Reddit of some of their power tripping idiots is actually a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
If you ask me, purging Reddit of some of their power tripping idiots is actually a good thing.
Agreed.
Re: (Score:2)
Why are you on my lawn?
Re: (Score:3)
Thanks for your insights, spez, but I believe that we need to start by replacing the key power-tripping idiot: you.
Did you seriously just try to insult me by calling me the CEO of Reddit? If I had anywhere near his kind of money I'd have way better things to be doing than posting on Slashdot at this ungodly hour.
Re: (Score:2)
Also CNN seems in the same ballpark right now (Warner Bros Discovery CEO David Zaslav trying to right-tack it in the last year, puppeting through head Chris Licht, then firing him last week).
Lot of really batshit direction calls from the billionaire media class at the moment. Maybe they just lost their minds in the AI jolt.
Re: (Score:2)
But neither is dead. Mastodon has not replaced them, nor has anything else. Why don't the communities move to the fediverse and effect real change? Same game for the developers using the Reddit API; why don't they make tools to improve the experience on Mastadon so it can compete?
It is like a bunch of bitching little kids sometimes. The power comes not from crying, although that can be a good distraction; it comes from the secondary actions you take.
Re: (Score:2)
The key reason most of the things you mention failed was that there was a place people could flock to when their former preferred site faltered. Digg is the perfect example here, when Digg crumbled, people had Reddit to go to and Digg was done for because once they were there, they did not return.
Unless there is somewhere to go now that Reddit is wavering, people might actually return when the storm settles. This is going to be decisive now because now, and only now, you can get people to jump ship. If, and
Re: (Score:2)
This is a great point. It feels to me like a chapter of the internet is closing before our eyes. Sites like Twitter and Reddit were built on the community spirit of the early internet but had consolidated a the traffic and content into a centralized platform. It seems to totally elude the tech bros who are currently running these companies that the community spirit is the primary thing that makes the site worth going to.
Community stuff is rewarding but also a giant pain in the ass - if you've ever been to
I called it :) (Score:3, Interesting)
For those saying "Reddit will just take over" that's what the protestors want.
Reddit is only profitable at all because of hundreds and hundreds of hours of free labor from unpaid mods. Go look at the shit show [latimes.com] that is post Musk layoffs Twitter if you doubt me. Twitter's on track to make $888 million this year with $1.5 billion in interest payments alone.
The question, of course, is does Reddit need the mods more than the mods need Reddit. i.e. how addicted to modding are the Reddit mods?
The folks doing the indefinite blackouts aren't. Addicts that is. What they're doing is daring Reddit to take over their forums and force them back open.
When (if?) Reddit does that it's over. Other mods jump ship fast, and Reddit won't have the cash to replace them with paid employees. Not with a pending IPO.
Re: (Score:2)
Some subs would be significantly improved without mods hanging over every word posted and making users play stupid games like "We only allow those sort of posts on Thursdays, didn't you read the rules? BAN!"
TBH, Reddit is really only fun for the shitpost subs. Can't have any sort of actual discussion on topics like politics, because the moment you run afoul of the groupthink you get modded into oblivion. If you really manage to piss off some incel Redditors, they'll mod down your unrelated posts in other
Google "Nazi Bar" (Score:2)
Bartender says he recognizes the patches on their jacket and their Nazis. Journalists ask, why not let them drink, they weren't doing anything.
Bartender says "Sure, they're polite, but you let them in and they bring some of their friend, and those guys aren't so polite. Pretty soon they bring more friends and they start wearing the patches everyone tell
Seems to me that (Score:5, Insightful)
The attitude that the Reddit CEO is exhibiting is the same attitude Reddit moderators have. If you disagree with their opinion it's a ban. Your account is locked out.
The problem today is that many, if not most, see things as black or white. Good or bad. There is no tolerance for a different opinion when in fact there are many shades of grey. So we have a knee jerk reaction that imposes someones will on another. In order for Reddit to work it needs a synergy of company, moderators and users. It also needs to learn that all need to respect one another.
Personally I feel Reddit should fail because it's not about an honest discussion. If you disagree with the moderators and have valid points you get banned with no recourse. It encourages and rewards bullies.
Re: (Score:2)
The attitude that the Reddit CEO is exhibiting is the same attitude Reddit moderators have. If you disagree with their opinion it's a ban. Your account is locked out.
The problem today is that many, if not most, see things as black or white. Good or bad.
Reddit gives you the options of ban or not. Consequently the decision always comes down to ban or not.
In order for Reddit to work it needs a synergy of company, moderators and users. It also needs to learn that all need to respect one another.
