Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Technology

Microsoft Pulls Plug on Mixed Reality in New Windows 11 Update 16

Microsoft has discontinued Windows Mixed Reality support in its latest Windows 11 update, rendering a number of VR headsets obsolete. The move, reported by UploadVR, affects devices from major manufacturers. An estimated 80,000 users will lose access to their headsets upon upgrading to Windows 11 24H2. UploadVR adds: Despite the name, all Windows MR headsets were actually VR-only, and are compatible with most SteamVR content via Microsoft's SteamVR driver. The first Windows MR headsets arrived in late 2017 from Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and Samsung, aiming to compete with the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive that had launched a year earlier. They were the first consumer VR products to deliver inside-out positional tracking, for both the headset and controllers.

All the original Windows MR OEMs except Samsung used the same cheap fixed panels LCD design with fixed lenses, while the Samsung Odyssey had IPD adjustment and OLED panels - the same OLED panels that would be featured in HTC Vive Pro and Oculus Quest a year and a half later. Even though the LCD headsets were sold for as low as $200 at times, and even though Samsung offered (for the time) high-resolution OLED panels, Windows MR headsets failed to ever reach widespread adoption amongst PC VR gamers. On the Steam Hardware Survey Windows MR peaked at around 10% of SteamVR usage share in 2019, and now sits around 3.5%.
The move follows Microsoft recently discontinuing the HoloLens 2.

Microsoft Pulls Plug on Mixed Reality in New Windows 11 Update

Comments Filter:
  • by Rinnon ( 1474161 ) on Thursday October 03, 2024 @05:01PM (#64837857)
    Great, now all those resources that were wasted on the last hype train can be reassigned to the current hype train (AI). Can't wait till the next "big thing" comes out and we start seeing articles like this talking about AI services being discontinued.
    • by HBI ( 10338492 )

      When share price pumping is the main driver of wealth, fads are the only thing left that can achieve the goal. It's not like running a profitable business is going to satisfy Wall Street.

      • by omnichad ( 1198475 ) on Thursday October 03, 2024 @05:07PM (#64837869) Homepage

        When it comes to Wall Street, success is any failure that you can then sell to someone else.

        • Brilliant! The 'Funny' upmods are definitely appropriate. But personally, I'd have modded you up as 'Insightful' - there's more than a little sober truth in your post.
      • Stock price doesn't represent wealth, merely what people value an ownership stake in a company at. The wealth is entirely in what a company actually produces and the valuation of that can be wildly off or entirely speculative. Anyone who just wants a good place to park money for retirement or isn't a degenerate gambler chasing the high of a big payday should just invest in an index fund. The individual companies may be up or down, but collectively they're up.

        Businesses that would prefer avoiding some blu
        • by HBI ( 10338492 )

          Actually, if you work at a company where the compensation is at least partially in stock, the stock price does indeed translate to wealth for the individual.

          Startups definitely fall into this category, as do companies such as Microsoft.

        • Stock price doesn't represent wealth, merely what people value an ownership stake in a company at. The wealth is entirely in what a company actually produces and the valuation of that can be wildly off or entirely speculative. Anyone who just wants a good place to park money for retirement or isn't a degenerate gambler chasing the high of a big payday should just invest in an index fund. The individual companies may be up or down, but collectively they're up. Businesses that would prefer avoiding some blue blood breathing down their neck about quarterly profits should just stay privately owned. Cancel the IPO and don't sell your soul to the devil. The existence of hustlers, pumps, etc. in the public market shouldn't be surprising. Someone will always try to be the one to part the fool from his money.

          The amount of resources we pour into making sure Wall Street is happy in this country is absolutely astounding to me. If we see society turn half that much enthusiasm into solving some of the very real problems we face we probably wouldn't have that many problems left. But? The owners make the rules. The rest of society somehow gets stuck propping them up for it. Makes zero sense to me, but money and greed are the only motivation that our society runs on. We have no other motives, and zero other aspirations

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Hype is good for short-term profits. Obviously, long-term, you really piss off your users and, as soon as they have a good alternative, they will be gone. All that keeps MS alive at this time is lack of a good alternative.

  • I guess I'm going to be explicitly preventing my windows 11 computer from updating.

  • ...don't want to wear shit on their face.

    VR/AR will eventually take flight when it's Black Mirror-like, no shit on your face.

    Might require a neural connection. Hope I'm dead by then.

  • by az-saguaro ( 1231754 ) on Thursday October 03, 2024 @06:02PM (#64838063)

    One value of a mature operating system is that it provides support for hardware classes via baked-in drivers.

    In "the early days", every modem maker had their own drivers on a floppy or cd, same for every cd-dvd player, every printer, every scanner, every expansion board to add a serial or usb port, etc. Then, authoritative standards are developed, and the OS (Win, Mac, Linux, whatever) adds in such standard support. A hardware vendor then merely needs to comply with said specification when making and distributing their product, allowing their products to interface the hardware and OS without much fuss.

    As I do not own or use VR/AR items, I have no personal experience, but the article makes it sound like hardware vendors have come to depend on such "public access" drivers or support in Windows, but now it will be gone. But, that shouldn't be the end of the world for the device makers or their customers who own legacy devices. Just write and distribute a user-installable device driver.

    Buy a gizmo, get the drivers with it. It used to be not just standard practice, but it was a great art - and a Wild West mess as well - that was the norm as little as 20 years ago. It makes me wonder if some of the hardware companies still retain in-house talent to write a low level device driver.

    • ... that shouldn't be the end of the world for the device makers or their customers who own legacy devices. Just write and distribute a user-installable device driver.

      And hope that users are sophisticated enough to figure out how to make Windows accept an unsigned driver.

  • Although we live in an age where most tech gear gets replaced every 3 years or so, my mind is still wired to make purchasing decisions as if I am going to keep it for 10 years or more.

  • Have an HP G2 and really like it. No plans on getting rid of it or downgrading to windows 11. Tracking is good and the display is nice although lens has a crummy sweet spot.

    This was like the only HMD platform left you didn't need an account to use and OpenXR shims for OVR etc work fine for all my apps. Yea the MS crap is annoying but nothing a few outbound rules in group policy editor can't fix.

The number of arguments is unimportant unless some of them are correct. -- Ralph Hartley

Working...