China's EV Sales Set To Overtake Traditional Cars Years Ahead of West (irishtimes.com) 134
"Electric vehicles are expected to outsell cars with internal combustion engines in China for the first time next year," reports the Financial Times, calling it "a historic inflection point that puts the world's biggest car market years ahead of western rivals."
China is set to smash international forecasts and Beijing's official targets with domestic EV sales — including pure battery and plug-in hybrids — growing about 20 per cent year on year to more than 12mn cars in 2025, according to the latest estimates supplied to the Financial Times by four investment banks and research groups. The figure would be more than double the 5.9mn sold in 2022. At the same time, sales of traditionally powered cars are expected to fall by more than 10 per cent next year to less than 11 million, reflecting a near 30 per cent plunge from 14.8 million in 2022...
Robert Liew, director of Asia-Pacific renewables research at Wood Mackenzie, said China's EV milestone signalled its success in domestic technology development and securing global supply chains for critical resources needed for EVs and their batteries. The industry's scale meant steep manufacturing cost reductions and lower prices for consumers. "They want to electrify everything," said Liew. "No other country comes close to China." While the pace of Chinese EV sales growth has eased from a post-pandemic frenzy, the forecasts suggest Beijing's official target, set in 2020, for EVs to account for 50 per cent of car sales by 2035, will be achieved 10 years in advance of schedule...
As China's EV market tracked towards year-on-year growth of near 40 per cent in 2024, the market share of foreign-branded cars fell to a record low of 37 per cent — a sharp decline from 64 per cent in 2020, according to data from Automobility, a Shanghai-based consultancy. In this month alone, GM wrote down more than $5 billion (€4.8 billion) of its business value in China; the holding company behind Porsche warned of a writedown in its Volkswagen stake of up to €20 billion; and arch rivals Nissan and Honda said they were responding to a "drastically changing business environment" with a merger.
"Meanwhile, EV sales growth has slowed in Europe and the US, reflecting the legacy car industry's slow embrace of new technology, uncertainty over government subsidies and rising protectionism against imports from China..."
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the news.
Robert Liew, director of Asia-Pacific renewables research at Wood Mackenzie, said China's EV milestone signalled its success in domestic technology development and securing global supply chains for critical resources needed for EVs and their batteries. The industry's scale meant steep manufacturing cost reductions and lower prices for consumers. "They want to electrify everything," said Liew. "No other country comes close to China." While the pace of Chinese EV sales growth has eased from a post-pandemic frenzy, the forecasts suggest Beijing's official target, set in 2020, for EVs to account for 50 per cent of car sales by 2035, will be achieved 10 years in advance of schedule...
As China's EV market tracked towards year-on-year growth of near 40 per cent in 2024, the market share of foreign-branded cars fell to a record low of 37 per cent — a sharp decline from 64 per cent in 2020, according to data from Automobility, a Shanghai-based consultancy. In this month alone, GM wrote down more than $5 billion (€4.8 billion) of its business value in China; the holding company behind Porsche warned of a writedown in its Volkswagen stake of up to €20 billion; and arch rivals Nissan and Honda said they were responding to a "drastically changing business environment" with a merger.
"Meanwhile, EV sales growth has slowed in Europe and the US, reflecting the legacy car industry's slow embrace of new technology, uncertainty over government subsidies and rising protectionism against imports from China..."
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the news.
Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:5, Insightful)
American politicians now: We can't compete in the marketplace! Sanctions! Tariffs! Bans!
China already got caught (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the west's sanctions are due to the Chinese gov't subsidizing EV & battery companies using tax breaks, discount real-estate, gov't fleet subsidies, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
using slave labor to build EVs.
Nonsense.
The EVs are built in Shanghai and Guangdong (Shenzen and Huizhou).
The slave labor camps are in Xinjiang, 4000 km away.
Re: China already got caught (Score:2)
If you call robots slave labor.
Re: (Score:2)
You see, robots don't get paid, so that makes them slaves. Free the 'bots!!!