That is the kind of stupid feel good nonsense that leads to nothing getting done and everything failing. You cannot always seek consensus. Sometimes people will disagree on what is fundamentally acceptable. That's why the subreddit model works.
Re: (Score:2)
But at least here you don't get silenced. People who want to see your drivel still can.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
So downvote. Why ban? Because this difference of opinion is getting upvotes and the moderator's ego is hurt.
On Slashdot you get downvoted by some who have an agenda or who just don't want to hear. It's not always political. A good example is DoH. Another is the volume control on Android. Another is Bluetooth tracking. You simply can't have a discussion on Reddit without someone's ego getting in the way and resulting in a ban. When did these topics become political? Why can't the user just choose? Why not j
Re: (Score:2)
So downvote. Why ban? Because this difference of opinion is getting upvotes and the moderator's ego is hurt.
No doubt there is plenty of that, but to answer your question, because letting people say the same shit over and over again that leads to the same arguments over and over again adds nothing to the conversation.
You do not have a right to turn a subreddit into your soapbox, unless it's your subreddit, and then YOU can have the fund of moderating it. Enjoy!
FFS Reddit Owns Their Code and Site (Score:3)
Why do people try to make a business model on accessing someone else's software? I worked for a company that had clients that asked us to build something like that for Facebook. And the APIs would change regularly and break how the developed app worked, and then people in the office would be shocked and complain about Facebook changing their own APIs. Make your own Facebook or Reddit if you have a good enough idea. Let me guess, you can't afford to pay the server fees and bandwidth. But you're OK sponging off someone else.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do people try to make a business model on accessing someone else's software?
Because Reddit provided the access. What is being protested is "Reddit's expensive API pricing changes", according to TFS. So this implies that said access is a part of Reddit's business model as well.
But yeah. People are at the mercy of the only company with access once your data is in their system. Don't like it? Build your own. Or move your business to 4chan.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do people try to make a business model on accessing someone else's software?
You have fundamentally missed the point.
1. This isn't about a business model. Reddit mods aren't standing in solidarity with app writers, they are lamenting on the loss of tools that they have and the fact that Reddit provided ones are garbage. The app writers aren't running some critical business. They wrote and app and distributed it for free.
2. What makes accessing someone else's software special? No business exists in isolation. It all works on the infrastructure and service of others. Are you asking wh
Re: (Score:3)
The APIs provide ways for the people who contribute to Reddit FOR FREE to manage the content that others provide FOR FREE. Reddit, not those who manage and/or contribute content to Reddit, are the ones sponging off the user base.
The exorbitant pricing structure now means that the people who are managing/contributing content to Reddit FOR FREE will now have to pay exorbitant fees or go back to trying to use Reddit's unusable and/or broken tools to do so.
Alternatives (Score:5, Interesting)
I miss my subreddits (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I miss my subreddits (Score:4, Insightful)
Same here... many are specialty/technical subreddits modded by experts in their field, where they contribute a lot and help a lot of people with their problems. They're the main reason I'm on reddit, since you can get cat pics and memes anywhere. It's looking like a lot of the ones I follow are planning to close up shop and find somewhere else to help people.
It's ironic to me since Reddit got a huge boost about 11 years ago when Digg went stupid. Now they're doing the same thing. Other than the number of users, Reddit doesn't really offer anything that's not easily replaced. And as the push the true content creators off the site, all they'll have left is all the stuff you can get anywhere else.
It's sad because when I search technical questions on say google, I often add "reddit" to the query since those were often the best answers.
Reddit will take away the button (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Then I go dark by simply deleting everything anyone posts for the blackout period. Or do you plan to take away modding abilities, too?
Recreate Reddit with the terrorists out (Score:2)
I don't know much if some apps on Reddit are a necessity at all. Hear these are culprit for what's happening.
What is clear though, is that saboteurs had too much of privilege delegated to them.
NBA Season is over (Score:2)
"Arguably" to worst time to what, shut the fuck up about NBA?
Seasons done, time to set down your NBA flags, and banners and pickup your baseball gear, so you can sit there in your fake althetic gear, sweating in the heat, and imagine the day when you were an athletes, in Highschool with the delusions of a future in sports.
Personally I think Reddit should start declaring threads dead and begin the purge. Goes for user accounts as well.
It might incentivize a few to dream big of launching their own servers, bu
Reddit is the new Digg (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A little extra = prohibitavely expensive for any 3rd party app to continue existing (costing more for them in one year than their apps have made over their lifetime).
these social justice warriors = everyone across politcal spectrums is protesting this.
I don't recall any blackouts when censorship was/continues to happen = Very few people missed the presence of hate speech, graphic videos of people dying, etc. Not saying they got the balance perfect because that's impossible, but they still need to be a plac
Re: (Score:2)
I don't recall any blackouts when censorship was/continues to happen. But you charge a little extra for these social justice warriors api access and it's hell on earth.
I guess the Reddit "blackout" was unrelated to the very recent Amazon AWS outage?
Re: (Score:2)
Why would moderators stage a protest against themselves?
This protest is because 3rd party moderation tools need api access that reddit is taking away.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm curious, is this sarcasm? Or are there actually mods who make money from moderating on Reddit?
Re:Force the subs open (Score:4, Insightful)
Anyone can create a new sub. Want to be the moderator of a potentially hugely popular new sub? Now's your opportunity.
Re: (Score:2)
That sort of thing happens with the internet. I was watching Weird Al's It's All About the Pentiums [youtube.com] music video recently and thought about the "you're waxing your modem, tryin' to make it go faster" lyric. I distinctly remember that being a reference to an old USENET joke about waxing your modem for improved speeds, but it seems to be completely scoured from the internet.
Ironically, the song having a reference to a joke that can no longer be found online makes the whole thing all the more meta.
Re: (Score:2)
I have contributed A LOT of knowledge and I am pissed that a handful of mods decided to hold that knowledge hostage.
That knowledge has already been archived in various places. You might have to find a new site to share knowledge in the future, but nothing has been lost. The site itself deserves to go bankrupt and shut down if this is how they regard their users and moderators on a site consisting of 100% user-generated user-moderated content.
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck with that. As a mod of two participating subs (r/canning and r/ipv6), finding new mods is almost an effort in futility. Sure, lots of people want the power, but most don’t want the responsibility. Few people want the day-in, day-out drudgery of curating and building a vibrant community, dealing with abusive users, and dealing with near unending piles of spam and misinformation — and when they see what being a moderator actually entails, they usually disappear (and then complain when
Re: (Score:3)
I'm not really moved by your speech. I think you have too high of an opinion of your worth as a mod. Frankly I think it is a task that will be automated by Reddit eventually in order to allow a much smaller group to mod and to prevent episodes such as this. Hell, they could leverage AI tools if they wanted to get really frisky. And the link to the list of modless subs is broke. But I'm going to assume that 99% of them were small time, barely active subs. No sub with a serious subscriber base is going
Re:Fire the CEO (Score:4, Informative)
This was a subreddit dedicated to sharing pictures of teenagers with no verification of either consent or age. That's the guy they picked to become a CEO, a walking liability.
Re: Fire the CEO (Score:3, Informative)
Plus, he got caught editing posts from conservatives directly in the database. Heâ(TM)s a dishonest scumbag.
Re: Fire the CEO (Score:5, Funny)
Heâ(TM)s a dishonest scumbag.
So he at least has one qualification to be a CEO.
Re: Fire the CEO (Score:5, Funny)
Heâ(TM)s a dishonest scumbag.
So he at least has one qualification to be a CEO.
If you look carefully, that's 3.
Re: Fire the CEO (Score:2)
This joke was much better but I think it will have a high whoosh value...
Re: (Score:3)
I am a normal reddit user, not even a moderator. I browse reddit primarily with a third party app, BaconReader. I purchased BaconReader Premium for a couple bucks, 10 years ago. I'd be willing to pay a few bucks a month, directly to reddit, if that meant I could keep using BaconReader with ALL of its current functionality. But that's not possible. Users cannot pay reddit directly. They want the app developers to start paying them millions of dollars for an API key, and expect them to start collecting
Re: (Score:2)
Being a moderator is a difficult and thankless job. Reddit already had a severe shortage of mode *before* all of this went down. The only way they could replace all of them would be to hire a bunch of people at $15/hr+. And that isn't happening! Especially when they're trying to file an IPO!
Re: (Score:3)
And you're gonna pay them? Or who?
Or are you just going to sign up whoever raises his hand to be mod? Take a wild guess who will instantly yell "pick me, pick me" when it comes to being in control of a subreddit with potentially hundred thousand of eyeballs.
Re: (Score:2)
Then Reddit is done for.
Reddit depends on free labor. You think Reddit could take over those subs and moderate them? How? Who? Do you even have a faint idea what kind of spam a platform with thousands or hundred thousands of eyeballs attracts?
Re: (Score:2)
This has actually affected my search results at least twice now. One was looking for information on whether or not to re-tighten head bolts on a specific engine 500 miles after a rebuild. Can't remember what the other was. I fell back on Google's cache and was able to get the information I needed. So even though I don't regularly visit Reddit, this affected me. There's a lot of good information in there depending on what you're looking for.
Re: And... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe I'm just not the target market of all this Reddit, but honestly, I can't say as I've noticed.
Now if /. or SE went on strike... well, that would be a different matter ;-)