Re: (Score:2)
You see, robots don't get paid, so that makes them slaves. Free the 'bots!!!
There is a difference between owning a machine and owning a sentient being.
Is the difference that one of them can have a sense of humor?
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
EVs sell "well" in China, as one needs 1+ year in most populated places in China to get permission to drive an ICE car.
Of all EV manufacturers, even though heavily subsidized, only one, BYD was profitable.
So "free marketplace", my bottom.
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:5, Informative)
Okay, let us agree.
President Xi is an authoritarian sociopath.
President Musk is an, un-elected, sociopath.
I choose not to buy an EV from either.
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:2)
A Tesla is also not very practical.
Re: (Score:2)
The Cybertruck seems to be, our friend who has a roofing business has one and says it's a beast. More payload and towing capacity than an F-150 and comparable range (assuming no saddle tanks in the gas version). The air compressor actually seems to be useful, and the 110 and 220 outlets have a reasonable capacity. Helps that he's got a special paint job (a PNW forest) and his company name on it, he says people post photos of it on Farcebook and Instagram all the time so it's free advertising too.
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The important point here is "roofing business". He probably has a limited range that he needs to tow trailers in, and he probably does so mostly in town. Where the low-range torque of an EV truck is more important for good handling in town than raw range.
That said, if we're assuming in-city driving, a F-150 may lose so much range while towing that the cybertruck can match it, in that driving mode. It may have more range on the highway, but most ICE vehicles lose much more range in city driving, while EVs
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How do you know that?
Looking, a "worst case" scenario, F150 Raptor, 5.2L 8 cylinder. 10 mpg city, 15 highway. 23-36 gallon tank size. He specified no saddle tanks, so 23 gallons. 10mpg city = 230 miles range. Ouch. That's without towing.
On the Tesla cybertruck side, I'm seeing 160 miles range while towing 6k pounds.
How much does towing reduce mileage? Sites are saying 2% per 100 pounds. [trucksonlysales.com] Which doesn't seem to be a good "rule of thumb" for me. Because 6k pounds would then be a reduction of 120%. But
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Not me, though I would prefer Chinese authoritarianism to American authoritarianism. If you don't want any form of authoritarianism at all, then you best leave the U.S. because Americans have clearly voted in favor of it.
Re: (Score:1)
I don't think you have much knowledge about history and economics. The US was historically strongest under two conditions: a) no income tax, but tariffs and b) world wars.
Unless you want the current situation of a perpetual US-involved war everywhere on the planet to continue, you have to return to the situation before 1913.
No income tax, tightly controlled money lending and a currency that can't be created out of paper or repeated lending of money.
If you get rid of bankers and foreign influences, one of tw
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:4)
Actually a lot of youtubers do just that and the reports are positive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:1, Troll)
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:5, Interesting)
It's like when the US takes diplomats on a tour of New York, only the nice bits...
Many Chinese earn 10x what their parents made 30-40 years ago. Some of my wife's friends live in flats that look like showhomes. All the latest modern tech of course.
You may be ideologically unable to accept it, but Chinese EVs are here, better than ours, and cost half the price. You refusing to believe it isn't going to stop them selling to people with more open minds.
Re: (Score:2)
CCP will pay well for you to go on guided (by a government official) showing the good side of China.
Nonsense. I've traveled to many regions of China. There was never any official.
The only restricted areas are Tibet and Xinjiang.
They somehow always miss the poor side of China
More nonsense. I've seen plenty of poverty in China.
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
My brother's brother-in-law moved to China to go to school to learn Mandarin. He did have an official keeping an eye on him; became friends with him, actually. That was years ago, though, and not really a tourist thing.
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Move to China and get back to us about how great it is then.
I was in Shenzhen in August.
Half the cars were EVs.
100% of the motorcycles were electric. Two-cycle engines are banned in the city.
Shenzhen is the most modern city in China, but still, the signs of progress were obvious.
Re: (Score:1)
Weird. Enforcing the law actually reduces crime. Meanwhile, the latest NYC subway pusher had 87 prior arrests, and NYC subway police now refuse to go out on singleton patrols. But Alvin Bragg is your hero, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Communism bad, m'kay? (Score:5, Interesting)
This article is about domestic sales of EVs and clearly EV sales have decreased in most other countries.
EV sales have increased in every major market. Growth rate may have decreased in some countries, but total sales has increased both in unit volume and as a percentage of all auto sales. In the US [investors.com], EV sales once again set a record at 1.3 million vehicles. For one example, Ford sold more Mustang Mach-E [motor1.com] EVs than ICE Mustang models.
In Brazil [bnef.com], despite being at an early stage of transport electrification, Brazil has seen a rapid uptake of passenger EVs. Sales reached nearly 55,000 units in the first half of 2024, or 5.3% of all new car sales during the semester. Thatâ(TM)s more than the number of EVs sold in 2023 in its entirety, and 2023 had already posted a whopping 178% year-on-year growth rate.
In the UK [electrifying.com], EV sales set a record again. And, while gas and diesel remain more popular, their 2024 registrations were down -4.4% and -13.6% respectively, while EV registrations were up 9.6%.
Europe as a whole [insideevs.com] looks to be a mixed bag, with sales being about flat. Germany is desperately trying to protect their auto manufacturing market and Stellantis is...well, no one is really sure what Stellantis is doing. There are EV standouts, like Norway [reuters.com], where 89% of all new cars sales were electric in 2024; and Denmark [www.dr.dk], where EVs outsold gas an diesel for the first time, reaching 51.5% of sales. And Down Under, Australia [theguardian.com] is also seeing record increases in EV sales.
The rest of the world is seeing a similar trend, except possibly Japan, because Japan buys Japanese and Toyota is sniffing hydrogen. There is hope with Honda setting records [electrek.co] with their Prologue EV. Even Nissan's EV sales [cleantechnica.com] are up, YoY. We'll see if being taken over by Honda can keep them more than just a nameplate.
China continues to build coal fire plants at a very high rate. In 2023 they built 95% of the world's new coal plants. Why isn't anyone going after China for such destruction of the environment?
Last year was 2024, not 2023. They're moving in the right direction, but huge and things don't turn on a dime. For example [reuters.com], "China's power firms are on track to cut coal's share of annual electricity generation to below 60% for the first time in 2024, which would mark a major milestone in the country's efforts to transition energy production away from fossil fuels.
Reduced coal reliance by the world's second-largest economy is a rare bright spot this year for climate trackers, who were disappointed by the recent COP29 meetings and are bracing for the United States' withdrawal from the Paris Accord next year."
They're moving to clean energy, leaving the rest of the world behind. [cnn.com]From CNN [cnn.com]:
The country is constructing two-thirds -- nearly 339 gigawatts -- of the world's utility-scale solar and wind projects. That would be enough to power more than 250 million homes, nearly double the number of homes that exist in the US. That is in addition to the 758 gigawatts of wind and solar capacity it has already built, according to the Global Energy Monitor [globalenergymonitor.org].
It is time to stop making excuses and playing whataboutism [wikipedia.org] with EVs, solar, and overall electrification.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Americans should embrace electric vehicles too. Then they wouldn't need 5x as much oil as China.
I see this as more a matter of supply than demand.
The USA produces about as much petroleum as it consumes, and does so in large part because it can. Many nations around the world import petroleum, or petroleum products, because they can't produce enough domestically and also have enough wealth that they can afford imports. There's nations that export petroleum because they produce more than they consume, in part because of an abundance of crude petroleum inside their borders and in part because they lack
Re: (Score:1)
LOL China is too poor to build ICE vehicles
But China is rich enough to completely dominate the more expensive EV markets...
Re: (Score:3)
Liquid fuels are cheap because of massive subsidies and externalised costs.
China went all in on EVs because it allowed them to get ahead of the rest of the world. They have the best tech and solved the long distance travel issues.
Re: (Score:2)
They have the best tech and solved the long distance travel issues.
How? As far as I know they have essentially the same batteries as every other country.
Re: (Score:3)
Their batteries have an edge in energy density and charge speed and are cheaper. So you can have a massive one, charge it super fast, and it's basically stronger than your bladder.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You have to stand around pumping gas into your fossil, so I guess that isn't solved either. And then take a separate comfort break, wasting even more time. And that's assuming you want to drink your coffee while driving, which is illegal here.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
meet the needs on range for most American drivers
What is this drivel? The average American drives 35 miles per day, with the range of most EVs in the US (270 miles) most people could drive for a week or more before recharging.
Re: oil (Score:2)
the average American drives 35 miles per day
Let's think very carefully about that statement. This means that the average American only drives 35 miles per day and never more, which is highly doubtable. I think what you mean is that the average trip is 35 miles, which is believable. But that still leaves the possibility of long trips that the average American occasionally does for which the EV will be very inconvenient.
Re: (Score:3)
No, the average amount of driving per day is 35 miles, not the average trip. While there are of course people who drive 200+ miles per day they're the exception, just like there are a lot of people who drive 0 miles per day.
https://www.kbb.com/car-advice... [kbb.com].
Federal Highway Administration data from 2020 indicates motorists in the U.S. drive an average of 35 miles per day.
Re: oil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
A person generally buys a car based on the maximum distance not the average.
You're speaking for yourself, I and pretty much everyone that I know buys a car based on how they expect to use it daily. I have a pickup because we remodel our house and have a huge garden so I have to frequently carry things. It has an extended cab because we expected to have kids (we have dogs, instead). It's a small pickup with a 4-cylinder engine because I don't need to tow things or carry more than a ton. I wouldn't drive it by choice on a trip to another state, it's not comfortable for that, I'd
Re: oil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If I were still single I'd rent/borrow, we use my wife's car, which is much more pleasant to drive for hours at a time. I meant to include that, but missed it somehow. Still once in a blue moon for us, generally our trips are to Peru so a bit difficult to drive. (Damn Darian Gap . . . )
Re: oil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh so you have a gas vehicle
Yes, a 22 year old Tacoma with a 5-speed and the smallest 4-banger they sold. So far there isn't an electric pickup similar, and I can't justify to myself spending on a new truck since the wheels haven't fallen off this one yet. Hopefully by the time it dies there's a reasonable electric replacement.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That’s why they call it an average.
Re: oil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Average is not really a good measure indeed. But I would say from personal experience that EVs work well for long trips - as long as a good charging infrastructure is in place.
Re: oil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Our electrical grid isn't going to handle it.
Americans should embrace living in large cities. Where you don't need a car and the electrical grid is large and robust.
subsidies Re:oil (Score:2)
because the Chinese government is subsidizing them, why can't the U.S. do exactly the same thing with their own offerings to be as competitive
But the U.S. did exactly the same thing [usatoday.com]. Come on, isn't that common sense knowledge by now even if you have never bought an EV?
Ah.... maybe American EVs could be more competitive if the U.S. didn't also subsidize the old guys [blsstrategies.com]?
If China does something, "It is evil!"
If the U.S. does the same thing or even started that earlier. "I don't want to talk about it. It is what-aboutism."
Conclusion: the U.S. propaganda machine rocks!
Re: subsidies Re:oil (Score:2)
Re: and? (Score:2)
No, they've actually way cut back on coal rollouts over the last couple of years. It's decline is imminent.
Re: and? (Score:3)
What you posted does not contradict anything I said. But nice attempt.
Re: (Score:2)
Different imperatives in China (Score:4, Interesting)
1 - of course, china has almost a stranglehold on current production of many of the materials (lithium, rare earths...) used in EVs and solar production.
2- China is rightfully concerned with its vulnerability to petroleum blockades in the event of conflict. BUT, they have a metric-shit-load of coal.
So, incenting the manufacture and purchase of EVs, which can use both of these power sources, is a no-brainer for them.
Re: (Score:2)
China also has a relatively low rate of vehicle ownership (about 300 per 1,000 people) and although that's been increasing rapidly over that past several decades, it doesn't make as much sense for them to invest in older technology i
Re:Different imperatives in China (Score:5, Insightful)
Chinese car manufacturers realised that competing with fossil engines was not a winning strategy. At best they would become participants in global car sales.
So they leapfrogged us. Went all in on EV technology.. Built the best batteries, the best drivetrains, got the cost down below parity, and put it all into mass production. And I do mean mass, on a scale that dwarfs the rest of the world combined.
Same thing with renewables. Unbelievable amounts of it, and continuing to increase exponentially.
We were asleep at the wheel.
Re:Different imperatives in China (Score:4, Insightful)
We were asleep at the wheel.
And still are.
The difference is accountability of leaders.China has a ruling elite formed out of and accountable to a large communist party apparatus. Our ruling elite is a bunch of folks from Harvard and Yale who pat one another on the back about how smart they are. Their leaders are focused on managing their country's economic progress. Ours are focused on managing perceptions. Their leaders are looking to the future. Ours are looking at the past. Their leaders are trying to lead their people in the direction they think is best. Ours are looking back to see where the parade they want to lead is headed so they can get in front of it.
Until we overthrow the folks from Harvard and Yale, we will continue to struggle. We are falling further and further behind our rivals and losing the confidence and support of our allies in the world. And we are losing any social cohesion at home as they seek to maintain their power by manufacturing and encouraging division rather than cooperation by all Americans in building a shared future.
Re: (Score:3)
We have a similar problem with Eton in the UK. I don't know how we fix it. We were offered a better alternative, and rejected it.
Re: (Score:2)
Like Japan in the late 70s making reliable fuel efficient cars that could corner and put de-tuned v8 land yachts to shame.
China needs EVs (regardless of climate change) (Score:5, Informative)
They don't have (much) oil, and that's a major weak spot. Therefore electric cars, which can be powered using their domestic energy sources like coal, hydro, nuclear, and solar are needed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
No. They import metallurgical coal. which is less than 10% of their coal needs. They need that type of coal for efficient steel production. It's used for making steel, not power plants.
What are the chances they're actually any good? (Score:1)
The chances are poor.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Something like 21,000 fires per year. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] ...and the quality is terrible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] ...and the manufacturers will register cars, to fake sales, and then park them to rot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
You're a bleating sheep. From 1990, pretending to be 1955:
In 2025, just substitute "China" for "Japan". Wake up or get left behind.
Re: (Score:2)
People still buy Jeep and Chrysler products so
Re: (Score:2)
Haha, funny.
People also regret those purchases quite often.
Missed opportunity (Score:2)
Domestic companies, as is typical, would rather fight change in the name of short term profits than embrace it for long term profit and good.
So... since they're going to fail anyway and take a lot of taxpayer dollars with them... we should have let China sell EVs here. Open the fucking floodgates, so long as they meet our safety standards and don't have any extra features requiring or enabling C&C from Beijing.
We could all be driving EVs for half the price and letting China deal with the environmental
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Half the US market perhaps, and that regulation driven fad will eventually fade away.
Rest of the world does not care about anything pickup. We use better suited vehicles.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> Does China make a full size EV pickup?
What ordinary person needs one of those?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I would go even further than that. Most safety standards have been put there by automaker lobbyists and do little more than prevent competition. We need a cheap electric people's car and we need it yesterday. Either Western companies provide one, or we should remove all barriers and let Chinese manufacturers do it.
How VW missed the EV change in China (Score:2)
Until last year, 50% of VW's global profits came from its China operations. For decades its ICE vehicles were the market leader in China, and its factories were major profit centres. In those circumstances it's perhaps not unexpected that VW missed the move to EVs because no executive wanted to kill the goose that laid the golden egg. VW head office is now in a world of hurt because its Chinese ICE production lines are at a standstill and its European designed EV offerings are two generations behind the Ch
Re: (Score:2)
Hopefully that's the future: modular. It would make vehicles a lot less expensive and add flexibility. VW actually might have it right after-all.
A message for Musk haters (Score:2)
Think of where we would be as a nation at this point in time had not Musk done a swan dive into the shallow pool. He committed the last of his funds into Tesla (and SpaceX) in order to save it because no other funding was forthcoming. At the time he figured a 50% chance of survival.
Had he not, the story in 2025 not be "China doing more EVs than ICE vehicles." It would be "China dominates the world with its EV production that nobody can match." Oh, and here's a limited quantity of Nissan Leaf cars for
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:A message for Musk haters (Score:5, Interesting)
Tesla is actually proof that we screwed up. Compare a Model 3 with Panasonic-Tesla battery, and one with a Chinese battery, otherwise identical. The Chinese one chargers faster, accelerates faster, degrades less.
Chinese companies started doing the fundamental R&D to improve that tech long ago. While Musk was selling expensive luxury vehicles with fake promises of self driving, the Chinese were deploying massive amounts of automotive batteries are scale in commercial vehicles. Buses, taxis, trains, construction equipment. That worked all the issues that Musk dumped on consumers out, and drove prices down.
A few western companies have tried making knock offs of Chinese batteries, but it's not as simple as implementing someone else's idea. There is a lot of R&D that needs to be done, and while they are doing it the Chinese are racing ahead. We need to do what they did and leapfrog, but it's not clear what tech we can do that with.
Re: BYD vs Tesla (Score:2)
That video is harrowing. I strongly advise anyone following this issue to take a look, and just imagine what the public reaction would have been had this been about Tesla cars and not BYD.
Re: (Score:2)
"China dominates the world with its EV production that nobody can match."
That pretty much describes the situation as it is. I am not sure how much difference Tesla makes to that reality now or will make in the future. Musk certainly caught the wave, but its not clear how long he can ride it. At some point Tesla will have to produce better and/or cheaper cars than its competitors. The novelty of EV is wearing off and with it the value of the Tesla brand which is tightly tied to that novelty.
Re: (Score:2)
> Think of where we would be as a nation at this point in time had not Musk done a swan dive into the shallow pool
Musk did nothing for the EV market other than to show its possible to inflate a car makers stock price to ridiculous levels.
Over here in the UK a Tesla was unheard of. The rest of the world saw:
The Toyota Prius
The Nissan Leaf.
How does China charge EVs? (Score:2)
I'm much more curious about how Chinese EV owners charge their cars, especially those owners without home charging options. Has China figured out a way to make public charging work? Do the Chinese simply accept waiting 30 minutes for a partial fast charge? Or do they have a system that is more convenient? If they do, perhaps other countries can learn something.
Norway overtook China years ago (Score:2)
I really don't get why a country (China) is compared to 'the West'.
Keep in mind (Score:2)
Keep in mind that 90% (probably more) of figures that come out of China are bullshit. Fields upon fields of these cars sit to rot all in a bid to trick investors into thinking sales are booming. It's just another Chinese smokescreen.
Full charge of Chinese EV costs 50 cents (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
> while their own price costs of fully charged EVs are swiftly approaching price levels of a full tank of gasoline or diesel fuels
Plus the cost of getting the vehicle in the first place.
Easy (Score:2)
Easy peasy when you (china) hold all the keys and control the manufacturing, when you have all the rare earth materieals and mines and processing facilities.
The West cant compete as China can price them out as well as ration what can be exported.
Not that I really care, I live in the UK and our 1% of global contributions are decreasing simply because we cant afford to use energy much anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
We can't find that page
You may need to improve your basic Google search skills...
Re: (Score:1)
Nah, just my copy/paste skills
https://www.reuters.com/articl... [reuters.com]
Septic tank emptying service. (Score:2)
Overfilled with shit.
We might have to call the septic tank emptying service.
Re: (Score:2)
In USA, they also paint the lawn green. And it's equally as laughable.